Mr. Nice Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 Just now, skitzorat said: adjective 1. based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. "his views are highly subjective" No, my links and points aren't. You ignore the FOI requests and the Chinese CDC. Given your logic they made a new test then when the samples suddenly appeared? haha GTFO. I'm away from my computer. I'll get back to you tomorrow....if I can be arsed. It isn't a five minute debunk. It takes a lot of trawling to answer these and I didn't take notes when I went through a lot of this for my own personal checks. I never had any intention of walking back into that covid thread after the mass trolling last time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddsnsods Posted March 29, 2022 Author Share Posted March 29, 2022 Them journals are very telling. Particularly the Journal of Paediatrics on Myocarditis in Kids. If you arnt concerned by this & wish to do something or alert others to the dangers, but rather talk shit on a flat earth thread. Then you are even more lobotomised than I originally figured. But I really am starting to see the whole Eugenics,depopulation agenda has a point with most of society cant see the obvious here & as I say I was warning about jabbing kids 2 years ago & immune deficiency syndrome. You can search my posts or even on the old site if you can find them archived. Was obvious..oh & I listened well to 'conspiracy loon's' like Mike Yeadon who warned about all this shit way back then. I got laughed at or patronised like you try to do, when I was saying to my family to take Vitamin D3, C, Zync. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 @oddsnsodsffs stop with the insults. Of course you won't get pulled up for it because you are on team local. Now. I will spend a bit if time re-examining this and seeing what's new. Give me some time. It's not a 5 minute thing. As I said...all my reading last year was done on the fly and I didn't take notes. Quite why MY assessment is important to you is baffling. I've seen and read quite substantial debunks on many of the Sub claims on this subject. I have not seen you disagree with a single one of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddsnsods Posted March 30, 2022 Author Share Posted March 30, 2022 (edited) 20 hours ago, Mr. Nice said: @oddsnsodsffs stop with the insults. Of course you won't get pulled up for it because you are on team local. Sounds like conspiwacy fearies,,,next will be saying we are all being censored by the technocracy that silences all opposition to the great reset. 20 hours ago, Mr. Nice said: Now. I will spend a bit if time re-examining this and seeing what's new. Give me some time. It's not a 5 minute thing. As I said...all my reading last year was done on the fly and I didn't take notes. Slave New Normal. 20 hours ago, Mr. Nice said: Quite why MY assessment is important to you is baffling. I've seen and read quite substantial debunks on many of the Sub claims on this subject. I have not seen you disagree with a single one of them. Subject? lol You mean dystopian nightmare reality. Try explaining from a scientific standpoint, why 4 year old children need this jab every 6 months please. I gave you plenty of data to show this *cough* deadly *cough* virus doesnt really effect them & giving you serious evidence of what the jab is doing already. Like pregnancy they also claimed safe without any trials atall with pregnant women. This doesnt raise an eyebrow. Why the insanity? Why hasent the jab thats not a vaccine been withdrawn completely & all those involved arrested & tried in a court of law for crimes against humanity. Is it just purely for money? Is it pure coincidence a megalomaniac eugenicist (Gates) is pushing this to the extreme & basically owns the WHO & all organisations involved. Im pretty sure that hasent be debunked. Why does this man have so much clout, when hes not a doctor or expert, or even educated like yourself. Who voted for Klaus Schwab to dictate to us how we should live our lives? Why is it people like Stanley Johnson who regularly talk about depopulation, linked with planned parenthood & the extinction rebellion death cult & write books about depopulation & deadly viruses, that wipe out humanity are so passionate about saving the planet. Isnt it atall obvious? As I asked you before..why do monopolists that own major shares in media & pharma, get to handle the assets of a bailout from mass hysteria they created. Problem > Reaction > Solution. If you cant see this obvious honestly. you are going to be pretty fucked when the shtf & they kick this shit show up a gear. We are already paying double leci & gas, coz of climate bollocks. Inflation hasent even started yet. We warned about this shit from 2 weeks to flatten the curve. You still believe that shit was about health im sure lol.. O DEAR.. You claim media doesnt lie or isnt fake news lol. All the commie SAGE 'experts' they have been terrifying the masses with for 2 years is a conspiracy theory. Nobody atall to counter the narrative. Like the unqualified Devi Sridhar who claimed Pfizer jab were totally safe on the BBC with children & the BBC had to apoligise. https://www.hartgroup.org/devi-sridhar-misleads-child-vaccine/ Theres countless examples of their lies & shills pushing zero covid commie woke bullshit. Amazing you dont know wtf im talking about tho. Like this demon cuntbag. Have a listen to this raving conspiracy loon, get you up to speed on "the subject!" Edited March 30, 2022 by oddsnsods 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skitzorat Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 LOL I just had to. mediabiasfactcheck.com CNN Bias Rating: LEFT Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY The Guardian Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY Least Biased/Centre - Reuters Random "FactCheck" FALSE Claim via Social Media: 60% of Democrats say they wouldn’t fight if America was invaded. Newsweek rating: False (52%, but the question was out of context) Fact Check: Did 60% of Democrats Say They Wouldn’t Fight if US Was Invaded? A post on the r/conservative subreddit shared a chart from American Gun Facts, a website advocating for gun rights in the U.S., which was citing a recent Quinnipiac University poll. "60% of Democrats say they wouldn't fight if America was invaded," the post published Tuesday stated. Numerous Twitter users also cited the poll, including Donald Trump Jr. The claims that Democrats would choose to leave, unlike most Republicans, are indeed based on a genuine poll, conducted by Quinnipiac University, that surveyed 1,374 U.S. adults across the country. But the interpretations of its results, are somewhat misleading and, disingenuous. First, the 60 percent figure some referred to is factually incorrect. It appears to be an extrapolation from the graph, which cites just "40 percent of Democrats" as willing to fight. But with 8 percent responding "don't know," the actual number is 52 percent. ahahaha I don't know about your math, mr nice-edjewcated, but when a question is will you fight yes/no/DK - DK=NO because it isn't = yes! Advertising (55%) – Media Bias Fact Check relies on two third-party advertising companies, Google I suppose you're only here to play in the Flerth thread, that's cool - but GTFO with your higher than thou attitude - it's never a good look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthblast Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 TRY ANSWERING THIS ONE MR NICE: CORBEVAX IS A HIGHLY EFFECTIVE NON-MRNA COVID VACCINE THAT IS SAFE, EFFECTIVE, NON-PATENTED, COMPLETELY OPEN SOURCE AND CAN BE PRODUCED BY VIRTUALLY ANY COUNTRY. https://theconversation.com/corbevax-a-new-patent-free-covid-19-vaccine-could-be-a-pandemic-game-changer-globally-174672 INDIA AND MANY OTHER COUNTRIES ARE PRODUCING TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOSES OF IT. WHY. THE. FUCK. ARE. WESTERN. GOVERNMENTS. INJECTING. 5 YEAR OLDS. WITH. MRNA. WHEN. YEAST BASED. WORKS. SO. WELL? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthblast Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 Unlike the three vaccines approved in the U.S. – Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines and Johnson & Johnson’s viral vector vaccine, which provide the body instructions on how to produce the spike protein – CORBEVAX delivers the spike protein to the body directly. Like those other approved COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, CORBEVAX also requires two doses. How was CORBEVAX developed? CORBEVAX was developed by the co-directors of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development at Baylor College of Medicine, Drs. Maria Elena Bottazzi and Peter Hotez. During the 2003 SARS outbreak, these researchers created a similar type of vaccine by inserting the genetic information for a portion of the SARS virus spike protein into yeast to produce large amounts of the protein. After isolating the virus spike protein from the yeast and adding an adjuvant, which helps trigger an immune response, the vaccine was ready for use. The first SARS epidemic was short-lived, and there was little need for Bottazzi and Hotez’s vaccine – until the virus that causes COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, emerged in 2019. So they dusted off their vaccine and updated the spike protein to match that of SARS-CoV-2, creating the CORBEVAX vaccine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.