Who would be held to account IF there ever was another Nuremberg type trial?

[CarpeDiem]

Apart from the obvious, Scientists, Doctors, Politicians, Police etc I wonder in this digital age who else could be held responsible for ‘following orders’?

 

A woman on a NHS tv advert telling everyone how important it is to get the covid jab? A radio presenter throwing ideas about on how to punish those who refuse the jab? The teacher telling pupils getting the jab is the right thing to do? The restaurant owner refusing entry to a non jabbed customer. A presenter on a tv show criticising those who refuse the jab? A ‘celebrity’ doctor telling people to get the jab?

 

In this digital age it is all out there to be seen. There will be no denying what they have done/said. But how far should the ‘following orders’ prosecutions go?

 

I doubt we will ever see any of this in a court of law but if we did it would certainly be interesting to see who would be considered for trial. 
 

 

 

 

[Seeker]

1 hour ago, CarpeDiem said:

Apart from the obvious, Scientists, Doctors, Politicians, Police etc I wonder in this digital age who else could be held responsible for ‘following orders’?

 

A woman on a NHS tv advert telling everyone how important it is to get the covid jab? A radio presenter throwing ideas about on how to punish those who refuse the jab? The teacher telling pupils getting the jab is the right thing to do? The restaurant owner refusing entry to a non jabbed customer. A presenter on a tv show criticising those who refuse the jab? A ‘celebrity’ doctor telling people to get the jab?

 

In this digital age it is all out there to be seen. There will be no denying what they have done/said. But how far should the ‘following orders’ prosecutions go?

 

I doubt we will ever see any of this in a court of law but if we did it would certainly be interesting to see who would be considered for trial. 
 

 

 

 

The person at the heart of it funding every important organisation or person is Bill Gates, we can all see that, so it would be him, along with other heads of companies like wef, Pfizer, moderna, Astra, etc, and those in government. 

 

From what i gather the first Nuremberg trials are not quite how we would think of them. For example one or two individuals were tortured for 3 days straight before their shocking confessions... were they tortured into making false claims? I guess we will never know.  

 

As you say this is never going to get anywhere in court. Even at an international level, allegedly 25% of the judges are funded by Gates & Soros, and the others can be blackmailed. 

[Observed]

3 hours ago, CarpeDiem said:

Apart from the obvious, Scientists, Doctors, Politicians, Police etc I wonder in this digital age who else could be held responsible for ‘following orders’?

 

A woman on a NHS tv advert telling everyone how important it is to get the covid jab? A radio presenter throwing ideas about on how to punish those who refuse the jab? The teacher telling pupils getting the jab is the right thing to do? The restaurant owner refusing entry to a non jabbed customer. A presenter on a tv show criticising those who refuse the jab? A ‘celebrity’ doctor telling people to get the jab?

 

In this digital age it is all out there to be seen. There will be no denying what they have done/said. But how far should the ‘following orders’ prosecutions go?

 

I doubt we will ever see any of this in a court of law but if we did it would certainly be interesting to see who would be considered for trial. 
 

 

 

 

Every single one of them.

[Saved]

As surely as the entire monetary system across the whole world can be brought to zero, the entire history of the internet can be destroyed.

 

It is easier to 'burn' digitalised history than it is trillions of books and newspapers.

 

Sure, hard copies of evidence are out there - but aren't accessible or sharable to anybody but friends, colleagues and neighbours. There would be no internet on which to put this proof out there or back out there.

 

The courts are owned by the powers, anyway. As far as I'm concerned, true justice will never be seen in a human court but shall be exercised by a perfect Judge at the appointed time.

[andy1033]

These people will never be prosecuted by legal means. They own the legal system.

[Ethel]

On 12/3/2021 at 8:32 PM, CarpeDiem said:

Apart from the obvious, Scientists, Doctors, Politicians, Police etc I wonder in this digital age who else could be held responsible for ‘following orders

 

Does anyone know of a courtroom big enough to fit nearly 8 billion people in it?

[Athenry04]

Every tv presenter can be added to the list, especially the news'casters'.