Jump to content

Conflict in Ukraine - Russian Invasion


Sexpistol50
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, TechnicGeek said:

 

That photo is outright disturbing and that's animals. Humans however seem to kill their own kind unnecessarily, even if it doesn't mean they will die if they won't kill. Beside physical suffering, humans are capable of causing emotional and mental suffering, with some even deriving joy from it.

 

Final solution should not be intended for particular race or nation but to entire human kind. This iteration of matrix has failed and I hope there will be no more since every iteration brings pain and suffering. Souls must be liberated from their imprisonment and return to the source. 

How much of that is human nature, or encouraged by the globalists? We know their Darwinists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Greenhulk50 said:

UK media headlines ..Prepare loved ones for war against Russia .

 

 

https://metro.co.uk/2022/08/21/top-soldier-warns-british-troops-must-be-ready-for-war-with-russia-17218087/

Why???? A war between the UK and Russia would result in an immediate tit for tat nuclear strike against each other, the troops wouldn't even get to fire a shot.

 

Typical MSM spreading fear as usual.

 

 

I noticed the news focused on a "flag factory" in Ukraine today, so their priority is making flags during a war, their power supply is also fully functional. If you are an invading force the first thing you would do is knock out a countries power supply... Russia haven't done that?  Hardly a "full scale invasion" is it?  I call it out for it is.  This whole "conflict" is complete an utter BS. 

 

It provides a convenient distraction and scapegoat for our own country being in a complete mess though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nefaria said:

Why???? A war between the UK and Russia would result in an immediate tit for tat nuclear strike against each other, the troops wouldn't even get to fire a shot.

 

 

Assuming those that control each side are really against each other. I could be wrong, but if world leaders on both sides are in bed together, then I'm sure they could arrange a conflict without nukes flying.

 

I wouldn't put it past our government wanting to get London nuked either though. They hate us with a passion. I don't see that happening, I think they want to divide the world up into zones like the Bunting map or 1984, but I bet they wargame various scenarios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

They were all empirical at that time. Is what he said inaccurate then? Mason or not. For clarity, what he's said in my post is exactly what you're seeing right now. The ultimate question is who's fighting for it? 

Edited by Morpheus
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

They were all empirical at that time. Is what he said inaccurate then? Mason or not? 

 

Not sure to be honest, never heard of him before. I just read that recently and you reminded me of it when it his named popped up in the ThoughtCo piece. I don't really have an opinion on him, I just thought it was worth sharing.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

"Who rules Eastern Europe commands the Heartland

Who rules the Heartland commands the World Island

Who rules the World Island commands the world"

 

Halford Mackinder

 

https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-mackinders-heartland-theory-4068393

 

 

He might have a point to be fair. Russia is a big landmass, and I wonder if Israel is allowing itself to be used for Operation SIG.

 

The chess pieces do seem to be lining up for this:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Not sure to be honest, never heard of him before. I just read that recently and you reminded me of it when it his named popped up in the ThoughtCo piece. I don't really have an opinion on him, I just thought it was worth sharing.

My point is this, putting the period of time into context, certain views of the world and society will be held by these people because it's the times. I don't however suggest that those views are correct/just or right, but it was a generality for the times. It's all about context. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see Britain coming out on top. The left don't like Britain much because of colonial history, and a lot white Europeans on the dissident Right hate the eternal Anglo because they think we stabbed other Europeans in the back by siding with the enemy. I doubt many would be sad to see us gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

He might have a point to be fair. Russia is a big landmass, and I wonder if Israel is allowing itself to be used for Operation SIG.

 

The chess pieces do seem to be lining up for this:

 

 

It's what you said it was a few posts up, it's the bunting clover leaf map, it's the belt and road initiative. This is why I posted the Mackinder quote, it's exactly that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Assuming those that control each side are really against each other. I could be wrong, but if world leaders on both sides are in bed together, then I'm sure they could arrange a conflict without nukes flying.

 

I wouldn't put it past our government wanting to get London nuked either though. They hate us with a passion. I don't see that happening, I think they want to divide the world up into zones like the Bunting map or 1984, but I bet they wargame various scenarios.

 

London and New York are supposedly the cabals centres, so to speak. I don't belive either will be nuked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nip said:

 

London and New York are supposedly the cabals centres, so to speak. I don't belive either will be nuked

 

London and New York are being ruined though. If the elites really like the West, then they're stupid because they're destroying our social cohesion. That's why I'm on the fence about nukes, because mass immigration can cause just as much damage as a bomb. Look at Japan for example, nuked twice but there isn't much violent crime there.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

London and New York are being ruined though. If the elites really like the West, then they're stupid because they're destroying our social cohesion. That's why I'm on the fence about nukes, because mass immigration can cause just as much damage as a bomb. Look at Japan for example, nuked twice but there isn't much violent crime there.

 

 

Or immigration, they hate foreigners and some of the worst racists going. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Morpheus said:

Or immigration, they hate foreigners and some of the worst racists going. 

 

Not condoning actual racial hatred, but they have a right to remain 99% Japanese. It's their country. Would you open your borders if you was Japanese, especially after seeing the state of the West right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Assuming those that control each side are really against each other. I could be wrong, but if world leaders on both sides are in bed together, then I'm sure they could arrange a conflict without nukes flying.

 

I wouldn't put it past our government wanting to get London nuked either though. They hate us with a passion. I don't see that happening, I think they want to divide the world up into zones like the Bunting map or 1984, but I bet they wargame various scenarios.

They'll turn America into a welfare state come banana republic and as Heinz Kissenger said Europe will then have to decide what relationship it has with the east. Basically, shut up and accept what we are going to do to you. 

 

What we can't have is Germany aligning with Russia (because we cannot have their high technology mixed with the Russian's rich resources to combine) and keep America in NATO. Unfortunately, like it or not, we need that constitutional republic to remain strong and free, because of they go down, we all go down. Pray for America. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Morpheus said:

They'll turn America into a welfare state come banana republic and as Heinz Kissenger said Europe will then have to decide what relationship it has with the east. Basically, shut up and accept what we are going to do to you. 

 

What we can't have is Germany aligning with Russia (because we cannot have their high technology mixed with the Russian's rich resources to combine) and keep America in NATO. Unfortunately, like it or not, we need that constitutional republic to remain strong and free, because of they go down, we all go down. Pray for America. 

 

I agree there. I think they didn't want Germanics teaming up either. Anglo and German engineering power probably threatened their plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Not condoning actual racial hatred, but they have a right to remain 99% Japanese. It's their country. Would you open your borders if you was Japanese, especially after seeing the state of the West right now?

Depends what they were being opened for and to whom.

 

Quite a narrow angle to come from with your question because the answer is multifaceted and not comparable to the observation I made about to their very apparent racism. Nationalism is not the same as being a racist mother fucker. It's one thing keeping your country as native as possible but it's quite another to hate everyone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Morpheus said:

Nationalism is not the same as being a racist mother fucker. It's one thing keeping your country as native as possible but it's quite another to hate everyone else. 

 

That's what I'm saying. If they're talking shit about foreigners then that's not good, but they have a right to be nationalists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...