Indigo Posted November 14, 2022 Share Posted November 14, 2022 (edited) Walk and Talk IN DONETSK! With Eva Bartlett Today I had the honour and pleasure of taking a stroll with Eva Bartlett who has been doing incredible work here in Donetsk. You can catch our previous chat here: 'Eva K Bartlett in Donetsk' - https://youtu.be/KszFzhJBcJA You can follow Eva's Work here: https://ingaza.wordpress.com/ https://rumble.com/c/c-2030196 https://odysee.com/@EvaKareneBartlett:9 https://t.me/s/Reality_Theories https://www.patreon.com/EvaKBartlett https://www.facebook.com/EvaBoBeeva https://twitter.com/EvaKBartlett https://www.youtube.com/c/EvaKBartlett/videos Edited November 15, 2022 by Indigo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skotfreezy Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 Russia-Ukraine war live: two people killed after Russian missiles cross into Poland, says US intelligence official (msn.com) A Russian 'stray' missile hit a town in Poland 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 2 minutes ago, Skotfreezy said: Russia-Ukraine war live: two people killed after Russian missiles cross into Poland, says US intelligence official (msn.com) A Russian 'stray' missile hit a town in Poland Just the excuse the west needs! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skotfreezy Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 3 minutes ago, Bombadil said: Just the excuse the west needs! yeah for sure.. here another link i found about it. Russian missiles land in NATO state Poland on Ukraine border killing at least two | World | News | Express.co.uk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 (edited) https://www.rt.com/news/566586-poland-missile-emergency/ We can all see what’s happening here! Russian missiles kill two people in NATO member Poland, US intelligence official says Seems reminiscent… Edited November 15, 2022 by DannyUK 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Grapes Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 On 11/14/2022 at 6:50 PM, Grumpy Grapes said: First photos of America's largest warship, USS Gerald Ford, off the coast of the Isle of Wight. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/news/see-worlds-biggest-warship-uss-gerald-r-ford-in-solent-and-send-us-your-photos/ar-AA145Cuq Another video of the USS Gerald Ford https://content.jwplatform.com/previews/p70epEI8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyUK Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 (edited) Setting the stage for war can quite easily be seen. Maybe this will solve the economic crisis. I wonder where they’ve got that idea from Clowns upon the earth - False Face Phantom/Mask - Interface We’ve certainly seen a lot of clowns upon the earth of late… The above video interpretations are sound just reference being to what individual they may refer is questionable. This is how those behind the deception can play this out to basically anyone they see fit to play the roles. This is a game the death cult are playing out imitating biblical prophecy to impose their will/plans/agenda is how I see what’s taking place. Corona Virus - A Total Eclipse of the Heart Head Wound - Self Destruction - The Intellect Unbalanced No Heart PI – FAITH IN CHAOS BY DARREN ARONOFSKY https://saniyaaj.wordpress.com/2014/09/08/pi-faith-in-chaos-by-darren-aronofsky/ Edited November 15, 2022 by DannyUK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nip Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 1 hour ago, Skotfreezy said: Russia-Ukraine war live: two people killed after Russian missiles cross into Poland, says US intelligence official (msn.com) A Russian 'stray' missile hit a town in Poland Oh dear ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamboozooka Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 (edited) Russia denies striking Poland with missiles Moscow insists a reported explosion near the Ukrainian border is not related to its military operation Russia has not carried out any strikes against targets near the Polish-Ukrainian border, the defense ministry in Moscow said on Tuesday, following reports of a missile striking the village of Przewodow and killing two civilians. Some Western media outlets and politicians have claimed that Russia is responsible for the incident. However, no evidence has been provided to support such assertions. Missile fragments, photos of which were published by Polish media outlets on the scene, “have nothing to do with Russian weapons,” the Russian Defense Ministry said. Statements by the Polish media and officials about the alleged ‘Russian’ missiles falling in the area of the village of Przewodow are “a deliberate provocation in order to escalate the situation,” the Russian military added. Read more: Poland calls emergency security meeting after claim about missiles Poland convened an emergency meeting of its national security council on Tuesday evening, after reports that at least two civilians were killed when one or more missiles struck the village in the Lublin region, just across the border with Ukraine. While the AP reported that Russian missiles had crossed into Poland, citing an unnamed “senior US intelligence official,” the Pentagon declined to corroborate the claim. “I can tell you that we don't have any information at this time to corroborate those reports and are looking into this further,” Air Force Brigadier General Patrick Ryder told reporters, when asked about the Przewodow incident. Polish government spokesman Piotr Mueller called on the media and the public “not to publish unconfirmed information.” Officials from the Baltic states blamed Russia and claimed that Poland should invoke NATO’s Article 5 in retaliation. Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky accused Russia of “terrorism” and said NATO needed to “act” against this “attack on collective security.” https://www.rt.com/russia/566589-russia-no-strikes-on-poland/ Edited November 15, 2022 by Indigo 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 On 10/4/2022 at 12:42 AM, Indigo said: NATO Intervention In Ukraine Could Spark Nuclear War. Here’s How It Could Happen By: Harry Kazianis March 04, 2022 In the simulation we mapped out, not only does NATO get sucked in unintentionally, but Russia releases nuclear weapons in its desperation. “How did we just kill a billion people?” Over just three days, as I have done countless times over the last several years, a group of past and present senior U.S. government officials from both sides of the aisle gathered to wage a NATO-Russia war in a simulation at the end of 2019. In the course of what we called the NATO-Russia War of 2019, we estimated one billion people died. And if we aren’t careful, what happened in a simulation could happen if a NATO-Russia war erupts over Ukraine. In fact, in the simulation I mentioned above from 2019, in which Russia invades Ukraine in a similar way as it did over the last week or so, not only does NATO get sucked in unintentionally, but Russia eventually releases nuclear weapons in its desperation. The result is an eventual escalation of bigger and more dangerous nuclear weapons whereby over one billion lives are lost. But before we start staring into the abyss, allow me to explain the goal of such simulations. NATO clearly would have a massive conventional advantage in any war with Moscow, ensuring that in a straight-up fight Putin would lose. However, Russia has stated time and time again it will use nuclear weapons to defend its territory and its regime if it feels mortally threatened. Our simulation always seems to ask: Can we ever defeat Russian President Vladamir Putin in an armed conflict over Ukraine or the Baltics and not start a nuclear war in the process? So far, over at least several years, and with at least 100 different participants that all held different ideas about war and political allegiances, the answer is a flat out no. Setting the Scene for War The scenario the group decided to test back in late 2019 was similar to today: Russia decided to invade Ukraine under the excuse that it is must defend Russian-speaking peoples that are being “oppressed” by Ukraine’s fascist government. In our scenario, we assumed Russia performs far more admirably than it does today but has more limited objectives, in that Moscow wants to connect Crimea to separatist regions in Eastern Ukraine that are under its effective control. We assumed that Russia does that quickly, achieving most of its military objectives in roughly four days. But Ukraine does not give up so easily, just like in real life today. Ukrainian forces, after taking heavy losses, mount an impressive counterattack, whereby Russia loses over 100 tanks and over 2,500 soldiers. Images on social media show Russian armor ablaze, elite Su-35 fighter jets are shut down from the skies, and arms are now flowing in from the West in massive numbers. Putin is outraged. He thought Ukraine would simply roll over, but he does not factor into his calculus the nearly decades-long training Kyiv received from the U.S. and NATO nor Ukraine’s military build-up for the last several years that was focused on this scenario. Russia then decides that its limited military objectives were a mistake, and that all of Ukraine must be “demilitarized.” Moscow then launches a massive ballistic and cruise missile strike followed up by Russia’s air force launching its own shock and awe campaign, destroying a vast majority of Ukraine’s command and control structure, air force, air defense, and armored units in the process. At the same time, Russia starts surging troops to the borders of Ukraine in what looks like an imminent general invasion and occupation of the entire country. The Spark Here is where things take a turn for the worst. A Russian ballistic missile’s guidance system fails and crash-lands into NATO member Poland, killing 34 civilians as it tragically lands into a populated village along the Polish-Ukraine border. While the missile was not directed at Poland intentionally, pictures on social media show children crying for their mothers and bodies left unrecognizable, and demands for justice and revenge mount. To its credit, Poland, which has its own tortured history with the Soviet Union and Russia, does its best to show restraint. While not responding with its own military, it leads an effort to see that Moscow pays a steep price for its aggression in Ukraine and actions, even unintentional, in Poland. Warsaw leads a diplomatic and economic boycott of Moscow resulting in Russia being kicked out of SWIFT as well as direct sanctions on Russian banks, similar to what we are seeing today. In our scenario, Russia’s reaction is also swift. Moscow decides to launch a massive cyber attack on Poland, having based cyber warriors all throughout NATO territory, using their geography and proxy servers to mask the origin of the attack. Russia, in just two hours, takes off-line Poland’s entire electrical grid, banking sector, energy plants, and more — essentially taking Poland back to the stone age. And this is where the nightmare begins. Even though attribution is hard to achieve, Poland appeals to NATO and starts to privately share its desire to invoke Article 5 of the NATO Charter, declaring that an attack on one is an attack on the entire alliance. NATO is worried, as there is debate on how far to punish Russia while also feeling as if they do not have a clear military objective amongst the member states as some want to respond to what happened to Poland while others feel they must intervene militarily in Ukraine. The Response Here is where NATO surprises everyone. The alliance decides to set up a limited no-fly zone around the Ukrainian city of Lviv to protect innocent civilians and refugees that are trapped and have nowhere to go. Russia is warned: NATO is not intervening in the conflict, but will ensure that its planes and the airspace around Lviv are protected. NATO does make clear its jets will be in the skies above Ukraine, but will not operate from Ukrainian territory. In Moscow, Putin now gets a sense that NATO is destined to intervene on Ukraine’s side. Russia fears NATO will use this protected corridor as a base of operations to send ever more sophisticated weapons. And with its economy now in a tailspin due to sanctions, Putin feels the walls closing in him. Before NATO can impose its no-fly zone, Putin orders strikes on any remaining airfields and military assets around Lviv. But here is where Putin miscalculates and sets the stage for a NATO-Russia war. Putin orders another massive cyber attack on the Baltic states’ military infrastructure, thinking that NATO will use the Baltics to stage an invasion of Russia. This ends up being the last straw for NATO, which then decides direct intervention in Ukraine is necessary to push back against Russian aggression. Before even an announcement is made, Russian intelligence sees missile and troop movements that indicate an impending NATO attack and decide to strike first — with tactical nuclear weapons. NATO decides to respond in kind. Russia then targets European cities with nuclear weapons, with NATO and America also responding in kind. What is left is nothing short of an apocalypse, with what we estimate is billion people dead. No War Goes As Planned In every scenario I have been a part of there is one common theme to all of them: When Vladimir Putin feels boxed in and feels Russia is directly threatened, usually from a mistake he makes on the battlefield, he decides to use whatever escalatory step he desires to try and make up for it. While we may well soon see Ukraine and Russia find a diplomatic path out of this brutal war, both sides seem dug in. That means the chances for escalation like the above are high. And if Russia and NATO do become involved in direct conflict, Putin knows that in a conventional fight his regime would be defeated. That means Russia will choose nuclear war. The only question in a NATO-Russia war seems obvious: how many millions or billions of people would die? Harry J. Kazianis is director of defense studies at the Center for the National Interest in Washington DC and executive editor of their publishing arm, The National Interest. The views expressed in this article are his own. He's on Twitter @grecianformula. https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/04/nato-involvement-in-ukraine-could-spark-nuclear-genocide-heres-how-it-could-happen/ Some time ago I posted the above article which says: Quote The Spark Here is where things take a turn for the worst. A Russian ballistic missile’s guidance system fails and crash-lands into NATO member Poland, killing 34 civilians as it tragically lands into a populated village along the Polish-Ukraine border. While the missile was not directed at Poland intentionally, pictures on social media show children crying for their mothers and bodies left unrecognizable, and demands for justice and revenge mount. Sounds similar doesn't it ;) Most probably false flag. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skotfreezy Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 (edited) Poland set to trigger Article 4 Ukraine war latest: Poland raising readiness of military units after Russian missiles feared to have hit NATO territory; experts suggest likely response | World News | Sky News Edited November 15, 2022 by Skotfreezy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted November 15, 2022 Share Posted November 15, 2022 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webtrekker Posted November 16, 2022 Share Posted November 16, 2022 Low budget Polish false flag is a farce. The supposed point of arrival of the Russian missile. A tipped farm trailer carrying a few wooden sleepers (not on fire) next to a trench dug by a back hoe, with the dig out neatly in piles. No damage to the tractor at all. This is a total farce and quite clearly not the impact site of a Russian missile. More like a scene from the Benny Hill Show, low budget television from the 1960s. A totally amateur attempt at scene setting for a false flag. WW3 deserves better than this farcical attempt at global deception. If the Pentagon takes this seriously, it’s time to quit NATO. We in the West are being run by imbeciles. To see what Kalibr missiles do to targets, try the below attack... How come TV presenters are taking this seriously? In explosions things like planks of wood are forcefully ejected. How come they are neatly spread out falling back into the hole? I think we know the answer. Tyres would be on fire. Tip the trailer back on its wheels and the tractor can carry on working as normal. Not one wooden sleeper is lost. Fill the hole back in. That could all be done for $100 in a country like Poland. No doubt a relative of the Defence Minister got the contract and pocketed $2000. A nice day’s pay out there https://tapnewswire.com/2022/11/low-budget-polish-false-flag-is-a-farce/ 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captainlove Posted November 16, 2022 Share Posted November 16, 2022 https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-war-missile-attack-appears-to-be-unfortunate-accident-polands-president-says-12748752 Seems to be a accident by ukraine not Russia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Thoth Posted November 16, 2022 Share Posted November 16, 2022 Raschid Sinook appears to fellate Emmanuel Macron as P.I. Joe watches intently (sniffing his finger) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11433783/World-leaders-plot-response-missile-hits-Poland-killing-two.html 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamboozooka Posted November 16, 2022 Share Posted November 16, 2022 need a stray hypersonic to hit the g20 do us all a favour 5 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skotfreezy Posted November 16, 2022 Share Posted November 16, 2022 Thankfully a civilian snapped a photo and posted the remains of the rocket before the authorities made it really seem like Russia did it. We would have been in WW3 by now. Biden want to send more money to Ukraine btw... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velma Posted November 17, 2022 Share Posted November 17, 2022 (edited) I have paid no attention to the phony Ukraine war with Royal Arch Freemason Putin vs Mossad Agent Zelensky, destroying by deception, the infrastructure of another European nation, but today, it was finally disclosed why… (build back digital) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63657350 Australian mining billionaire Andrew Forrest has launched an investment fund that is hoped will be worth at least $25bn (£21bn) to help rebuild war-torn Ukraine. Mr Forrest and his wife have committed $500m to the fund, which its organisers say could eventually grow to $100bn. The Ukraine Green Growth Initiative plans to invest in primary infrastructure such as energy and telecoms networks. President Zelensky welcomed the move. "We will take advantage of the fact that what the Russians have destroyed can readily be replaced with the latest, most modern green and digital infrastructure," Mr Zelensky said. The fund said it had been working with Larry Fink, the chairman of investment giant BlackRock, and hopes to gain the support of sovereign wealth funds and other professional investors. Edited November 17, 2022 by Velma 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil Posted November 17, 2022 Share Posted November 17, 2022 2 hours ago, Velma said: I have paid no attention to the phony Ukraine war with Royal Arch Freemason Putin vs Mossad Agent Zelensky, destroying by deception, the infrastructure of another European nation, but today, it was finally disclosed why… (build back digital) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63657350 Australian mining billionaire Andrew Forrest has launched an investment fund that is hoped will be worth at least $25bn (£21bn) to help rebuild war-torn Ukraine. Mr Forrest and his wife have committed $500m to the fund, which its organisers say could eventually grow to $100bn. The Ukraine Green Growth Initiative plans to invest in primary infrastructure such as energy and telecoms networks. President Zelensky welcomed the move. "We will take advantage of the fact that what the Russians have destroyed can readily be replaced with the latest, most modern green and digital infrastructure," Mr Zelensky said. The fund said it had been working with Larry Fink, the chairman of investment giant BlackRock, and hopes to gain the support of sovereign wealth funds and other professional investors. Same here. I find it pretty much pointless following what's going on in Ukraine. Its things like you have just posted which show what's really happening. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted November 17, 2022 Share Posted November 17, 2022 (edited) INTERVIEW: The Russians need fewer troops to defend the new line on the Dnieper says Gonzalo Lira Edited November 17, 2022 by Indigo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted November 17, 2022 Share Posted November 17, 2022 (edited) https://thegoodcitizen.substack.com/p/cocaine-rocket-man Edited November 17, 2022 by Indigo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted November 17, 2022 Share Posted November 17, 2022 WHAT ON EARTH Ukraine is doing to pro-Russia people in Kherson?! https://www.rt.com/russia/566485-kherson-punishment-ap-photos/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamboozooka Posted November 17, 2022 Share Posted November 17, 2022 (edited) cant get more cringe Edited November 17, 2022 by bamboozooka 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted November 18, 2022 Share Posted November 18, 2022 (edited) NATO’s hair trigger: The Polish missile incident was a close brush with nuclear annihilation The fervor with which Poland and others sought to drag NATO into a war with Russia should ring alarm bells for everyone The world dodged a bullet this week, with some NATO members trying, but failing, to trigger Article 4 as a means of confronting Russia in Ukraine. We may not be so lucky next time. The recent scandal surrounding what most of the world now agrees was an errant Ukrainian surface-to-air missile landing on Polish soil, killing two Polish citizens in the process, has exposed an ugly reality about the eastern reaches of NATO today: Despite the more reserved stance of the old NATO establishment (the US, UK, France, and Germany), the new upstarts in eastern Europe seem hell-bent on finding a mechanism that will justify NATO intervention in Ukraine. This predilection for nuclear annihilation (no one should have any misgivings that a NATO-Russia conflict would end any other way) should send alarm bells ringing in the halls of power throughout NATO and the rest of the world, because left to their own devices, the Russophobic officials that dominate the governments of Poland and the three Baltic republics act like lemmings, running toward the Ukrainian cliff, oblivious to their fate as they chase the fantasy of NATO defeating Russia on a European battlefield. The rush to judgment that accompanied the arrival of the Ukrainian surface-to-air missile on Polish soil serves as a stark reminder about how the supposedly defensive characteristics of the NATO Charter can be used to promote, rather than deter, conflict. Let there be no doubt – NATO was aware that the missile that impacted near the village of Przewodów in Poland, killing two Polish citizens, was a Ukrainian surface-to-air missile the moment it was launched. The airspace over Ukraine is one of the most highly-monitored locations in the world. Without revealing sources and methods, suffice it to say there isn’t anything that happens over Ukraine that isn’t registered in real time on a NATO display in headquarters throughout Europe – including Poland. And yet … Poland saw fit to summon the Russian ambassador and lodge a protest. Moreover, Poland declared that it would increase its military readiness while contemplating the activation of Article 4 of the NATO Treaty, a mechanism which allows the alliance to discuss security threats to member states with an eye on possibly using NATO military force to rectify the situation. Article 4 is behind every combat deployment of NATO since its inception, from Serbia, to Libya, to Afghanistan. On cue, Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda, whose country borders Poland, tweeted that “every inch of NATO territory must be defended!” Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala likewise turned to Twitter to exclaim: “If Poland confirms that the missiles also hit its territory, this will be a further escalation by Russia. We stand firmly behind our EU and NATO ally.” For its part, Estonia called the news “most concerning,” with its foreign minister declaring via Twitter, “We are consulting closely with Poland and other allies. Estonia is ready to defend every inch of NATO territory.” While all parties concurred that there was no basis for triggering Article 5 of NATO (i.e., the collective security clause), Article 4 was very much in play. Poland was adamant: The missile “attack” against Poland was clearly a crime, one that could not go unpunished. As such, under Article 4, Poland would be pushing “for NATO members and Poland to agree on the provision of additional anti-aircraft defense, including in part of the territory of Ukraine.” And there you have it: “Including in part of the territory of Ukraine.” Enter Germany, stage left: “As an immediate reaction to the incident in Poland, we will offer to strengthen air policing with combat air patrols over its airspace with German Eurofighters,” a German Defense Ministry spokesperson declared. Cue NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who convened an emergency meeting of NATO ambassadors in Brussels to discuss the Polish incident. According to the Finnish foreign minister (Finland, although not a NATO member, was invited to the meeting), “Closing the airspace [above Ukraine] will definitely be discussed. Various options of how we can protect Ukraine are on the table.” While Germany reportedly rejected the establishment of a no-fly zone over Ukraine, noting that such an action would pose a threat of direct confrontation between Russia and NATO, one is left pondering how such a discussion came to be in the first place: Ukraine fired a surface-to-air missile, which was tracked by NATO as it impacted on Polish soil. And, as a result, NATO members end up discussing the possibility of invoking Article 4 of the NATO Charter, seeking to extend NATO air defense into Ukrainian air space in concert with the establishment of a no-fly zone enforced by NATO aircraft. Even if it was a blue on blue [incident] with a Ukrainian rocket that landed in Poland, I think there is still enough ground for Poland to invoke Article 4,” a former director of policy planning for NATO, Fabrice Pothier, declared. Just to clarify what Mr. Pothier is saying: Because Ukraine fired a surface-to-air missile that ended up landing on Polish soil, NATO is justified in invoking Article 4, setting the stage for a possible NATO-Russia conflict in Ukraine which could lead to global nuclear annihilation. If there was ever any doubt about the threat NATO posed to the entire world, there is no more. That this is being promulgated on behalf of a Ukrainian leader who, despite universal consensus that the missile which hit Poland was Ukrainian, denies this possibility, all the while blaming Russia in the hopes that NATO will intervene, only adds to the insanity of this crisis. While it appears that the world has dodged the potential death sentence triggered by the NATO Article 4 this time, the hair-trigger aspect of NATO’s Pavlovian response mechanism when it comes to seeking causal justification for military intervention in Ukraine should have everyone on high alert. Scott Ritter is a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer and author of 'Disarmament in the Time of Perestroika: Arms Control and the End of the Soviet Union.' He served in the Soviet Union as an inspector implementing the INF Treaty, in General Schwarzkopf’s staff during the Gulf War, and from 1991-1998 as a UN weapons inspector. The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT. https://www.rt.com/news/566710-polish-missile-incident-nato/ Btw. I haven't found surnames of those two people allegedly killed in this incident so far. Edited November 18, 2022 by Indigo 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.