Jump to content

Has the anti-Christ just bought 9.2% of Twitter?


rebornsteve

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

I think its a safeguard against bot farms running rampant on Twitter? 

 

How is making Twitter pay to win a safeguard? This will just suppress conservative speech more as those on the left block and mute more, and those on the right will be on more block lists and get less reach. This is reddit tier groupthink bullshit.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

How is making Twitter pay to win a safeguard? This will just suppress conservative speech more as those on the left block and mute more, and those on the right will be on more block lists and get less reach. This is reddit tier groupthink bullshit.

The link was talking about paying? Not as far as I could see anyhow.

 

Twitter will start incorporating mute & block signals from Blue Verified (not Legacy Blue) as downvotes
Replying to
To be clear, all user actions will factor into a NN model for a tweet and the account tweeting, including positive actions.  As user accounts develop credibility, their actions will have greater weight, similar to how @CommunityNotes works.
Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

The link was talking about paying? Not as far as I could see anyhow.

 

Twitter will start incorporating mute & block signals from Blue Verified (not Legacy Blue) as downvotes
Replying to
To be clear, all user actions will factor into a NN model for a tweet and the account tweeting, including positive actions.  As user accounts develop credibility, their actions will have greater weight, similar to how @CommunityNotes works.

 

Blue verified is a subscription plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Blue verified is a subscription plan.

and that wasn't about payment or not those tweets were about how the account algo will work, thus safeguarding against blue checkmarked bots which exist in droves.

 

 

6 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Nah, redditors will say whatever is socially acceptable for muh reddit gold.


Reddit is censored, controlled and biased with algorithms and bias accounts as google, youtube and facebook. Look in to /u/maxwellhill on reddit, it was Ghislaine Maxwells account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

and that wasn't about payment or not those tweets were about how the account algo will work, thus safeguarding against blue checkmarked bots which exist in droves.

 

I must be confused because everyone is saying you will have more power to manipulate the platform if you pay. 🤷‍♂️

 

5 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

Reddit is censored, controlled and biased with algorithms and bias accounts as google, youtube and facebook. Look in to /u/maxwellhill on reddit, it was Ghislaine Maxwells account.

 

I know, didn't I already bring that up in this thread? Don't forget Chinese involvement with Reddit.

 

Why are you so obssessed with bots anyway? Makes no sense, especially since you Q and Trump followers were getting called bots for years. Who gets to decide what a bot is and how do they determine it? I know you don't say much that threatens the status quo, but do you like being abused or something? Wake up, bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

I must be confused because everyone is saying you will have more power to manipulate the platform if you pay. 🤷‍♂️

 

 

I know, didn't I already bring that up in this thread? Don't forget Chinese involvement with Reddit.

 

Why are you so obssessed with bots anyway? Makes no sense, especially since you Q and Trump followers were getting called bots for years. Who gets to decide what a bot is and how do they determine it? I know you don't say much that threatens the status quo, but do you like being abused or something? Wake up, bro.


Not obsessed with bots but bots are used to shape the narrative just as much as censorship is. More fake accounts promoting the same bollocks (some of them semi manned if bot flags an intervention needed such as verification or something it is not able to parse etc) if this person thinks this and is heavily upvoted people are more likely to follow the upvoted crowd, its basic human psychology - I seem to rattle your status quo of not understanding the over labelling of groups who are ultimately the same group owned by the larger umbrella above.

Not sure Q folks were called bots, they do seemingly get called a lot of names though. Would the bots not be best described as the mainstream? Some people call them npc's
 

1 minute ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Exactly.


always ways to game the system in place, I am sure that will be factored in, pretty basic thinking there. The idea at the moment is rooting out the bots and tracking where they are located, I am sure China will be involved, I am sure most countries with some coin will be involved also. Root them out, block IP ranges, continue looking for others that crop up.  No idea is perfect, certainly not when it comes to technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

I agree, but can we trust technocrats to be honest about which accounts are bots? Is there any transparency?

More transparency at Twitter in the months Elon has owned it than the prior however many years @jack dorsey ran it. Dont know what to expect, just watching things unfold as I see them occur. I could be wrong elon could be satan himself, I guess we will all find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

More transparency at Twitter in the months Elon has owned it than the prior however many years @jack dorsey ran it. Dont know what to expect, just watching things unfold as I see them occur. I could be wrong elon could be satan himself, I guess we will all find out.

 

Twitter has been better since he took over, but that update to the algorithms seems dodgy. People are just fortunate that it won't limit a users reach to you if you follow them personally. That doesn't really promote good dialogue between different groups though, you'll just see a bunch of centrist or left-wing content in the trends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Possibly, but if he bans nutty redditors for brigading the poll, then he loses integrity.

 

I don't know what is going on, and as crazy as it sounds, I wouldn't be mad if he let Jared control it. It might wake more people up.


I assume you are stockpiled with popcorn? ...then we wait...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...