Tinfoil Hat Posted July 6, 2022 Share Posted July 6, 2022 The above should say 'dares', not 'dates'. And come to think of it, why would anyone accept what's gone on as a genuine reason for the mutiny? What sense does it make? If that gonk was found not guilty of prior molestation claims, I don't think the fact that accussations were made that weren't upheld should be a reason to impede anyone being appointed. It would be different if he'd been found guilty, but anyone can accuse anyone else of anything at any given time without substantiation. (Not that I believe he's likely to have got where he was without being a sleaze, but that's not the point). Whereas Tony Blair on the other hand was charged with cottaging, and many of the public made known their wish for him to be tried in a court of law for the slaughter that had been justified by the mythical WMD (I, along with 100's of others, signed a petition demanding it, which was entirely ignored). But none of that has marred his continued status or dissuaded any one of these ne'r-do-wells openly associating with him. Not that I'm sticking up for Bojo, but it's just that this constant barage of BS from the lot of them keeps going unchallenged with logic, and it's beyond tedious. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.