ARTICLE IN WORLD RENOWNED MEDICAL JOURNAL PROVES JABS CAUSE SEVERE HEART PROBLEMS

[epsom]

ARTICLE IN WORLD RENOWNED MEDICAL JOURNAL PROVES JABS CAUSE SEVERE HEART PROBLEMS

 

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

 

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Steven R Gundry

Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712

Abstract

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2^nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.

We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

 

Edited November 24, 2021 by epsom

[DarianF]

1 hour ago, epsom said:

ARTICLE IN WORLD RENOWNED MEDICAL JOURNAL PROVES JABS CAUSE SEVERE HEART PROBLEMS

 

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

 

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Steven R Gundry

Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712

Abstract

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2^nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.

We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

 

 

Posted by Malone too. Nice.

 

[Firestarter]

I couldn't find the "full study" to read...

 

 

Vernon Coleman responds to this evidence that the COVID vaccines cause dead.
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/finally-medical-proof-the-covid-jab-is-quot-murder-quot_TWpj5FDYSrjRIsT.html

 

On 13 September 2021, the 4 Chief Medical Officer’s of the UK advised to start jabbing kids of 12 years an older with the dangerous Pfizer COVID-19.
You could have guessed that suddenly the deaths (all causes) among 10 – 14-year-olds increased by 62% compared to the same period from 2015 to 2019...

From 2015 to 2019 in weeks 38 to 41,  in England and Wales an average total of 21 deaths occurred among 10 – 14-year-olds.

In 2021 in weeks 38 to 41,  in England and Wales a total of 34 deaths occurred among 10 – 14-year-olds. 34 is 62% higher than 21...

 

The increase was even bigger in weeks 40 (+120%) and 41 (+100%).
And not surprisingly, as the clot shots are associated with heart disease especially in young men and boys, there was an increase in deaths 83% for boys this age for this period in 2021.

 

There is also an earlier spike in deaths for 10 – 14-year-olds of +175% in week 34.
This couldn't have anything to do with vulnerable children being poisoned with the deadly COVID-19 vaccines the week before, as recommended by the JCVI?

 

In the 6 weeks before week 38 (including the 11 in week 34) in 2021, there were 29 deaths among children aged 10 – 14 years.
In the 6 weeks before week 38, there were 28 deaths among children aged 10 – 14 years on average from 2015 to 2019.
Or a negligible increase of deaths from all causes (or even decrease if we exclude week 34).

 

As for the necessity for jabbing  these kids, you can see that there was no increase in deaths, at least not for this age group in the 6 weeks before week 38 in 2021...
There are 15.6 million people younger than 20 in the UK, of which between March 2020 and 20 October 2021 only 64 died with COVID-19 (only 14 without other conditions): https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/28/child-deaths-62-percent-higher-since-covid-19-vaccination-began/

(https://archive.md/2o3Dz)

[Firestarter]

Also in Queensland (in Australia) Myocarditis & Pericarditis cases are skyrocketing (with the numbers going up almost exponentially).

June: 39 cases
July: 121 cases
August: 283 cases
September: 519 cases
October: 813 cases

 

https://cairnsnews.org/2021/11/19/myocarditis-cases-through-the-roof-mrs-qld-premier-from-an-inoculation-that-does-not-work/

[Firestarter]

The "full report" won't be published because the scientists are afraid that they lose big pharma funding!

 

[Saved]

9 hours ago, Firestarter said:

The "full report" won't be published because the scientists are afraid that they lose big pharma funding!

 

I was thinking the same as I read the above posts. Only a hint of what is happening can be said publicly.

 

They will simply lie their way out of any findings that point to more than one in a hundred thousand suffering any serious adverse reactions.

 

Most (who had the real thing) are on a slow kill in my opinion. Those who exert themselves in bursts (who had the real thing) are showing up the definition of 'extremely rare' as a sick joke.

 

There will never be a full report.

[Seeker]

They’re now claiming there’s an error with the study 

 

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001051