Jump to content

Who would be held to account IF there ever was another Nuremberg type trial?


CarpeDiem
 Share

Recommended Posts

Apart from the obvious, Scientists, Doctors, Politicians, Police etc I wonder in this digital age who else could be held responsible for ‘following orders’?

 

A woman on a NHS tv advert telling everyone how important it is to get the covid jab? A radio presenter throwing ideas about on how to punish those who refuse the jab? The teacher telling pupils getting the jab is the right thing to do? The restaurant owner refusing entry to a non jabbed customer. A presenter on a tv show criticising those who refuse the jab? A ‘celebrity’ doctor telling people to get the jab?

 

In this digital age it is all out there to be seen. There will be no denying what they have done/said. But how far should the ‘following orders’ prosecutions go?

 

I doubt we will ever see any of this in a court of law but if we did it would certainly be interesting to see who would be considered for trial. 
 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CarpeDiem said:

Apart from the obvious, Scientists, Doctors, Politicians, Police etc I wonder in this digital age who else could be held responsible for ‘following orders’?

 

A woman on a NHS tv advert telling everyone how important it is to get the covid jab? A radio presenter throwing ideas about on how to punish those who refuse the jab? The teacher telling pupils getting the jab is the right thing to do? The restaurant owner refusing entry to a non jabbed customer. A presenter on a tv show criticising those who refuse the jab? A ‘celebrity’ doctor telling people to get the jab?

 

In this digital age it is all out there to be seen. There will be no denying what they have done/said. But how far should the ‘following orders’ prosecutions go?

 

I doubt we will ever see any of this in a court of law but if we did it would certainly be interesting to see who would be considered for trial. 
 

 

 

 

The person at the heart of it funding every important organisation or person is Bill Gates, we can all see that, so it would be him, along with other heads of companies like wef, Pfizer, moderna, Astra, etc, and those in government. 

 

From what i gather the first Nuremberg trials are not quite how we would think of them. For example one or two individuals were tortured for 3 days straight before their shocking confessions... were they tortured into making false claims? I guess we will never know.  

 

As you say this is never going to get anywhere in court. Even at an international level, allegedly 25% of the judges are funded by Gates & Soros, and the others can be blackmailed. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CarpeDiem said:

Apart from the obvious, Scientists, Doctors, Politicians, Police etc I wonder in this digital age who else could be held responsible for ‘following orders’?

 

A woman on a NHS tv advert telling everyone how important it is to get the covid jab? A radio presenter throwing ideas about on how to punish those who refuse the jab? The teacher telling pupils getting the jab is the right thing to do? The restaurant owner refusing entry to a non jabbed customer. A presenter on a tv show criticising those who refuse the jab? A ‘celebrity’ doctor telling people to get the jab?

 

In this digital age it is all out there to be seen. There will be no denying what they have done/said. But how far should the ‘following orders’ prosecutions go?

 

I doubt we will ever see any of this in a court of law but if we did it would certainly be interesting to see who would be considered for trial. 
 

 

 

 

Every single one of them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As surely as the entire monetary system across the whole world can be brought to zero, the entire history of the internet can be destroyed.

 

It is easier to 'burn' digitalised history than it is trillions of books and newspapers.

 

Sure, hard copies of evidence are out there - but aren't accessible or sharable to anybody but friends, colleagues and neighbours. There would be no internet on which to put this proof out there or back out there.

 

The courts are owned by the powers, anyway. As far as I'm concerned, true justice will never be seen in a human court but shall be exercised by a perfect Judge at the appointed time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2021 at 8:32 PM, CarpeDiem said:

Apart from the obvious, Scientists, Doctors, Politicians, Police etc I wonder in this digital age who else could be held responsible for ‘following orders

 

Does anyone know of a courtroom big enough to fit nearly 8 billion people in it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...