Who is "Hugo Talks"?

[Grumpy Owl]

On 8/13/2022 at 12:42 PM, oddsnsods said:

Is true, I never knew this.

 

 

On 8/13/2022 at 2:25 PM, Mitochondrial Eve said:

Well, well, well. It seems that Hugo is indeed a Harry and Meghan fan boy which runs counter to the anti-establishment stance he supposedly takes. Hypocrisy abounds as I understand Hugo heavily criticised Neil Oliver for "boot licking the head of the state" (the Queen).

 

I haven't trusted Hugo for some time - not since the New Age Doctors videos which were clear religiously motivated disinfo to me and which I called out at the time. I unsubscribed from all of his channels then but the Hugo Talks Facebook group can be viewed publicly which confirms he posts there as "Hugo Waverly".

 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/891553834934792

 

My view is that Hugo started out by winning the trust of alternative thinkers but, after gaining a reputation and following, has more recently switched tack to sowing division by calling out everyone else within the independent media as controlled opposition and as being part of a Satanic agenda.

 

Thanks @oddsnsodsfor the Tweet above which does provide many great leads including the "Who is Hugo?" video below.

 

The Meghan Markle & Prince Harry News YT channel can be found here but all videos older than May 2021 appear to have been hidden or taken down. This coincides with the time when the new presenter "Alex" took over from "Hugo" which is the oldest video to be found. The archived website can be found here https://meghanharrynews.com/.

 

Here are the Facebook groups / pages referred to:

 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/meghanandharrynews

https://www.facebook.com/hugo.waverly

 

 

There is also this archived Tweet, taken from Annie Watson's research, which links Hugo Talks with the Harry and Meghan news site / channel.

 

Hugo is certainly also Yellow Film King as Annie Watson's Tweets suggest. The voice over is identical when watching the Yellow Film King video below. And he might be Intelligentsia too which is a YT channel containing some very early Hugo Talks videos.

 

 

 

Thanks for this, its all very interesting and also a little sinister, as it throws some doubts as to his honesty and integrity.

 

He's certainly a very prolific character, if he's still doing some of those other channels at the same time.

 

It makes you wonder if he is just reading off someone else's scripts, and if so, who is writing them for him?

 

 

[Grumpy Owl]

On 8/13/2022 at 2:25 PM, Mitochondrial Eve said:

Hugo is certainly also Yellow Film King as Annie Watson's Tweets suggest. The voice over is identical when watching the Yellow Film King video below. And he might be Intelligentsia too which is a YT channel containing some very early Hugo Talks videos.

 

On reflection, I'm not ready to start wading in with a pitchfork, unless some confirmed evidence comes forward that Hugo is definitely a controlled opposition shill.

 

I looked at both those YT channels, and neither have been active in over a year.

 

I'll give anyone the benefit of the doubt, after all anyone can change their opinion or viewpoint on anything.

 

Perhaps it is true that he was involved in these other YT channels before, such as 'Harry and Meghan News' (seriously a channel devoted to that pair?), maybe he had some dawning realisation or worked out that what he was doing/peddling was just a load of tat?

 

I don't think we should all write him off just yet, I mean just consider the possibility that he may have 'rattled some cages' recently, especially with regards to recent videos he has made warning people about 'controlled opposition', and thus we now have some concerted efforts to 'out' him and discredit him.

 

For what its worth, I think he made some good points in his 'Trump New Age Doctors' video and its followup.

 

There are 'pied pipers' all around us, and yes it is increasingly difficult to know who you can trust. The trick is to not just blindly follow where you are being led, and use your own judgement and reason, and follow your own instincts.

 

I will continue to watch Hugo Talks' videos, but I will exercise a degree of caution from now on.

[Macnamara]

7 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

To be fair, Neil Oliver supports her maj!  And Hugo Talks promoted Harry and Megan.  What a tangled web.

 

 

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Oliver

 

 

 

the key word in that clip of neil speaking is 'continuity'

 

That i think is neil's primary concern and it is one that I have sympathies with in this time of rapid change

 

Im reading Neil's book 'The story of the british isles in 100 places' at the moment and i'm about a quarter of the way through. It's a love affair with the british isles and that love affair is one that i share. Yes there is plenty of orthodox history in it but he also speaks of more ethereal aspects as well and i've been impressed by his commentary during the scamdemic. I like to think he is on a journey of discovery, like the rest of us

 

Its no secret that i am not a fan of the crown and yet on the other hand i am also deeply cautious about change because i know that not all change is good.

 

I think neil sees the monarchy as an ancient british institution and part of the long established furniture of these islands and i think his support for the queen there is more a call for continuity with the past. Its tricky situation for me

 

I was a libertarian-socialist in my youth and was kicking back a bit against my british upbringing and was in danger of becoming atheistic but i walked past a church once and there was singing coming from inside. The church was part of a larger complex with ruins around it and it struck me that a part of me would be saddened if that singing was forever silenced. I never did manage to shake off my british upbringing and like neil i think a connection to the past is important

Edited August 14, 2022 by Macnamara

[Mitochondrial Eve]

2 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

On reflection, I'm not ready to start wading in with a pitchfork, unless some confirmed evidence comes forward that Hugo is definitely a controlled opposition shill.

 

I looked at both those YT channels, and neither have been active in over a year.

 

I'll give anyone the benefit of the doubt, after all anyone can change their opinion or viewpoint on anything.

 

Perhaps it is true that he was involved in these other YT channels before, such as 'Harry and Meghan News' (seriously a channel devoted to that pair?), maybe he had some dawning realisation or worked out that what he was doing/peddling was just a load of tat?

 

I don't think we should all write him off just yet, I mean just consider the possibility that he may have 'rattled some cages' recently, especially with regards to recent videos he has made warning people about 'controlled opposition', and thus we now have some concerted efforts to 'out' him and discredit him.

 

For what its worth, I think he made some good points in his 'Trump New Age Doctors' video and its followup.

 

There are 'pied pipers' all around us, and yes it is increasingly difficult to know who you can trust. The trick is to not just blindly follow where you are being led, and use your own judgement and reason, and follow your own instincts.

 

I will continue to watch Hugo Talks' videos, but I will exercise a degree of caution from now on.

 

To respond to your point about getting the pitch forks out, my only concern when judging a person's content is whether or not it stacks up truthfully. I do not approve of witch hunts and certainly do not blindly follow any lynch mob - however, I will question the alternative media as much as the MSM. If the information somebody posts does not turn out to be accurate, that content creator becomes less reliable to me and I am less inclined to trust them. It doesn't mean they are necessarily "controlled opposition" or a "shill", however, their content may not be trustworthy.

 

From what I have seen of Hugo, he puts out a lot of dubious info. Examples of this include the new age doctors, triple helix and Ukrainian wartime payments videos. Yes, we all make mistakes so that doesn't necessarily make someone untrustworthy as they could, instead, simply be mistaken. However, in Hugo's case - as opposed to Richard D Hall who has been known to issue corrections to his content - he doesn't ever acknowledge he has made a mistake. A reliable and trustworthy person, in my eyes, will rectify any errors they have made. Instead, I find Hugo hides behind a veneer of innocence whilst planting seeds of doubt, claiming that he is only asking questions / putting it out there and, in a more subtle way, undermining others.

 

Even if we are to allow that Hugo has had a change of heart since the Harry and Meghan channel / site, it still seems pretty rich for him to come out and criticise Neil Oliver for the same royalist sympathy Hugo apparently held. If we are to allow that Hugo may have had different stages of "awakening", surely we have to allow that for Neil Oliver too? Or even that he simply has a, shock horror, different opinion? I would therefore have thought that Hugo might understand that there are different levels of the "rabbit hole" but, rather than accept nuance and that there may be gaps in his understanding, he instead publicly disparages other people resisting the encroaching tyranny, many of which have been doing so for far longer than he. And nobody knows who he is either especially given that he only popped up on the alt media scene two years ago.

 

As for others now having an axe to grind against Hugo, I am frankly not surprised. Whilst you speak of pitch forks against Hugo, other content creators - such as Dan Astin Gregory - have already experienced that off the back of Hugo's inaccurate content about them.

 

In light of the above, the impression I am left with regarding Hugo is that he is trying to build up a niche fan base as a money making enterprise rather than being motivated by a search for truth. Whilst warning of pied pipers, Hugo doesn't seem to practice what he preaches and isn't immune to contradictions in the way he presents himself.

[EnigmaticWorld]

5 hours ago, Macnamara said:

Its no secret that i am not a fan of the crown and yet on the other hand i am also deeply cautious about change because i know that not all change is good.

 

Agreed. People are right to have an issue with the royals, but they should also be wary of jumping on any anti-monarchy bandwagons that are not coming from our own people. We need our own movements, not movements that just lead to the next step in the elites plans. The elites only push anti-monarchy and anti-western sentiment because they know they can create a new order if they scapegoat the last system as evil and colonialist, but how can they point the finger when they're supremacists that want the world for themselves? Screw the royals and those that are planning the next stage of our misery. I honestly think TPTB used Britain as a base of operations to plunder the world, and I also think they want to leave us hanging now they have placed themselves at the top of society.

 

The most frustrating part is the lack of self-awareness from low IQ idiots. They think they're stunning and brave for attacking anything that they deem as white or western because of things some white people (as well as others) did a long time ago, but the elites that actually allow these people to attack our way of life had a much bigger hand in colonialism and slavery. Why don't the idiots ever go for them? They're like confused attack dogs taking their anger out on the wrong people, and they're enabled by the people that they're supposed to hate but they don't see it.

 

TLDR: In short, I don't like the royals, but I also don't trust certain cliques that want me to dislike the royals for their agenda.

Edited August 15, 2022 by EnigmaticWorld

[Golden Retriever]

5 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Agreed. People are right to have an issue with the royals, but they should also be wary of jumping on any anti-monarchy bandwagons that are not coming from our own people.

 

Absolutely.

 

Although the Russian Royal Family didn't really care about their people imo, what followed was much, much worse.

 

Execution of the Russian Royal Romanov family by the (((Bolsheviks)))

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family

 

[Macnamara]

6 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

The most frustrating part is the lack of self-awareness from low IQ idiots. They think they're stunning and brave for attacking anything that they deem as white or western because of things some white people (as well as others) did a long time ago, but the elites that actually allow these people to attack our way of life had a much bigger hand in colonialism and slavery. Why don't the idiots ever go for them?

 

such people in the soviet were called 'useful idiots' because they are easily led by the nose to support aspects of the agenda without ever seeing it as part of a wider agenda

[Macnamara]

10 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 I find Hugo hides behind a veneer of innocence whilst planting seeds of doubt, claiming that he is only asking questions / putting it out there and, in a more subtle way, undermining others.

 

 I would therefore have thought that Hugo might understand that there are different levels of the "rabbit hole" but, rather than accept nuance and that there may be gaps in his understanding, he instead publicly disparages other people resisting the encroaching tyranny, many of which have been doing so for far longer than he. And nobody knows who he is either especially given that he only popped up on the alt media scene two years ago.

 

Obama appointed Cass Sunstein to act as his internet tzar to combat the rise of conspiracy theories and one of the suggestions that sunstein came up with was for the government to create cyber agents whose job it would be to go into chat rooms and forums online and to say things that sowed confusion and doubt. When people are then torn in two directions unable to know which one is true they become neutralised because they are unable to act through lack of direction. They called this tactic: COGNITIVE INFILTRATION as it is actually infiltrating peoples cognition.

 

Certainly Hugo seems to want us to doubt a lot of people but on the other hand Richie Allen has always spoken about a 'truther industrial complex' and i think it would be naive to think that 'they' wouldn't infiltrate a growing movement and create a CONTROLLED OPPOSITION

 

So the question facing us is to what extent that controlled opposition is? Is Hugo casting his net too wide or is Hugo in fact the controlled opposition? One thing going against him is that he did just pop up out of no where with these very slick  but anonymised videos but that isn't in itself proof of nefarious intent but certainly that is what you WOULD expect from a state funded enterprise.

 

Something to monitor for sure

Edited August 15, 2022 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

On 8/14/2022 at 11:16 AM, alexa said:

The latest video from Hugo Talks: I personally haven't found anything wrong with Hugo as of yet.

 

 

 

i thought that was a good video

 

I agree that the cabal are trying to counterfeit creation and mark passio speaks about how they placed the one eye on the dollar bill. Even the word 'bill' is significant as the elites worship baal / bil / bull as the dark sun

 

The one eye being the third eye which is opened through the balancing of the two hemispheres of the brain so by placing that on their money the elite are trying to appropriate the image of enlightenment so that people associate money which is an illusion with that which enables you to see through illusion

 

Everything they do is a counterfeit and an inversion and it makes perfect sense that they would use the internet and the metaverse to create an entire counterfeit reality. I would go further than Hugo to say that i believe that the intelligence that is behind all of this is the demon behind the AI and that the dark occultists who have made themselves the conduit of that force in this realm are building a PHYSICAL body for that demon through the creation of the internet, digital world and the 'internet of things'

 

The elites are connecting everything and making everything automated and autonomous including military hardware which means that anything connected to the internet of things becomes part of the physical body of the demon. They connect voting machines to the internet, they connect drones to it, they connect missiles to it! Their ultimate goal of course is to connect humans to it and elon musk is working at creating a 'neural lace' interface between humans and the machines. The CIA have been working on 'stimo-ceivers' for decades. Its little wonder then that many of us have suspected the covid jabs may contain nanotechnology as that would be a way to trick people into becoming 'smart' which is to say connected to the 'cloud' which is of course controlled by the artificial intelligence

Lawyers could have electronic chips implanted in their BRAINS: Neurotechnology could cut costs by allowing solicitors to scan years of background material in a fraction of the time, report suggests

• Brain implants could reduce the number of lawyers required to work on a case
• Clients could pay for their services by unit of attention rather than by hour
• A report claims neurotechnology in society could pose new ethical issues
• Lawyers may have to consider that their defendants' chips could be hacked 

By Fiona Jackson For Mailonline

Published: 14:56 BST, 15 August 2022 | Updated: 15:10 BST, 15 August 2022

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11112653/Brain-implants-let-lawyers-scan-years-material-fraction-time-report-suggests.html

 

Edited August 15, 2022 by Macnamara

[Doc]

After reading this thread I'm starting to think maybe 'Hugo' is just a professional YouTuber. He seems to have a lot of channels, some more active than others. I believe he may have dipped his toe into a few different ponds to see which one is most profitable. Obviously the 'conspiracy' stuff is quite lucrative for him. He may even be the 'front' of a team that makes the videos. The info presented in his vids is pretty much the same stuff we talk about here but after the fact, so when I do watch one of his videos it's usually nothing I haven't heard before. Also,something about his voice makes me think he's of Indian/Pakistani decent.

Edited August 15, 2022 by Doc

[alexa]

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

i thought that was a good video

 

I agree that the cabal are trying to counterfeit creation and mark passio speaks about how they placed the one eye on the dollar bill. Even the word 'bill' is significant as the elites worship baal / bil / bull as the dark sun

 

The one eye being the third eye which is opened through the balancing of the two hemispheres of the brain so by placing that on their money the elite are trying to appropriate the image of enlightenment so that people associate money which is an illusion with that which enables you to see through illusion

 

Everything they do is a counterfeit and an inversion and it makes perfect sense that they would use the internet and the metaverse to create an entire counterfeit reality. I would go further than Hugo to say that i believe that the intelligence that is behind all of this is the demon behind the AI and that the dark occultists who have made themselves the conduit of that force in this realm are building a PHYSICAL body for that demon through the creation of the internet, digital world and the 'internet of things'

 

The elites are connecting everything and making everything automated and autonomous including military hardware which means that anything connected to the internet of things becomes part of the physical body of the demon. They connect voting machines to the internet, they connect drones to it, they connect missiles to it! Their ultimate goal of course is to connect humans to it and elon musk is working at creating a 'neural lace' interface between humans and the machines. The CIA have been working on 'stimo-ceivers' for decades. Its little wonder then that many of us have suspected the covid jabs may contain nanotechnology as that would be a way to trick people into becoming 'smart' which is to say connected to the 'cloud' which is of course controlled by the artificial intelligence

Lawyers could have electronic chips implanted in their BRAINS: Neurotechnology could cut costs by allowing solicitors to scan years of background material in a fraction of the time, report suggests

• Brain implants could reduce the number of lawyers required to work on a case
• Clients could pay for their services by unit of attention rather than by hour
• A report claims neurotechnology in society could pose new ethical issues
• Lawyers may have to consider that their defendants' chips could be hacked 

By Fiona Jackson For Mailonline

Published: 14:56 BST, 15 August 2022 | Updated: 15:10 BST, 15 August 2022

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11112653/Brain-implants-let-lawyers-scan-years-material-fraction-time-report-suggests.html

 

 

Agree 100%, they don't call it the web for ought. 

[alexa]

1 hour ago, Doc said:

I believe he may have dipped his toe into a few different ponds to see which one is most profitable

 

Or maybe he's dipped his toe in one to many & the establishment want to take him down. He does seem to bend more towards the truth every time although his voice does tend to get on my nerves a bit.

[Grumpy Owl]

20 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

From what I have seen of Hugo, he puts out a lot of dubious info. Examples of this include the new age doctors, triple helix and Ukrainian wartime payments videos. Yes, we all make mistakes so that doesn't necessarily make someone untrustworthy as they could, instead, simply be mistaken. However, in Hugo's case - as opposed to Richard D Hall who has been known to issue corrections to his content - he doesn't ever acknowledge he has made a mistake. A reliable and trustworthy person, in my eyes, will rectify any errors they have made. Instead, I find Hugo hides behind a veneer of innocence whilst planting seeds of doubt, claiming that he is only asking questions / putting it out there and, in a more subtle way, undermining others.

 

I would agree with that sentiment. Much of what Hugo used to put out was stuff that had been shared here in this forum, the kind of stuff that gets frantically shared amongst the various Telegram groups which has been posted on the likes of Bitchute, and expecially during the Covid pandemic I did question here before how much disinfo/misinfo was being 'seeded' within these groups in the hope that they would be shared amongst the various 'conspiracy circles', and in effect 'muddy the waters'.

 

Hugo came across to me as someone who regularly received emails about "the latest bombshell" and would then make a video about it.

 

I agree with what you say about Richard D Hall, he is not as 'prolific' as the likes of Hugo Talks, his videos are quite detailed and well researched and yes, he has put his hands up recently and removed a video where the findings were brought into question.

 

21 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

In light of the above, the impression I am left with regarding Hugo is that he is trying to build up a niche fan base as a money making enterprise rather than being motivated by a search for truth. Whilst warning of pied pipers, Hugo doesn't seem to practice what he preaches and isn't immune to contradictions in the way he presents himself.

I am also of the same opinion, that he has seized an opportunity to make money, but then again, he does often post videos that don't appear on Youtube (the ones he says are 'too spicy'), and I haven't yet looked into how people can make money from posting videos on Odysee etc.

 

He's keen for people to subscribe to his website, though again I'm not sure how he would make money from this, as he doesn't appear to be running any adverts there, and he only uses the same Jetpack plugin for Wordpress that I use on my own website (and I'm not making thousands of pounds a day out of that, though that was never my intention!)

 

I do still have the feeling that someone else is writing most of his material, and Hugo is just another 'frontman'.

3 hours ago, Doc said:

After reading this thread I'm starting to think maybe 'Hugo' is just a professional YouTuber. He seems to have a lot of channels, some more active than others. I believe he may have dipped his toe into a few different ponds to see which one is most profitable. Obviously the 'conspiracy' stuff is quite lucrative for him. He may even be the 'front' of a team that makes the videos. The info presented in his vids is pretty much the same stuff we talk about here but after the fact, so when I do watch one of his videos it's usually nothing I haven't heard before. Also,something about his voice makes me think he's of Indian/Pakistani decent.

 

When I first came across and started watching the Hugo Talks videos on Youtube, the one thing that did tweak my curiosity was that in the 'About' section on his Youtube channel, his location was specified as Ireland. Yet to me, his voice and accent was clearly from London/Essex. Now I know its not uncommon for people from the UK to move to Ireland, but I did think that a bit odd.

[Oakwise]

22 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

. . .I did question here before how much disinfo/misinfo was being 'seeded' within these groups in the hope that they would be shared amongst the various 'conspiracy circles', and in effect 'muddy the waters'.

 

That's been going on for decades. All they've done is pour ink into already muddy water. All kinds of bullshit has been seeded, and those without crit. thinking skills jump on the various bandwagons and it becomes their treasured 'thing'. Like, for example, all the Hitler-lovers. Hitler fanboy material was seeded into the truth-sphere with the full knowledge that a bunch of pseudo-intellectuals and gullible, average IQ folk will buy it uncritically, and then go out and proselytise about it like a bunch of supercilious preachers. The strategic aim is to position the truth / freedom movement as a bunch of crazy right-wing extremists, neo-Nazis etc.

 

And boy is it working to a certain degree! They walked straight into that one! And the sad thing is, they can't even see it. They genuinely believe they're more intelligent, more informed than what they actually are. The next phase is Gladio C: Right-wing terrorism driven by 'dangerous conspiracy theories' as a way to discredit alternative media etc. And you've just played right into the oligarchy's hands.

 

However, it's not too late to abandon the foolishness. 

 

[Macnamara]

22 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

i thought that was a good video

 

I agree that the cabal are trying to counterfeit creation and mark passio speaks about how they placed the one eye on the dollar bill. Even the word 'bill' is significant as the elites worship baal / bil / bull as the dark sun

 

The one eye being the third eye which is opened through the balancing of the two hemispheres of the brain so by placing that on their money the elite are trying to appropriate the image of enlightenment so that people associate money which is an illusion with that which enables you to see through illusion

 

Everything they do is a counterfeit and an inversion and it makes perfect sense that they would use the internet and the metaverse to create an entire counterfeit reality. I would go further than Hugo to say that i believe that the intelligence that is behind all of this is the demon behind the AI and that the dark occultists who have made themselves the conduit of that force in this realm are building a PHYSICAL body for that demon through the creation of the internet, digital world and the 'internet of things'

 

The elites are connecting everything and making everything automated and autonomous including military hardware which means that anything connected to the internet of things becomes part of the physical body of the demon. They connect voting machines to the internet, they connect drones to it, they connect missiles to it! Their ultimate goal of course is to connect humans to it and elon musk is working at creating a 'neural lace' interface between humans and the machines. The CIA have been working on 'stimo-ceivers' for decades. Its little wonder then that many of us have suspected the covid jabs may contain nanotechnology as that would be a way to trick people into becoming 'smart' which is to say connected to the 'cloud' which is of course controlled by the artificial intelligence

Lawyers could have electronic chips implanted in their BRAINS: Neurotechnology could cut costs by allowing solicitors to scan years of background material in a fraction of the time, report suggests

• Brain implants could reduce the number of lawyers required to work on a case
• Clients could pay for their services by unit of attention rather than by hour
• A report claims neurotechnology in society could pose new ethical issues
• Lawyers may have to consider that their defendants' chips could be hacked 

By Fiona Jackson For Mailonline

Published: 14:56 BST, 15 August 2022 | Updated: 15:10 BST, 15 August 2022

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11112653/Brain-implants-let-lawyers-scan-years-material-fraction-time-report-suggests.html

 

 

AI: A secular look at the Digital Antichrist

https://www.technocracy.news/ai-a-secular-look-at-the-digital-antichrist/

[Steven Tansell]

On 8/15/2022 at 4:26 PM, Doc said:

After reading this thread I'm starting to think maybe 'Hugo' is just a professional YouTuber. He seems to have a lot of channels, some more active than others. I believe he may have dipped his toe into a few different ponds to see which one is most profitable. Obviously the 'conspiracy' stuff is quite lucrative for him. He may even be the 'front' of a team that makes the videos. The info presented in his vids is pretty much the same stuff we talk about here but after the fact, so when I do watch one of his videos it's usually nothing I haven't heard before. Also,something about his voice makes me think he's of Indian/Pakistani decent.

Or Welsh, they have the same sing song lilt in their voices, whenever someone called Mary or Jane, but are clearly India based phone to sell me something, I always ask what the weather is like in Cardiff? A lady phoned me some time back about my 'recent accident' something that was absolute news to me! So, 'in for a penny in for a pound' as the saying goes!  I said 'blimey that was quick, it only happened about half an hour ago' She said 'can you talk me through it'? I said 'O.K., well I was going down Wilson Avenue towards Brighton seafront when I was distracted by a clown running along the grass verge with a very old nun sitting on his shoulders! I've seen many strange sights in my life, but this was 'virgin on the rediculous'! Suddenly, right there in front of me was a U.F.O. flying very low across the road in front of me, I tried to swerve and avoid the U.F.O., but, HELLO ARE YOU STILL THERE? HELLO'? I seemed to have lost the connection? That was quite some time ago, and she still hasn't phoned back yet!

[Athenry04]

I like his videos, i'll be honest. But in truth it does bother me that from the start he was been warning that he may be de-platformed by youtube, but yet this has never happened, some of his vidoes have been taken down, but on the whole his youtube channel appears unmolested, wheras many others were booted from youtube back in 2020. The fact he is still allowed to put videos on youtube is interesting.

Edited October 24, 2022 by Athenry04

[alexa]

On 8/14/2022 at 11:16 AM, alexa said:

I personally haven't found anything wrong with Hugo as of yet.

 

 

[Macnamara]

^ interesting video there....sounds like hugo has found faith

 

Its interesting what he says at the end about us needing stability and foundation from which to then build our life so that we don't drift into corruption and decay. I was listening to mark passion saying essentially the same thing but citing natural law as the foundation upon which to build

 

So two different perspective but both saying that humans need a moral framework from which to then create their life and certainly in the void left by the breakdown of christianity i think we are seeing the forces of darkness seeking to pull the now unanchored masses into the morass of degeneracy

Edited October 28, 2022 by Macnamara

[alexa]

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

i think we are seeing the forces of darkness seeking to pull the now unanchored masses into the morass of degeneracy

 

Unfortunately, as we are nearing the end of days we are going to see a lot more of this.

[TetraG]

5 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

Unfortunately, as we are nearing the end of days we are going to see a lot more of this.

 

 

Ripple Effect turning one extreme into a multiple of extremes all happening at once....

 

Possible Silly Answer:

We NEEEEED Anchor Man,,,, Sorry. I am not brainwashed I am not brainwashed. I am NOT.

[TetraG]

On 8/14/2022 at 9:11 PM, Macnamara said:

 

That i think is neil's primary concern and it is one that I have sympathies with in this time of rapid change

 

Im reading Neil's book 'The story of the british isles in 100 places' at the moment and i'm about a quarter of the way through. It's a love affair with the british isles and that love affair is one that i share. Yes there is plenty of orthodox history in it but he also speaks of more ethereal aspects as well and i've been impressed by his commentary during the scamdemic. I like to think he is on a journey of discovery, like the rest of us

 

Its no secret that i am not a fan of the crown and yet on the other hand i am also deeply cautious about change because i know that not all change is good.

 

Sounds reasonable. Read on my friend, his book, maybe come back and review it again by the time you are reaching the end, would you mind?..

 

On 8/14/2022 at 10:54 PM, Mitochondrial Eve said:

I would therefore have thought that Hugo might understand that there are different levels of the "rabbit hole" but, rather than accept nuance and that there may be gaps in his understanding, he instead publicly disparages other people resisting the encroaching tyranny, many of which have been doing so for far longer than he. And nobody knows who he is either especially given that he only popped up on the alt media scene two years ago.

 

Excuse my slight cross choreography of mind, but are you still talking about Neil Oliver at this point ending that particular paragraph- Mito?
Just ratifying just in case of doubt by anyone, (although your post there was a really great post, allowing room for nuance in particular, your post as one of the few I have read so far).

......

Reason I ask is mostly about which I put as BOLD, as that is "concerning", but not so much if it's said about HUGO I suppose given all said by various members airing on the side of caution in the wake of HUGO. and yet in the case where we turn our attention to Neil it would seem contradictory to Neil Oliver if it were he being mentioned about him, even when to be  scrutinizing any person of note to some degree is necessary........But No, I think I have it down as you are pointing in BOLD purely at HUGO it seems to be whom you are pointing to, yep think so concerning right there. Hope I've got that straight. 

 

 

ETA: not forgetting for those not aware, HUGO is representative of it's maker, ie, takes after his (of by himself the owner) name as I understand.

Edited October 28, 2022 by TetraG

[TetraG]

btw, ALEXA, sorry sorry sorry - as being pigeon-holed by such a small selection of non-multifarious (unvaried) emojis, I cannot bring myself to LIKE your post as it's appalling to say "I like the sound of the world coming to an end." ...But EXTREME THANKS for your LIKE you gave to my equally horrific post! 

Edited October 28, 2022 by TetraG

[greatreject]

Hugo's done... I used to subscribe to this guy. He hasn't got a clue.

 

https://hugotalks.com/2022/11/20/david-icke-petition-psyop-hugo-talks/

[Rory]

After watching Hugo's latest hysterical diatribe against David I have strong suspicions that he s not just 'controlled opposition' but directly out of MI5's stables. I include the link here to his recent diatribe, https://odysee.com/@hugotalks:8/Icke-Petition-Psyop-Hugo-Talks2:0

Perhaps David can turn the spotlight on Hugo and his tawdry little games?