David is our guru…

[AfanofDavid]

Now that it has been proven that everything David says - and has said - is verifiably and absolutely true, it it not time that his followers laid claim to the fact that he is a true and genuine prophet?
 

Furthermore, would it not make sense - for tax purposes alone - for a modern church to be set up in David’s name so that a greater legitimacy could be given to David’s teachings?

 

Also, every other religion can claim protection on the grounds that their followers are being offended or are being victimised and discriminated against because of their beliefs, so it would surely go a long way to protecting David’s followers if they could be protected in this way. 
 

What do other Forum members think of this? 
 

 

[screamingeagle]

so the conspiracy people are some kind of religion.....good luck with that claim 

 

sounds fishy to me

 

religions have enough protection as it is  

 

no need for "organised following",jusy speak the truth,it's that simple 

 

[Anti Facts Sir]

Shit, only just converted to Jedi last year.

[Ethel]

It was David's books which made me look at the world in an entirely different way, but he's not my guru. We're all meant to be our own guru. Much love to him for the painstaking time, energy, effort and attention to detail in his books, but hero worship is silly and it probably wouldn't be what he wants.

 

As an aside, I miss when his dot connector videos were filmed in his house. It was more personal, down to earth and relatable. I wish he would consider going back to that. Just my two cents.

[Macnamara]

I went to a temple in India once where a guru had held up a mirror to people and told them to love and respect what they saw in that mirror

 

Then the guru died and once he was gone some of his followers took the mirror down from the front of their temple and replaced it with a picture of the guru which they worshipped instead

[Guest m754]

 

We are all our own gurus, because there is nobody else...

[Guardian]

15 hours ago, AfanofDavid said:

Now that it has been proven that everything David says - and has said - is verifiably and absolutely true, it it not time that his followers laid claim to the fact that he is a true and genuine prophet?
 

Furthermore, would it not make sense - for tax purposes alone - for a modern church to be set up in David’s name so that a greater legitimacy could be given to David’s teachings?

 

Also, every other religion can claim protection on the grounds that their followers are being offended or are being victimised and discriminated against because of their beliefs, so it would surely go a long way to protecting David’s followers if they could be protected in this way. 
 

What do other Forum members think of this? 
 

 

 

Wow… a very weird perspective you got there, friend. Interesting nonetheless.

 

Prophet? Guru? Lol

 

Maybe from your limited point of view. No offence, my friend.

 

Your reality is limited by your perception…. if your perception is at a high level, you can see the patterns very easily. And can predict their move with accuracy.

If your perception is limited or non existed…. well, people like him will indeed seem like Nostradamus. 

 

I personally think David is another Guardian of light. 

Only the Guardians have the ability to see through illusions and deceptions with ease. 

 

 

 

BTW: Remember who you are.

 

 

[Origin]

In the end it will be possible to put all significant Templates into true patterns where it was active. You will be able to distinguish more than clearly what has been interpreted by humans and what it has actually demonstrated. You will know that all have seen and see the same thing. This will be the greatest challenge an individual can experience. There is not really a limitation on the part of this intelligence. In any case, a different and more interesting perspective will emerge. This will be challenged by the prevailing belief system and will definitely not be accepted. I have never been and will never go to that level because I do not see certain approaches as the right way. In my eyes, it has caused this mind-boggling confusion itself, countless possibilities of concepts. Less would have been more..

[Mr H]

You should not bow or worship any human. I think David would agree.

[Grumpy Grapes]

On 1/4/2022 at 5:55 PM, AfanofDavid said:

Now that it has been proven that everything David says - and has said - is verifiably and absolutely true, it it not time that his followers laid claim to the fact that he is a true and genuine prophet?
 

Furthermore, would it not make sense - for tax purposes alone - for a modern church to be set up in David’s name so that a greater legitimacy could be given to David’s teachings?

 

Also, every other religion can claim protection on the grounds that their followers are being offended or are being victimised and discriminated against because of their beliefs, so it would surely go a long way to protecting David’s followers if they could be protected in this way. 
 

What do other Forum members think of this? 
 

 

No, he's not our guru. I suspect that you have ulterior motives and are putting out anti-Icke propaganda (dredging up the old 'he's a religious leader' propaganda) to alienate newcomers to this forum. 

[Grumpy Owl]

On 1/4/2022 at 5:55 PM, AfanofDavid said:

Now that it has been proven that everything David says - and has said - is verifiably and absolutely true, it it not time that his followers laid claim to the fact that he is a true and genuine prophet?
 

Furthermore, would it not make sense - for tax purposes alone - for a modern church to be set up in David’s name so that a greater legitimacy could be given to David’s teachings?

 

Also, every other religion can claim protection on the grounds that their followers are being offended or are being victimised and discriminated against because of their beliefs, so it would surely go a long way to protecting David’s followers if they could be protected in this way. 
 

What do other Forum members think of this? 
 

 

 

David Icke is NOT a prophet. Certainly there have been some things where he hasn't been right.

 

And as for setting up a church, well that would be completely hypocritical considering his views on organised religions.

 

David does not 'teach', he merely compiles together information and presents it in a way that the reader/viewer/listener is able to make up their own mind.

 

I have read several of Davids books now, watched many videos, and even attended one of his tour events a few years ago. I don't consider myself any kind of 'follower', I don't see him as any prophet or 'guru', I don't agree with some things he has ideas about, but in the main he has allowed me to open my mind to all sorts of possibilities, and allowed me to follow my own path to discerning what is really going on with the world and the nature of our reality.

 

I think the last thing that David himself would want is to consider himself someone worthy of 'worship'. That's not what he's about.

 

 

[peter]

On 1/5/2022 at 3:55 AM, AfanofDavid said:

Now that it has been proven that everything David says - and has said - is verifiably and absolutely true, it it not time that his followers laid claim to the fact that he is a true and genuine prophet?
 

Furthermore, would it not make sense - for tax purposes alone - for a modern church to be set up in David’s name so that a greater legitimacy could be given to David’s teachings?

 

Also, every other religion can claim protection on the grounds that their followers are being offended or are being victimised and discriminated against because of their beliefs, so it would surely go a long way to protecting David’s followers if they could be protected in this way. 
 

What do other Forum members think of this? 
 

 

Ah ,the church of David Icke, I can see now , all the easily led can swap one god for  another

If you think that's what he's about you haven't understood a bloody thing

[Guardian]

9 hours ago, Grumpy Grapes said:

No, he's not our guru. I suspect that you have ulterior motives and are putting out anti-Icke propaganda (dredging up the old 'he's a religious leader' propaganda) to alienate newcomers to this forum. 

 

My conclusion exactly. 

[Firebird]

He isn't my guru and for that matter I don't view anyone as a guru. The concept of a guru means to give one's power away, to allow the guru to remake you in the way he wants.