Jump to content

Deca`s take on "Gangstalking"


Deca
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Deca said:

 

sorry that just does not meet as good evidence ..."going around and asking somebody" .....that's like asking somebody if "ghost are real"  plus you not provided any supporting evidence  so its just really gossip/hearsay and we just have to take your word on this as we have no access to what you said and the context of the reply etc just have to rely on your selective retelling interpretation of events 

327894123_1280px-Grahams_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement-en_svg.png.a0dacd7d4252c8d7d8a38e9147dd98b0.png

 

I used to work in a pub and had hundred's of friends from all sorts of backgrounds ...so you are trying to use guilt by association and ad hominem ....

 

I want to understand the psychological impact , effects ,social consequence so we can mitigate it ..then learn try to detect the technology and gather evidence so we can build a case ........ you seem want to make it about "particular group" the "masons" and then point your anger and frustration towards them .... 

 

37637331_1994967057214892_5457474012265316352_n.jpg.5760f8dca5a6ba143f3cb642d59aeb11.jpg

 

 

 

clearly you don`t understand how phased array antenna's work like modern RADAR and 5G use (beamforming)

 

Phased Array Antennas

 

 

 

 

clearly  there some good info on this post .....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look as I said I agree with the stuff you say on this thread. But my point was about the burden of proof. (Even though I agree with you on the tech angle) it is a interpretation that that's how they will use it to target one individual. There's no proof they will use it like that, even tho I know they will. Its just a personal take thats how they will deploy it.

Saying thats what there going to do and them actually doing it are two different levels of proof. As I said I agree with the fact thats exactly how they will use it, but in a court of law that's not going to cut it.

With the Mason side of it, you won't take evidence of pics of cars, you won't take the harrased individuals word, and tbh those on there own don't prove anything so the only thing you have left is the masons word. You will never get them in court so it will never reach court, but testimony from multiple sources within there organisation will give yourself they fact they do, it's not court certified evidence but it's the most your ever gonna get. As they have a say in control of the system, police, lawyers, judges you would never be successful anyhow. So like with your stuff you will only reach a certain level of proof that is all.

You said you had mates that's not guilt by association, I asked you as you said mates go ask them if they would ever deploy those tactics against anyone as an organisation, you tried to get funny about there to busy hobnobbing I said ask them but you deflect away from that. If you had someone from within the workings of what you talk about on radar tech you would be all over it as proof, if you had multi people saying that you would say I've hit the jackpot in terms  of levels of proof. But if you get multiple members of freemasonry your saying that's not good enough. It's double standards.

The fact you dismiss it without checking that out is lazy in terms of saying it doesn't happen, as you no members you don't even need to find away of finding them.

Freemasons aren't top of the food chain, there part of it. They all work in sync with one another there part of the problem as are many other parts. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Relativity said:

Look as I said I agree with the stuff you say on this thread. But my point was about the burden of proof. (Even though I agree with you on the tech angle) it is a interpretation that that's how they will use it to target one individual. There's no proof they will use it like that, even tho I know they will. Its just a personal take thats how they will deploy it.

Saying thats what there going to do and them actually doing it are two different levels of proof. As I said I agree with the fact thats exactly how they will use it, but in a court of law that's not going to cut it.

With the Mason side of it, you won't take evidence of pics of cars, you won't take the harrased individuals word, and tbh those on there own don't prove anything so the only thing you have left is the masons word. You will never get them in court so it will never reach court, but testimony from multiple sources within there organisation will give yourself they fact they do, it's not court certified evidence but it's the most your ever gonna get. As they have a say in control of the system, police, lawyers, judges you would never be successful anyhow. So like with your stuff you will only reach a certain level of proof that is all.

You said you had mates that's not guilt by association, I asked you as you said mates go ask them if they would ever deploy those tactics against anyone as an organisation, you tried to get funny about there to busy hobnobbing I said ask them but you deflect away from that. If you had someone from within the workings of what you talk about on radar tech you would be all over it as proof, if you had multi people saying that you would say I've hit the jackpot in terms  of levels of proof. But if you get multiple members of freemasonry your saying that's not good enough. It's double standards.

The fact you dismiss it without checking that out is lazy in terms of saying it doesn't happen, as you no members you don't even need to find away of finding them.

Freemasons aren't top of the food chain, there part of it. They all work in sync with one another there part of the problem as are many other parts. 

 

 

look TI`s don't have a monopoly on intimidation and harassment, anti-social behavior and hate crimes   .... many people are victims of it ..that does not make you a TI

 

WHAT MAKES YOU A TI and is unique to TI`s and our mine claim is

Quote

Electronic harassment, electromagnetic torture, or psychotronic torture is a conspiracy theory that government agents make use of electromagnetic radiation (such as the microwave auditory effect), radar, and surveillance techniques to transmit sounds and thoughts into people's heads, affect people's bodies, and harass people.[1][2] Individuals who claim to experience this call themselves "targeted individuals" (TIs).

now victims of such attacks also started to notice many others things ... that got coined as "gangstalking" but people realized it gave the wrong impressions so numerous other names have come forward like organized stalking ,stalking by proxy, cause stalking etc

but really it's a product of having your body zapped and trying to function in a society that does not recognize your condition and normal reacts negativity towards you plus the psychological impact

 

unfortunate over the years "gangstalking" has taken a life of its own and anybody with a hard luck story /mental health issues  and getting treated badly by people in their area can claim they are a victim off it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Relativity said:

Look as I said I agree with the stuff you say on this thread. But my point was about the burden of proof. (Even though I agree with you on the tech angle) it is a interpretation that that's how they will use it to target one individual. There's no proof they will use it like that, even tho I know they will. Its just a personal take thats how they will deploy it.

Saying thats what there going to do and them actually doing it are two different levels of proof. As I said I agree with the fact thats exactly how they will use it, but in a court of law that's not going to cut it.

With the Mason side of it, you won't take evidence of pics of cars, you won't take the harrased individuals word, and tbh those on there own don't prove anything so the only thing you have left is the masons word. You will never get them in court so it will never reach court, but testimony from multiple sources within there organisation will give yourself they fact they do, it's not court certified evidence but it's the most your ever gonna get. As they have a say in control of the system, police, lawyers, judges you would never be successful anyhow. So like with your stuff you will only reach a certain level of proof that is all.

You said you had mates that's not guilt by association, I asked you as you said mates go ask them if they would ever deploy those tactics against anyone as an organisation, you tried to get funny about there to busy hobnobbing I said ask them but you deflect away from that. If you had someone from within the workings of what you talk about on radar tech you would be all over it as proof, if you had multi people saying that you would say I've hit the jackpot in terms  of levels of proof. But if you get multiple members of freemasonry your saying that's not good enough. It's double standards.

The fact you dismiss it without checking that out is lazy in terms of saying it doesn't happen, as you no members you don't even need to find away of finding them.

Freemasons aren't top of the food chain, there part of it. They all work in sync with one another there part of the problem as are many other parts. 

 

 

look TI`s don't have a monopoly on intimidation and harassment, anti-social behavior and hate crimes   .... many people are victims of it ..that does not make you a TI

 

WHAT MAKES YOU A TI and is unique to TI`s and our mine claim is

 

Quote

Electronic harassment, electromagnetic torture, or psychotronic torture is a conspiracy theory that government agents make use of electromagnetic radiation (such as the microwave auditory effect), radar, and surveillance techniques to transmit sounds and thoughts into people's heads, affect people's bodies, and harass people.[1][2] Individuals who claim to experience this call themselves "targeted individuals" (TIs).

now victims of such attacks also started to notice many others things ... that got coined as "gangstalking" but people realized it gave the wrong impressions so numerous other names have come forward like organized stalking ,stalking by proxy, cause stalking etc

but really it's a product of having your body zapped and trying to function in a society that does not recognize your condition and normal reacts negativity towards you plus the psychological impact

 

unfortunate over the years "gangstalking" has taken a life of its own and anybody with a hard luck story /mental health issues  and getting treated badly by people in their area can claim they are a victim off it

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Relativity said:

Look as I said I agree with the stuff you say on this thread. But my point was about the burden of proof. (Even though I agree with you on the tech angle) it is a interpretation that that's how they will use it to target one individual. There's no proof they will use it like that, even tho I know they will. Its just a personal take thats how they will deploy it.

Saying thats what there going to do and them actually doing it are two different levels of proof. As I said I agree with the fact thats exactly how they will use it, but in a court of law that's not going to cut it.

With the Mason side of it, you won't take evidence of pics of cars, you won't take the harrased individuals word, and tbh those on there own don't prove anything so the only thing you have left is the masons word. You will never get them in court so it will never reach court, but testimony from multiple sources within there organisation will give yourself they fact they do, it's not court certified evidence but it's the most your ever gonna get. As they have a say in control of the system, police, lawyers, judges you would never be successful anyhow. So like with your stuff you will only reach a certain level of proof that is all.

You said you had mates that's not guilt by association, I asked you as you said mates go ask them if they would ever deploy those tactics against anyone as an organisation, you tried to get funny about there to busy hobnobbing I said ask them but you deflect away from that. If you had someone from within the workings of what you talk about on radar tech you would be all over it as proof, if you had multi people saying that you would say I've hit the jackpot in terms  of levels of proof. But if you get multiple members of freemasonry your saying that's not good enough. It's double standards.

The fact you dismiss it without checking that out is lazy in terms of saying it doesn't happen, as you no members you don't even need to find away of finding them.

Freemasons aren't top of the food chain, there part of it. They all work in sync with one another there part of the problem as are many other parts. 

 

 

look start YOUR OWN THREAD AND SO YOU CAN PROVE MASONS ARE GANGSTALKING ..... I not wasting my time on that ...but YOU can ok

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Deca said:

clearly  there some good info on this post .....

 

There is but the Dr starts with suppose(it's not fact)

Saying tech CAN be used in a certain way doesn't say it is how they are using it.

Look I believe that's how they do and will use it by the way. But the same arguments can be applied on Masons. 

If you asked them if they deploy these tactics you would know they do.

You choose not to which is your right to do so, but you shouldn't then claim they don't.

I believe the masons are used for that purpose, but off something else's orders not because its what they just go round doing for sh*ts and giggles, but because they are told to do it by a higher element.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Relativity said:

There is but the Dr starts with suppose(it's not fact)

Saying tech CAN be used in a certain way doesn't say it is how they are using it.

Look I believe that's how they do and will use it by the way. But the same arguments can be applied on Masons. 

If you asked them if they deploy these tactics you would know they do.

You choose not to which is your right to do so, but you shouldn't then claim they don't.

I believe the masons are used for that purpose, but off something else's orders not because its what they just go round doing for sh*ts and giggles, but because they are told to do it by a higher element.

look any more and you get reported ...start YOUR own thread to discuses YOUR own beliefs and who you think is doing  GANGSTALKING ok ..... 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deca said:

look TI`s don't have a monopoly on intimidation and harassment, anti-social behavior and hate crimes   .... many people are victims of it ..that does not make you a TI

 

WHAT MAKES YOU A TI and is unique to TI`s and our mine claim is

now victims of such attacks also started to notice many others things ... that got coined as "gangstalking" but people realized it gave the wrong impressions so numerous other names have come forward like organized stalking ,stalking by proxy, cause stalking etc

but really it's a product of having your body zapped and trying to function in a society that does not recognize your condition and normal reacts negativity towards you plus the psychological impact

 

unfortunate over the years "gangstalking" has taken a life of its own and anybody with a hard luck story /mental health issues  and getting treated badly by people in their area can claim they are a victim off it

When I first noticed it there was not much online accounts, within two years the net is flooded with accounts. It is being used as misdirection and giving them cover. I agree to that. But I also believe the tech is used and the otherside of it is deployed aswell. It all goes into altering the brains cognitive function. Subliminal plays alongside the tech.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Relativity said:

There is but the Dr starts with suppose(it's not fact)

Saying tech CAN be used in a certain way doesn't say it is how they are using it.

Look I believe that's how they do and will use it by the way. But the same arguments can be applied on Masons. 

If you asked them if they deploy these tactics you would know they do.

You choose not to which is your right to do so, but you shouldn't then claim they don't.

I believe the masons are used for that purpose, but off something else's orders not because its what they just go round doing for sh*ts and giggles, but because they are told to do it by a higher element.

have you any actual objective evidence video , documents ...??? 

I am not wasting my time on speculation and beliefs ok 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Relativity said:

When I first noticed it there was not much online accounts, within two years the net is flooded with accounts. It is being used as misdirection and giving them cover. I agree to that. But I also believe the tech is used and the otherside of it is deployed aswell. It all goes into altering the brains cognitive function. Subliminal plays alongside the tech.

 

er we know how this works we have the documents thanks to Snowden

How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations

https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

 

Quote

Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re publishing today:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deca said:

have you any actual objective evidence video , documents ...??? 

I am not wasting my time on speculation and beliefs ok 

I did but 47 sd cards were wiped by someone and my computer was corrupted and lost all copies on it. Don't quote me and I won't be on this thread, don't aim a message at me and I won't be on this thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Relativity said:

When I first noticed it there was not much online accounts, within two years the net is flooded with accounts. It is being used as misdirection and giving them cover. I agree to that. But I also believe the tech is used and the otherside of it is deployed aswell. It all goes into altering the brains cognitive function. Subliminal plays alongside the tech.

 

how I see this is you are in a hyper arousal/hyper vigilant state ... basically scanning for threats/cues looking for patterns and connections to support your core belief in gangstalking and thus support your skewed world view and explain how you feel etc .... this is not how Subliminals work ok

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subliminal_stimuli

 

Quote

Subliminal stimuli (/sʌbˈlɪmɪnəl/) (the prefix sub- literally means "below, or less than"),[1] contrary to supraliminal stimuli or "above threshold", are any sensory stimuli below an individual's threshold for conscious perception.[2] A 2012 review of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies showed that subliminal stimuli activate specific regions of the brain despite participants' unawareness.[3] Visual stimuli may be quickly flashed before an individual can process them, or flashed and then masked to interrupt processing. Audio stimuli may be played below audible volumes or masked by other stimuli.

 

again this show the really bad cherry picked skewed information that you get form websites propagating gangstalking ....its not about informing you but about keeping your trapped believing in "gangstalking" 

 

Edited by Deca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deca said:

how I see this is you are in a hyper arousal/hyper vigilant state ... basically scanning for threats/cues looking for patterns and connections to support your core belief in gangstalking and thus support your skewed world view and explain how you feel etc .... this is not how Subliminals work ok

 

I don't think it's used like that, but I'm not going to answer again as you will then say I'm gonna report if you don't stop. So I'll stop the discussion now

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gameisup said:

10+ years later and deca is still talking about this bs. And still being rude and angry towards everyone. Keep up the good work lol 

yep you think I would have moved on from all the cointelpro/jtrig gangstalking nonsense from now .....and guess what I have ......its others that want to keep it like this because it benefits the people doing it not the victims ok ....

Edited by Deca
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gameisup said:

10+ years later and deca is still talking about this bs. And still being rude and angry towards everyone. Keep up the good work lol 

also you are welcome to join there "its the mason gangstalking people" ....and make post about "oh them nasty masons ...thats what they do" etc if YOU want ok ...but i sense that will not actually achieve anything ok ...

 

Edited by Deca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is deca take on gangstalking. How can it be a take on it if you don't back up what is said.

Ask your Mason friends if they do it then your argument holds weight. 

Here is the other angle

You can't prove they don't do it, wheres your proof of them not doing it?

Oh I've had it collaborate by multiple sources within the organisation.

Your last response was childlike be an adult and stop trying to throw petty little snide remarks around.

Who do you think is targeting you by the way you've not mentioned that.

 

Edited by Relativity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Relativity said:

This thread is deca take on gangstalking. How can it be a take on it if you don't back up what is said.

Ask your Mason friends if they do it then your argument holds weight. 

i changed jobs and moved away years ago and lost touch with them ...plus ITS YOUR argument and claim you have the burden of proof not mine ....I have already stated my stance on gangstalking ...it YOU that's not provide any evidence ok

again make your own thread if you want to claim masons are going around gangstalking people 

 

19 minutes ago, Relativity said:

Here is the other angle

You can't prove they don't do it, wheres your proof of them not doing it?

Oh I've had it collaborate by multiple sources within the organisation.

Your last response was childlike be an adult and stop trying to throw petty little snide remarks around.

Who do you think is targeting you by the way you've not mentioned that.

 

again i look at the symptoms/effects that victims experiences and match them up with the documents .....again pretty obvious government agency/military industrial complex /people doing research in this area people with their figure prints on such weapons/technology.....also who has a past history of doing unethical human experiments 

 

Edited by Deca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deca said:

i changed jobs and moved away years ago and lost touch with them ...plus ITS YOUR argument and claim you have the burden of proof not mine ....I have already stated my stance on gangstalking ...it YOU that's not provide any evidence ok

again make your own thread if you want to claim masons are going around gangstalking people 

 

again i look at the symptoms/effects that victims experiences and match them up with the documents .....again pretty obvious government agency/military industrial complex /people doing research in this area people with their figure prints on such weapons/technology.....also who has a past history of doing unethical human experiments 

 

On researching on my own stuff I made a link to Dr Basson. When I tried to get documents off the British they responded all files relating to him went up in smoke in a building fire. Do you know of anything program relating to him involving work in Britain. I know about project coast. But was wondering if you knew of any spin off, or different. I know he did come to Britain at points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Relativity said:

On researching on my own stuff I made a link to Dr Basson. When I tried to get documents off the British they responded all files relating to him went up in smoke in a building fire. Do you know of anything program relating to him involving work in Britain. I know about project coast. But was wondering if you knew of any spin off, or different. I know he did come to Britain at points. 

never heard of the guy ....again create your own thread and post his stuff there ...

 

 

 

 

Edited by Deca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...