Jump to content

Brain Hemisphere Synchronisation and CIA Documentation


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

More on magnetism
 


Growing stuff from seeds? try exposing those seeds or even the plants to either magnetic pole and see how either pole affects their growth differently. Quite drastic. I understand that a particular magnetic pole can even protect plants from environmental issues, such as radiation. I would assume that would transfer to mammals at the cellular level, some studies do show that some cancers can be cured with magnetism, but weirdly some can be exaggerated also. Fascinating, IMO.
 

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

 


I disagree with some of the language used here such as vacuum, but this man and a team of others went back to the beginnings of electrical theory to understand what is in place and why and by doing so they realised we are doing some fundamental things completely at odds to our progression. 

Missing Maxwell equations.

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Maxwell lost unified field of electromagnetics and gravitation as described and explained by Harold Aspden of Southampton University Department of Electrical Engineering

http://www.nzdl.org/cgi-bin/library?e=d-00000-00---off-0envl--00-0----0-10-0---0---0direct-10---4-------0-0l--11-en-50---20-about---00-0-1-00-0--4----0-0-11-10-0utfZz-8-10&cl=CL1.4&d=HASHa4422b7fbbfa2350e1c317.4.3&gt=1

As taken from above - take a look, again the language used isn't necessarily the language I would choose and of course some areas are not mystery and entirely solved as he is still coming from an orthodox stance, just less than others he speaks of. Undoing our delusions of energy generation entirely needs to end. No energy is created or destroyed at any point in a generator, at all.


The scientific basis for tapping energy in the vacuum

 

Harold Aspden
Department of Electrical Engineering
University of Southampton
SOUTHAMPTON SO9 5NH
United Kingdom
 

The thought of extracting energy from a hidden but active field environment more plentiful than air or water is rejected outright by orthodox scientists. Yet there are sound scientific reasons for expecting that we should be able to extract "free energy" from that hidden field.
 

The Zero-point energy field

In 1987, a Senior Research Fellow at the institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, Texas circulated a paper that had just appeared in the Physical Review (1). It was entitled, "Ground state of hydrogen as a zero-point state". It spoke of the energy of these fluctuations, but nothing in the paper would excite the interest of a "free energy" enthusiast; the paper had to be acceptable to a scientific community hostile to such ideas, otherwise it may never have been published.

What is more revealing are the words in the special summary of the paper that its author, Dr. Harold E. Puthoff, also distributed. Quoting from the summary:

"One of the more bizarre predictions of modern quantum theory is that each cubic centimeter of space, including that of the most pristine vacuum of outer space, contains an enormous amount of untapped electromagnetic energy known as zero-point energy (it is the zero-point from which all other energies are measured). The amount of energy associated with this (usually unobserved) background is conservatively estimated to be of the order of nuclear energy densities or greater."

Dr. Puthoff goes on to explain how theorists have tended to question the enormity of the energy density involved but how, over the years, the discovery of the Casimir force and other effects have given the quantitative verification. The Casimir force is a force found to exist between closely-spaced metal plates. The force results from unbalanced pressures in the zero-point field due to the presence of the plates. Dr. Puthoff's own paper announced another indication of the physical reality of this "ubiquitous" energy field, by showing how it accounted for the stability of matter at the atomic level. In his summary, he commented on this with the concluding words:

"The significance of this observation is the understanding that the very stability of matter itself depends upon, and verifies the presence of, an underlying sea of electromagnetic energy of almost inconceivable magnitude, a vast reservoir of random energy that is universally present throughout space."

Now, Dr. Puthoff is not alone in researching this subject. There are many university scientists throughout the world who are working on the underlying stochastic electrodynamics. Sadly, however, many of these researchers are led to conclusions which are not to the liking of others in the scientific community, particularly those who treasure the sterile mathematical abstractions of Einstein's model of space.

One particular conclusion, which has been the basis of my own interest for more than 30 years, is the realization that when an electron responds to an electric field it moves exactly in such a way that it conserves the energy involved in this process. The isolated electron or any such fundamental charge does not, in my opinion, radiate energy. This is consistent with quantum theory and the result deduced by Dr. Puthoff from the atomic electron interactions with the zero-point energy background, but I see this in a different context. It is the fundamental basis of the inertial property of that electron. Its mass is nothing other than a measure of its response when affected by an energy field. By conserving energy, that electron moves as if it has just the mass or inertia that assures field fluctuations consistent with overall energy conservation.

Obviously, this argument leads to a formula relating both the mass and the energy of that electron with the propagation speed of the fluctuation involved. It leads to:

E = mc²

but without requiring Einstein's theory. Though I discovered this over 30 years ago, it was not until 1976 that I found a scientific journal willing to publish such a claim (2). It was heresy to suggest that the famous Einstein formula might have a simple physical basis unconnected with the doctrines preached by Einstein. Such is the faith in Einstein's theory, that the vast majority of journal referees will only allow publications to trespass into relativistic territory when the scientific ideas advanced glorify Einstein's methods. There must be so many scientists who have had their ideas totally surpressed by the unfair attitudes of those who seek to preserve a status quo. Yet any aspect of the scientific status quo is only worth preserving if it can survive criticism. Sadly, that criticism is suppressed and the message to the public is therefore clear: Einstein's theory has weaknesses which those who speak for it cannot see, but yet they sense this, and their inbred instincts cause them to fear the consequences of embroilment to the point where they are ready to fight off any intruder.

I conclude this introductory comment by stressing that the vacuum is full of energy ready to be tapped, if only we can find the right techniques, and I express the view that those who control research funding are ensnared by the adverse doctrines of Einstein's theory. How can one think otherwise when, in 1988, a leading scientist, now retired from a lifelong service at the UK National Physical Laboratory, in which he measured those quantities that are so germane to Einstein's theory, time and the speed of light, published an article in which he called Einstein's theory a "swindle".(3) In an earlier article, again not written until after he was retired, the same author, Dr. Louis Essen, the pioneer of the Caesium atomic clock, had declared that the hope for the future lay in supporting those who reject Einstein's theory and search for that hidden energy that pervades the vacuum state (4).

Is there an ether?

The orthodox scientist will tell you that there is no ether because of an experiment performed by Michelson and Morley in 1887. A more informed scientist might add that a further experiment performed by Trouton and Noble in 1903 (5) is equally relevant in proving that there is no ether. To these scientists one can now say: "Get with it, there is something wrong with the theory of both of these experiments and a new experiment has now taken over".

An experiment has been performed in the State of Washington by E. W. Silvertooth, another retiree, but in this case from a senior position in which he exercised his expert knowledge of optical systems. The experiment was first reported in 1986 in the journal, Nature (6) and then more fully elsewhere (7) in 1987. Silvertooth avoids the retro-reflections of the Michelson-Morley experiment and uses a transparent photo-detector in linear translational motion relative to the optical source to scan along a beam set up by interfering rays coming through one another from opposite directions. He finds that the single laser apparatus he now uses can sense, in an enclosed laboratory, our motion through space in the direction of Constellation Leo at nearly 400 km/s. This is what both Michelson and Morley, and Trouton and Noble were trying to do in their experiments.

The Michelson-Morley experiment did not work because the retro-reflection set up standing waves that were locked onto the mirror surfaces and so their energy was dragged along by the apparatus. That energy affected the speed of light in those standing wave components along the beam. Michelson and Morley did not know about those standing wave properties, because standing waves as such were only discovered by Wiener. The Trouton-Noble experiment did not work because it assumed the Lorentz force law applies to non-circuital charge motion, whereas it is empirically based on effects that demand such a circuital charge motion. The experiment does not involve circuital charge motion.

These are, however, specialist points that are best discussed elsewhere. From our point of view here it suffices to declare that Silvertooth has detected our motion through the ether and so we can now begin to think of the properties of a real ether in which those zero-point energy fluctuations are seated.

1987 was the centennial year of the Michelson-Morley experiment. It gave me the occasion of mentioning the Silvertooth experiment in a letter published in Physics Today (8). It is claimed that Silvertooth's experiment has been repeated by Marinov (9) and that the positive result is confirmed. Also, a further repeat of the experiment is being considered at this time on the initiative of Professor R. Monti in Bologna, Italy.

It should not therefore be too long before we see the consequences of the detection of the ether rumbling through the orthodoxy of modern science. Undoubtedly there will be efforts to patch up the relativistic doctrine in some way, but by then the new research opportunities will have outpaced mere theory and we will, I trust, have broken through into the new world that recognizes the hidden energy field.
 

The Gyromagnetic anomalies

Magnetism is a phenomenon that features prominently in devices aimed at extracting free energy from the vacuum medium. It has long been realized that there are certain anomalies in magnetism evident in gyromagnetic reactions.

The orthodox scientist will tell you that an electron is a point charge that spins to set up a quantum of spin magnetic moment. How a point can spin is something that stretches the imagination. It takes one into that fuzzy and abstract world that exists only in the mind of the mathematician. How a point charge can spin and yet set up a related magnetic effect that somehow depends upon motion relative to the observer is even more taxing on the imagination. For these reasons I say to the orthodox scientist: "Think again and figure out something better".

The whole problem centres on the factor of two. When the magnetism in a steel rod is suddenly reversed the rod has a tendency to rotate about its axis. If mounted so as to rotate freely, the reversal of magnetism produces a measured angular motion. This corresponds to exactly half that expected if we suppose that magnetism comes from the orbital motion of electrons. The factor of half or two, if the formulae are inverted, is anomalous and has led to a fanciful relativistic based mathematical interpretation for which the Nobel prizewinner Paul Dirac is famous.

Let us think again on this matter. When we consider how energy travels between two interacting electric charges that are subject to an instantaneously-acting electric field, we realize that energy has to travel a certain distance commensurate with the distance between the charges in order to feed the kinetic energy of those charges. This takes a little time and it is convenient to imagine that the energy does travel at the speed of light. In this way, it can be shown that the energy in transit accounts for the magnetic interaction of two moving charges.

The key to understanding this process is to regard that zero-energy in the ether as a source of energy locally. Thus, when the instantaneous action between the two charges says that they have altered their relative positions, owing to their motion, their kinetic energies adjust by energy exchange involving the local zero-point energy background. Such energy is "radiation" energy and it communicates momentum and so force in relation to the energy involved as divided by the speed of light. The total energy in transit is measured by the transit time and the rate at which time is the separation distance divided by the speed of light. Accordingly, the overall force effect that accounts for the electrodynamic action is related to the electrostatic Coulomb force as divided by the speed of light squared and proportional to the square of the separation speed.

The point of this argument is to show how vital that background energy in the ether is to the physical justification for the electrodynamic action. Now this ignores any reaction in the ether apart from its role in providing an energetic environment and in determining the speed of light, but we see ether as containing electric charge itself in some kind of neutral composition. Therefore, this electrodynamic action between charges can never occur in isolation without inducing secondary reaction either in the ether or in any enveloping substance, such as by free electrons in the steel rod just mentioned. Detailed analysis then shows that the optimum reaction will halve any magnetic effect produced by the primary action. This brings us to a position where the ether has to be seen as having special properties which enhance the primary field effects just enough to keep the energy balance. The magnetic energy is stored in the reacting system and resultant fields conform with the unity state that we associate with a true vacuum.

In spite of this neutralizing action, we are still left with an observable gyromagnetic effect that has double the magnetic strength for the same mechanical action. This is exactly what is found if we assume that magnetism in a steel rod is due to orbital electron motion.

In summary we can say that Dirac's spin interpretation cannot be used to reject ideas about the orbital nature of ferromagnetism and that there is an essential reaction density trapped in any magnetic field. The question then is whether this energy can be extracted.

Well, of course, it can. Imagine that we supply current to magnetize a solenoid. The energy fed into the inductive field is stored somewhere and we do not go into that in detail in our textbooks. However, it really is stored in that reacting charge motion that sets up the half-canceling back-field. Thus when the solenoid is switched off it is this reacting charge that feeds energy back to the solenoid circuit. Now ask what happens if that reaction is in a substance and involves electrons in free motion. The energy of that motion is part of their thermal energy. So if we switch off the solenoid containing a core of such material we will actually extract heat energy from that material.

So this tells us that if we energize a solenoid having a copper core, say, the energy supplied to the coil will all be used to generate heat. Suppose then that we extract that heat and use it efficiently for some useful purpose. Suppose further that the solenoid itself is superconducting, meaning that there is no continuous energy loss owing to ohmic resistance. Let the core cool to its initial ambient temperature as this heat is extracted. Then let us switch off that D.C. current, de-energizing the solenoid slowly so as to minimize eddy-current losses. This will return all the inductive energy by extracting it from the thermal activity of the electrons in that copper core.

The energy supplied in the first place was not wasted. It was all available as heat output. Yet much of that energy is returned as electricity when the solenoid is switched off and this energy comes from a cooling of that copper core. We have "free energy" in the sense that ambient heat energy has been tapped to produce a useful energy output.

The orthodox scientist and also the orthodox engineer will suggest that this is not really practical but that is not our immediate concern since we seek here to make a point of principle. "Free energy" can be accessed by tapping the thermal background. Now let us go just a little further with this argument and say that the magnetic field produced by the solenoid is so powerful that when the energy is extracted from the reacting electrons in the copper core the energy drawn out exceeds all the thermal energy of that core. What would happen? Would the core cool to absolute zero, that is minus 273 degrees Centigrade? Perhaps, but in addition could we not expect to find that this process might well draw on that zero-point energy in the background vacuum field?

I can only theorize about the answers to these questions but I submit that one day, if we do get strong room temperature superconductors that can withstand very high magnetic fields, we will get to those answers in a way that could lead to practical devices. In the meantime, let us here remember that orthodox scientists do use the technique of adiabatic demagnetization to achieve supercooling to very low temperatures. What is proposed should not, therefore, be seen as pseudo-science. Furthermore, it is known from experiment that the application of short duration intense magnetic fields (several hundred kilogauss) to copper cores can reveal that they have momentarily experienced a near-molten state from which they were spontaneously cooled when the magnetization pulse terminated. The technological challenge is to get that heat energy out whilst the pulse is on and before the cooling phase begins as the pulse subsides.

I could give many references that bear on what has just been said, but will just mention one, namely my own discussion of this subject in a book dated 1969 (10). The book aroused no particular interest, possibly because its title was "Physics without Einstein", but in a world intent on discovering new sources of energy it is surprising that what I said on this subject has not been investigated or, at least, contradicted by now. I mention also that my Ph.D., which was based on experimental research at Cambridge in England, was for work on the anomalous magnetic reaction effects induced in ferromagnetic substances. That research did not extend to the ideas just presented, but it gave me a relevant scientific background and so a basic confidence in what I was later to propose.
 

Conductivity anomalies

The scientific world has been shaken by the recent discovery of "warm" superconductivity. Superconductivity at temperatures in excess of liquid nitrogen temperature is a phenomenon that defies the orthodox scientific expectation. The questions we should be asking are whether we are looking at zero electrical conductivity or negative electrical conductivity. The latter would imply a source of "free energy", whereas the former merely is a state of no ohmic loss.

It is conceivable to have particles such as electrons or even protons traveling through conductors and not causing thermal oscillations that imply heat loss. Therefore, logically we must be looking at a system in which there is a transfer of the heat energy associated with the random motion of the atoms that make up the conductor to an ordered motion of the charges carrying the current. Superconductivity sets in when the break-even point is reached and more energy is fed from the thermal condition to the current condition than is dissipated as ohmic loss and so fed back into heat.

This is how I, as a non-expert on matters relating to superconductivity, must view the whole process. It follows that the question of interest to me is what happens if those "warm" superconductors are operated at much lower temperatures than that of the threshold level. My hope is that the circuit might develop an EMF of its own and so supply "free energy" by feeding a current which can be used in an ohmic load, energy which is sourced in the heat of that superconductive element. This imaginary device would need to be cooled down to prime it for operation and would need to have a current fed through it also to prime it for operation, but, once primed, it could continue to feed current to a load and at the same time cool itself to remain superconductive. Indeed, to keep it operative and feeding current one would need to allow some ambient heat energy to reach the superconductive element, but only at such a rate that is needed to sustain the electrical output.

The orthodox scientist would say that this is a pipe dream Certainly it cannot work according to the second law of thermodynamics, though it does satisfy the first law. Be this as it may, in advising on entrepreneurial activity into new and safe sources of energy, I would not recommend turning away anyone who claimed that he or she could demonstrate a source of electrical energy from a primed conductor system fed only on ambient heat.

One may also wonder whether what scientists regard as superconductivity is really an essential preliminary to this prospect of "free energy" from a conductor device. We know of thermoelectric phenomena in conductors comprising junctions between dissimilar metals. In a sense these different junctions exhibit positive and negative resistance. A positive resistance produces heat in absorbing electrical power and a negative resistance cools down in supplying such electrical power. By appropriate selection of metals and operating temperatures of the junctions, one can wonder whether we may be able to fabricate a circuit in which the negative resistance junctions are more effective than the positive resistance junctions.

The result could be a solid-state device which can feed a steady supply of electricity by drawing on heat at the ambient air temperature.

Another version of the same pipe dream? There are certain scientific factors that need looking into from an experimental point of view, but there is nevertheless a sufficient scientific basis in such a "free energy" proposition to warrant the investment involved. It is probable that the Second Law of Thermodynamics will not yield ground on the "free energy" issue, but we must at least try to penetrate that barrier. At the very least I expect that we will eventually discover thermoelectric techniques by which to derive electrical power efficiently from low temperature differential and so gain our energy at the expense of the atmospheric conditions.
 

Other developments

Space does not permit discussion of the possibility of deriving "free energy" from special kinds of electric motor. Nor does it allow discussion as part of this paper of the current interest in gyroscopic propulsion, which brings with it the prospect of levitation and so energy saving in a new means of transportation.

It is however, appropriate to mention that there is a scientific basis for suspecting that energy can be transferred to and from that zero-point energy in the vacuum field by techniques involving electric motor generators. In evaluating any claims of "free energy" machines of this kind, one should be prepared to give more credibility to the inventor who says his machine has also the surprising property of being able to lose energy. By "free energy" we think of a machine that is more than 100 per cent efficient, but we should also have in mind the machine that is less than 0% efficient. A plausible machine would be one that is reversible to work in either way, that is control the energy transfer from and to that zero-point background.

The secret of such a device will surely be based upon the role of that zero-point vacuum state in determining the Planck quantum of action. This is what governs the quanta of energy radiation across empty space, the so-called photons. It is also what sets the magnetic polarization on a per atom basis of the ferromagnetic substances used in our electrical machines. However, what "free energy" inventors must realize is that the ferromagnet is intrinsically always magnetically saturated. All we do in magnetizing it is to re-orientate the microscopic domains within the substance. This hardly affects the magnetic energy density in these domains, at least for the level of polarizing fields used in most practical machines. Consequently, there seems no basis for extracting energy from that zero-point field.

This having been said, imagine that we do force a much higher level of magnetization so that those quantized orbital electrons do draw on the zero-point energy to help to power the forces acting between the poles of an air gap. Having done this, imagine what happens if we tap that energy in the air gap, using it to drive a motor, whilst the magnetizing current is switched on. Surely those orbital electrons in the ferromagnet will make their own contribution to the energy in the air gap, just as the supplied magnetizing current will feed in some energy. Then, with the poles having moved close together, let us switch off the current. I suspect that energy used as output will then have transferred from those two sources, the magnetizing circuit and the zero-point vacuum field, but only the part needed to sustain the inductive reaction effects in the magnetic core will be recovered.

In summary, I subscribe to the view that there could be ways of designing electrical machines which can transfer energy either way between the zero-point vacuum field and our material environment. "Free energy" in this sense is a distinct possibility and thinkers in this field should not be deterred by the opinions of orthodox scientists who have heard of Einstein but have not heard of that vast reservoir of zero-point energy.
 

References

1. Puthoff, H. E., Physical Review D., 35, 3266 (1987).
2. Aspden, H., Int. Jour. Theor. Phys., 15, 631 (1976).
3. Essen, L., Electronics and Wireless World, 64, 44 (October 1978).
4. Essen, L., Electronics and Wireless World, 94, 126 (February 1988).
5. Trouton, F. T. and R. H. Noble, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 72, 132 (1903).
6. Silvertooth, E. V., Nature, 332, 590 (1986).
7. Silvertooth, E. V., Speculations in Science and Technology, 10, 3 (1987).
8. Aspden, H., Physics Today, 41, 132 (March 1988).
9. Marinov, S., in: "Progress in Space-Time Physics 1987", J. P. Wesley, Editor, Benjamin Wesley, Federal Republic of Germany, pp 16-31 (1987).
10. H. Aspden, "Physics without Einstein", Sabberton, Southampton, pp. 27-37 (1969).


 

 

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2022 at 10:31 AM, TheConsultant said:

ONLY USE NORTH POLE MAGNETISM AS WATER TREATMENT!


I need to correct this. Read the books, they flip between geomagnetic south and magnetic south throughout which are polar opposites so apologies for the confusion. Each has different properties, explore/experiment but carefully and read carefully, then read it again to make sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MAGNETIC EXCITATION OF SENSORY RESONANCES

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/d4/9e/ec/30ac6904f3f85e/US5935054.pdf

around 1/2Hz or 0.5Hz of a rotating magnetic field can be used therapeutically, the exact timing ranging from 0.1Hz up to nearer 1Hz appears to directly communicate with your nervous system most effectively. 

"A major application of the electric excitation of the resonance is seen in the form of a sleeping aid. The method can further be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation and arousal, and clinically for the control of tremors and seizures as well as disorders resulting from malfunctions of the autonomic nervous System, such as panic attacks. Electric fields are subject to polarization effects that bar certain applications. These limitations would be circumvented if the excitation could be done by magnetic rather than electric fields. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for excitation of the 1/2 Hz Sensory resonance by Oscillatory magnetic fields"

The rotating magnetic field has the same effect on the nervous system as the fluctuating electrical excitation in previous studies

The direct, i.e., non-physiological, effect of the imposed oscillatory magnetic field can be described as follows. Eddy currents are induced in the body by the electric field that results from Oscillating magnetic fluxes and also from polarization charges that accumulate on the body Surface and high-resistivity membranes. Charge concentrations in tissue relax with a time constant (10) where e is the permittivity and O is the conductivity of the tissue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 


Yes I know I have become obsessed with this guys content, but as long as he is apparently being correct on the things he puts out why on earth would I not use his channel as some sort of bible? The guy translates multiple dead languages and because of that understands the texts of ancient scientists, philosophers, educators etc. As well as being interested in and being somewhat an expert in Field Theory, which lead him to make discoveries regarding Magnetism which unifies Physics as we know it. In fact Physics is already unified, its our 'brightest minds' that are dumbing it down as insane as that sounds. You aren't ever going to achieve unification via particles, never, but that's not really surprising as quantum had to replace aether with something. Call it whatever you want, a medium exists and has been detected a multitude of times world over.
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

https://vixra.org/pdf/1710.0125v1.pdf - About Longitudinal Waves of an Electromagnetic Field

From The State Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOM, "Research and Design Institute of Radio-Electronic Engineering" - branch of Federal Scientific-Production Center Zarechny, Penza region, Russia E-mail: [email protected] (Dated: September 22, 2017)

I do not claim to understand that paper
 

 

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Ok, so bare with this video, be patient as some of which you can overlook but the principles of free energy and an open circuit to provide free energy are in this video. The youtube comments are 95% calling him a schizophrenic, but hey, nothing true is popular. This goes against so many principles we hold as fundamental or foundational, but he is right at least on some of what he is saying without any doubt. A magnet is absolutely the key to a free energy source as it is already tapping in to that, we just need to learn how to utilise its already free flow of energy. 

For context he gave a lecture to Royal Navy about this 40 years ago and they did everything they could to shut him up, that is unfortunately how this world works, stepping on too many toes here, energy industry being one of them. So bare with his attitude towards people who cannot accept what he is saying, I guess I would be furious too.
 


Here is a guy taking one of the principles nearer the end and repeating it successfully.
 

 

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

To summarise what I think I understand from his array of magnets, he is using multiple magnets to constructively and deconstructively extend counterspace in to being a useable energy, and if done twice together in an array you get a useable + and - of the magnetic circuit itself. Usually this sits in the centre of magnets as you can see underneath ferrocells (which emanates from a point that infinitely small). When you place two magnetic fields together that are 'like' poles you can see they create counterspace in between which is what we call magnetic repulsion, when the fields are opposites they become constructive and attract. 

The 4 magnetic fields he talks about and draws are of course in 2d form here, I think he is referring to centripetal and centrifugal vortices on either pole, both poles have both on one side centripetal "wins", on the other side the centrifugal "wins" so its an in and out. So each centrifugal and centripetal on either poles = 4 magnetic "fields". Its still one field but drawn by 2 lots of the same force in binary form. I.E. a positive and a negative. 

Mother nature draws lines differently to how we would see and think of them.   <---(-)--------(counte(centre)rspace)--------(+)--->

Ferrocell counterspace in centre of both magnets and in between like poles?

 

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I do quite enjoy listening to Sean Carroll who generally speaks as if he isn't above the questions or people he talks to, is forthcoming saying "we don't know" about things when relevant and generally appears to be a scientist in it for the right reasons seemingly with a childish sense of wanting to understand how and why this came to be how it is.

On a survey discussed above, 42% voted for a particular model of Quantum Mechanics - Copenhagen Interpretation. So not even 50% of the asked quantum physicists agree on what quantum mechanics is, how it works, and what it means. Not to suggest I understand how it all works either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting the videos, ill check them out to grasp the physics better. 
 

The zero point energy (free energy) you link to i find intriguing, as i understand that also consciousness can ‘vibrate’ (for lack of a better word) at that zero-point. When this occurs i think is what spiritual doctrines describe as ‘bliss/nirvana/atman’-type experiences. We are no longer in a ‘dualistic’ left/right brain hemisphere division mind - flitting from one to the other with our thoughts/desires/beliefs etc - there is the possibility of both hemispheres aligning equally that creates a (what is now commonly referred to as) ‘non-dual consciousness’ experience.

 

I have always called it zero-point consciousness, where the left/right brained conditioned ego of the personality is eclipsed by the ‘unification’ of both hemispheres, where our conscious experience no longer sees anything at all as ‘good/bad/right/wrong’.

 

Even reading this with our left/right ego-mind-consciousness doesnt make sense does it? Its like the marriage of a paradox - something the ego-mind can never do!

 

Yet the pertinent point of zero-point consciousness is because the ego-mind no longer acts as a ‘filter’ - all that is experienced is the pure consciousness field. It tallies with zero-point free energy physics in the simile of the consciousness having free access to all knowledge, just as free energy exists at this point of the ‘zero field’ in physics.

 

It’s really the field of ‘god’ - whether we are talking from a consciousness viewpoint or physics. It’s ‘free’ energy, ‘free’ knowledge. When we look at all pertinent centuries old spiritual writings from all eras/theologies - woven within them is the idea that ‘gods kingdom’ is abundant, all-giving, absolutely over-flowing with free energy. 
What prevents access to this is the duality mind (ego personality left/right brain belief systems) and AC current oscillates between 2 poles. The unification of any ‘thing/being’ automatically renders it to experience this ‘Zero-Point’ energy field. 
 

So mankind has known this for aeons - and we have dribs and drabs of knowledge woven in religious doctrines, but its so dilute to not enable the follower to condense the meaning amidst the ritualistic aspect of all religions. 
We get the 10 commandments - as an example are like ego-rules….yet, the essence of those commandments - which are replicated in varying ways through many other ancient teachings - is to dispel the left/right ego-mind from dominating the person, so they eventually ‘come to know god’ - aka zero-point consciousness. 
 

If i love 1 person and not another im ego-minded. If i embrace true unconditional love state i love all equally. Ego-mind always differentiates/separates/transacts life into left/right thinking. This is a huge dense filter blocking pure consciousness experience. Its simple - like the physics experiment, but difficult to dispel an ego-character we have been encouraged to create and revere, which ultimately is a huge loss, the most damaging, loss to our true selves. 
 

The zero-point energy field of consciousness is a state of pure ‘energy/prana’ circulating through the body, so it feeds itself, energises itself, doesnt need sleep, food, water….these cases have been documented, these experiences are had. All manner of life events can accidentally provoke this state too if shocking enough to the ego to cause it to rattle loose somewhat.

The slow-path is to slowly dispel ego-left/right brain traits of seeing a difference between all living things. Regard it all equally. 
 

We try so hard to generate physical electricity dont we? Quarry for coal, or nuclear fuels, build turbines or solar panels…no matter the physical way ot requires a great amount of energy to ‘get’ energy. A deficit is the result. Yet between the + and - of magnetism lies the abundance we seek….completely free! 😁

 

 

Edited by BeeThrive
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BeeThrive said:

Thanks for posting the videos, ill check them out to grasp the physics better. 
 

The zero point energy (free energy) you link to i find intriguing, as i understand that also consciousness can ‘vibrate’ (for lack of a better word) at that zero-point. When this occurs i think is what spiritual doctrines describe as ‘bliss/nirvana/atman’-type experiences. We are no longer in a ‘dualistic’ left/right brain hemisphere division mind - flitting from one to the other with our thoughts/desires/beliefs etc - there is the possibility of both hemispheres aligning equally that creates a (what is now commonly referred to as) ‘non-dual consciousness’ experience.

 

I have always called it zero-point consciousness, where the left/right brained conditioned ego of the personality is eclipsed by the ‘unification’ of both hemispheres, where our conscious experience no longer sees anything at all as ‘good/bad/right/wrong’.

 

Even reading this with our left/right ego-mind-consciousness doesnt make sense does it? Its like the marriage of a paradox - something the ego-mind can never do!

 

Yet the pertinent point of zero-point consciousness is because the ego-mind no longer acts as a ‘filter’ - all that is experienced is the pure consciousness field. It tallies with zero-point free energy physics in the simile of the consciousness having free access to all knowledge, just as free energy exists at this point of the ‘zero field’ in physics.

 

It’s really the field of ‘god’ - whether we are talking from a consciousness viewpoint or physics. It’s ‘free’ energy, ‘free’ knowledge. When we look at all pertinent centuries old spiritual writings from all eras/theologies - woven within them is the idea that ‘gods kingdom’ is abundant, all-giving, absolutely over-flowing with free energy. 
What prevents access to this is the duality mind (ego personality left/right brain belief systems) and AC current oscillates between 2 poles. The unification of any ‘thing/being’ automatically renders it to experience this ‘Zero-Point’ energy field. 
 

So mankind has known this for aeons - and we have dribs and drabs of knowledge woven in religious doctrines, but its so dilute to not enable the follower to condense the meaning amidst the ritualistic aspect of all religions. 
We get the 10 commandments - as an example are like ego-rules….yet, the essence of those commandments - which are replicated in varying ways through many other ancient teachings - is to dispel the left/right ego-mind from dominating the person, so they eventually ‘come to know god’ - aka zero-point consciousness. 
 

If i love 1 person and not another im ego-minded. If i embrace true unconditional love state i love all equally. Ego-mind always differentiates/separates/transacts life into left/right thinking. This is a huge dense filter blocking pure consciousness experience. Its simple - like the physics experiment, but difficult to dispel an ego-character we have been encouraged to create and revere, which ultimately is a huge loss, the most damaging, loss to our true selves. 
 

The zero-point energy field of consciousness is a state of pure ‘energy/prana’ circulating through the body, so it feeds itself, energises itself, doesnt need sleep, food, water….these cases have been documented, these experiences are had. All manner of life events can accidentally provoke this state too if shocking enough to the ego to cause it to rattle loose somewhat.

The slow-path is to slowly dispel ego-left/right brain traits of seeing a difference between all living things. Regard it all equally. 
 

We try so hard to generate physical electricity dont we? Quarry for coal, or nuclear fuels, build turbines or solar panels…no matter the physical way ot requires a great amount of energy to ‘get’ energy. A deficit is the result. Yet between the + and - of magnetism lies the abundance we seek….completely free! 😁

 

 


Thank you for your input, very interesting reading and I agree with your points entirely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2022 at 12:53 PM, TheConsultant said:

I found a poignant part on the properties of either magnetic pole. 
 

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg


This info is really interesting. It’s like too much of any 1 thing, becomes a ‘bad’ thing - we sway either side of ‘balance’. Im yet to try magnetised water, and would like to do some experimenting.

 

I’ve been researching off/on about climatic effects on health - and google these days throws up results based on ‘climate change and mental health’ - but before that topic was chic, the studies on barometric pressure on humans, as well as other climatic metrics all pointed to conclusions as they say above : a balance needs to be struck.

 

We as humans seem to have the need for this balance wired-within ourselves as ‘instinct’ some would say. I moved from a dry uk region to a wet damp british isles region and it had a disturbing effect on my equilibrium. The urge for curries/hot spicy foods/drinks, being by lit fires/hot baths etc increased markedly. The equatorial regions have abundant fruit trees for cooling, light snacks, to off-set the climate of heat/stuffiness of humidity. 
Why indians eat hot curries in a hot country is beyond me! 😂

 

This post about body effects of magnetism, reminds me of electro-shock-brain-therapy. I can see the logic of trying it, and for many it really did help shift chronic depression states, but for some it was not successful. I guess the ‘shock’ to the hemispheres of a current not usual for the brain, was a method to see if the brain would return, re-set to a more ‘even’ magnetism of its own? Like heat shock pads to revive an unconscious pulse-less person.
ECT was daring, yet crude, but in its intention are some very plausible reasons.  
 

The fallacy we have as a civilisation is that we need to add something, to find perfect equilibrium/peace/happiness. Whether that be a job promotion, having a baby, falling in love, or doing a line of pure coke. We all search for that ‘high’ of what we think we need to ‘boost’ our life experience. We are addicts of serotonin and dopamine, but it's very understandable isnt it? The substances that deliver both these neurotransmitters in high doses simultaneously are often known as psychotropics that induce ‘out of body’ experiences - or out-of-ego-mind experiences.

So our inclinations towards mundane life serotonin and dopamine highs, no matter what they are, is our natural instinct towards ‘god’ - as the blast of pranic consciousness experience is akin to a dose of pure serotonin/dopamine and the ‘magical’ DMT.

We reach for hemisphere synchronisation through eating an ice-cream, getting applauded on stage after performing, giving the homeless a tenner from our wallet. 
 

We become addicted to reaching. But the neurotransmitters circulating through the brain are the ‘fake’ version of unified consciousness. How do we find this state of equilibrium without our preferred ego methods of getting that temporary high?

 

Many doctrines speak that we need to take away layers of the ego, to reveal a consciousness state of equilibrium. Our ego’s get in the way. Like a shell obstructing the pure treasure within. 
Love, drugs, food, life experiences that give us a high, are poor substitutes for the truly unified brain experience. It’s like our ego’s are conned that through this mundane life we can navigate life, get all our personal jigsaw pieces of satisfaction in order, then WE KNOW perfection will be experienced. Pure contentment awaits us - if we work for it.

 

But this is the epitome of the path of Ouroboros - destined to die, be reborn and try again. We didnt quite ‘get it’ - we live a life of trying to ‘get’ contentment outside ourselves, we build an ego identity to go ‘get god’. Yet, all the while, unbeknownst to us, the perfection of consciousness experience we all crave more deeply than any desire our ego’s could ever dream-up, was always there, underneath the ego-manmade-personality layer of being. 
Once found, the cycle of rebirth/death stops. We’ve unified. 

This experience commonly causes death because it’s so sublime on one hand and shocking to the ego on the other. The ‘parts of self’ wrench apart and cannot ‘hold’ the experience. We often hear of ‘spiritual madness’ - where psychosis/mania and other states are described. This is reasonable to expect considering what the awareness is juggling all at one time.
By dissolving the ego’s hard-lined wants/needs/wishes to be merely more like ‘floating ideas’, is the direction which helps the unified experience to ‘bleed through’ slowly, so the person can hold/encompass the state, and it to remain permanent, than a temporary ‘bliss’ experience.
 

This ‘self-realisation’ state lived, is the perfection we seek , but through taste, feeling, sights, touch. We’re just a bit distracted! Hence why meditation is recommended, but that is another subject, which your brain unification information reaches into.
The brainwaves of experienced meditators are interesting. I suspect the brainwaves of babies might be similar. Days old babies before ego indoctrination begins 😉
 

There’s an aspect of our consciousness that is ALWAYS unified. But the ego-personality of this lifetime mind, is distracted with focusing on stuff of this world..its wants/desires/loves/hates etc. How can we notice the dove flying in the sky while we walk along looking at the people around us. 
We’re a bit like a computer with a partitioned hard-drive. Each partition thinks its the hard-drive, not knowing there’s others on the same device. The operating system of the entire computer knows everything about the computer, how many hard-drives, soundcards, USB’s connected. 
We need to discover our OS, then we will no longer be deluded. 
 

 

I havent researched this but do you know of any studies on brainwave states when a person has taken high doses of serotonin/dopamine, comparing them to meditative brainwaves? Are there any brain images of those in euphoric bliss?  

 


 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BeeThrive said:

We’re a bit like a computer with a partitioned hard-drive. Each partition thinks its the hard-drive, not knowing there’s others on the same device.

I like that analogy, a lot and I agree with your post.

 

15 minutes ago, BeeThrive said:

I havent researched this but do you know of any studies on brainwave states when a person has taken high doses of serotonin/dopamine, comparing them to meditative brainwaves? Are there any brain images of those in euphoric bliss?


MDMA has a profound effect on brainwaves, it is currently being studied as a medication for post traumatic stress disorder, clinical depression, anxiety and such. I do not know of any specific studies on brainwaves vs meditative states and chemically induced states, but much like many drugs, some of them are a gateway in to understanding something more readily then working on meditation techniques. Many cultures have a strong history of incorporating some of these medicines in to their diet, it isn't a coincidence we all have a cannabinoid system for instance.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872058/ - Localization of MDMA‐induced brain activity in healthy volunteers using low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA)

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22280-a-real-fmri-high-my-ecstasy-brain-scan/

https://www.inverse.com/mind-body/your-brain-on-drugs - some others. 

Would be interesting to see meditative brainwave activity vs checmically induced brainwave activity, especially something like MDMA (or as you state serotonin) as transcendental meditators/practitioners state the end goal is nirvana, or a natural MDMA type bliss as you understand truth outside of ego-mind, ego-mind is the trap, IMO.

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

I like that analogy, a lot and I agree with your post.

 


MDMA has a profound effect on brainwaves, it is currently being studied as a medication for post traumatic stress disorder, clinical depression, anxiety and such. I do not know of any specific studies on brainwaves vs meditative states and chemically induced states, but much like many drugs, some of them are a gateway in to understanding something more readily then working on meditation techniques. Many cultures have a strong history of incorporating some of these medicines in to their diet, it isn't a coincidence we all have a cannabinoid system for instance.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6872058/ - Localization of MDMA‐induced brain activity in healthy volunteers using low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA)

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22280-a-real-fmri-high-my-ecstasy-brain-scan/

https://www.inverse.com/mind-body/your-brain-on-drugs - some others. 

Would be interesting to see meditative brainwave activity vs checmically induced brainwave activity, especially something like MDMA (or as you state serotonin) as transcendental meditators/practitioners state the end goal is nirvana, or a natural MDMA type bliss as you understand truth outside of ego-mind, ego-mind is the trap, IMO.


Very interesting links, thanks for posting. I wish i was an experienced radiologist and brain biologist to be able to see a brain and know what that part is responsible for. Takes a lot of learning to fully grasp what im seeing, yet the differences are notable and specifically the central ganglia region changes are interesting.

 

I have recently become intrigued with brainwaves, and researched about brain bands at consumer level, to be able to discover what brainwaves im engaging in when relaxed V meditating V mentally energised etc. I found BrainBit headbad and will buy one when finances allow. It seems the most reliable to use as the inventor is a guy who developed brain reading equipment as a profession, and his ‘head tabs’ technology far outweigh the others on the market. Hence they would give more accurate readings. The others were far too simple with readings of “your relaxed” rather than showing the actual level of brainwaves, and their head-tabs had issues with contact and getting readings. Looking forward to exploring that myself!

 

Here’s a video, of unfortunately lesser quality than preferred, but does talk about brain imaging of meditation V psychedelics. I dont know if this video presentation is available anywhere else in better quality, as its difficult to see the images he’s showing clearly, but the audio is good and confirms the thesis that chemicals can induce a ‘synchronised brain’ effect - as well as meditation.

 

 

Drugs are instant, quick compared to other ‘self-induced’ techniques. Both have merit to give the experience to a person. im familiar with cannabinoids and psychedelics personally, than chemical lab-made drugs, and found them valuable to exploring consciousness, and expanding understanding, as well as induce more intrigue and curiosity about this subject from a ‘self-induced’ perspective.

 

Our ego-minds do trap us, i agree. It seems intrinsically linked with our belief system. Belief system = Ego. Without a left/right brain belief system who are we? All my mental constructs of right/wrong/loves and hates, my history and memories, aspirations, skills, preferences, needs etc have all coalesced to form ‘me’ this ego personality. If i could ‘drop’ all that, have my hard-drive wiped, so to speak, my awareness will automatically, without effort on ‘my’ part, be seated in the field of pure awareness BEFORE manifestation. I’ll be at the centre of the Operating System of consciousness, Its the energy-field where all potential loads from, where everything is born from. The field that ‘powers’ all ideas. 

I’ve been lucky to have experienced a complete change of life/ego identity, and having no control or choice. When i reflect on those times, i often marvelled why i felt a huge surge of energy, renewal? My life had been pulled from beneath me, i had the clothes i was standing in, no other belongings, all friends/familiarity completely gone within a day, no home to call my own. I had nothing anchoring me at all on an ego level to give me ego-stability. I just had my body.  I should have been terrified, and we all imagine with our ego minds that’s horrible to ever experience, and we work HARD to SECURE our ego needs. 
I was forced to literally let go of everything material, everything familiar, all familiar people - and start from scratch - which the ego does extraordinarily well. Or it collapses for a while in despair reacting to its loss of familiarity. I was young enough to think i would be helped, and everythings fine. I didnt worry about it. The ‘naivety’ of youth is a very useful attribute! 
Yet that renewal surge of energy - like the windscreen of my mind had been cleaned to sparkle clear, i have always remembered. I now understand it…decades later. 
I received an ‘ego-wipe’ - which was enforced not chosen, so that element added an extra zap to me ‘surrendering’ to ‘what will be will be’. When our minds are experiencing that we have no option but to either react, and immerse ourselves in emotional meltdowns, or accept…and when we decide ‘ok, so be it’ within, we dive automatically into the OS of our consciousness system, and receive a surge of energy from ‘pure consciousness/prana’ because there’s not much mundane ego left obscuring the experience.

 

We can experience these bursts of pure consciousness energy through many means of everyday life. Experiences or drugs. Yet the self-sufficient route has always appealed personally. I want to live in that awareness without external catalysts. 
The essence of my personal experiences in this state, has highlighted that when we live in the ‘zone of the unknown’, permanently, (i just had temporary experiences of this) is where our minds are healthiest and more unified. 
We can look at it the other way, and see that having complete control of our lives, and know what time dinner is, and what’s happening next saturday, has not brought genuine everlasting contentment.

Suspending overt control over every aspect of life seems like one ‘in-road’ to experience a more unified consciousness.

Having control, which is so important to the ego - is the one (major) thing to relinquish to dissipate its power to obscure true unified consciousness experiences. The essence of mundane ego is separation. Of course it will steer the consciousness to control its life, keep it distracted, so it never can be found out its an actor in the show called material 3-d earth, a shell that will crumble along with the body. 
 

I am split about meditation’s usefulness because like anything, it can become a crutch we end up abusing because the ego cant deal with ego life. Its a fine line between valuable use of a tool/technique and over-reliance/abuse of same. Yet sitting by oneself, just being by ourselves, no distractions, just being still and aware, can bring-up a tidal wave of ego-assaults/revelations about ourselves, that we can, just by willingness to sit with our ego, dissipate its power.
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting video, thanks for that. It appears that taking psilocybin (active compound in magic mushrooms) has a similar effect on parts of the brain as meditation!!

I then found this:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-14512-3 - Psilocybin microdosers demonstrate greater observed improvements in mood and mental health at one month relative to non-microdosing controls

So taking tiny amounts of magic mushrooms (0.1g to 0.3g) multiple times a week is incredibly good for mood, anxiety, depression, stress etc. As someone with PTSD all options are on the table, no scheduled medication touches PTSD unless it shuts you down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...