Jump to content

Boris Johnson defends 'draconian' plan to electronically tag refugees  - Resource Management/Sustainable Development/Hunger Games


DannyUK
 Share

Recommended Posts

This guy is the most lowest piece of scum on the earth.
How the hell he is keeping within political office is anyones guess.
The whole reason for anyone within doubt as to why this is, is because he is carrying out the plan of tyrants and what he is doing is part of an agenda, so no matter how perverse and how corrupt, if he does it, he will be protected because “he is just doing his job”…
The plan is for everyone and anyone to be electronically tagged.
This is a/the way in…
They will cultivate this agenda through a systematic imposed resource crisis.
If you want food and drink, you’ll need an electronic tag to ensure the appropriate “rationing of resources” - then comes “sustainable development” which is ensuring “this can’t be allowed to happen again” - treating us all like “refugees” until the electronic tag is used permanently and indefinitely.

Wake up!

It’s being made to happen and then we can be reframed and it is being “allowed to happen” first time round.

 

Boris Johnson defends 'draconian' plan to electronically tag refugees  

Critics have called the policy ‘draconian and punitive’

https://cdn.jwplayer.com/previews/BkmVHlTA

Boris Johnson has defended “draconian” Home Office plans to electronically tag asylum seekers arriving in Britian across the Channel on small boats or lorries. Despite campaginers warning it will see people who have fled conflict treated as “criminals”, the prime minister said it is essential that people could not simply "vanish" after arriving in the UK.
 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/boris-johnson-refugees-patel-tagging-b2104061.html?fbclid=IwAR1gxl9wORI8McUSorxocU-fg8UD-mQp8fR0MBVOE3HU5-c3bk-A216iaVs&fs=e&s=cl


^ Population Control - COVID NHS Tracking Extended ^

A7D2A475-4931-4412-8A6F-3D0D8C76ED6D.jpeg.81a83a1e23c233353ff5f0c1a2ef0ba2.jpeg


Why are they getting rid of cash?


6EB939A0-22E5-417B-8B3B-15642604F6F4.jpeg.22ad1a65ca5c6c8e04ee4c9d3bf5148d.jpeg

 

Yeah…
Btw you can no longer use physical currency, everything has to be carried out now digitally via the chip in your arm or else you’ll starve to death ☠️ as you won’t allow yourself to be controlled by the said abuser which doesn’t actually exist unless you’re a conspiracy theorist with paranoid schizophrenia and have delusions of persecution 😬

 

CDC50036-272D-488E-82E5-C06D691C3F8A.jpeg.1f144f4ed1cf3bd9e4aa4e9fb1bfb2c6.jpeg

 

Meanwhile, what’s happening now as 5G towers are being installed everywhere and a hunger games society is being cultivated quite deliberately, from manipulating the weather to killing mass amounts of livestock and blaming “anomalies”…

Refugees to be electronically tagged and prosecuted if they don’t comply under ‘draconian’ Home Office plan
Ministers accused of treating people seeking refuge as criminals in ‘dehumanising’ move
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/refugees-electronic-tag-home-office-boats-b2103622.html

 

 

BDAFF0A5-7B8B-45DC-96AF-05E76A246CC7.jpeg.0cacc1b6db29a07acf9e791a6f24196d.jpeg

Thousands of cows are killed by extreme heat and humidity amid freak weather in Kansas as shocking video shows rows of cattle laying dead - with temperatures set to hit 110F in days

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10924039/Video-shows-thousands-cows-laying-dead-Kansas-amid-freak-weather-rising-food-prices.html


“There are an estimated 333 Million people in the United States.
Farmers that are responsible for growing our food & fiber, make up only 0.60% of that population.

Farmers are highly outnumbered already. With a fast-growing population and a decrease in farmers, it seems a little concerning for our future.

The average age of your American farmer is 57.5 years old.”


E569B058-37C1-4B47-A3D4-D65F1928271F.jpeg.a018d90d1f425f3567104abb230aa83e.jpeg


Climate change - not the V

EC39A8FF-7D2A-43CF-9D23-48A9C2F139F9.jpeg.70fb4bbf7eae0016815477d4ba340a0c.jpegD5843A90-750D-47AF-9FEC-5F938437678D.jpeg.d487f9ed0a3910f8689794580ad26b62.jpeg
 

COVID to Climate Change to a Resource Crisis, entering into a perception for Sustainable Development.

Through the resource crisis, the masses are electronically tagged for “rationing resources”.

This is all happening by chance, even though there’s an agenda to do this and it’s not a conspiracy theory which is baseless…

This is what we are supposed to believe and unfortunately many do.

 

Edited by DannyUK
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DannyUK said:

This guy is the most lowest piece of scum on the earth.
How the hell he is keeping within political office is anyones guess.
The whole reason for anyone within doubt as to why this is, is because he is carrying out the plan of tyrants and what he is doing is part of an agenda, so no matter how perverse and how corrupt, if he does it, he will be protected because “he is just doing his job”…
The plan is for everyone and anyone to be electronically tagged.

 

Boris Johnson is just a puppet. These announcements and decisions are not his own.

 

He stays in office because the opposition (Labour) is equally useless. And the mainstream media manipulates public opinion anyway.

 

Anyone who owns a smartphone is already 'electronically tagged'. And these migrants who arrive across the Channel have been already provided with smartphones before they even get here. (by whom?)

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Grumpy Owl said:

Anyone who owns a smartphone is already 'electronically tagged'. And these migrants who arrive across the Channel have been already provided with smartphones before they even get here. (by whom?)

 

Spy Satellites can find anyone anywhere by looking at their cast shadow-silhouette, shoulder width, hairdo, gait, walking speed and so forth.

 

You could be walking in a crowd of 500 in Leicester Square, Times Square or central Barcelona.

 

A supercomputer being fed satellite video of the area will find you in that crowd.

 

No smart-tag needed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Truthblast said:

 

Spy Satellites can find anyone anywhere by looking at their cast shadow-silhouette, shoulder width, hairdo, gait, walking speed and so forth.

 

You could be walking in a crowd of 500 in Leicester Square, Times Square or central Barcelona.

 

A supercomputer being fed satellite video of the area will find you in that crowd.

 

No smart-tag needed.

 

Sorry but if you believe that then you have no idea how spy satellites actually work.  As Grumpy Owl says, everyone who uses a smartphone is already electronically tagged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can tag someone but that doesn't actually change the fact that they have just migrated into the country and are now living here

 

basically its another bullshit initiative that is going to do NOTHING to stem the tide of people that is not going to stop until this country is swamped

 

just as flying people on expensive flights to africa to wait a while before you rubber stamp their visa to allow them to become british citizens before flying them back to the uK won't do anything to stem the inflow either

 

The british people did not vote for brexit so that our border would become non existent as this government is allowing. We voted for it so that we would get our border back

 

all the tories are doing is PRETENDING to care but in truth it was the tory ex-Prime Minister theresa may who went to marrakech, in secrecy (not covered by the mainstream media), to sign the UN Migration Compact which is about assisting tens of millions of migrants to come into britain

 

migration is being used as a weapon to smash britain into extinction

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nefaria said:

Sorry but if you believe that then you have no idea how spy satellites actually work.  As Grumpy Owl says, everyone who uses a smartphone is already electronically tagged.

 

Spy Sats are classified.

 

How precisely do you know that they cannot do this???

 

All it takes for what I wrote is an 8K UHD video feed of a location.

 

Spy Sats can probably shoot even higher res - Gigapixel - video in realtime.

 

If you are referring to the blocky sat pics they show on the news, those are deliberately resolution degraded.

 

They are not allowed to release images which show the FULL resolution of satellite optics.

 

Classified I am afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Truthblast said:

 

Spy Sats are classified.

 

How precisely do you know that they cannot do this???

 

All it takes for what I wrote is an 8K UHD video feed of a location.

 

Spy Sats can probably shoot even higher res - Gigapixel - video in realtime.

 

If you are referring to the blocky sat pics they show on the news, those are deliberately resolution degraded.

 

They are not allowed to release images which show the FULL resolution of satellite optics.

 

Classified I am afraid.

I think you have been watching too many movies.  Spy satellites are limited by their orbit, their resolution, the time of day/night they pass over an area and the weather conditions they are attempting to spy through.  Even the most advanced spy satellites can't photograph through thick storm clouds!  

 

There are far more reliable ways of spying on people and it doesn't rely on technology miles up in space!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nefaria said:

I think you have been watching too many movies.  Spy satellites are limited by their orbit, their resolution, the time of day/night they pass over an area and the weather conditions they are attempting to spy through.  Even the most advanced spy satellites can't photograph through thick storm clouds!  

 

There are far more reliable ways of spying on people and it doesn't rely on technology miles up in space!

 

Watch the film DeJaVu, it's a good movie but more importantly allows you to see just what is capable/possible and how extensive the Beast system will be.

 

dejavu.jpg.6c9c2b37f9877684896bbd09194c2735.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nefaria said:

I think you have been watching too many movies.  Spy satellites are limited by their orbit, their resolution, the time of day/night they pass over an area and the weather conditions they are attempting to spy through.  Even the most advanced spy satellites can't photograph through thick storm clouds!  

 

There are far more reliable ways of spying on people and it doesn't rely on technology miles up in space!

 

Military tech is ALWAYS 20 to 30 years ahead of where everyone *pretends* it is.

 

If you ever hear "Bla military outfit is starting initial research into X type of new weapons technology for possible future war scenarios" that translates as "We added that to our arsenal 17 years ago".

 

Have you ever seen a NATO country go to war with a really HIGH-TECH ADVERSARY?

 

NO?

 

If that ever happened, the REALLY HIGH TECH WAR TOYS WOULD COME OUT TO PLAY.

 

There is a lovely phrase Nikola Tesla used shortly before he died:

 

"I AM TALKING HERE ABOUT NEW LAWS OF PHYSICS"

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are talking about the laws of physics, you would understand that spy satellites follow an orbit, it doesn't matter how advanced the tech is, it still has to obey the laws of physics, the stuff you have seen in films where they move satellites over a specific area to film in real-time is complete and utter fantasy.  Drones can do this, not satellites!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Truthblast said:

 

Military tech is ALWAYS 20 to 30 years ahead of where everyone *pretends* it is.

 

If you ever hear "Bla military outfit is starting initial research into X type of new weapons technology for possible future war scenarios" that translates as "We added that to our arsenal 17 years ago".

 

Have you ever seen a NATO country go to war with a really HIGH-TECH ADVERSARY?

 

NO?

 

If that ever happened, the REALLY HIGH TECH WAR TOYS WOULD COME OUT TO PLAY.

 

There is a lovely phrase Nikola Tesla used shortly before he died:

 

"I AM TALKING HERE ABOUT NEW LAWS OF PHYSICS"

 

 

 

 

Military tech is not always 20 to 30 years ahead, it advances quicker when you have a foe that matches your strength, and as you yourself point out, NATO does not currently have a high tech adversary! Technology sometimes stagnates.  There is no need to chuck money at advanced spy satellites (which are always restricted by their orbits) when there is far more reliable means of spying closer to earth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Humans create AI and end up wiping all humans out with it, poetic is it not. We'll never know the true extent of how advanced technology is today. The day they realised just what they can do with frequencies, it was always going to be game over for humans.

 

Edited by Puzzle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nefaria said:

If you are talking about the laws of physics, you would understand that spy satellites follow an orbit, it doesn't matter how advanced the tech is, it still has to obey the laws of physics, the stuff you have seen in films where they move satellites over a specific area to film in real-time is complete and utter fantasy.  Drones can do this, not satellites!

 

Musk wants to launch nearly 30,000 satellites into earth orbit.

 

Are those:

 

A)  Mere 5G/6G Satellites?

 

B)   The above PLUS Spy Sat Optics/Sensors built into them?

 

With that kind of coverage, orbits become pretty moot...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Truthblast said:

 

Musk wants to launch nearly 30,000 satellites into earth orbit.

 

Are those:

 

A)  Mere 5G/6G Satellites?

 

B)   The above PLUS Spy Sat Optics/Sensors built into them?

 

With that kind of coverage, orbits become pretty moot...

 

Elon musk's Starlink satellites are comms satellites, therefore they would be in fixed geostationary orbits.  Pretty useless as spy satellites they would only being seeing the same fixed area above earth!!!!  Even 30000 of the things would have huge gaps between them that they can't see!

 

The moot point is the very idea of investing so much in spy satellites when there are far more reliable means of spying on the ground!

Edited by Nefaria
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Nefaria said:

Elon musk's Starlink satellites are comms satellites, therefore they would be in fixed geostationary orbits.  Pretty useless as spy satellites they would only being seeing the same fixed area above earth!!!!  Even 30000 of the things would have huge gaps between them that they can't see!

 

The moot point is the very idea of investing so much in spy satellites when there are far more reliable means of spying on the ground!

 

During the Cold War, the Pentagon classified all patent applications for 2 technologies:

 

- Ion Thrusters

- Plasma Thrusters

 

Nobody was allowed to get public patents for "thrusters which can move satellites in space".

 

This was 50 YEARS ago.

 

Do you really believe that HALF A CENTURY LATER Satellites are STUCK IN FIXED ORBITS or HOVER OVER ONE SPOT OVER THE EARTH???

 

NOBODY WAS ABLE TO INVENT AN ELECTRICAL THRUSTER SINCE THE 1970S???

 

REALLY??  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Truthblast said:

 

During the Cold War, the Pentagon classified all patent applications for 2 technologies:

 

- Ion Thrusters

- Plasma Thrusters

 

Nobody was allowed to get public patents for "thrusters which can move satellites in space".

 

This was 50 YEARS ago.

 

Do you really believe that HALF A CENTURY LATER Satellites are STUCK IN FIXED ORBITS or HOVER OVER ONE SPOT OVER THE EARTH???

 

NOBODY WAS ABLE TO INVENT AN ELECTRICAL THRUSTER SINCE THE 1970S???

 

REALLY??  

 

 

Doesn't matter what thrusters you have you still have to obey the laws of physics, you cannot drastically alter a satellites position, it would fall back to earth or drift off into space.  Thrusters are put on satellites to make slight corrections to their position to maintain their orbits not to put them in a completely different location!!!!!

 

Maybe you are confusing satellites with drones?

Edited by Nefaria
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Nefaria said:

Doesn't matter what thrusters you have you still have to obey the laws of physics, you cannot drastically alter a satellites position, it would fall back to earth or drift off into space.  Thrusters are put on satellites to make slight corrections to their position to maintain their orbits not to put them in a completely different location!!!!!

 

Maybe you are confusing satellites with drones?

 

Why are you so adamant that what is stated publicly about Satellites is the ACTUAL TRUTH?

 

Have you built one?

Launched one?

Sat behind the controls of one?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top & bottom of the matter is that Borris & the rest of them need to come up with some proper solution that does not involve tagging. Obviously, they never will because that would defeat their covert objective, but surely even outright bigots can see that this proposed solution is not acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Truthblast said:

 

Why are you so adamant that what is stated publicly about Satellites is the ACTUAL TRUTH?

 

Have you built one?

Launched one?

Sat behind the controls of one?

 

Because i understand basic physics and that "satellites" by their very definition must follow an orbit.  Otherwise it is not a satellite!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Nefaria said:

Because i understand basic physics and that "satellites" by their very definition must follow an orbit.  Otherwise it is not a satellite!

 

i think people forget that they only have limited fuel to manoeuvre in space.   much easier to track people with in car gps / mobile phones and cctv etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Nefaria said:

Because i understand basic physics and that "satellites" by their very definition must follow an orbit.  Otherwise it is not a satellite!

 

Does a satellite with an anti-gravity module also need to "follow an orbit"?

 

Can really strong electrical thrusters prevent a satellite from "falling back to Earth"?

 

Questions, questions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eddy64 said:

 

i think people forget that they only have limited fuel to manoeuvre in space.   much easier to track people with in car gps / mobile phones and cctv etc.

 

Nuclear battery. Hyper-efficient and lightweight photovoltaics. Electrical thrusters.

 

Satellites "burning fuel" is very 1980s...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...