RICO Lawsuit

[Luvapottamus]

To give this context I want to introduce David Martin's expose on Rand Paul's treachery: He's (Rand Paul) a gatekeeper acting against justice according to Martin and I concur.

 

Dr. David Martin - Political theatre with Rand Paul who "Tries to expose Fauci" (brandnewtube.com)

 

David Martin makes a good argument that Rand Paul is letting Fauchi skate actively as an ACTIVE participant.

 

My input is this:

 

We don't need a grand jury.

 

It is generally true that you need a prosecutor willing to fulfill their sworn duties in order to prosecute somebody like Anthony Fauchi.

 

And if none of them are brave enough it won't happen.

 

But I think there is a loophole.

 

I haven't reviewed it, but I'm pretty sure you can sue under RICO.

 

A civil RICO lawsuit.

 

We sue for damages in a civil suit, prove racketeering in the civil case, coward prosecutors follow.

 

Life insurance companies will join the mass tort under RICO.

 

Once you prove racketeering the coward prosecutors have to prosecute.

 

????

 

 

 

 

Edited March 20, 2022 by Luvapottamus

[Luvapottamus]

Paypal Faces Civil RICO Lawsuit For Freezing Customer Accounts

[Luvapottamus]

Paypal Faces Civil RICO Lawsuit For Freezing Customer Accounts (turnpikelaw.com)

[Luvapottamus]

The paypal example is why the loophole exists.

 

Written into RICO is the ability to thwart PROSECUTORS who refuse to do their duty.

 

The next congress should augment RICO and do another Church Committee and update that too.

 

But they won't.

 

So let's use the existing civil RICO loophole and shame them.

 

 

[Luvapottamus]

If we win a mass tort under RICO in a civil lawsuit...prosecutors have to prosecute.

 

No Grand Jury needed.

 

It's all in the depositions.

 

The only worry at that stage is poseurs and stolen valor.

 

 

 

Edited March 20, 2022 by Luvapottamus

[Luvapottamus]

Please send this to David Martin, and others if you have contacts and can reach them.

 

Reiner Fullmich

Alex Jones

etc please

 

It would interest that Blackrock guy.

 

.Fmr Blackrock CEO Reveals The Covid-Crime Against Humanity Was To Cover The Collapse of Central Bank (bitchute.com)

 

If you have his email send him a link to this thread,.

 

 

[Luvapottamus]

If the life insurance industry doesn't join the mass tort Dr Martin is right about them and they are culpable as well.

 

Killed off the working age premium payers too, they just wanted to screw the beneficiaries, not their revenue stream.

 

 

Edited March 20, 2022 by Luvapottamus

[Luvapottamus]

Civil RICO: A Manual for Federal Attorneys

 

civrico.pdf (justice.gov)

 

If we file a civil mass tort, hire great attorneys and stick to reality, we will prove racketeering and damages, then prosecutors will be compelled to have show trials and punish 1/400 masterminds.

 

That sort of sucks eh?

 

Civil RICO MASS TORT. Depositions and documentary evidence from civil pretrial disclosures.

 

If we do that judges will demand prosecutors fulfill their obligations or resign.

 

 

Edited March 20, 2022 by Luvapottamus

[Luvapottamus]

Quote

To obtain civil equitable relief under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(a), the United States must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) a defendant committed or intended to commit a RICO violation by establishing the same elements as in a criminal RICO case, except that criminal intent is not required; and (2) that there is a reasonable likelihood that the defendant will commit a violation in the future.

civrico.pdf (justice.gov)

 

 

This is a manual for prosecutors to file civil suits instead of prosecuting these corporate crimes.

 

That's not what the RICO Act says,

 

The safety valve is we can prove it in a civil tort and compel prosecutions that way.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Luvapottamus]

18 U.S. Code § 1964 - Civil remedies

(a)

The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of section 1962 of this chapter by issuing appropriate orders, including, but not limited to: ordering any person to divest himself of any interest, direct or indirect, in any enterprise; imposing reasonable restrictions on the future activities or investments of any person, including, but not limited to, prohibiting any person from engaging in the same type of endeavor as the enterprise engaged in, the activities of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or ordering dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise, making due provision for the rights of innocent persons.

(b)

The Attorney General may institute proceedings under this section. Pending final determination thereof, the court may at any time enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other actions, including the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds, as it shall deem proper.

(c)

Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, except that no person may rely upon any conduct that would have been actionable as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities to establish a violation of section 1962. The exception contained in the preceding sentence does not apply to an action against any person that is criminally convicted in connection with the fraud, in which case the statute of limitations shall start to run on the date on which the conviction becomes final.

(d)

A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal proceeding brought by the United States under this chapter shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding brought by the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title IX, § 901(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 943; amended Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, § 402(24)(A), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3359; Pub. L. 104–67, title I, § 107, Dec. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 758.)

 

18 U.S. Code § 1964 - Civil remedies | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)

 

 

Thanks to the library at Cornell...

 

What this means is I can sue you if you are engaged in racketeering and you injure me.

that's Magna Carta.

 

If you hurt me I can sue you. Common Law.

 

The peculiarity here is the RICO label.

 

Somehow if it's rackettering they sue you instead of prosecute and jail you?

 

That's not what the act says.

 

It says I can sue even if prosecutors drop the ball.

 

 

Then I can force them to resign.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Luvapottamus]

unlawful debt

(6) “unlawful debt” means a debt (A) incurred or contracted in gambling activity which was in violation of the law of the United States, a State or political subdivision thereof, or which is unenforceable under State or Federal law in whole or in part as to principal or interest because of the laws relating to usury, and (B) which was incurred in connection with the business of gambling in violation of the law of the United States, a State or political subdivision thereof, or the business of lending money or a thing of value at a rate usurious under State or Federal law, where the usurious rate is at least twice the enforceable rate;

 

Definition: unlawful debt from 18 USC § 1961(6) | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)

 

This is a hurdle in my strategy.

 

What the RICO Act accomplished was to industrialize corporate welfare graft And assimilate mafia insider trading activities.

 

Steal a billion dollars, the federal prosecutor sues you for three million.

 

So when I get to the civil tort part, where I get to sue, seems like almost a loophole.

 

You can't mount a private prosecution in the Queen's realm.

 

Bur you can shame prosecutors and magistrates and judges if you prove it in civil tort.

 

It's not ideal but a safety valve we need to do a spring fire extinguisher inspection on.

 

 

 

[Luvapottamus]

Start with a cut and dry racketeering offense. Myocarditis in thirty year olds.

 

Prove the racketeering in that case then prosecutions should commence before we file strokes.

 

By the time we get to tinnitus Fauchi is doing 5 to 15 in a federal pen for the Myocarditis crimes.

 

Dazak is facing life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited March 20, 2022 by Luvapottamus

[Luvapottamus]

There is a pririciple in law that you bring all torts at the same time, but this is too big for that. mANY PRECEDENTS NEEDS CITATIONS

 

There is also a statute of limitations ISSUE

NEED TO FILE BRIEFS AND MOTIONS REGARDING THOSE.

 

There are vaccine injured people whO were injured when the RICO infractions started. As with buried sexual abuse cases....got to let the autistic kids sue after we prove the racketeering in the 30 year olds with myocarditis test case.

 

sOME OF THEM MAY HAVE TRIED TO SUE AND COULDN'T HIRE A LAWYER.

 

rico.

 

You don't get to pretend the autistic kids have lost statute of limitations.

 

yOU GOT CAUGHT FINALLY.

 

wHEN SOCCER SUPERSTARS DROPPED DEAD.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited March 20, 2022 by Luvapottamus

[Luvapottamus]

i JOPE THIS DISCUSSION DOESNT ENCITE VAX HESITANTCY. dERP DERPY DOOO