Jump to content

The homosexual elite and the velvet mafia


Golden Retriever
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Macnamara said:

 

I guess the reason the cabal might push homosexuality is because they are waging war on creation and pro-creation requires intercourse between a man and a woman and impregnation and birth then occur through the female yoni

 

Yes, they are misusing a gift of creation, but the gift, sexuality, is not evil in and of itself.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Macnamara said:

 

I think that is too simplistic. I believe that he was a SABBATEAN and that he was advancing a sabbatean agenda in western society

 

And, why does that make sexuality bad in and of itself? You still haven't been able to say.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobSS said:

And, why does that make sexuality bad in and of itself? You still haven't been able to say.

 

that depends on what the sabbatean higher ups like the rothschilds and rockefellers want

 

if they want to genocide white european people then they would want to do certain things like:

 

-destroy their fertility through exposing them to endocrine disrupting chemicals

-foment wars and fund both sides to get europeans to kill each other

-put fluoride in the drinking water to destroy health and lower IQ

-create artificial banking crises so that they can destroy the economic health of people

-inject them all with health destroying mRNA injections

-encourage people to shag ANYTHING except heterosexual relations which enable the birthing of more white people

-the destruction of white peoples history and culture and religion

-flood outsiders into white countries to destroy social cohesion

-encourage non white people to HATE white people to create more discord

-flood the cities and homes of white people with microwaves to destroy their health

-encourage white people to hate themselves and feel guilty so that they never stick up for themselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

that depends on what the sabbatean higher ups like the rothschilds and rockefellers want

 

if they want to genocide white european people then they would want to do certain things like:

 

-destroy their fertility through exposing them to endocrine disrupting chemicals

-foment wars and fund both sides to get europeans to kill each other

-put fluoride in the drinking water to destroy health and lower IQ

-create artificial banking crises so that they can destroy the economic health of people

-inject them all with health destroying mRNA injections

-encourage people to shag ANYTHING except heterosexual relations which enable the birthing of more white people

-the destruction of white peoples history and culture and religion

-flood outsiders into white countries to destroy social cohesion

-encourage non white people to HATE white people to create more discord

-flood the cities and homes of white people with microwaves to destroy their health

-encourage white people to hate themselves and feel guilty so that they never stick up for themselves

 

It may be what the higher ups what, but what they want is wrong, and they are misusing sexual energy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RobSS said:

It may be what the higher ups what, but what they want is wrong, and they are misusing sexual energy.

 

they can't achieve anything on their own as they are few. To achieve their goals they must dupe, coerce, condition and threaten people into going along with the various aspects of their agenda

 

What they really don't want is white men and women coming together to create families within which they then raise healthy children able to think for themselves who know their history, know where they have come from and know what is going on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

they can't achieve anything on their own as they are few. To achieve their goals they must dupe, coerce, condition and threaten people into going along with the various aspects of their agenda

 

What they really don't want is white men and women coming together to create families within which they then raise healthy children able to think for themselves who know their history, know where they have come from and know what is going on

 

It's not just white people they are against because many of the people involved in these groups are white themselves. They hate all humanity. They want power and control over all humanity, and then more.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RobSS said:

It's not just white people they are against because many of the people involved in these groups are white themselves. They hate all humanity. They want power and control over all humanity, and then more.

 

if we were sat right now in nigeria or in india we could have a chat about the process that has gone on in those countries and how the cabal has screwed them over but we are sitting in britain and therefore any discussion about the process of sabotaging the native people will by necessity have to consider the journey of white people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RobSS said:

 

It's not just white people they are against because many of the people involved in these groups are white themselves. They hate all humanity. They want power and control over all humanity, and then more.

 

 

Round and round we go.


Freemasonry is the force which rules the world. It is a Kabbalistic movement designed from day one by a certain chosen tribe to infiltrate and eventually fully control and ultimately destroy White Western Christian civilisation.....

 

I can show my work.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, RobSS said:

 

I've practised sexual sublimation for the past 7 years,


Seminal sublimation? Is that difficult to maintain? What are the key benefits?

I don't wish to derail this topic. Just asking. Please feel free to message me, if you want to.

Edited by JJ73
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, RobSS said:

 

It's to do with intent. The abuse of children is also carried out by heterosexuals.

 

 

When researching years ago whether there was a disproportionate amount of convicted homosexual men

compared to heterosexual male paedophiles, homosexuals were over-represented. Much of this

information has been wiped from the interent, but I found this pdf which I will read later

 

CHILD MOLESTATION AND THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT

 

https://www.regent.edu/acad/schlaw/student_life/studentorgs/lawreview/docs/issues/v14n2/Vol. 14, No. 2, 3 Baldwin.pdf

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JJ73 said:


Seminal sublimation? Is that difficult to maintain? What are the key benefits?

I don't wish to derail this topic. Just asking. Please feel free to message me, if you want to.

 

T'spoon brought up the subject of my sexuality, so if you want to blame anyone for detailing this thread, blame him, but as you asked... I find it beneficial because I can channel my sexual energy into my creativity. the more you practise it, the easier and more rewarding it becomes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobSS said:

I find it beneficial because I can channel my sexual energy into my creativity. the more you practise it, the easier and more rewarding it becomes.


Your sexuality is for you alone. I don't wish to apportion blame to anyone. I am merely interested in sublimation as a means to become more creative and focused. Thank you for the reply. Would you recommend the work of Mantak Chia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

When researching years ago whether there was a disproportionate amount of convicted homosexual men

compared to heterosexual male paedophiles, homoseuxauls were over-represented. Much of this

information has been wiped from the interent, but I found this pdf which I will read later

 

CHILD MOLESTATION AND THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT

 

https://www.regent.edu/acad/schlaw/student_life/studentorgs/lawreview/docs/issues/v14n2/Vol. 14, No. 2, 3 Baldwin.pdf

 

Maybe it depends on which period, this kind of research in history, is carried out in? In other ages, perhaps the opposite was the case? We also don't even know how accurate what you say is, but in any event, sex in and of itself is not evil, and that's the key thing to remember. It's how sex is used that determines whether it's good or bad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the internet archives

 

 

"A study commissioned by the German Bishops Conference and published last year “found that more than 3,600 children were sexually abused by Catholic clergy in Germany between 1946 and 2014.”

 

Cardinal Brandmüller was a bit too quick to deflect blame from the Catholic Church itself, by blaming the whole problem on homosexuality. But they invited this scandal when it began allowing homosexuals to enter its seminaries in the 1960s. They did so because of the difficulty of recruiting young men into the priesthood who quite naturally wanted to marry and have families. As more and more homosexuals flooded seminaries and then went into the priesthood, a culture of homosexuality was fostered in the church with all its attendant pathologies.

 

One pathology that LGBT activists will not acknowledge is the unmistakable connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. The American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children stated flatly that “the vast majority of the offenders are male.” (The information in these paragraphs is found in the publication, “The Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality” from the Family Research Council.)

 

The Journal of Sex & Married Therapy, in a study of male sex offenders against children, found that one-third of the offenders directed their sexual activity against males. And the Journal of Sex Research found that homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of sex offenses against children.

 

This fact is particularly disturbing. Homosexuals comprise just two percent of the population, yet are responsible for 33% of all child sexual abuse. They offend against children at 16 times the rate of the normal population.

The Archives of Sexual Behavior, in a study of 229 convicted child molesters, found that “eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.”

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20190928165145/https://afa.net/the-stand/culture/2019/01/the-inescapable-link-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia/

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RobSS said:

It's how sex is used that determines whether it's good or bad.

 

nevertheless it is STRAIGHT men that we see the sabbatean cabal demonise NOT gay men who the cabal encourage society to celebrate

 

Now in purely LOGICAL terms that makes no sense when viewed from the sense of the continuity of society because it is invariably straight men that perpetuate society

 

From a purely LOGICAL point of view, if you WANTED a society to continue you would put all of your resources into assisting straight men and women to come together, procreate and then be able to raise the offspring in a stable, healthy environment

 

Instead everywhere we look we see the OPPOSITE of that being pushed by the corporate media and governments, all in the name of 'inclusivity' which of course sounds great after all nobody wants anyone to be excluded

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JJ73 said:


Your sexuality is for you alone. I don't wish to apportion blame to anyone. I am merely interested in sublimation as a means to become more creative and focused. Thank you for the reply. Would you recommend the work of Mantak Chia?

 

I haven't heard of Mantak Chia, but there's a vast amount of information available on the Internet now. I did a lot of research 7 years ago, but forgotten most of it now. It's really a very simple thing, but that's not to say the subject isn't fascinating.

 

There was once a big discussion about the topic on this forum, or i should say a few forum versions ago. There was a forum member called 'farros'. He made this video, when he was researching the subject back in 2014:

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

From a purely LOGICAL point of view, if you WANTED a society to continue you would put all of your resources into assisting straight men and women to come together, procreate and then be able to raise the offspring in a stable, healthy environment

 

That's your problem: you are able to think logically whereas 'liberals' care about feels over facts. They believe that there is no objective truth, only what they subjectively WANT to believe is true and the cabal is thrilled to be able to enable them at every turn because they know that the only way to fix a society is to engage with ACTUAL reality not subjective reality so as long as they can keep large portions of the population engaging in what they WANT to believe reality is instead of what reality ACTUALLY is they can keep steering society into the rocks

 

for example they currently have a large portion of the public believing that mRNA covid jabs are a medicine aimed at protecting them from a novel coronavirus and for as long as people keep engaging with that subjective view of reality (because they WANT to believe that) their health will be destroyed and their children enslaved

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

From the internet archives

 

 

"A study commissioned by the German Bishops Conference and published last year “found that more than 3,600 children were sexually abused by Catholic clergy in Germany between 1946 and 2014.”

 

Cardinal Brandmüller was a bit too quick to deflect blame from the Catholic Church itself, by blaming the whole problem on homosexuality. But they invited this scandal when it began allowing homosexuals to enter its seminaries in the 1960s. They did so because of the difficulty of recruiting young men into the priesthood who quite naturally wanted to marry and have families. As more and more homosexuals flooded seminaries and then went into the priesthood, a culture of homosexuality was fostered in the church with all its attendant pathologies.

 

One pathology that LGBT activists will not acknowledge is the unmistakable connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. The American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children stated flatly that “the vast majority of the offenders are male.” (The information in these paragraphs is found in the publication, “The Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality” from the Family Research Council.)

 

The Journal of Sex & Married Therapy, in a study of male sex offenders against children, found that one-third of the offenders directed their sexual activity against males. And the Journal of Sex Research found that homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of sex offenses against children.

 

This fact is particularly disturbing. Homosexuals comprise just two percent of the population, yet are responsible for 33% of all child sexual abuse. They offend against children at 16 times the rate of the normal population.

The Archives of Sexual Behavior, in a study of 229 convicted child molesters, found that “eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.”

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20190928165145/https://afa.net/the-stand/culture/2019/01/the-inescapable-link-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia/

 

There is no connection between homosexuality and paedophilia. One reason why paedophilia was so rampant amongst priests is ironically because they were forced into celibacy, which is a recipe for creating all kinds of pathological conditions. If sex becomes a taboo, and society treats people with different sexualities as outcasts, then people who are unnecessarily made to be outcasts will become traumatised and this may manifest itself in all manner of sexual perversions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RobSS said:

priests is ironically because they were forced into celibacy

 

some people might have been 'forced' to become priests but many of them CHOSE to become priests. The celebacy part was just meant to be part of the deal

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

That's your problem: you are able to think logically whereas 'liberals' care about feels over facts. They believe that there is no objective truth, only what they subjectively WANT to believe is true and the cabal is thrilled to be able to enable them at every turn because they know that the only way to fix a society is to engage with ACTUAL reality not subjective reality so as long as they can keep large portions of the population engaging in what they WANT to believe reality is they can keep steering society into the rocks

 

I'm against all subversion. You talk about subversion, but it's subversion that's the problem and not a person#t sexual orientation. It's just as wrong to force and coerce a heterosexual man to be homosexual, as it is to coerce a homosexual man to become heterosexual.

 

There have been many examples in history where the elders of a society tried to force everyone to be heterosexual or at least only to honour the family paradigm. That's what Roman Catholicism did throughout Europe in the Middle Ages, but did that achieve any kind of utopia? No it didn't. One by-product was a class of clergy who went in on themselves and started abusing children, male and female in secret on huge scale.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

The information I have posted today on this thread, with links from studies says otherwise.

 

 

Then why is it that most homosexuals have no interest whatsoever in abusing children? Why is it that heterosexuals can also abuse children?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, RobSS said:

I haven't heard of Mantak Chia, but there's a vast amount of information available on the Internet now. I did a lot of research 7 years ago, but forgotten most of it now. It's really a very simple thing, but that's not to say the subject isn't fascinating.

 

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

some people might have been 'forced' to become priests but many of them CHOSE to become priests

 

A lot may have chosen under peer pressure or pressure from their religious parents, and at the time they made the choice, it's very possible they didn't fully understand the psychological pressure they would face after several years of forced celibacy. Sometimes, people only learn by experience and they don't understand the consequences of their choices.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...