Jump to content

Theory of evolution


Mr H

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Pinkiebee said:

I cant prove 4 billion years.

 

Ok thanks .... can you prove ....

 

14 minutes ago, Pinkiebee said:

the late heavy bombardment

 

then :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

Because you're repeating a common creationist misconception, and you've now ignored the explanations that debunk it.

Debunk it! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yes Wikipedia and knob head Dawkins have it all figured out. Go back to sleep everyone, here's 24 hours of gladiators with steroid pumped freaks smashing the shit out of each other with plastic sticks. Go back to sleep everyone........ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, zarkov said:

 

Wouldnt the formation of planets & stars be classed as going from a state of disorder to a state of order!

Much like the existence of bacteria.

Seems counterintuitive in terms of entropy!

 

Well they too are part of the entropy mechanism.  The law doesnt say that it must go from order to disorder directly it says a closed system so that's the whole universe in this case TENDS toward to entropy over time . So blips in the graph are fine we are still on our way to the heat death of the universe 

 

Or" how are we going to get rid of all this hydrogen? I know we will set fire to it. That will work"

Edited by Pinkiebee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pinkiebee said:

The process didnt go from fish directly to mammals so that's an unlikely find

 

And your unlikely to ever find a 50/ 50 split between two species coz that's not generaly how it works and if there was such there would only be one generation of them out of a few hundred million years of generation. So a bit hard to track down

Of course, whatever fits the narrative. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

How convenient. There's also no such thing as scientific proof either, because there are no proofs in science, only in maths and logic are there proofs. They're self contained systems of propositions, whereas science deals with the empirical. 

 

So to be clear, we have two types of science, empirical and pseudo science. We know which one many people deal with that's for sure. 

 

There's a good discussion on types of evidence here, along with the common misunderstandings:

 

https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-011-0371-0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Morpheus said:

I'll read that, because it's not Wikipedia or Richard Dawkins. I'll check back with you. Got any fossils of half bird half mammal yet?

Nor did mammals turn into birds or vice versa. Your struggling wiith the basic concept . Il see if I can find a lady bird book for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, zarkov said:

 

Wouldnt the formation of planets & stars be classed as going from a state of disorder to a state of order!

Much like the existence of bacteria.

Seems counterintuitive in terms of entropy!

 

 

Some say evolution would violate the law of thermodynamics. I'm not that good at calculations, but feel free to check these out: http://physics.gmu.edu/~roerter/EvolutionEntropy.htm

 

Here is more about The Second Law of Thermodynamics and evolution: https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-009-0195-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pinkiebee said:

Nor did mammals turn into birds or vice versa. Your struggling wiith the basic concept . Il see if I can find a lady bird book for you

No, I'm really not. You're failing to provide any proof of your 'THEORY'. 

 

What makes me laugh is the very person who's forum this is hates Richard Dawkins and doesn't believe in evolutionary 'THEORY' either. 

 

I think the evolutionists should listen to our Dave about what he thinks about human evolution. 

Edited by Morpheus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pinkiebee said:

I didnt actualy offer proof  I offered guidance

 

So no actual proof .... but you are happy to 'guide' me out of the 'maze' I am in?

And do that so a 'child' could understand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Morpheus said:

No, I'm really not. You're failing to provide any proof of your 'THEORY'. 

 

What makes me laugh is the very person who's forum this is hates Richard Dawkins and doesn't believe in evolutionary 'THEORY' either. 

 

I think the evolutionists should listen to our Dave about what he thinks about human evolution. 

Its a) not a theory b) not my theory and c) not my job to prove it to you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

No, I'm really not. You're failing to provide any proof of your 'THEORY'. 

 

What makes me laugh is the very person who's forum this is hates Richard Dawkins and doesn't believe in evolutionary 'THEORY' either. 

 

I think the evolutionists should listen to our Dave about what he thinks about human evolution. 

 

I notice you are obsessed with Richard Dawkins. Are you a secret fan, but can't admit it? 😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Debunk it! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yes Wikipedia and knob head Dawkins have it all figured out. Go back to sleep everyone, here's 24 hours of gladiators with steroid pumped freaks smashing the shit out of each other with plastic sticks. Go back to sleep everyone........ 

 

Okay, so you're not a creationist. You just repeat creationist claims. I accept that. Just clarifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pinkiebee said:

No it really isnt

 

Oh no it isn't .... Oh yes it is .... Oh no it isn't .... Oh yes it is .... etc

 

I return to the initial question I asked .... Prove the 4 billion years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ink said:

 

Give a go at showing some actual proof!

Im guy sat in his home having a chat about things on the internet 

 

I'm prepared to help you. It's not fair to make me  responsible for educating you. 

It's like giving guitar lessons I advise, you practice on your own

 

I can work google for you if your strugling 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ink said:

 

Oh no it isn't .... Oh yes it is .... Oh no it isn't .... Oh yes it is .... etc

 

I return to the initial question I asked .... Prove the 4 billion years?

Sorry to have  point out the obvious ! But" prove 4 billion years" is not a question, even if you put a ? at the end

Edited by Pinkiebee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pinkiebee said:

Well they too are part of the entropy mechanism.  The law doesnt say that it must go from order to disorder directly it says a closed system so that's the whole universe in this case TENDS toward to entropy over time . So blips in the graph are fine we are still on our way to the heat death of the universe 

 

Or" how are we going to get rid of all this hydrogen? I know we will set fire to it. That will work"

 

I thought the Physical Law of entropy was evident and derived from observation of matter transitioning from a state of order to disorder.

 

Life it appears  moves from a matter state of disorder to a state of order.

Is life exempt from the laws of thermodynamics?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...