Jump to content

The homosexual elite and the velvet mafia

Golden Retriever

Recommended Posts

Lorenz Hart (1895–1943), an American lyricist who partnered with the Broadway musical composer Richard Rodgers (1902–1979). They were known as 'Rodgers and Hart'. Rodgers was not gay, but Lorenz Hart was part of the gay elite on Broadway.


Blue Moon (lyrics by Lorenz Hart, sung by Mel Tormé, 1949)



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget Jeffrey Dahmer.









Most of Dahmer's victims had been rendered unconscious prior to their murder, although some had died as a result of having acid or boiling water injected into their brain. As he had no memory of the murder of his second victim, Steven Tuomi, he was unsure whether he was unconscious when beaten to death, although he did concede it was possible that his viewing the exposed chest of Tuomi while in a drunken stupor may have led him to unsuccessfully attempt to tear Tuomi's heart from his chest.[203] Almost all the murders Dahmer committed after moving into the Oxford Apartments had involved a ritual of posing the victims' bodies in suggestive positions—typically with the chest thrust outwards—prior to dismemberment.[204]


Dahmer readily admitted to engaging in necrophilia with several of his victims' bodies, including performing sexual acts with their viscera[204] as he dismembered their bodies in his bathtub. Having noted that much of the blood pooled inside his victims' chest after death, Dahmer first removed their internal organs, then suspended the torso so the blood drained into his bathtub, before dicing any organs he did not wish to retain and paring the flesh from the body.[205] The bones he wished to dispose of were pulverized or acidified, with Soilex and bleach solutions used to aid in the preservation of the skeletons and skulls he wished to keep. In addition, Dahmer confessed to having consumed the hearts, livers, biceps, and portions of thighs of several victims he had killed within the previous year,[206] often tenderizing the flesh and organs prior to consuming them alongside condiments.[207]


Edited by Truthspoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites




January 31, 2021DES-EARLY-RELEASE-06-8495985-scaled-1.jp

There’s something fascinatingly macabre about serial killers. Obviously, they’re horribly damaged people who inflict enormous pain, suffering, and terror on others. We’re not here to idolise them in any way, or turn them into quasi-celebrities.


But the trauma inflicted by serial killers that have targeted gay men is part of our history. Knowing your history is about understanding the bad stuff as well as the good stuff.

Let’s take a look at some of the notorious gay serial killers that have shaped our queer history.

Dennis Nilsen

Nilsen admitted to murdering at least 15 young men between 1978 and 1983. The media referred to him as the Muswell Hill murderer.

All of Nilsen’s murders were committed in the two North London addresses in which he lived between 1978 and 1983.

He would meet his victims in pubs and bars, take them back to his flat and then kill them.

In 1983, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. He died in 2018 as the result of complications from surgery. A coroner’s inquest found that he died from natural causes.

Colin Ireland

Convicted in 1993, Colin Ireland – known by the press as The Gay Slayer – was found guilty of the murder of five gay men.

Ireland suffered a severely dysfunctional upbringing. He committed various crimes from the age of 16, and had served time in your remand centres and prisons. While living in Southend, he started frequenting the Coleherne pub, a gay pub in Earl’s Court.

Ireland said he was heterosexual – he had been married twice – and that he pretended to be gay only to befriend potential victims. Ireland claimed that his motives were not sexually motivated. He was highly organised, and carried a full murder kit of rope and handcuffs and a full change of clothes to each murder. After killing his victim he cleaned the flat of any forensic evidence linking him to the scene and stayed in the flat until morning in order to avoid arousing suspicion from leaving in the middle of the night.

Ireland was convicted of killing Peter Walker, 45, Christopher Dunn, 37, Perry Bradley, 35, Andrew Collier, 33, and Emanuel Spiteri, 41.

Following his conviction, Ireland remained imprisoned until his death in 2012, at the age of 57.

Gary Ray Bowles

Gary Ray Bowles admitted to killing six men in 1994 from Florida to Maryland but was only convicted of three deaths.

Sometimes dubbed the I-95 Killer, most of his victims were found near the interstate corridor that spans the entire eastern seaboard of the US.

Investigators say that Bowles, originally from West Virginia, left an abusive household as a child and made his living as a sex-worker for a number of years. After two jail sentences for theft, robbery, assault, and rape, he moved to Daytona Beach in 1993.

Bowles was then living with his girlfriend, but the relationship ended when she discovered that Bowles had been a sex-worker. Bowles later told authorities that he blamed gay men for the end of his relationship.

Bowles was convicted of killing Walter Hinton, 47, John Hardy Roberts, 59, and Albert Alcie Morris, 37.

Appealing against the death penalty, lawyers for Bowles contended that he was too intellectually disabled to be executed.

Bowles was eventually arrested in Jacksonville, where he was living under a false identiy. The state of Florida executed Bowles, aged 57, in August 2019.

Stephen Port

In 2016, Stephen Port was convicted of the murders of Anthony Walgate, 23, Gabriel Kovari, 22, Daniel Whitworth, 21, and Jack Taylor, 25, as well as the rapes of three other men he drugged, and ten counts of administering a substance with intent, and four sexual assaults. In total, eleven men are known to have been victims of Port’s crimes.

Port, who lived in London, committed the crimes that he was convicted of over a period of three years. Meeting his victims through hookup apps and then drugging them with GHB.

Port was sentenced to life imprisonment, which he is currently serving.

Bruce McArthur

In February 2019, Bruce McArthur was convicted of the murder of eight men in Toronto. He was sentenced to eight concurrent life sentences.

McArthur, a 67-year-old landscape gardener from Toronto, was arrested in January 2018. He was initially charged in relation to the deaths of two men  –  police subsequently charged him in relation to six further cases.

The men that McArthur has admitted killing are Selim Esen, Andrew Kinsman, Majeed Kayhan, Dean Lisowick, Kirushna Kumar Kanagaratnam, Abdulbasir Faizi, Skandaraj Navaratnam, Soroush Mahmudi. All went missing during the years 2010–2017.

Police have confirmed that some of the victims were killed during a sexual assault or while being “unlawfully confined”. After the murders, McArthur dismembered the men’s bodies to avoid detection.

The arrest of McArthur confirmed the worst fears of many in Toronto’s gay village, who for years had whispered that a serial killer might be targeting their community.

Many of the victims were immigrants from South Asia or the Middle East who were not out to their families. Toronto’s gay village was supposed to be their safe place. Instead, it became the place where they met Bruce McArthur. The grandfather and father of two had come out as gay later in life, but had been a neighbourhood regular since the late 1990s.

Jeffrey Dahmer

Dahmer killed 17 men and boys from 1978 to 1991, when he was apprehended.

Most of his murders took place in the state of Wisconsin.

In 1992, he was sentenced to 15 terms of life imprisonment.

Dahmer was beaten to death in 1994 by a fellow inmate at the prison where he was serving his sentence.

John Wayne Gacy

Gacy murdered at least 33 teenage boys and young men between 1972 and 1978 in Chicago.

All of Gacy’s known murders were committed inside the house where he lived.

In 1980, Gacy was sentenced to death on 1980, and was executed in 1994.

Gacy became known as the Killer Clown – he often worked at children’s parties dressed as a clown.

Edited by Truthspoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites



J. M. Barrie, author (1860 – 1937)




Barrie’s love of young boys, which inspired him to create the timeless Peter Pan, is documented in the biography by Birkin (1979) (republished as Birkin & Goode, 2003).In 1894, Barrie married Mary Ansell, but their relationship soured because he showed little interest in sex. He met the young sons of the Llewelyn-Davies family in 1897, and was soon spending much of his time playing with them. An associate, Dolly Ponsonby, wrote that the boys “fill his life & supply all his human interest” (Birkin & Goode, 2003, p. 168), and he became passionately attached to two of them, George and the openly homosexual Michael. He took many photographs of the boys, some of them nude, but never made any sexual passes, according to the boys themselves. Barrie modeled the characters in The Little White Bird after himself and George; one suggestive passage about a sleepover reads (Barrie, 1902, chapter 19):

“Why, David,” said I, sitting up, “do you want to come into my bed?”

“Mother said I wasn’t to want it unless you wanted it first,” he squeaked.

“It is what I have been wanting the whole time”, said I, and then without more ado the little white figure rose and flung itself at me. For the rest of the night he lay on me and across me, and sometimes his feet were at the bottom of the bed and sometimes on the pillow, but he always retained possession of my finger, and occasionally he woke me to say that he was sleeping with me. I had not a good night. I lay thinking.

Barrie wrote the following to Michael on the eve of his eighth birthday (Birkin & Goode, 2003, p. 166):

My dear Michael,

Paris is looking very excited today, and all the people think it is because there were races yesterday, but I know it is because tomorrow is your birthday. I wish I could be with you and your candles. You can look on me as one of your candles, the one that burns badly — the greasy one that is bent in the middle. But still, hurray, I am Michael’s candle. I wish I could see you putting on the redskin’s clothes for the first time. Won’t your mother be frightened. Nick will hide beneath the bed, and Peter will cry for the police.

Dear Micheal, I am very fond of you, but don’t tell anybody.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Benjamin Britten, composer (1913 – 1976)


The most important British composer of the 20th century. Britten was homosexual, and, according to biographer Donald Mitchell, “it was chiefly pre-pubescent boys to whom Britten was attracted” (Mitchell & Reed, 2011). Bridcut (2011) chronicles Britten’s many intense friendships with young boys between the ages of 9 and 14. Although clearly attracted to children, Bridcut (2011) concludes that Britten’s behavior never went beyond bed-sharing, kissing and skinny dipping.David Hemmings, who sang for Britten’s opera The Turn of the Screw, writes of Britten’s infatuation with him at the age of eleven (Mitchell & Reed, 2011):

I went on to stay with Britten in this wonderfully claustrophobic atmosphere and he cared for me, he developed my voice and he was a deeply considerate father figure. It was only later that I learnt that he was very much infatuated with me and that caused some problems between himself and his long-time companion, Peter Pears. In all of the time that I spent with him he never abused that trust.


And when I listen to The Turn of the Screw now, I remember that moment, and it is perhaps one of the best gifts that anybody could give anyone, and I thank Benjamin Britten for that because no one else could have given it to me — particularly at eleven years old.

Britten dedicated one of his arrangements to thirteen-year-old Bobby Rothman, with whom he had shared a room (Mitchell & Reed, 2011):

When Britten stayed with the Rothman family, he shared a room with the thirteen-year-old Bobby:

“[…] many an evening we used to spend […] a lot of time just really talking he in the bed next to me […] His fondness for me was something that was beyond my normal social connections, and I was a little overwhelmed that someone should be so fond of me […] I can still remember us talking late at night one time, and finding when it was really time to call it quits and go to sleep […] he said, ‘Bobby, would you mind terribly if, before we fell asleep, I came over and gave you a hug and a kiss?’ It was just one of those touching moments […] And I’ve got to say I really did not know what to do except say, ‘no, no I don’t mind’, and he gently got up and gave me a gentle hug and kiss and said goodnight.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

André Gide, novelist (1869 – 1951)


Author of The Immoralist and recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literature. In his journal, Gide distinguishes between adult-attracted “sodomites” and boy-loving “pederasts”, categorizing himself as the latter (Gide, 1948, p. 246-247):

I call a pederast the man who, as the word indicates, falls in love with young boys. I call a sodomite (“The word is sodomite, sir,” said Verlaine to the judge who asked him if it were true that he was a sodomist) the man whose desire is addressed to mature men. […]

The pederasts, of whom I am one (why cannot I say this quite simply, without your immediately claiming to see a brag in my confession?), are much rarer, and the sodomites much more numerous, than I first thought. […]

That such loves can spring up, that such relationships can be formed, it is not enough for me to say that this is natural; I maintain that it is good; each of the two finds exaltation, protection, a challenge in them; and I wonder whether it is for the youth or the elder man that they are more profitable.

Gide was bisexual, although he preferred boys. His journal approvingly describes the bodies of a 12-year-old boy and young girl (Gide, 1948, p. 334):

Both at Saint-Martin and here I have seen, among the guests of the hotel, none but faces exuding stupidity, egotism, and vulgarity. (Except for a Greek boy of twelve with a marvelous face and body,

wonderfully svelte; but excessively aware of his beauty and, consequently, quite stupid with self-satisfaction.) Yet at the next table to the one where I am writing, and turning her back to me, a girl, barely beyond childhood, with great elegance in her outlines, whom M. would like. I do not tire of looking at her; she notices this and, I believe, is amused by it. But already one can foresee just where her features are going to thicken and become heavy.

In the company of Oscar Wilde, he had several sexual encounters with young boys abroad (Gide, 1935, p. 288):

Wilde took a key out of his pocket and showed me into a tiny apartment of two rooms… The youths followed him, each of them wrapped in a burnous that hid his face. Then the guide left us and Wilde sent me into the further room with little Mohammed and shut himself up in the other with the [other boy]. Every time since then that I have sought after pleasure, it is the memory of that night I have pursued. […]

My joy was unbounded, and I cannot imagine it greater, even if love had been added. How should there have been any question of love? How should I have allowed desire to dispose of my heart? No scruple clouded my pleasure and no remorse followed it. But what name then am I to give the rapture I felt as I clasped in my naked arms that perfect little body, so wild, so ardent, so sombrely lascivious?

For a long time after Mohammed had left me, I remained in a state of passionate jubilation, and though I had already achieved pleasure five times with him, I renewed my ecstasy again and again, and when I got back to my room in the hotel, I prolonged its echoes until morning.

Gide’s novel Corydon, which he considered his most important work, erects a defense of pederasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2021 at 6:22 PM, Macnamara said:


The endocrine disruption thread .... was looking at how common it was for every day products to contain chemicals that mimicked hormones


There have been studies that have found that fish exposed to such gender bending chemicals then experience population crashes


So the thread was speculating that the prevalence of endocrine disrupting chemicals may have been a way in which the satanists behind the corporations were weaponising every day products against the general public


There are signs that people ARE being affected by environmental toxins for example crashing sperm counts, upticks in genital deformities and in gender identity issues as well as early onset puberty in girls and an increase in people seeking IVF treatment etc


Popular fruit and vegetables covered in a ‘cocktail of pesticides’, study finds

By Saman Javed
The Independent
 1 day ago

Some of the UK ’s most popular fruit and vegetables are covered in more than 100 pesticides, according to new research .

Every year, the UK government tests samples of food and drink for traces of pesticide residues.

The latest report , analysed by Pesticide Action Network (PAN), has found that grapes (both dried and fresh), oranges and herbs contain the highest amount of pesticides.


Other items making the list of the 12 most polluted products, being dubbed “the dirty dozen”, include pears, beans (dried and fresh), okra, lettuce, carrots and mango.

These foods contained traces of a total of 122 different pesticides.

Researchers found that 80 per cent of grapes, herbs and oranges tested contained more than one pesticide and just one-kilogram sample of sultanas contained 25 different chemicals.

Of the 122 chemicals identified, 61 per cent are classed as “ highly hazardous ” by the UN, PAN said. Additionally, 47 have links to cancer and 15 contain “reproduction or developmental toxins” that can have an adverse effect on sexual function and fertility.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2021 at 7:41 PM, Golden Retriever said:


Explore this.



By Michael Swift, "Gay Revolutionary." Reprinted from The Congressional Record of the United States Congress.
First printed in Gay Community News, February 15-21 1987

“We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams
and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your
gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth
groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in
your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together.
Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image.
They will come to crave and adore us.
“Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make
you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take
your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace
them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with
men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never
known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please
another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of
another man.
“All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed
which engenders love between men. All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we
must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will
triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.
“If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and
defile your dead, puny bodies.
“We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly
caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace
the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently
dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold
athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the
world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.
“Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we
will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons
through usage of the Redeeming the Rainbow 203 devices of wit and ridicule, devices which
we are skilled in employing.
“We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be
shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars,
your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar,
bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have
infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always
among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same
bed with you.
“There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we
are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for
less. Those who oppose us will be exiled. We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima
did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded
together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.
“The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence--
will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will,
must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory.
They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of
homosexual savants.
“All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men.
We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will
be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are
free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is
not enough.
“The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One
of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will
be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be
automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining
stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible
“We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and
distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have
shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and
imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true
nobility, true beauty in a man.
“We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed
who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows
throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the
ultimate revolution.
“Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks"https://media1-production.mightynetworks.com/asset/4819597/The_Gay_Manifesto.pdf



No agenda?


Carrie Johnson insists it’s entirely possible to be LGBT+ and a Tory

Carrie Johnson speaks at the LGBT+ Pride reception at the Conservative Party Conference



Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not against any homosexual nor transgender people, but come on now folks you must see

the media social engineering to promote it?


Why doesn't any party promote the issue of disabled people, also a minority like they do homosexuals and trangenders who are able bodied?


It's surely a more wothwhile cause?


Carrie Johnson yesterday supports LGBTQ and al lthe media report it






Carrie Johnson tells Tory party conference: I’ve wept over LGBT hate




Carrie Johnson will give LGBT+ rights speech at Tory party conference's Pride reception 



There's loads more, but you get the gist or not?

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:


I'm not against any homosexual nor transgender people, but come on now folks you must see

the media social engineering to promote it?


Of course a lot of people can see it. Not everyone's stupid! Corporations don't promote anything for altruistic reasons! Corporations only want to make more wealth and increase their power. The gay movement was originally a grass-roots movement, but human greed and ambition co-opted these movements. The devil leads people astray using temptations and distractions.


2 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

Why doesn't any party promote the issue of disabled people, also a minority like they do homosexuals and trangenders who are able bodied?



Actually, a lot are, they are, especially in public transport and sport.



Edited by RobSS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:


The LGBTQ lobby is far more powerful than any lobby for disabled people.



The "LGBT lobby" is no longer representative of grass-roots it's supposed represent. The lobby you're referring to is a sham, which is all part of the general human greed and ambition problem that's so widespread. 


12 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:


To infer otherwise is just plainly dishonest



Where did I infer that?



Edited by RobSS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

Why doesn't any party promote the issue of disabled people, also a minority like they do homosexuals and trangenders who are able bodied?


It's surely a more wothwhile cause?



1 hour ago, RobSS said:

Actually, a lot are, they are, especially in public transport and sport.


Glad you now agree the disabled are a more worthy cause, but with less support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:


Why doesn't any party promote the issue of disabled people, also a minority like they do homosexuals and trangenders who are able bodied?


It's surely a more wothwhile cause?



A lot of groups are out there helping disabled people who could do with your help! If it's something you feel so strongly about, why don't you do something practical to promote disability?


3 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:


Glad you now agree the disabled are a more worthy cause, but with less support.



But I never disagreed in the fist place. I saw them as separate issues.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobSS said:


A lot of gay people do that too.





That isn't the issue.


You agreed the LGBTQ lobbyists have huge influence over Government.


Why is that?


"Carrie Johnson has said her husband, the Prime Minister, is “completely committed” to protecting the gains of the LGBT+ community and extending them further"




I don't see homosexuals marginalised, quite the opposite is most fields these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...