David Icke on Rogge Report

[Gremmels]

Just watched David on the Rogge Report and let’s just say it was ....interesting.

 

did anyone else find the host was kinda weird and distracting?

 

none of this is David’s fault of course and ngl I found myself cracking up at the hosts exaggerated gestures and facial expressions.

 

definitely seemed as though she was trying to monopolize the attention.

 

anyway, it was entertaining so I guess there’s that and David was on point as usual. 
 

I could tell he was getting uncomfortable at times though, and as was I. awkward interview.

[Grumpy Grapes]

It's possible that she is 'controlled opposition', deliberately behaving in an odd way, but David has to overlook this if he wants to get his message far and wide. 

[Pierre-Luc]

This episode was a bit awkward for some brief moments here and there. I think she(the host) is a very good example of someone that woke up recently to what happen. She is also a good example of someone that just started to deal with her own cognitive dissonance. She was looking at David like a child looking for approbation. And some people have this weird habit of exaggerate gestures, i have ones of those in my family. it is...i still dont know how to put it after 37 years. Those exaggerations are really appreciate by some people. Now i think they are appreciate by people who are not very good at reading body language in general. Like if they were always talking to autistic people. I always been uncomfortable with those type of behaviors, and realize that not many people were as uncomfortable as i was. But in the case of the host, toward the end she was trying to quickly find a way to show her appreciation toward David without becoming hysterical and she wanted it to be obvious...Like the part she was showing the book...she had the look of "look i made a macaroni necklace". I dont think she is control opposition. She was also struggling with staying focus at some point, but she manage it well i think. She have more quirks than we are use to see in the alternative media. But it was definitely awkward from time to time. I am use to see people who have always much more knowledge than i have in the alternative media for more than 10 years by now. That was for me obviously not the case for the host of this one..But she really helped spreading the message.

[Gremmels]

12 hours ago, Pierre-Luc said:

This episode was a bit awkward for some brief moments here and there. I think she(the host) is a very good example of someone that woke up recently to what happen. She is also a good example of someone that just started to deal with her own cognitive dissonance. She was looking at David like a child looking for approbation. And some people have this weird habit of exaggerate gestures, i have ones of those in my family. it is...i still dont know how to put it after 37 years. Those exaggerations are really appreciate by some people. Now i think they are appreciate by people who are not very good at reading body language in general. Like if they were always talking to autistic people. I always been uncomfortable with those type of behaviors, and realize that not many people were as uncomfortable as i was. But in the case of the host, toward the end she was trying to quickly find a way to show her appreciation toward David without becoming hysterical and she wanted it to be obvious...Like the part she was showing the book...she had the look of "look i made a macaroni necklace". I dont think she is control opposition. She was also struggling with staying focus at some point, but she manage it well i think. She have more quirks than we are use to see in the alternative media. But it was definitely awkward from time to time. I am use to see people who have always much more knowledge than i have in the alternative media for more than 10 years by now. That was for me obviously not the case for the host of this one..But she really helped spreading the message.

yeah she was definitely someone who “woke up” recently, if indeed she even woke up at all.

 She took the fake vaccine and seemed very ignorant on a lot of topics.

she was definitely looking up at David for validation. 
Not a renegade mind imo.

 

the most recent interview David had with Jo Woods might take the cake in worst interviews.

the lady had to be either drunk or on drugs. She was a mess.

kept interrupting. Had a dazed expression on her face most of the time.

geez, David you need to screen these people before you go on their channels.

it really doesn’t even get the word out going on these no name channels. David has a big audience enough on his own.

[Pierre-Luc]

13 hours ago, Gremmels said:

yeah she was definitely someone who “woke up” recently, if indeed she even woke up at all.

 She took the fake vaccine and seemed very ignorant on a lot of topics.

she was definitely looking up at David for validation. 
Not a renegade mind imo.

 

the most recent interview David had with Jo Woods might take the cake in worst interviews.

the lady had to be either drunk or on drugs. She was a mess.

kept interrupting. Had a dazed expression on her face most of the time.

geez, David you need to screen these people before you go on their channels.

it really doesn’t even get the word out going on these no name channels. David has a big audience enough on his own.

If you talk about the blond lady from the UK...If she had any alcohol in her blood...i dont know, i dont really care. Sober all the time in 2021 is almost not a sign of good mental health in my opinion. I taught she seem to have a fair amount of knowledge in her field of interest. She was enthusiast and happy to be imply in the discussion. I like hearing David talking. But for the last year he do what he think he have to do, repeating what is for us obvious. I do like also when he interact with the host of a podcast. I am almost eager to see what you will have to say about the host of the next "no name" podcast....they are like us..."no name". Sometimes i skip forward to see if David gone talk about something different or the latest lies. If i see that it is something that i already know and understand, or i do not like something i just stop it...the internet magic. It always get the word out. If one person get it for this episode it is a victory. He is better than i am. He is very strong and caring. Like those who invite him on there podcast.

[Gremmels]

4 hours ago, Pierre-Luc said:

If you talk about the blond lady from the UK...If she had any alcohol in her blood...i dont know, i dont really care. Sober all the time in 2021 is almost not a sign of good mental health in my opinion. I taught she seem to have a fair amount of knowledge in her field of interest. She was enthusiast and happy to be imply in the discussion. I like hearing David talking. But for the last year he do what he think he have to do, repeating what is for us obvious. I do like also when he interact with the host of a podcast. I am almost eager to see what you will have to say about the host of the next "no name" podcast....they are like us..."no name". Sometimes i skip forward to see if David gone talk about something different or the latest lies. If i see that it is something that i already know and understand, or i do not like something i just stop it...the internet magic. It always get the word out. If one person get it for this episode it is a victory. He is better than i am. He is very strong and caring. Like those who invite him on there podcast.

the host shouldn’t be a drunken mess ( or drug addled mess). If she can’t hold it together then she shouldn’t be giving the interview.

It is unprofessional.

 

him going on small no name channels is more like charity for David. These channels are often so small they aren’t conducive in spreading the word. It’s mostly just David being kind and doing the channels a favor.

 

most of these interviewers do a good job and are professional 

 

it’s only when they aren’t doing a good job do they stand out enough for me ( and others) to notice.

 

i don’t agree with you at all. I never heard of someone arguing for someone being sloppy and unprofessional during an interview but oook then

[Pierre-Luc]

On 11/18/2021 at 8:13 AM, Gremmels said:

the host shouldn’t be a drunken mess ( or drug addled mess). If she can’t hold it together then she shouldn’t be giving the interview.

It is unprofessional.

 

him going on small no name channels is more like charity for David. These channels are often so small they aren’t conducive in spreading the word. It’s mostly just David being kind and doing the channels a favor.

 

most of these interviewers do a good job and are professional 

 

it’s only when they aren’t doing a good job do they stand out enough for me ( and others) to notice.

 

i don’t agree with you at all. I never heard of someone arguing for someone being sloppy and unprofessional during an interview but oook then

that is ok for me too. We agree to disagree. It make me feel good being kind with someone. Maybe it is in some ways similar for David. As long as someone do no harm of try to manipulate and playing with me, seeing kindness, compassion and openness as being a weakness to exploit. I ask myself many time if the gratification i have being kind with someone who deserve it, is making me selfish. Maybe there is in it a healthy selfishness.