alexa Posted June 7, 2022 Author Share Posted June 7, 2022 7 hours ago, Golden Retriever said: Dear oh dear Neil Oliver.    I feel sick again 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted June 7, 2022 Author Share Posted June 7, 2022 The Queen reportedly banned Harry and Meghan from having a photographer snap the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet for the first time. I wonder WHY ? A supposed picture of Lilibet on her first birthday but still no picture of Archie. Â Â DM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted June 7, 2022 Author Share Posted June 7, 2022 So apparently you can choose when you die.....  'It was a JOKE!' Dame Deborah James hits back at critics after saying she 'wouldn't die over the Jubilee weekend' because she 'didn't want Meghan Markle to steal her thunder' Deborah James, 40, from London, who is currently receiving hospice at home care, posted on Twitter to clarify a comment about Meghan Markle had been 'a joke' as she hit back at critics.  She apparently said it as joke...........Or did she ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Retriever Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 14 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said: It's vital this sort of info isn't allowed to fade from memory, and the links between all these people and events is not forgotten.  Yes so much has been lost from the original David Icke forum and other sites.  This link is very good imo for the connections. Originally a Twitter thread I believe, but deleted.  https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1283513167625281542.html   1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinfoil Hat Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 6 hours ago, alexa said: The Queen reportedly banned Harry and Meghan from having a photographer snap the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet for the first time. I wonder WHY ? A supposed picture of Lilibet on her first birthday but still no picture of Archie. Â Â DM Can anyone advise why the above is an official photo of Lilibet, and so is this picture of a clearly different child..? Â https://imgur.com/a/3K6Tph7 Â Â Â 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted June 7, 2022 Author Share Posted June 7, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said: Can anyone advise why the above is an official photo of Lilibet,  Cus it was published in the Daily Fail  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10891893/Inside-Lilibets-birthday-party-Photos-reveal-Meghan-Harrys-intimate-backyard-picnic.html  She does seem to have the same button nose tho. Edited June 7, 2022 by alexa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Retriever Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 16 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said: Can anyone advise why the above is an official photo of Lilibet, and so is this picture of a clearly different child..? Â https://imgur.com/a/3K6Tph7 Â Â Â Â The photo in the link you provided looks dodgy i.e. photo shopped to me, but I'm no expert. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 Harry looks totally photoshopped in that linked pic. WTF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinfoil Hat Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 I agree it does look photoshopped but even if it is, it's being presented in more than one place as the official photo (just took me several attempts on my grotty phone to get that particular link posted).  I'll search again later when I'm home. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 32 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said: Â The photo in the link you provided looks dodgy i.e. photo shopped to me, but I'm no expert. Â Original. Â Â That manipulation can't be an official image, surely? 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemuri Kyoshiro Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 3 hours ago, Golden Retriever said: Yes so much has been lost from the original David Icke forum and other sites. RonisRon put some great stuff up on the old site. Whatever happened to all that data? Is it irretrievably lost? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinfoil Hat Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 2 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said: Â Original. Â Â That manipulation can't be an official image, surely? Good one Enigmatic! It's just someone playing silly beggars then. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Retriever Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 4 hours ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said: RonisRon put some great stuff up on the old site. Whatever happened to all that data? Is it irretrievably lost? Â Afaik it's not irretrievably lost. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinfoil Hat Posted June 7, 2022 Share Posted June 7, 2022 17 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:  Afaik it's not irretrievably lost. Well that's what we've been told, but I've yet to see any evidence of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted June 8, 2022 Author Share Posted June 8, 2022 Excuses, excuses, excuses,  Royal experts say Harry and Meghan would have been 'incredibly cheeky' if they asked to bring photographer to capture Queen and Lilibet - as it emerges Sussexes 'spent no solo time with William and Kate during Jubilee' The Sussexes reportedly wanted their own photographer to capture the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet at Windsor. DM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora_Wolf Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 8 minutes ago, alexa said: Excuses, excuses, excuses,  Royal experts say Harry and Meghan would have been 'incredibly cheeky' if they asked to bring photographer to capture Queen and Lilibet - as it emerges Sussexes 'spent no solo time with William and Kate during Jubilee' The Sussexes reportedly wanted their own photographer to capture the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet at Windsor. DM Maybe they will whisk away one of these children like they did with some nephews and nieces Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athenry04 Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 On 6/6/2022 at 5:43 PM, alexa said: Hilarious and barmy... the final parade was so very British: This barmy and delightful three-hour compendium of memories and tributes was part-carnival, part-Olympic opening ceremony, part-Cup Final procession.  I reckon Louis had the the right idea       The Best Bit -The End  Every single one of those people is a total and irredeemable cunt. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athenry04 Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 Talking of the Jimmy Saville thread in this thread, I'm personally of the opinion that the hack was done on purpose to destroy the information contained within that thread. That thread had so much detail, so many names, so many links and dots connected, that someone wanted it gone. Hence the whole of the old forum was removed. Just my opinion. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 7 minutes ago, Athenry04 said: Talking of the Jimmy Saville thread in this thread, I'm personally of the opinion that the hack was done on purpose to destroy the information contained within that thread. That thread had so much detail, so many names, so many links and dots connected, that someone wanted it gone. Hence the whole of the old forum was removed. Just my opinion.  that doesn't explain why the following forum was hacked as well as that didn't have a jimmy saville thread  imo they wanted something gone that was on both forums Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athenry04 Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 1 minute ago, Macnamara said:  that doesn't explain why the following forum was hacked as well as that didn't have a jimmy saville thread  imo they wanted something gone that was on both forums  Yeah, no idea about the second one, but that Saville thread was incredibly detailed and named names with evidence. The second hack, I presume might have been at attempt to stop the forum ever gathering such a large amount of members and momentum ever again. It may have worked, there are less members and more 'agitators' these days I guess. But clearly when you are over the target, some one somewhere steps in. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Athenry04 said: Yeah, no idea about the second one, but that Saville thread was incredibly detailed and named names with evidence. The second hack, I presume might have been at attempt to stop the forum ever gathering such a large amount of members and momentum ever again. It may have worked, there are less members and more 'agitators' these days I guess. But clearly when you are over the target, some one somewhere steps in.  what i do know for sure is that much of what is happening now was predicted on those two previous forums and that if people were able to see those two forums they would be able to see that so called 'conspiracy theorists' were just people able to see further down the tracks  they can't allow society to see conspiracy theorists that way. They cannot allow us to have credibility in the eyes of the general population because then people might actually start listening to us  They don't mind us as long as we are a tiny fringe minority that they can ridicule and alienate but if people could see posts from the last decade being proven constantly correct through events as they play out then it becomes much harder for them to portray conspiracy theorists as fringe lunatics because lunatics don't make correct calls all the time  that's also why they have their agents here working around the clock to fill this forum up with complete crap so that it makes conspiracy theorists look like whackjobs to anyone who might come down here to see what we are talking about Edited June 8, 2022 by Macnamara 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheConsultant Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 The hack/removal of threads makes a lot of sense after reading the last few posts. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, TheConsultant said: The hack/removal of threads makes a lot of sense after reading the last few posts. Â especially when you consider that they were about to play out their covid scamdemic with its lockdowns which would inevitably create an upswing in interest in 'conspiracy theories' Â we just got a big nod in the mainstream news from neil oliver who said conspiracy theorists were just the people who called it ahead of time. That kind of mainstreaming of the truth is what the dark occultists will fight tooth and nail to prevent and that's why they are bringing in new legislation to control the intenet Edited June 8, 2022 by Macnamara 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheConsultant Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 I think it is for everyones benefit that we restart all missing threads, personally. I also think all of those threads and content should be archived offline, including what we have here now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamboozooka Posted June 8, 2022 Share Posted June 8, 2022 On 6/6/2022 at 10:07 PM, Golden Retriever said: Dear oh dear Neil Oliver. Â Â so you think he should say "doesnt the queen look marvellous, eating children makes her skin look so soft after all these years" Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.