Jump to content

Minor News items - Not worth a thread of their own


SuperstarNeilC

Recommended Posts

Got wondering the other day how many fireworks it would take to have the same power as an atom bomb…

 

Anyway I did a Google and the strength of a firework is 0.000001 of the atom bomb but it’s estimated over 20m fireworks are set off in uk every year…

 

So does that mean that we let off the same energy as an atom bomb into our skies every bonfire night?

 

Or is my maths just terrible. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Mazthehobo said:

Yeah I agree with you. 
I think people should be able to protest if they want to but it’s disrespectful. 
That being said, in a world where freedom of speech is being censored more every day who am I to tell someone they can’t protest… 

 

Quite right. If you want the right to protest yourself, it's hypocritical to interrupt someone else's peaceful expression of whatever it might be, in this case the Remembrance. 

 

Having said that, it's not clear to me what exactly he was protesting about and what it had to do with Remembrance day, which to be fair might be as much about how it was reported as what he actually said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Mazthehobo said:

Got wondering the other day how many fireworks it would take to have the same power as an atom bomb…

 

Anyway I did a Google and the strength of a firework is 0.000001 of the atom bomb but it’s estimated over 20m fireworks are set off in uk every year…

 

So does that mean that we let off the same energy as an atom bomb into our skies every bonfire night?

 

Or is my maths just terrible. 

 

It's hard to say because both atom bombs and fireworks come in a wide range of sizes! But with your figures, 0.000,001 x 20m = 20.  So equivalent to 20 atom bombs. That sounds a lot! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

Quite right. If you want the right to protest yourself, it's hypocritical to interrupt someone else's peaceful expression of whatever it might be, in this case the Remembrance. 

 

Having said that, it's not clear to me what exactly he was protesting about and what it had to do with Remembrance day, which to be fair might be as much about how it was reported as what he actually said. 

 

I can't find it now, but there was a story yesterday about some privileged group of young toffs planning to disrupt Remembrance services with 'pro-Palestine protests'.

 

A group calling themselves "Youth Demand" who are associated with 'Just Stop Oil'.

 

With the lack of details provided in this local news report (typical Reach Plc), it's not clear if this was some way related.

 

I would suspect that as the police swiftly removed and arrested this fella, and the crowds were seen/heard to be shouting "rat, traitor", he was probably some 'white dude' rather than anyone of an ethnic minority.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

It's hard to say because both atom bombs and fireworks come in a wide range of sizes! But with your figures, 0.000,001 x 20m = 20.  So equivalent to 20 atom bombs. That sounds a lot! 


Yeah. It must be my bad maths. I came to the same conclusion that 20 atomic bombs would surely be too much to ignore…

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I can't find it now, but there was a story yesterday about some privileged group of young toffs planning to disrupt Remembrance services with 'pro-Palestine protests'.

 

A group calling themselves "Youth Demand" who are associated with 'Just Stop Oil'.

 

With the lack of details provided in this local news report (typical Reach Plc), it's not clear if this was some way related.

 

I would suspect that as the police swiftly removed and arrested this fella, and the crowds were seen/heard to be shouting "rat, traitor", he was probably some 'white dude' rather than anyone of an ethnic minority.


I suppose it’s the best way to get your protest heard. Guarantee to get in the media. 
It’s like those guys in the states that picket funerals of gay soldiers killed in combat. I don’t like it. But I guess that freedom of speech is either all in or nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1velocity7 said:

after 2020 does anyone else get wound up when ppl say they died for our freedom?

If you talking about war veterans then no.  Those people were told to fight for their country and thought they were doing the right thing, lied too most likely yes. Now freedoms they died defending are now being destroyed. so the people who died during the wars now died for nothing. If thats what you mean.

Edited by Captainlove
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 1velocity7 said:

after 2020 does anyone else get wound up when ppl say they died for our freedom?

That's what their programming was at the time. Many would have considered it their life purpose perhaps, many still go to war with that misguided idea pushed on them by someone else.

Why would it wind you up? Those folks suffered their entire life from what they went through and witnessed.

Perhaps, something you may like to open up to consider,  is that it winds you up because you haven't found your own life purpose yet.

When we have negative reactions its often because we need to examine why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, 1velocity7 said:

after 2020 does anyone else get wound up when ppl say they died for our freedom?


I get what you’re saying. Also worth remember that in a lot of wars in the past people didn’t really have a choice to go and fight or not. If they refused they were branded a coward with white feathered and shamed from society (bit like the anti vaxxers come to think of it). And if you tried to escape from the army you were sent to prison or shot. 
so for a lot of people they didn’t die for freedom, the died because they were forced to go to war.

 

But for those who went believing they were fighting for freedom and who believe all the patriotic propaganda, then I guess they died fighting for freedom because that’s what they believed they were doing. 
 

I think most country will say their soldiers died for freedom. I guess it depends which freedom you are raised into.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RobinJ said:

That's what their programming was at the time. Many would have considered it their life purpose perhaps, many still go to war with that misguided idea pushed on them by someone else.

Why would it wind you up? Those folks suffered their entire life from what they went through and witnessed.

Perhaps, something you may like to open up to consider,  is that it winds you up because you haven't found your own life purpose yet.

When we have negative reactions its often because we need to examine why.

I agree that people will die fighting for a purpose they believe is defending their own, even though they've been lied to about who, precisely, is the enemy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/12/2024 at 4:52 AM, Freaky Dragonfly said:

 

Hahaha! Not via trump they won't. He is just another great deceiver. Doubt he will live much longer anyway. Hanging on to a belief that politicians will save you is utterly ridiculous.

Those in power know exactly whats happening, they know they are already on the way out. What we are witnessing is the final destruction of the veil. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mr H said:

TEACHER LET OFF Trainee teacher who shared sick videos of newborn babies being raped walks free from court

"But he dodged a custodial sentence as a judge said he was not a direct danger to the public."

 

and because of the mitigation i.e. "Chouffot’s lawyer Kellie Enever said her client had experienced abuse from age 11 and was self-medicating with drink and drugs during his offending."

 

"Chouffot was given just 30 rehab sessions and 180 hours of unpaid work" - is that enough to fix his damaged mind?

 

I wonder who the judge was, perhaps an admirer of John Jackson Smyth QC (deceased)? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Katsika said:

"But he dodged a custodial sentence as a judge said he was not a direct danger to the public."

 

and because of the mitigation i.e. "Chouffot’s lawyer Kellie Enever said her client had experienced abuse from age 11 and was self-medicating with drink and drugs during his offending."

 

"Chouffot was given just 30 rehab sessions and 180 hours of unpaid work" - is that enough to fix his damaged mind?

 

I wonder who the judge was, perhaps an admirer of John Jackson Smyth QC (deceased)? 

 

 


I mentioned it in another thread but cases and sentences like this when added to the stories about violent gun gang criminals being released within 18 months due to prison shortages, it shows you just exactly who is the real enemy in the eyes of the government when Alex Belfield is still behind bars for harassing a bbc worker.

 

Soon the prisons will be full of people that don’t agree with the narrative.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...