........or that thing that Elon Musk is designing with the little chip...........

[CarpeDiem]

Can you believe this crap?

A little known escapologist is paralysed and his wife is hoping "that thing that Elon Musk is designing with the little chip" Is going to help him.

I guess this is the beginning of programming the masses for what is to come.

 

https://news.sky.com/story/actress-amanda-abbington-recalls-how-escapologist-fiance-jonathan-goodwin-nearly-died-twice-when-stunt-went-wrong-12605143

[Truthblast]

2 hours ago, CarpeDiem said:

Can you believe this crap?

A little known escapologist is paralysed and his wife is hoping "that thing that Elon Musk is designing with the little chip" Is going to help him.

I guess this is the beginning of programming the masses for what is to come.

 

https://news.sky.com/story/actress-amanda-abbington-recalls-how-escapologist-fiance-jonathan-goodwin-nearly-died-twice-when-stunt-went-wrong-12605143

 

Brain chips are acceptable for the disabled - people who cannot walk, people who have lost the ability to see, hear, talk and similar.

 

But I don't think that this is what Musk is after...

[78ast78dgyad]

[jedidiah]

8 hours ago, Truthblast said:

 

Brain chips are acceptable for the disabled - people who cannot walk, people who have lost the ability to see, hear, talk and similar.

 

But I don't think that this is what Musk is after...

 

I totally disagree; wth are you thinking?

 

This is part of the slippery slope; start with the ‘afflicted’, then it becomes mainstream.

 

The ‘disabled’ are part of this existence; dealing with it or not is also.

If I was ‘disabled’ there’s no way I’d get a fucking chip ffs.

 

They may ‘help’ said ‘disabled’ person, but what about the rest of the nefarious shit in that chip that allows the arseholes to do what they will with that person; and anyway, ‘disabled’ people are on the ‘useless eaters’ list; to be exterminated.

[Truthblast]

41 minutes ago, jedidiah said:

 

I totally disagree; wth are you thinking?

 

This is part of the slippery slope; start with the ‘afflicted’, then it becomes mainstream.

 

The ‘disabled’ are part of this existence; dealing with it or not is also.

If I was ‘disabled’ there’s no way I’d get a fucking chip ffs.

 

They may ‘help’ said ‘disabled’ person, but what about the rest of the nefarious shit in that chip that allows the arseholes to do what they will with that person; and anyway, ‘disabled’ people are on the ‘useless eaters’ list; to be exterminated.

 

I agree that these chips will be used for nefarious purposes.

 

I also think that Elon Musk is the wrong person to build them.

 

I do know disabled people, however, who would kill to be able to walk or see or talk like a normal person again.

 

Brain implants are a potential lifesaver for them.

 

But this work should be done by reputable universities, with complete transparency and with strict ethics rules being enforced.

 

Musk is a salesman for big pharma here.

 

I doubt that he even owns or runs Neuralink. Probably much bigger fish behind this company.

[zarkov]

This cultural mechanism simply breaks our legs then offers us crutches.

The disabled are a consequence of this corrupted counterfeit system endlessly feeding and simultaneously consuming itself.

Similarly charities exist precisely because the system is so corrupted and damaging.

Not to say that all technological advances are bad but to use them effectively unlearning the social engineering of the past century would seem essential from a moral perspective.

Musk clouds the water as intended.

[Anti Facts Sir]

If you'll excuse the pun, this woman is hoping Musk will be her husband's get out of jail card.

 

Smart thing for that guy would have been to not waste his good health on ridiculous "tricks" that can get you killed or, in this case, paralysed.

 

Some of us have not been that fortunate.

 

But like @jedidiahsays, like hell would I ever go the robotics route or use tech like that to put myself back together and be able-bodied.

[jedidiah]

2 hours ago, Truthblast said:

 

I agree that these chips will be used for nefarious purposes.

 

I also think that Elon Musk is the wrong person to build them.

 

I do know disabled people, however, who would kill to be able to walk or see or talk like a normal person again.

 

Brain implants are a potential lifesaver for them.

 

But this work should be done by reputable universities, with complete transparency and with strict ethics rules being enforced.

 

Musk is a salesman for big pharma here.

 

I doubt that he even owns or runs Neuralink. Probably much bigger fish behind this company.

 

Will those disabled kill to eventually be thoroughly under the control of the ptb, or be eventually put down like an unwanted animal?

 

Brain implants will never be a potential lifesaver for the peasants, only for the ‘elite’.

 

Im sorry, but for you to use the words ‘reputable’ ‘transparency’ and ‘ethics’ is entirely laughable.

 

None of those things exist anymore in the ptb scheme of things; certainly not any universities, which these days are hotbeds of  hysterical, woke, controlled by the ptb, festering pits of hell.

 

Musk is a total pretender; the ptb have their hand/s far up his arse.

 

Imo of course he doesn’t own Neuralink - or anything else for that matter; another frontman.

[alexa]

5 hours ago, Truthblast said:

 

I agree that these chips will be used for nefarious purposes.

 

I also think that Elon Musk is the wrong person to build them.

 

I do know disabled people, however, who would kill to be able to walk or see or talk like a normal person again.

 

It's the same ol story. use something good for an evil agenda. this makes me so angry. 

[Itsjaybigjay]

14 hours ago, alexa said:

 

It's the same ol story. use something good for an evil agenda. this makes me so angry. 

Exactly its not necessarily the tech that's the issue its the purpose that its put to. I have no issue with tech being used to help the disabled not that i think Musk should be involved.

[alexa]

4 minutes ago, Itsjaybigjay said:

Exactly its not necessarily the tech that's the issue its the purpose that its put to. I have no issue with tech being used to help the disabled not that i think Musk should be involved.

 

Is Musk qualified, I don't think so.

[Itsjaybigjay]

2 hours ago, alexa said:

 

Is Musk qualified, I don't think so.

fuck No

hence my comment above 

[Delidroid]

Hello. I have a theory (Which is just that, I'm a Plumber not a doctor).

a while ago, I wondered if the web with it's millions of computers could ever become "Conscious" of itself.

Maybe that's the master plan. There's plenty of rich weirdos who want to live forever.

 

now just suppose they have found a way. Connect loads of Human brains to the the web and it will gain consciousness

that way.

 

In the near future: "Forbes You're late for work". "Sorry Sir, I was cremated yesterday and I needed to stop thinking for a while"

"That's no excuse"