Jump to content

What do the Jesuits do?


Recommended Posts

One of the secret societies we sometimes hear about, but what exactly is their role in helping the NWO come about? A quick search shows me they’re big believers in Jesus Christ, kinda confuses me that does, especially with their symbol clearly being of a sun, sun worship, perhaps Saturn/ Satan worship... so why are they so pro Jesus and the pope if they’re the bad guys? What’s the deal here? 



Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Seeker said:

One of the secret societies we sometimes hear about, but what exactly is their role in helping the NWO come about? A quick search shows me they’re big believers in Jesus Christ, kinda confuses me that does, especially with their symbol clearly being of a sun, sun worship, perhaps Saturn/ Satan worship... so why are they so pro Jesus and the pope if they’re the bad guys? What’s the deal here? 




I think the pro-Jesus stuff is a ruse, or a front.


The Catholic Church, or the modern Catholic Church at least, as well as the Jesuits, they seem to do more to promote another ideology that hates Christendom in my opinion, but it's not really politically correct to talk about.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Timely thread...I've just finished investigating the Jesuits and read Loyola's Spiritual Exercises a few weeks ago....this is in my new book:




Once when Inigo was preaching on the street, three women who had been investigated by the Inquisition for being members of the Alumbrados started experiencing suspicious ecstatic states:

"One fell senseless, another sometimes rolled about on the ground, another had been seen in the grip of convulsions or shuddering and sweating in anguish." Inigo himself had been imprisoned on being suspected of being Alumbrado but was eventually released without charge.

It’s suspicious since such activity has historically been considered to be a sign of demonic possession. That fact that Inigo was able to elicit a kind of resonant demonic possession in these three Alumbrado women indicates that he himself was probably himself, operating under the impulse and control of the demonic realm.

The Spiritual Exercises form the key element of preparing the mind for acceptance into the Jesuit mental framework though I would say that the key aim is the auto-induction into psychosis through the deliberate and continual contemplation, in the words of Loyola: “to see with the sight of the imagination”. The fifth exercise for example, is a mediation on Hell. The novitiate is required by stages, or degrees you might say, to visualise Hell, to place himself there with his mind.

“The first Point will be to see with the sight of the imagination the great fires, and the souls as in bodies of fire. Second Point. The second, to hear with the ears wailings, howlings, cries, blasphemies against Christ our Lord and against all His Saints.”

In general the system of the Jesuits is as I have stated, seems to be a fast track to auto-initiated psychosis. As we have heard the Rosicrucians have a psychic initiatory framework whereby degrees and information is revealed psychically to particular favoured people. It is my contention that the Jesuit system is the same and it does this by establishing contact with some kind of ‘astral agency’ which can only approach the human psyche once it is sufficiently weakened and unable to resist. Of course the Jesuits think this is God and since their system tells them that it is, and that they are suitably humbling themselves and wallowing in their sins, in order to apparently make them fully repentant enough to be worthy of God’s favour. Repeatedly the Jesuit Spiritual Exercise make plain their aim to invoke confusion and shame in the novitiate.

“The first Point will be to bring the memory on the First Sin, which was that of the Angels, and then to bring the intellect on the same, discussing it; then the will, wanting to recall and understand all this in order to make me more ashamed and confound me more, bringing into comparison with the one sin of the Angels my so many sins, and reflecting, while they for one sin were cast into Hell, how often I have deserved it for so many…”

“it will be to ask shame and confusion at myself, seeing how many have been damned for only one mortal sin, and how many times I deserved to be condemned forever for my so many sins.”

Thus he is specifically instructed to pray for pain, torment, shame and confusion and to see himself in the lowest terms:

“to see all my bodily corruption and foulness; to look at myself as a sore and ulcer, from which have sprung so many sins and so many iniquities and so very vile poison.”

It goes without saying that the most obvious fallacy here is that he is appealing to God, the presumed creator of humanity and all life on  Earth, either directly or indirectly, while presenting himself as an example of God’s creation in the lowest and foulest possible terms. Such self-abasement has nothing appealing in spiritual terms and if anything might only possibly appeal to a being who has a great hatred of humanity, such a well-known adversary we do not need to name here for fear of labouring a point.

Additionally these ‘prayers’ or ‘invocations’ or whatever once might call them, are often under instruction to take place just after midnight or in total darkness:

“..to deprive myself of all light, closing the blinds and doors while I am in the room, if it be not to recite prayers, to read and eat.”

“at midnight, bringing myself to confusion for my so many sins, setting examples, as, for instance, if a knight found himself before his king and all his court, ashamed and confused at having much offended him, from whom he had first received many gifts and many favors: in the same way, in the second Exercise, making myself a great sinner and in chains; that is to say going to appear bound as in chains before the Supreme Eternal Judge; taking for an example how prisoners in chains and already deserving death, appear before their temporal judge.”

Again it is evident to most according to millennia of religious and metaphysical literature that God and the angels are usually associated with light while other types of beings and unwholesome spirits are generally, in the folklore, said to be most active and abroad at night and in conditions of darkness.

The gist of the Spiritual Exercises seems to be instead of drawing closer to God and achieving a more positive relationship with the divine creative principle, the contrary seems to be the logical outcome. The repeated invocation of shame, of ones loathsome sinful nature and finally the:

“…understanding how in sinning and acting against the Infinite Goodness, he has been justly condemned forever.”

In fact the Spiritual Exercises specifically deny contemplation on the positive aspects of the Christian message and of Jesus’ ministry, but instead to continually ruminate on death and judgement exclusively:

“Not to want to think on things of pleasure or joy, such as heavenly glory, the Resurrection, etc. Because whatever consideration of joy and gladness hinders our feeling pain and grief and shedding tears for our sins: but to keep before me that I want to grieve and feel pain, bringing to memory rather Death and Judgment.”

Nor indeed to think of the Good News Jesus brought, of our salvation through his sacrifice/murder by the proto-Rabbinical authorities following their own traditions alien to Torah Judaism but instead: “force myself to grieve, be sad and weep.” Furthermore Jesuits are taught:

“Not to laugh nor say a thing provocative of laughter…(and) restrain my sight, except in receiving or dismissing the person with whom I have spoken.”

This leads to the creation of a peculiarly unappealing personality. One who does not laugh or enjoy humour and is not interested in encouraging humour of laughter in others, not only that but a man who will only make eye contact twice, upon receiving and dismissing someone. Such rules are designed to further alienate such a person from his fellows and the simple human pleasures of human fellowship. This could only be forbidden by someone wanting to make someone estranged from goodness and languishing only as we have seen, in pain and torment. C.S.Lewis reminds us that God wants only the best for us and certainly would not have created the majesty and wonder of the world in order for us to be self-flagellating slaves crippling ourselves and renouncing the good things about the human experience.

The Jesuits are even encouraged not to take any simple pleasure in the eating food:

“Another time, while he is eating, he can take another consideration, either on the life of Saints, or on some pious Contemplation, or on some spiritual affair which he has to do, because, being intent on such thing, he will take less delight and feeling in the corporal food.”

Focussing on the bad and renouncing the good can only have the effect of making a man become what he focusses on: evil. And this I have no doubt was the devious aim of the Jesuit organisation: the inculcation of a militant band of priests languishing in evil, cutting themselves off from humanity, goodness and becoming brooding beings of pestilence, death and sin. Nothing good can come from such auto-suggestion because as Proverbs remind us:
“For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he.”
Not only were the Jesuits told to take no pleasure from life and “ to leave off the superfluous of delicate or soft things” but indeed to actually provoke pain and damage to their own bodies:

“to chastise the flesh, that is, giving it sensible pain, which is given by wearing haircloth or cords or iron chains next to the flesh, by scourging or wounding oneself, and by other kinds of austerity.” Loyola also praises fear, servile fear no less, as a way, if not the best way, to serve God, but this directly contradicts Biblical teaching which tells us:

“God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7). 

“Although serving God our Lord much out of pure love is to be esteemed above all; we ought to praise much the fear of His Divine Majesty, because not only filial fear is a thing pious and most holy, but even servile fear -- when the man reaches nothing else better or more useful -- helps much to get out of mortal sin. And when he is out, he easily comes to filial fear, which is all acceptable and grateful to God our Lord: as being at one with the Divine Love.”

This focusing on fear, doom, terror and all such negative qualities seems to be the key focus of the Jesuit system and it is ironic that we find a similar mental framework being evoked in the 1st degree initiation into the arch-enemy of the Catholic church, the Royal Black Lodge, a high level of the protestant Orange Order of Northern Ireland said to have taken its rites and history from the Knights Templar. The following extract is from evangelicaltruth.com:

“In this interview the Black Grand Registrar reveals much about the actual nature of the Royal Black and its very reason for existence. In essence, he admits that it is a secret Order that is immersed in the accoutrements of death. He admits that it is a society that is in a continual state of mourning. Take away the mourning and the Black loses its identity. It is an Order that proudly parades the symbols of death as an outward representation of its inward beliefs and spiritual psyche. 

The skull and cross-bones is not merely a Black emblem but is an important exhibit used in its ritual initiations and in certain secret formal gatherings to lay stress upon, or represent secret esoteric teaching. In probably one of the most shocking practices existing within the Loyal Orders, the candidate entering the first degree of the Black – the Royal Black degree – is met with a display of human remains. There, before him, sits an actual human skull and bones amidst a gathering of sober Black brethren. As the entrant views the human skull he is solemnly instructed on the teaching of the Black on death, the resurrection and eternity.”

Interestingly the same website gives details of the sequence of events in the initiation and we find the interesting detail:

“Something on a table under a white cloth being uncovered, was perceived to be a human skull, which the witness was desired to take up, and view it, and was told it was a real skull of a brother called Simon Magus. Porter was poured into the skull, which the witness was desired to drink; he did so, and it was handed round the whole Knights.”

So here we have a recipe for the auto-induction of psychosis, schizophrenia and demonic possession, and it is clear at times that Loyola himself is in a state of deep spiritual confusion and trapped at times in just the kind of manic-uncertainty can lead to the development of chronic conditions of psychosis, in fact the following example might lead the disinterested reader, if he or she has any knowledge of the kind of manias and inescapable double-binds that many suffering from severe mental illness suffer from, the following one assumes that Loyola must have stepped on the cracks in the pavement, visualising them as a Christian cross:

“After I have stepped on that cross, or after I have thought or said or done some other thing, there comes to me a thought from without that I have sinned, and on the other hand it appears to me that I have not sinned; still I feel disturbance in this; that is to say, in as much as I doubt and in as much as I do not doubt. That is a real scruple and temptation which the enemy sets.”

The thirteenth rule of Loyola’s Jesuits as outlined in his Spiritual Exercise is as follows and must surely be the most damning especially if we consider that Jesus said of himself: “I am the way, the truth and the life.” For the Jesuits, the ‘truth’ is whatever the institution of the Roman Church says it is:

“Thirteenth Rule. To be right in everything, we ought always to hold that the white which I see, is black, if the Hierarchical Church so decides it..” 

Strangely, Loyola seemed to have an inkling of what he was doing and perhaps he was in some doubts as to whether his Spiritual Exercises were not in fact demonically inspired and that reading the following extracts and then comparing it to the broader work in general we may see that he had unwittingly given the key and explanation to the creation of not only his own work, but the Jesuit order and their operations in the world to this present day:

“The enemy looks much if a soul is gross or delicate, and if it is delicate, he tries to make it more delicate in the extreme, to disturb and embarrass it more. For instance, if he sees that a soul does not consent to either mortal sin or venial or any appearance of deliberate sin, then the enemy, when he cannot make it fall into a thing that appears sin, aims at making it make out sin where there is not sin, as in a word or very small thought.”

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

In studying the Jesuits it's interesting to learn that, as with the Freemasons, not all members of this Order were/are nefarious plotters. Some early ones were said to be canonized as saints, while others have contributed to various schools of science, as human race-contributing inventors and discoverers.


There are those researchers who point to the 1960s and the Second Vatican Council as being a defining moment, when an anti-papal faction within the Order began to rear its serpentine head, prior to which the Jesuits as a whole were known for being loyal to and defenders of the papacy. So, then, are we to chalk up this purported coup to the work of, say, one Jacob Frank? I think not, as this infiltration into the ranks of the Vatican appears to be, for the most part, limited to a 20th-century manifestation.


Since the 1960s, we have seen the U.S. counterculture and the impact its drug-laden philosophy has had on the minds and values of countless American youth. This would be in keeping with a Jesuit influence, an Order said to be anti-American and pro-socialist at its core.


Of course, you have some who regard the Roman Catholic Church/Vatican itself as being satanic and since its very inception; their constituting the very 'whore of Babylon' with the papacy viewed as the Antichrist. Although certainly not a fan of the RCC nor the Vatican, I personally wouldn't go to such perceptual extremes as to believe this, myself.


Indeed, a few anti-Catholic researchers have even gone so far as to claim that the late, great Malachi Martin, author of a large critical expose of the Jesuits, was nothing but an agent of the Order, simply because he saw the Society of Jesus as having been infiltrated by anti-papal fifth columnists, as opposed to perceiving the entire Order and the RCC as false and evil from their very start. Malachi Martin, a Jesuit shill? What bull. More Martin-bashing is found in a little known book titled, Clerical Error, authored by 'former' Jesuit Robert Blair Kaiser. Within the pages of this highly entertaining and often amusing memoir, Kaiser portrays Martin as a Vatican agent not to be trusted, as one who got excited while watching a Marilyn Monroe movie, and as a man whom he suspected of having an affair with his wife. These portions of the book read like a hit piece to me. (Martin was a man of God, imo, who knew that dark supernatural entities were at work in the world and who spoke at length exposing and warning of this, so it's no surprise that he would be the victim of various character assassination attempts,)


In answer to the Protestant Reformation of 1517, the Society of Jesus was founded in 1540 as a counter force against it. It is on this point that some researchers have put forth the claim that teachings since this period of a future, individual Antichrist is nothing but Jesuit propaganda, designed to deflect attention away from the RCC, the 'true' Antichrist, so these ones imagine. What is worth noting, however, is that eschatological futurism did not originate in the 16th century but in fact has it roots in many of the early first- and second-century Church Fathers, who had been premillennial restorationists, themselves -- and obviously not Jesuits.


That the Jesuits were always more than just a religious order, one primarily driven by sociopolitical aims and goals, there is no doubt. Illuminati-founder, Adam Weishaupt, was one such notable Jesuit, as Pierre Trudeau was reportedly to have been as well. None, however, have been as culturally influential, perhaps, than Pierre Tielhard de Chardin -- coiner of pretentious neologisms, moronic disbeliever in the supernatural, anti-capitalist, deluded evolutionist, benighted heliocentrist, proto-transhumanist, eugenicist, and misguided proponent of linear human progress, toward what in his grand vision for the world he dubbed the 'Omega Point,' a time he envisioned of panoramic apotheosis and insanity for all. ('Tielhardism' arguably being Jesuitism at its most masterfully insidious form.)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2023 at 4:13 PM, Hegel Schmegel said:

In studying the Jesuits it's interesting to learn that, as with the Freemasons, not all members of this Order were/are nefarious plotters. Some early ones were said to be canonized as saints, while others have contributed to various schools of science, as human race-contributing inventors and discoverers


I agree, take Jesuit scholar Athanasius Kircher, he was once given the Voynich Manuscript to decode but failed & his interest was dealing with subjects such as the north pole & the underworld. He was also known as the last man who knew everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...