Jump to content

How Many Of You Will Be Celebrating Liz's Jubilee This Weekend ?


alexa
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Queen reportedly banned Harry and Meghan from having a photographer snap the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet for the first time.

I wonder WHY ?

A supposed picture of Lilibet on her first birthday but still no picture of Archie.

 

image_2022-06-07_065445711.png.e9deec5d1e3d7e3d7e3a14d0856c3e22.png

 

DM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So apparently you can choose when you die.....:classic_unsure:

 

'It was a JOKE!' Dame Deborah James hits back at critics after saying she 'wouldn't die over the Jubilee weekend' because she 'didn't want  Meghan Markle to steal her thunder' 

58740561-0-image-a-6_1654515041944.jpg

Deborah James, 40, from London, who is currently receiving hospice at home care, posted on Twitter to clarify a comment about Meghan Markle had been 'a joke' as she hit back at critics.

 

She apparently said it as joke...........Or did she ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

It's vital this sort of info isn't allowed to fade from memory, and the links between all these people and events is not forgotten.

 

Yes so much has been lost from the original David Icke forum and other sites.

 

This link is very good imo for the connections. Originally a Twitter thread I believe, but deleted.

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1283513167625281542.html

 

 

EdAvBZ0XgAAT0hn.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, alexa said:

The Queen reportedly banned Harry and Meghan from having a photographer snap the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet for the first time.

I wonder WHY ?

A supposed picture of Lilibet on her first birthday but still no picture of Archie.

 

image_2022-06-07_065445711.png.e9deec5d1e3d7e3d7e3a14d0856c3e22.png

 

DM

Can anyone advise why the above is an official photo of Lilibet, and so is this picture of a clearly different child..?

 

https://imgur.com/a/3K6Tph7

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Can anyone advise why the above is an official photo of Lilibet,

 

Cus it was published in the Daily Fail¬†ūüėā

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10891893/Inside-Lilibets-birthday-party-Photos-reveal-Meghan-Harrys-intimate-backyard-picnic.html

 

She does seem to have the same button nose tho.

Edited by alexa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree it does look photoshopped but even if it is, it's being presented in more than one place as the official photo (just took me several attempts on my grotty phone to get that particular link posted). 

 

I'll search again later when I'm home.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excuses, excuses, excuses,:classic_rolleyes:

 

Royal experts say Harry and Meghan would have been 'incredibly cheeky' if they asked to bring photographer to capture Queen and Lilibet - as it emerges Sussexes 'spent no solo time with William and Kate during Jubilee' 

58761783-0-image-m-83_1654554199428.jpg

The Sussexes reportedly wanted their own photographer to capture the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet at Windsor.

DM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, alexa said:

Excuses, excuses, excuses,:classic_rolleyes:

 

Royal experts say Harry and Meghan would have been 'incredibly cheeky' if they asked to bring photographer to capture Queen and Lilibet - as it emerges Sussexes 'spent no solo time with William and Kate during Jubilee' 

58761783-0-image-m-83_1654554199428.jpg

The Sussexes reportedly wanted their own photographer to capture the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet at Windsor.

DM

Maybe they will whisk away one of these children like they did with some nephews and nieces

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2022 at 5:43 PM, alexa said:

Hilarious and barmy... the final parade was so very British: This barmy and delightful three-hour compendium of memories and tributes was part-carnival, part-Olympic opening ceremony, part-Cup Final procession.

 

I reckon¬†Louis had¬†the the right idea¬†ūüėÖ

 

1052401753_apagent.PNG.89e0fbc4a6cb7fceb8783a31d1485861.PNG

 

590126298_apagent2.PNG.2628f1be8281a54dcff54994ba578d67.PNG

 

1885741816_apagent3.PNG.abcdf82abfd86cf9384863fb9110b2c7.PNG

 

2045181423_apagent4.PNG.10cdaa1aa09400a736e91dfb800da420.PNG

 

1205158856_apagent5.PNG.296061d2d0a980b64d03f8290128da58.PNG

 

The Best Bit -The End

 

Every single one of those people is a total and irredeemable cunt.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking of the Jimmy Saville thread in this thread, I'm personally of the opinion that the hack was done on purpose to destroy the information contained within that thread. That thread had so much detail, so many names, so many links and dots connected, that someone wanted it gone. Hence the whole of the old forum was removed. Just my opinion.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Athenry04 said:

Talking of the Jimmy Saville thread in this thread, I'm personally of the opinion that the hack was done on purpose to destroy the information contained within that thread. That thread had so much detail, so many names, so many links and dots connected, that someone wanted it gone. Hence the whole of the old forum was removed. Just my opinion.

 

that doesn't explain why the following forum was hacked as well as that didn't have a jimmy saville thread

 

imo they wanted something gone that was on both forums

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

 

that doesn't explain why the following forum was hacked as well as that didn't have a jimmy saville thread

 

imo they wanted something gone that was on both forums

 

Yeah, no idea about the second one, but that Saville thread was incredibly detailed and named names with evidence. The second hack, I presume might have been at attempt to stop the forum ever gathering such a large amount of members and momentum ever again. It may have worked, there are less members and more 'agitators' these days I guess. But clearly when you are over the target, some one somewhere steps in.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Athenry04 said:

Yeah, no idea about the second one, but that Saville thread was incredibly detailed and named names with evidence. The second hack, I presume might have been at attempt to stop the forum ever gathering such a large amount of members and momentum ever again. It may have worked, there are less members and more 'agitators' these days I guess. But clearly when you are over the target, some one somewhere steps in.

 

what i do know for sure is that much of what is happening now was predicted on those two previous forums and that if people were able to see those two forums they would be able to see that so called 'conspiracy theorists' were just people able to see further down the tracks

 

they can't allow society to see conspiracy theorists that way. They cannot allow us to have credibility in the eyes of the general population because then people might actually start listening to us

 

They don't mind us as long as we are a tiny fringe minority that they can ridicule and alienate but if people could see posts from the last decade being proven constantly correct through events as they play out then it becomes much harder for them to portray conspiracy theorists as fringe lunatics because lunatics don't make correct calls all the time

 

that's also why they have their agents here working around the clock to fill this forum up with complete crap so that it makes conspiracy theorists look like whackjobs to anyone who might come down here to see what we are talking about

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

The hack/removal of threads makes a lot of sense after reading the last few posts.

 

especially when you consider that they were about to play out their covid scamdemic with its lockdowns which would inevitably create an upswing in interest in 'conspiracy theories'

 

we just got a big nod in the mainstream news from neil oliver who said conspiracy theorists were just the people who called it ahead of time. That kind of mainstreaming of the truth is what the dark occultists will fight tooth and nail to prevent and that's why they are bringing in new legislation to control the intenet

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2022 at 10:07 PM, Golden Retriever said:

Dear oh dear Neil Oliver.ūüôĄ

 

 

so you think he should say

"doesnt the queen look marvellous, eating children makes her skin look so soft after all these years"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...