Jump to content

Conflict in Ukraine - Russian Invasion


Sexpistol50
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why is Ukraine the West's Fault?

Featuring John Mearsheimer - 6 years ago

 

Understand what caused the present crises in Ukraine.

 

 

 

Edited by Nemo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Enemy of Jewish people, but more specifically, anyone that wants to preserve their culture and remain a cohesive group of people by the looks of it.

 

So anti-globalist/communist/immigration/integration nationalist type. Basically Europe then. And you said destabilizing Europe wasnt good for the UK. Like I said, Europe is on the brink of Fascism. Nazis didnt create Fascism, they just organised and expressed a long standing sentiment of many old, rich and powerful European people.

Edited by Nemo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nemo said:

 

So anti-globalist/communist/immigration/integration nationalist type. Basically Europe then. And you said destabilizing Europe wasnt good for the UK.

 

Europeans wouldn't destabilize themselves though. Europeans wouldn't make themselves a hated minority in their own homelands. Europeans wouldn't want hate speech laws that target European wellbeing.

 

What I'm saying is that westerners don't have self-determination, and that our leaders want to see our downfall.

 

"Europe today has a choice: Eurasianism or Atlanticism."

- Dugin

 

"The United Kingdom should be cut off from Europe." - Dugin

 

Look into Duginism, NazBols, and Neo-Eurasianism.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Velma said:

 

Scrapping the bottom of the 'Holocaust' barrel to make Jews appear the eternal victims, a "survivor" of three "death camps" was shelled in Kharkiv. Boris Romantschenko was interred at Buchenwald concentration camp, he also spent time in the subcamp of Mittelbau-Dora, as well as the infamous Bergen Belsen and Peenemünde camps, before being liberated and then killed by Putin in Ukraine. (Violins wailing plaintively.)

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-60826303

 

Peenemunde? That was  German rocket development site not a 'death camp.' My dad flew on the Peenemunde raid in August 1943 when RAF bombers were sent to level the place and kill the scientists stationed there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

What is going on here? Is it really true that you can't Mossad the Assad, or is this just cheap dollar store anti-zionism? Pretty good take from Assad, I just wish he would add a bit of context about why the Ukrainians welcomed Nazis.

 

It's looking like a fight between left and right World Jewry and their lackies, but they are really secretly allies.

 

Churchill was a Jewish lackey with possibly a Jewish mother (not sure about this) making

him Jewish himself.

 

First line of his famous article "Zionism versus Bolshevism"

 

"SOME people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world"

 

Really? Or was it because they cunningly took control of world banking, holding Governments to ransom and enslaving people through compound interest debt.

 

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism

 

zionvsbolchurchill.gif&f=1&nofb=1

 

th?id=OIP.Rxeav3VjFHU6qWwp1owP8wHaEK%26p

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know it's that Zelenski is hiding somewhere, Biden was hiding in his basement and Trudeau was hiding in a unknown location. These mo'fo's are cowards and western globalist (really mid-eastern Zionist) puppets and have sold out the people the govern to the cult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Doc said:

After 25 days of this 'war' I am 100% convinced it's all part of the general ass fucking leading to Agenda2030.

 

The narrative's at play all fit in so nicely, the Bio-lab tie in with the well established COVID fear, the fuel/energy crisis slotting nicely with the green agenda, the refugee crisis slides nicely into the Kalergi/replacement agenda. The cost of living/inflation crisis eventually resulting in CBDC and "You will own nothing".

 

And still all the turkeys are begging for Christmas. I fucking despair.

 

Absolutely spot on sir. 👏👏👏

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

but they are really secretly allies.

 

Yep. Everything that is happening now benefits the usual clique. The Right are being sheepish like the Left too, but it's not surprising considering the amount of crypto Trotskyists among mainstream conservatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In every age an avatar or Christ is said to be reborn. The last being Pisces, Jesus born 0AD and died 33AD means that the avatar of this age Aquarius would have been born in the year 2000. I don't see why agenda 2030 wouldn't be in preparation for this their awaited King for whom for the past 2000 years, they've been creating his throne. A throne from which the world and all its resources and peoples can be controlled.

 

Throne of the Christ or the anti-christ. Remember 'I come not to bring peace, but a Sword'.

 

Given the way Christ was treated last time he was here, I'd not be surprised if this time he'd be a little pissed.

Edited by Nemo
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nemo said:

In every age an avatar or Christ is said to be reborn. The last being Pisces, Jesus born 0AD and died 33AD means that the avatar of this age Aquarius would have been born in the year 2000. I don't see why agenda 2030 wouldn't be in preparation for this their awaited King for whom for the past 2000 years, they've been creating his throne. A throne from which the world and all its resources and peoples can be controlled.

 

Throne of the Christ or the anti-christ. Remember 'I come not to bring peace, but a Sword'.

 

Given the way Christ was treated last time he was here, I'd not be surprised if this time he'd be a little pissed.

 

They probably always have one ready.

 

"For the messiah to arrive, you can't think of him like we think of messiah. We think of messiah after the model of Jesus. He's the son of God, divine birth, all of that. That's not how the Jews look at the messiah. They're looking for a king. They are looking for a political leader. And so a matter of fact, messiah to them means the anointed one, and it goes back to the ancient days when they would anoint a king and recognize him as this is the man that God sent," Horn said

 

https://www.christianpost.com/news/some-rabbis-in-israel-believe-trump-could-be-messiah-or-his-forerunner-end-times-author-says.html

 

Obviously elites need to destroy Europe before the temple though.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Hes pushing the evil Nazi meme pretty hard like Putin. People will believe this is just politrix, but seems to me they wish to crush all opposition to Jewish supremacism..the real threat of course we both know.

The Nazi in Ukraine & elsewhere are a very small threat, but Nazi fever in the west obviously has a lot of political clout in swaying the hearts & minds mahhhh.

If the Nazi threat was real of course, they would be shitting themselves.

Assad will be part of the Masonic network like Gaddafi was & playing his part..like the Iranians too.

Is an interesting speech tho with a few truths.

Heres some real racial supremacists for anyone whos not been paying attention:

 

 

 

 

I watched the BBC gasp, horror! documentary HyperNormalisation (2016) in full for the first time the other

night, nearly three hours long. It's a good documentary, but of course they don't touch much on Zionism,

Judaism etc.

 

This clip, I think is pertinent as to why Assad Junior doesn't like the West.

 

Some extra info .. was never destined to be a leader. "He settled in London to start postgraduate training in ophthalmology at the Western Eye Hospital. He was described as a "geeky I.T. guy" during his time in London" but had to take on the role when his elder brother died in a car crash.

 

Some good information about how the West used Gaddifi too, in the second full lenght video.

 

 

This is the full documentary.

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

Have you tried looking it up. 

Wiki can give you a rough idea.. 

 

I did look it up...

 

'The Amalekites harassed the Hebrews during their Exodus from Egypt and attacked them at Rephidim near Mount Sinai, where they were defeated by Joshua. They were among the nomadic raiders defeated by Gideon and were condemned to annihilation by Samuel. Their final defeat occurred in the time of Hezekiah'.

 

This is what the LORD Almighty says: `I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them.

 

The Amalekite spirit is arrogant like the king that Saul failed to kill. It's sneaky, manipulative, and deceiving like the enemy that carried off David's family. This spirit has no respect for authority and will kill the king in you given the chance.

Edited by Nemo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
4 minutes ago, Nemo said:

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them.

 

This. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nemo said:

 

I did look it up...

 

'The Amalekites harassed the Hebrews during their Exodus from Egypt and attacked them at Rephidim near Mount Sinai, where they were defeated by Joshua. They were among the nomadic raiders defeated by Gideon and were condemned to annihilation by Samuel. Their final defeat occurred in the time of Hezekiah'.

 

This is what the LORD Almighty says: `I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them.

 

The Amalekite spirit is arrogant like the king that Saul failed to kill. It's sneaky, manipulative, and deceiving like the enemy that carried off David's family. This spirit has no respect for authority and will kill the king in you given the chance.

 

Any European that is concerned about becoming a hated minority is called a white supremacist, and some of them think white supremacists are Amalek. They call Palestinians Amalek too.

 

Is that not a rules for thee, but not for me kind of thing?

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nemo said:

 

I'm saying he's a Patsy for the globalists (just like Hitler) and why would a Jew allow Nazi militant groups to remain whilst closing down all political and and media opposition in his counrty?

 

Who exactly in your opinion are Globalists and what does "Globalist" really mean?

 

I don't like the term because it's so vague.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recent article in the JC on Dugin.

https://www.thejc.com/lets-talk/all/aleksandr-dugin-the-sinister-ideologue-whos-putins-favourite-philosopher-3829SiTsfS8P7UK19PwT4k

 

It's not just Dugin though, it's a whole ideology and group of people pushing Eurasianist talking points to westerners. I think Dugin is just like a Soros bogey man figure for the East or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

Churchill was a Jewish lackey with possibly a Jewish mother (not sure about this) making

him Jewish himself.

Didn't they bail him out when he was on the verge of bankruptcy? He certainly acted as though he were indebted to them. He even initiated war crimes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nemo said:

Fascism, they just organised and expressed a long standing sentiment of many old, rich and powerful European people.

 

Well most of the very rich people in Europe for a long time are of Jewish descent, especially in Britian, so Judaism is fascism.

 

L G Pine was the Editor of Burkes Peerage, so he should know their backgrounds, even if they had anglo names.

 

Published in 1959 I believe.

 

Tales.jpg

 

According to L.G. Pine, the Editor of Burke’s Peerage , Jews “have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this country would not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also.” (Tales of the British Aristocracy1957, p.219.)

 

Pine is outspoken in a way few people are today. He says that for every Rothschild or Disraeli, there were “10 cases of Jewish connection which are now forgotten. The reason is that in many cases “Jewish origin is concealed.” (218) The marriage of Jewish finance and British aristocracy took place literally. Spendthrift gentry married the daughters of rich Jews.

 

An outstanding example is the marriage of the 5th Earl of Roseberry who married the only daughter and heiress of Baron Mayer de Rothschild and later became Prime Minister.  “She stayed in the Jewish religion but her children were educated as Christians…The alliances between Jewish ladies and British lords are mostly of this type, the wife providing large sums…while the aristocrat has the title and ancient estate. The children are able to look back upon a varied bag of ancestors.”

 

Pine obviously does not approve of these parvenus: “There can be no question that the British Peerage is now very much diluted with Jewish blood and has many connections among its most ancient and august families with those who only a few generations ago were inhabitants of the Ghetto.”

 

But he opines that England’s enfeebled elite may need this protection from the “forces of revolution”:

 

“The power of money is very great and as almost every liberal newspaper is under Jewish influence it follows that the forces of revolution when directed against the peers are likely to meet with as determined opposition from the Jewish kinfolk of the aristocracy…”

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Didn't they bail him out when he was on the verge of bankruptcy? He certainly acted as though he were indebted to them. He even initiated war crimes.

 

His father Randolph Churchill owed money to the Rothschilds, and afaik this debt was cancelled when Winston

Churchill became PM. They controlled him and WW2

 

"Lord Randolph’s friend Lord Rosebery (who afaik married Hannah de Rothschild) believed that the illness began in the early 1890s, when Lord Randolph was around forty years old. Lord Randolph routinely lived beyond his means. In 1891 his finances were in such a parlous state that he decided to travel to South Africa to invest in gold mines (and engage in a spot of game hunting). He borrowed money from Lord Rothschild who protected his investment by insisting that Lord Randolph should be accompanied by an experienced mining engineer."

 

https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/finest-hour-extras/what-killed-lord-randolph-churchill/

 

Winston Churchill with the homosexual Sir Phillip Sassoon (a Rothschild), effeminate Prince of Wales and

Winston Chruchill

 

14b1e57b63490dfcd8792fad87ff8ec7.jpg

 

Before the Versailles treaty after WW1 carving up Europe, Sir Phillip Sassoon hosted British politicians at one of his homes, Port Lympne Mansion

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second part of John Ward's excellent 2-part article from his Internet blog "The Slog" that I posted at the beginning of the week, and this one is definitely dialled in to the financial aspect of this conflict.

 

Another on-the-money appraisal: suggesting the TPTB might well blame The War for the impending financial meltdown and will certainly be pointing the finger at Putin as the dastardly villain... 

 

https://therealslog.com/2022/03/21/ukraine-uxb-germanys-fuhrerprinzip-problem/

 

http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d008144fd500e9977860000b14f17760?s=50&d=&r=PG

UKRAINE UXB: GERMANY’S FUHRERPRINZIP PROBLEM

by John Ward

 

hyperinfl2.png?w=533

Part 2: A simple question for NATO & Brussels: do you contain Putin by collapsing the European Union?

 

In this second part of today's double-header, The Slog looks at the untold consequences of trying to bankrupt the Russian Federation, and wonders just how many Europeans would be prepared to pay that price. More specifically, the so-called sanctions present Germany with an insoluble dilemma. Cracks may soon start to appear in the entire EUNATO defence rationale.

 

Very few people really understand the full extent of collapse we will almost certainly be looking at if and when Russia defaults. Naturally, the propaganda sins of omission continue; thus, although there's a gigantic problem for the sanctioning folks, they don't want you to know about it. The BSDs out there need to rethink the current jingoism, and ask themselves whether the cost of "containing" Putin is either worth it...or indeed, a problem they need to worry about in the first place.

To kick off things off with an appetiser, you probably failed to notice this, but Russia paid its due debt installment in full last Friday.

 

You probably didn't see that, because the MSM blanked it. They want you to think that Russia is doomed, but they can't deal with evidence that this is not the case.

In the same spirit but on a different subject, what's also just come to light via objective observers is that, since Russian speakers in the eastern Ukraine provinces Donetsk and Luhanks voted to leave and become Russian provinces again, 15,000 Russian speakers have died in blatant breakages of the Minsk accord by Ukrainian far Right nationalists. As this bores a large hole in the "plucky Zelenskyy" script, our media don't talk about that either.

 

However, what they especially don't want you to grasp is what one might call the German Dimension.


Germany plays a unique role in Europe (more exactly, the EU) - a multi-layered role understood by a minority in the US élite, and only very few ordinary Europeans. This involves three key elements above all others:

·         A near autonomic fear response to the idea of hyper-inflation and its role in bringing Hitler to power

·         An Ostpolitik approach to energy supply and trade

·         A 'bankers' banker' leadership role in the European Union.

 

The first of these is reasonably well-understood by everyone except the French who, along with Lloyd George, dreamt up the horrendous 'war reparations' repayment schedules at the 1919 Peace Conference in Versailles. Germany simply printed money to pay the debt, as a result of which all socio-economic assumptions became null and void, extreme politics flourished, and the decent German bourgeoisie were reduced to the dog-eat-dog desperation of hyperinflation.

 

At the end of the Second World War, the lesson had been learned: the US poured money into West Germany in a bid to help its economy rise from the ashes, to rub the Soviet Union's nose in the reality of Western material success, and to ensure that Germany represented a strong bulwark against the USSR with a fully retained NATO nuclear presence.

 

When the 1955 Coal Agreement between France and Germany effectively gave birth to what became the European Union, the idea - an excellent one - was to make war impossible between them due to massive economic interdependence. Sadly, two bad ideas took hold at the same time. The first of these was a window-façade of democracy hiding a reality of top-down rule by anal bureaucrats ("so the People don't make mistakes") - something already enshrined in the French ENARC system; the second was a cynical Elysée desire to play upon German war guilt, and thus give France an easy ride when first EEC, then EC, then EU budget overspends began to materialise with monotonous regularity.

This is not a simplistic analysis: my second father in law is a prominent German industrialist who moved in circles more elevated than mine. Once the euro came into being, he confided in me that "Now at last we can stop picking up the tab for French largesse...if they want to stay in the eurozone, they will have to conform". In fact, they decided to do no such thing: in the twenty-one fiscal years of the euro, France has never met the criteria for membership.

 

Chiefly because of this reality, Berlin has fought tooth and nail first of all to retain massive trade links beyond the EU (a classic example of 'Alles Klar'*) and secondly, to keep its hands very firmly on the monetarist side of EU financial viability.

*'Be prepared for all eventualities'

The 'be prepared' element of the German pysche enabled Willi Brandt to bring in Ostpolitik after 1969, under which Germany maintained some energy dependence upon the USSR while exporting high quality engineering products to the Warsaw Pact countries. Emotionally, it is important to realise that only Germany among all the big World War II players lost half its citizens to the victorious Sovyets.The result is that the now reunited Germany still looks East with far greater comfort than any other member of the original Common Market Six.

 

Unsurprisingly, it has in turn been unwilling to engage in the kind of brainless jingoism that so typifies the outbursts of Biden, Boris and Macron....of all those imposing energy and economic sanctions on Putin, Berlin has by far the most to lose. Thanks to EUNATO sanctions against Russia, for instance, German heavy engineering production has come to a virtual standstill.

 

What most people fail to grasp, however, is that this is as nothing compared to the German responsibility for any and all consequences of Russian debt default.


We're back in the "Heads we win tails you lose" Wall Street/City/ Defense/Frankfurt firms, their stupid intra-bank trading mechanisms....and the pernicious use of "safe-bet" Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) - which are usually safe for them, but can be disastrous for Sovereign borrowers. The accepted reality of CDS profits being in inverse proportion to sovereign economy survival tells you just how sick financialised globalism is. And it's sociopathic NWO outlook - its Weltanschauung - is in perfect lockstep with the Davos Dystopians.

 

But here's the problem we've had since the tinpot euro was launched: there is no sovereign body in the European Union. So in order for "normal" hahaha lending business to continue, some mug has to step up and put it's house on the line.

 

Step forward Berlin.

 

Quite how this happened is a ball of knitting wool assaulted by a determined kitten. The EU borrowings are in theory guaranteed by a number of states, but there's only one the vultures trust: Germany.

 

The files describing how this came about run to over 5,000 pages. Bizarrely, they're secret: as the German site Koncept-Veritas avers, "Nobody has ever read them, let alone understood them". There's a very good reason for that: the ridiculous intra-bank CDS trading means that nobody has the faintest idea what their values are any more. All we do know is that, to use the complex fiscal terminology re this one, they are UFH - Unimaginably Fucking Huge. If, at the next call, the Russian Federation pays again in Roubles not Dollars, a waiver will be triggered, and a default declared.

Dr Wolfgang Hetzer was responsible for the fight against corruption in the European Anti-Fraud Office in Brussels. He knows only that if a waiver is presented, the Deutsche Bundesrepublik has to pay. Hetzer explained very clearly in an interview with Die Welt, "The perpetrators are those in the financial industry who make bets with help from profiteers in politics, who do nothing to put the investment bankers in their place."

 

Welcome to the wicked world of corporacratic impunity.

 

The bottom line is this: the German government faces an insoluble dilemma. If and when the RF defaults, the Bundesrepublik will have to pay (or in reality, write off) Russia's debts - otherwise the EU banking system, and much of its economy, will implode.

 

Nobody knows if Germany is in a position to do that....or indeed, if Berlin has the slightest intention of even trying. But given the catastrophic disorder and EU collapse that will result from a Russian default, Vladimir Putin is very probably sitting in the Kremlin and thinking, 'OK wiseasses....bring it on'.

The risk is being underplayed by Wall Street; Bloomberg, for instance, talks of Russia having "very little foreign debt" - figures of $120bn are bandied about, which is less than the UK spends on the NHS. But they know perfectly well that this definition is narrow.

 

First of all, that is pure sovereign debt. Corporate debt on top comes in much higher at around $480 billion. Second, 90% of the debt is owed to Eurozone banks. And third - most important of all - trading in CDSs by the banks between each other and Hedge Funds may have, over time, made them much more 'valuable'. “I worry about what I do not see,” the World Bank's Carmen Reinhart says, “Financial institutions are well-capitalised, but balance sheets are often opaque … There is the issue of Russian private sector defaults. One cannot be complacent.”

The truth is, nobody knows at any given point in time how much a CDS lay-off is "worth". Nor do they know who the final holder of the CDS might be. A loan obtained from (say) Santander Bank may well be held by the Hedge Fund Pimco.

 

Also, CDSs are "infectious" in the banking system itself. Every CDS trade will reduce risk on one side and increase it on the other. The banks, hedge funds and banking firms are supposed to nil "cancel out" high versus low CDS risk. Experience in the past, however, has shown that their estimates of risk balance are so much hokum most of the time.

 

In a nutshell, driving Russia into default risks a nuclear chain reaction that is impossible to predict....and anyone telling you otherwise (eg the Pentagon) is lying.

 

Ultimately, NATO could well find itself sitting in Europe alongside bankrupt donators, and wondering what to do next. Somehow, I doubt very much if media demonisation is going to cut it in that context. But I am very clear on the fact that the Great Reset numpties haven't done proper due diligence on the outcome....and even where they have, you can rest assured that the audit guys were lying to them.

I further suspect that the fat idler in Downing Street lacks the focus to grasp any of this reality. This is a case of being hoist by both petade and facade: if you are mad and megalomanic enough to create a globally connected Ponzi scheme that is palpably unsustainable, then you deserve everything that follows.

 

The ordinary citizen, however, deserves none of it. Such considerations are of no interest to the Dystopians....and we of the 1in8 must face the strong possibility that total European financial collapse is exactly what these lunatics have in mind.

 

As usual with the MSM, there are no insights to be found in relation to this fiscal dilemma for Berlin. The FT - in a "major article" six weeks ago - failed to even mention Germany's EU debt responsibilities, choosing instead to trot out some classic Washington smear-fat:

 

'In the first crisis of the post-Merkel era, Germany is floundering. The complex legacy of the second world war is weighing on its efforts to craft a coherent policy on Russia. A new government in office for only seven weeks is being pulled in one direction by its powerful pacifist lobby and in the other by Washington...critics say Berlin has failed to grasp the enormity of the threat Russia poses to Ukraine. They worry that Germany, which draws 55 per cent of its imported gas from Russia, cares more about the impact sanctions will have on its economy than about forming a united front against Moscow. Some NATO countries have even begun to doubt that Berlin is a reliable partner.'

 

The FT pesters me regularly to return to its fold of paid subscribers. Its owners need to grasp that nobody with half a brain wants to pay in order to have a spurious CIA global hegemony line played back to them. There is, as in so much of this, the desire in Washington to defend Europe down to the last European.


If this Slog double-header goes anywhere around the internet, you can be sure that the experts, fact checkers and opinion leaders will say I am vague on the arse/elbow arrangement. If they do, we will know that cages have been rattled.

 

As I write, to all intents and purposes the Ukrainian port of Mariupol has already fallen, and the Russians are trying to negotiate a ceasefire under which non-combatants can be escorted to safety. The Western MSM are "covering" this story as - and we're talking the BBC here - 'Russia is trying to starve the besieged port city of Mariupol into surrendering....the residents having endured weeks of Russian bombardment with no power or running water'.

 

It's odd is it not how 'flunkey' Western State journalism covers a story by covering up. Russia invaded Ukraine exactly three weeks ago today, and only reached Mariupol three days ago on 18th March. So it's a tad tricky to see how the residents have been pounded and starved into submission during 'weeks of Russian bombardment'.

 

In conclusion, there is one depressing certainty in 21st century life: our economic system, US democracy, EU fiscal stability, media investigation, bureaucratic rules, banking credibility, corporate governance, NATO information, health science, civil policing, military intelligence and financial sectors are all irreparably compromised by greed, mendacity and unachievable globalist megalomania.

As you might have noticed, I am not a man subject to false optimism: in the world of 2022, such an outlook will lead only to lazy compliance. There are good, true and socially beneficial ways to break down the overweening confidence of diabolical ideas. But running away, staying melded to the sofa and hoping for the best is not going to be enough.

 

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for many good men and women to do nothing.

 

Go well.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nemo said:

Ok, Kermit. Will you tell me what Amalek is?

 

They were doomed to annihilation.

The Amalekites harassed the Hebrews during their Exodus from Egypt and attacked them at Rephidim near Mount Sinai, where they were defeated by Joshua. They were among the nomadic raiders defeated by Gideon and were condemned to annihilation by Samuel. Their final defeat occurred in the time of Hezekiah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

They were doomed to annihilation.

The Amalekites harassed the Hebrews during their Exodus from Egypt and attacked them at Rephidim near Mount Sinai, where they were defeated by Joshua. They were among the nomadic raiders defeated by Gideon and were condemned to annihilation by Samuel. Their final defeat occurred in the time of Hezekiah.

 

So when they say "let's blot out the memory of Amalek", who are they talking about in the modern sense?

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...