Jump to content

Who Built All These & When ?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The question is WHO or WHAT taught the Ancient Egyptians to use relatively basic technology to create incredible marvels.....

 

For me that is the real mystery here.....not the fruitless chase after phantom advanced technological systems which people seem to want to attribute to the Egyptians.

 

The real marvel is that SOMETHING must have taught them how to cut granite using sand.....SOMETHING must have taught them to shape limestone blocks using water...

 

I believe that SOMETHING is the key mystery to all of the riddles and problems we presently face.....This SOMETHING has involved itself in human affairs for thousands of years.

 

I have no wish to take away the mystery of the Pyramids... but for me the greater mystery is the identity of this discarnate force which has trafficked with certain humans for thousands of years and apparently taught them so many of the technological marvels which seem to have occurred, I would say UNNATURALLY in the past 10,000 years.....


Something happened 10,000 years ago....SOMETHING saw humans as a way to express its own being....and USE THEM for its own purpose....


Things like the Ancient Pyramids were just part of that ongoing purpose.....

 

And we can safely say, that looking at the present culmination of this ongoing programme..... this SOMETHING does not have human interests at heart..... but perhaps the contrary...... Indeed, THERE IS an ANCIENT and ongoing conspiracy.......

Edited by Edgewood
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

You would not move 100 ton granite or carve diorite with pure precision & symmetry using copper tools. Would be an insane undertaking.

You're not moving it with muels either. Excellent pictures odds, as you know fascinated by this stuff, will check that video as well. 👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Edgewood said:

What's stupid? Carrying granite using the natural buoyancy of the Nile?

it's stupid to say pyramids were built that way

 

1 hour ago, Edgewood said:

one further and say that perhaps the waters of the Nile, correctly channeled were instrumental in the construction of the Great Pyramids

that could be the case in some way,but only because the water was there to conduct the eletricity

 

1 hour ago, Edgewood said:

No, it makes perfect sense. What's the alternative? Dragging it through the hot desert? 

 

That's not going to work

it makes perfect sense(to hide the true history)

 

Dragging wouldn't work,i agree 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats clear, is the more older stuff found is more quality.

There are machine marks found several examples, like Giza basalt floor. If you research them. Cant be assed to debait with a deboonker who pulls out all the usual arguments, but ignores the real issues with his story.

 

cup #99 in anorthositic gneiss, Catalogue of the exhibition: l'Art... |  Download Scientific DiagramThe Disc of Sabu: Ancient Egyptian Water Pump or Alien Hyperdrive? |  Ancient Origins

Egyptian Stone Vases-The Smoking Gun In The Advanced Technology Debate?,  page 1Head of Anubis, the jackal-headed. God of embalming. Temple of Luxor, reign  of Amenophis III (1403-1365 BC). Diorite. Detail from statue Stock Photo -  Alamy

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

it's stupid to say pyramids were built that way

 

 

So what's your theory?

 

I only suggest the granite blocks were probably transported by water, the Nile is kind of close to the pyramids and there is a great deal of evidence of both water erosion and the actual presence of water even inside the pyramids. Anyone who has been to the pyramids will recognise how damp they are inside and the smell of ammonia which is present in many of the lower chambers of most of the pyramids I visited possibly indicates water reacting with limestone.


Of course the Osireion is mostly underwater too..... But the water level of the Nile would have been so much higher back in the days of Ancient Egypt...It is only the Aswan dam which has made the Pyramids appear to be on a dry sandy outcrop.

 

 

Edited by Edgewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Edgewood said:

The question is WHO or WHAT taught the Ancient Egyptians to use relatively basic technology to create incredible marvels.....

 

For me that is the real mystery here.....not the fruitless chase after phantom advanced technological systems which people seem to want to attribute to the Egyptians.

 

The real marvel is that SOMETHING must have taught them how to cut granite using sand.....SOMETHING must have taught them to shape limestone blocks using water...

 

I believe that SOMETHING is the key mystery to all of the riddles and problems we presently face.....This SOMETHING has involved itself in human affairs for thousands of years.

 

I have no wish to take away the mystery of the Pyramids... but for me the greater mystery is the identity of this discarnate force which has trafficked with certain humans for thousands of years and apparently taught them so many of the technological marvels which seem to have occurred, I would say UNNATURALLY in the past 10,000 years.....


Something happened 10,000 years ago....SOMETHING saw humans as a way to express its own being....and USE THEM for its own purpose....


Things like the Ancient Pyramids were just part of that ongoing purpose.....

 

And we can safely say, that looking at the present culmination of this ongoing programme..... this SOMETHING does not have human interests at heart..... but perhaps the contrary...... Indeed, THERE IS an ANCIENT and ongoing conspiracy.......

 

Now you are talking.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oddsnsods said:

Whats clear, is the more older stuff found is more quality.

There are machine marks found several examples, like Giza basalt floor. If you research them. Cant be assed to debait with a deboonker who pulls out all the usual arguments, but ignores the real issues with his story.

 

cup #99 in anorthositic gneiss, Catalogue of the exhibition: l'Art... |  Download Scientific DiagramThe Disc of Sabu: Ancient Egyptian Water Pump or Alien Hyperdrive? |  Ancient Origins

Egyptian Stone Vases-The Smoking Gun In The Advanced Technology Debate?,  page 1Head of Anubis, the jackal-headed. God of embalming. Temple of Luxor, reign  of Amenophis III (1403-1365 BC). Diorite. Detail from statue Stock Photo -  Alamy

 

The ancient world outclasses modernity in pretty much ever way imo. All this knowledge and the best we can do is make crap that breaks within hours. After the L,Aquila Earthquake a few years ago the modern buildings were damaged to such a degree as to be condemned. The Roman buildings had barely any damage. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bombadil said:

The ancient world outclasses modernity in pretty much ever way imo. All this knowledge and the best we can do is make crap that breaks within hours. After the L,Aquila Earthquake a few years ago the modern buildings were damaged to such a degree as to be condemned. The Roman buildings had barely any damage. 

 

Devolution for sure.👍

That is what archaeology is hiding.

Screenshot 2022-05-21 at 12-06-50 Pin on aliens.png

Screenshot 2022-05-21 at 12-07-15 Pin on aliens.png

Screenshot 2022-05-21 at 12-08-16 Pin on aliens.png

Screenshot 2022-05-21 at 12-06-20 Pin on aliens.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just counted. I've got 63 books on which discuss to some degree or another on this subject. 5 are what I would consider mainstream. I go on the basis that if I don't understand the mainstream view I cant question its validity. Of the other 58 books, they all have theories about the construction and the constructors. Some more valid imo than others. Some of the books discuss Giants, Nephilim etc. For me the fact that the Smithsonian was involved in the suppression and cover up of giant finds, tells me I'm on the right path

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

I've just counted. I've got 63 books on which discuss to some degree or another on this subject. 5 are what I would consider mainstream. I go on the basis that if I don't understand the mainstream view I cant question its validity. Of the other 58 books, they all have theories about the construction and the constructors. Some more valid imo than others. Some of the books discuss Giants, Nephilim etc. For me the fact that the Smithsonian was involved in the suppression and cover up of giant finds, tells me I'm on the right path

Giants you say..... 🤔 😊

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

I've just counted. I've got 63 books on which discuss to some degree or another on this subject. 5 are what I would consider mainstream. I go on the basis that if I don't understand the mainstream view I cant question its validity. Of the other 58 books, they all have theories about the construction and the constructors. Some more valid imo than others. Some of the books discuss Giants, Nephilim etc. For me the fact that the Smithsonian was involved in the suppression and cover up of giant finds, tells me I'm on the right path

I am sure from memory that the Smithsonian were also involved in covering up pyramids in the grand canyon as well. 

 

The thing for me is and I have not seen a credible answer as yet is how the same Greco Roman architecture is found all over the world, yet all those different cultures had the same way of building? It doesn't make sense. 

 

Who or what provided the knowledge as Edge stated is the biggest question and most fascinating. I'm not buying aliens before anyone starts. 🤭

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Morpheus said:

I am sure from memory that the Smithsonian were also involved in covering up pyramids in the grand canyon as well. 

 

The thing for me is and I have not seen a credible answer as yet is how the same Greco Roman architecture is found all over the world, yet all those different cultures had the same way of building? It doesn't make sense. 

 

Who or what provided the knowledge as Edge stated is the biggest question and most fascinating. I'm not buying aliens before anyone starts. 🤭

Concerning the Grand Canyon. There was a story in local newspapers at the time that a hidden caves etc.

The Pyramids of the Grand Canyon, its “Off-Limit” Areas, & Egyptian Relics | dailyoddsandends (wordpress.com)

 

Its not the best article but certainly will lead to others

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Devolution for sure.👍

That is what archaeology is hiding.

Screenshot 2022-05-21 at 12-06-50 Pin on aliens.png

Screenshot 2022-05-21 at 12-07-15 Pin on aliens.png

Screenshot 2022-05-21 at 12-08-16 Pin on aliens.png

Screenshot 2022-05-21 at 12-06-20 Pin on aliens.png

 

 

No space alien technology is required. 

 

Just be wary of putting, space aliens or WHATEVER, in the facts vacuum. 

 

If you can't explain something it means you should try harder to find the truth.

 

Clearly those stones looks like they've been 'melted' to fit.

 

Vitrification is a known technology which has been applied to various locations at various times in history.

 

The use of various concentrated acids in the vitrification of stones has been something known about in esoteric circles for a long while but has recently made something like the geological mainstream:

 

https://www.siftdesk.org/article-details/On-the-reddish-glittery-mud-the-Inca-used-for-perfecting-their-stone-masonry/264

 

 

 

 

Edited by Edgewood
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Edgewood said:

 

 

No space alien technology is required. 

 

Just be wary of putting, space aliens or WHATEVER, in the facts vacuum. 

 

If you can't explain something it means you should try harder to find the truth.

 

Clearly those stones looks like they've been 'melted' to fit.

 

Vitrification is a known technology which has been applied to various locations at various times in history.

 

The use of various concentrated acids in the vitrification of stones has been something known about in esoteric circles for a long while but has recently made something like the geological mainstream:

 

https://www.siftdesk.org/article-details/On-the-reddish-glittery-mud-the-Inca-used-for-perfecting-their-stone-masonry/264

 

 

 

 

 

I posted this guys work A much more indepth study he done later. Link below.

Ancient Architects I dont trust tho, he claims without doubt the Incas built all these structures, he puts across similar crap about Egypt. He shills I believe so Yewtube wont demonetise him like they do other alternatives, but some of his works okay.

Like according to his story again one king Pachacuti built all the inca megaliths in his lifetime. Total 💩

 

I never suggested aliens, although I wouldnt rule aliens out, as plenty of evidence for them in that part of the world especially & Egypt.

 

I see you seem to know they have been melted, yet have no evidence lol & are telling me to not jump to conclusions.

They look like geo polymer to me, put in hessian sacks. to perfect to be carved imo, maybe melted, that would be pretty advanced if they are.

Although AA in the video I posted points out a study that claims the rocks are natural if I recall, so the plot thickens. But like I say I dont trust him or his study. :)

 

There are usually always knobs attached, which is a clue im guessing.

Nobody is sure what these polygonal walls are in truth.

 

If the stones have been melted, it would be a pretty big fucking job, ide definitely call highly advanced.

 

 

In this video they show a quarry site with knobs attached.

 

 

 

Edited by oddsnsods
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Edgewood said:

The question is WHO or WHAT taught the Ancient Egyptians to use relatively basic technology to create incredible marvels.....

Egyptians did not build them,they inherited them,that you can easy check out 

 

a lot of "knowledge" was and is incoded into the the structuers

 

the problem is constant suppresion so we ended up here with bits and pices 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Edgewood said:

I have no wish to take away the mystery of the Pyramids... but for me the greater mystery is the identity of this discarnate force which has trafficked with certain humans for thousands of years and apparently taught them so many of the technological marvels which seem to have occurred, I would say UNNATURALLY in the past 10,000 years.....

 

^ this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

There are usually always knobs attached, which is a clue im guessing.

 

could be used as fixture points to attach harnesses around

 

1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

Nobody is sure what these polygonal walls are in truth.

 

we know that they are particularly resistant to earthquakes

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quacks on TV often suggest non-humans were responsible for mysterious ancient structures, but I still think it's bigotry of low expectations towards ancient people, for the most part. There are certain symbols and aesthetics that elites don't like, and the conquered are going to have their history told by the victor. Knowledge gets erased, and sometimes by accident. I'm open to the idea of some non-human element though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/21/2022 at 9:50 PM, screamingeagle said:

Egyptians did not build them,they inherited them,that you can easy check out  

 

Tell me who they inherited them from..... lay out the facts for us please.

 

I'm always willing to learn..... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...