Dave Bates

[Dave Bates]

Hi everyone, Maybe a simple answer is all I'm looking for.The big elephant in the room for me is the following.  

   I completely understand the idea of frequency & it's resonant affects on all of nature's growth & the affects on the dna strands which make us what we are. Infinite frequencies & with infinite values within an Analogue waveform. My belief is that natural universal frequencies are "Analogue " & yet our planet has gone fake Digital. How do fake digital frequencies affect our analogue minds & also how it effects everything at an atomic level. 

  I'm not finding any answers to this living in an analog natural world where frequencies are generated & yet there is " not to my knowledge " anything in nature that generates a digital frequency,  & is a totally fake human version copy. 

  Love some answers

    Regards Dave Bates

[pi3141]

On 7/13/2022 at 5:02 PM, Dave Bates said:

  Love some answers

    Regards Dave Bates

 

 

Hi Dave - if that is your real name! 

 

I'm a Broadcast engineer, got into the biz as the analogue to digital transfer was taking place.

 

I learnt most of my theory at college with Analogue, they tacked on a load of Analogue to Digital conversion and Digital coding etc

My opinion, I agree with you, Digital is a fake representation of reality. Its not really 'there' its an illusion happening so many times a second that you cannot tell the difference.

 

But there is a difference. Some audio engineers say they can hear clicking when listening to CD etc.

 

To me, Digital is the Devils work. (Joke - ish) because its fake. Analogue systems with their Harmonics was beautiful. Analogue TV pictures were nicer than Digital (personal opinion) Analogue signals stood up better to interference than Digital.

 

However, as an engineer I see the benefits of going Digital. Less bandwidth, more channels available (not necessarily a good thing) But we get high quality audio files that take up less space, think Walkman with Tape Cassette compared to iPod with Digital files, you get to store way more information.

 

There's some interesting material on TV and how it Hypnotizes you and affects your brain state. That was true with analogue and still true with Digital.

The fact is, the Frequencies chosen for TV were derived from the Mains frequency. UK mains is 50Hz and pretty stable, so to use the timing from the mains to synchronize TV signals was an obvious choice. From that 50Hz, we divide it in 2 for Fields (2 fields = 1 Frame) and from the number of lines our old TV's used we got our Line Frequency. These frequencies are said to affect the brain but I can (kind of) attest that there was no conspiracy to engineer that, its just the way it worked out when using the mains frequency as a timing source.

 

For me, Digital is fake, not real, elusive, never really there - the Devils work - an imposter! However Digital technology makes more things possible. Think of your mobile phone, your iPod, your Data storage capacity on a Hard Drive, think of the hiss and crackle you used to get with Records, now non existent with Digital, if we tried to replicate these things with analogue we would really struggle.

 

So yes, Digital is a fake reality, but its a technology that allows us to far more than we could with analogue - however, maybe we didn't get to the pinnacle of Analogue, maybe there was more to it. I saw an article about an invention with a Transistor which had a Capacitor integrated into it, it was Analogue and when employed in a camera, that camera could zoom in and in and in and keep going because it was an Analogue signal, Analogue is always there, however small, with Digital, it takes a sample, you can't easily zoom that in, maybe there is some more amazing stuff we can do with Analogue that we just didn't discover.

 

As for effects, well, don't know really, Digital seems 'harsh' where as Analogue seemed 'smooth' what effect does all this High Frequency switching - On Off, 1's and 0's etc have on us. I don't know. Remember, Tesla wanted to Electrify the world, transmit power around us wirelessly. He seemed to think it would not have any effect on us, but again, that would have been an analogue signal, not Digital.

 

I'm currently working with RF, yes we have to be careful around high power amplifiers and transmitting dishes, but most engineers believe the Radiation risk is very small, same with Mobile phones, the power levels are to small to effect us but with Digital coding, high frequency switching, on off on off, 1's and 0's etc maybe its not great - I don't particularly like it but it allows us to do amazing stuff.

 

An interesting side note - when we convert analogue to Digital we use Nyquist sampling. In the lab when you experiment with this sampling, you get a 'Phantom' signal - an additional copy of the signal you created with sampling, only slightly higher up the spectrum, we use filters to get rid of it, but interestingly - nobody can explain why it happens. Its considered a phantom signal because when we try to measure it we find there is barely any power there at all. It doesn't really exist although we can detect it.

 

So for me, Digital is the devils work, its fake, not real. But it allows us to have Video Phones, loads of TV channels, less noisy Audio CD's. It allows us to store more data and use lower power in our devices and transmission, think of an analogue TV power consumption compared to LCD. We can have better resolution pictures on our TV, build small CCD Sensors for small camera's that fit in phones - try doing that with film!

 

I'd go back to analogue in a heart beat, but I can't deny all the things we can do with Digital.

 

Does it affect us negatively? It seems the power levels we use are to low to be of any real significance physically, but what does it do to our minds? That jagged signal.

 

Well, there's this - 

 

Do digitized Recordings give negative effects to human body and mind?

Summary:

In this article, Dr. John Diamond states that there is a strong correlation between music and healing. He had used classical music played by a phonograph for therapeutic purposes and gained successful results. However, in 1979, he realized that the therapeutic effects did not last – in fact his patients had negative effects due to listening to the music. After a long investigation, he came to the conclusion that the phenomena occur through the use of digital recordings. When he played an analog version of a classical music work to his patient, he was able to gain the therapeutic effects, but as soon as a digital version of the same piece was played, the undesired symptoms appeared (muscle weakness, augmentation of stress). He claims that a human voice recorded by a digital device can also cause negative effects. Dr. Diamond emphasizes that he has led research regarding the effect of digital music by collaborating with other researchers. He also conducted many double blind tests in order to obtain accurate results. He points out that most of therapeutic recordings have been produced by the digital process, which weakens not only the muscles of the human body, but also the human mind and mental states. At the end of the article, he added an anecdote about the major recording and electronic companies that had been against his research results in the 80’s. In 2001, they contacted Dr. Diamond, saying that they knew the negative effects of digital sound, but they were obliged to release CDs. They asked him for help in finding a solution to the digital fatigue. He wraps up his article by mentioning the importance of escaping from the digital sound which releases us from the hatred of life.

 

Link - http://musicbrainerblogger.blogspot.com/2014/12/do-digitized-recordings-give-negative.html

 

Source link -

 

Link - https://drjohndiamond.com/what-interests-you/human-stress-provoked-by-digitized-recordings/

 

 

Sorry for the ramble, maybe you can take something from it.

Edited July 15, 2022 by pi3141

[Anti Facts Sir]

I still use a CRT television from the 90s. People comment on how good the picture is, and they're used to these new digital/smart TV things.

 

The analogue picture on my other secondary digital TV has started to show interference lately. I expect it's whatever they're messing about with thanks to 5G taking some the freeview bandwidth. It used to be completely stable.

[JCP]

I don't think it matters a lot if it's digital or analogue ....... It's the TV itself that does the hypnotizing and influencing. Smart phones and radio have the same effect. Mind control technology has progressed exponentially and flowered, since the early days of broadcasting. A huge portion of your behavior, beliefs, and personality is shaped by TV. Anything that your mind is exposed to, affects it. Of course frequency does matter, and why they use 440hz instead of 432hz to record music; whether it's in analogue or digital format.

 

 

[Dave Bates]

Many thanks for all of your comments & yes I'm in agreement that digital versus analogue in a technical sense has made the world what it is. AI would not even get off the ground was it not for digital frequency. 

    The point I'm making is not the technical or the info that it carries to corrupt humanity , but rather it's in direct conflict to nature's analogue system. I believe & feel everything David Icke says about frequency being everything about our universe & how frequency energy pulses affect every living thing that resonates with it. I'd love to know if digital frequency would brake a wine glass or destroy a bridge that naturally resonates in analogue? My point is that all life including plants resonate in infinite & infinitely variable    analogue frequencies & at these miniscule power levels that maybe can't be detected. When we observe brainwaves on an oscilloscope,  they are analogue & with minute power levels, so how do our atoms cope with digital frequency?  Human 1 to human 2 is probably the point in which we are no longer connected to the analogue universe via telepathy & other instinctive intuitions & our bodies have mastered this fake digital frequency

[Dave Bates]

[Dave Bates]

Hi it's Dave again & yes that is my correct name , It's my personal theory & when I try to find information in the usual channels,  I can only find the "technical " differences. I'm old school analogue from the 70's radio/TV & worked on early electronics in the newspaper industry & various other disciplines. 

    I'm English but living in Brasil & have noticed a wildlife change since we had towers installed in our tourist village in the mountains. Are these digital frequencies affecting the wildlife?  Do pigeons loose their sense of direction in a digitised world ? How do the bees cope with digital ( & maybe pesticides) aren't to be blamed ? How does plant growth respond to digital bombardment, as opposed to a soft analogue voice ? Life ,sound & bodies resonate to natural analogue frequencies, & apart from the short term digital benefits for humanity from quality toys , I see digital frequency as a threat to all that has been naturally created over millions of years. My "thoughts" may be totally wrong , but my frustration is that I haven't found other viewpoints. Dave Bates

[sock muppet]

27 minutes ago, Dave Bates said:

Hi it's Dave again & yes that is my correct name , It's my personal theory & when I try to find information in the usual channels,  I can only find the "technical " differences. I'm old school analogue from the 70's radio/TV & worked on early electronics in the newspaper industry & various other disciplines. 

    I'm English but living in Brasil & have noticed a wildlife change since we had towers installed in our tourist village in the mountains. Are these digital frequencies affecting the wildlife?  Do pigeons loose their sense of direction in a digitised world ? How do the bees cope with digital ( & maybe pesticides) aren't to be blamed ? How does plant growth respond to digital bombardment, as opposed to a soft analogue voice ? Life ,sound & bodies resonate to natural analogue frequencies, & apart from the short term digital benefits for humanity from quality toys , I see digital frequency as a threat to all that has been naturally created over millions of years. My "thoughts" may be totally wrong , but my frustration is that I haven't found other viewpoints. Dave Bates

 

Hi, i am not an expert on electronics but i know the basics and have built quite a few digital circuits, from this is the most important aspect of all between analogue components like the Audion or better known as Valves and transistor switched components, and i think is the most critically overlooked but crucial in understanding how the damage from broadcasted signals over the air comes from and that is the odd harmonics generated by the fast switching of the transistor, now these harmonics reduce in power away from the generated frequency but, if the over air transmission is saturated with these harmonics such as what these towers emit and mobiles in use at anyone time then they could combine to have a near instantaneous detrimental effect on any biological life, it just depends on the harmonic frequency and the combined increase in power that resonates with the biology to do damage.

So my thinking is, it is not limited to just one specie but all biological life, some will withstand the attack better than others and i don't think size matters, it is the resonance and driving power received that is more likely the deciding factor at play.

Hope this stirs some thoughts for you, as i say i am not an expert and there are many notable experts on video available to help further.