Is This Planet X?

[Nick Myer]

Is This Planet X?

Any thoughts on the below linked footage?

Worth baring in mind that lens flares move

and the objects don't, at least not in the same rapid way lens flares do.

If this is not Planet X, The Sun and a sun simulator, or reflector what do you think it is?

Many people will likely think it's some kind of atmospheric refraction effect. I personally don't think so.

What is particularly interesting is that the apparent object on the left is clearly behind cloud (chemtrails) cover..

Is this connected to the current mass depopulation via vaccines, 5G and more?

Analyze and decipher the footage... and see what you think.. and if you know of any other footage please share..

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Xm5O31LG7yDp/

[Grumpy Owl]

4 hours ago, Nick Myer said:

Is This Planet X?

 

Nope, sorry.

 

4 hours ago, Nick Myer said:

Many people will likely think it's some kind of atmospheric refraction effect. I personally don't think so.

 

It is some kind of effect, I have seen this before but can't quite remember the terminology now. It is some kind of combination of lens flare/refraction/reflection, plus the fact you are filming through a window, which is likely double or triple glazed?

 

If there really was a Planet X 'out there' then someone would have surely seen it or detected it by now.

[Nick Myer]

No,

1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

Nope, sorry.

 

 

It is some kind of effect, I have seen this before but can't quite remember the terminology now. It is some kind of combination of lens flare/refraction/reflection, plus the fact you are filming through a window, which is likely double or triple glazed?

 

If there really was a Planet X 'out there' then someone would have surely seen it or detected it by now.

Why be 'sorry'? It's just your opinion. It's not as though your vague speculation of an analysis is the final say on what this actually is.

You are only theorizing and haven't accounted for the fact the object on the left can be clearly seen to be behind cloud cover and is not a source of emitting light.

I have no sense that you are correct in your judgement on this. Filming through double glazed glass or glass with a UV film does not produce clone

images or altered images that reside next to the real object being filmed, nor would that make objects change colour or reside behind cloud cover.

It may well not be Planet X though.. but 2 sun like objects are up there in my opinion, emitting different kinds of light, one obviously our real sun, in the middle....and there is a non light transmitting object as far as I can tell to the left. Writing it all off as an illusion via sketchy info is a little hasty... Don't be so sure that is the case.

There have been multiple sightings of  apparent 2 suns for a few years now with filmed or still shot evidence

to support those claims. It doesn't mean it is actually 2 suns as I tend to think one is a sun simulator.

So it's certainly looking like that at the very least 2 sources of strong light are up there..

Time will tell.. but thanks for your feedback..  A still shot from another clip I took a while back..

[Grumpy Owl]

30 minutes ago, Nick Myer said:

I have no sense that you are correct in your judgement on this. Filming through double glazed glass or glass with a UV film does not produce clone

images or altered images that reside next to the real object being filmed, nor would that make objects change colour or reside behind cloud cover.

It may well not be Planet X though.. but 2 sun like objects are up there in my opinion, emitting different kinds of light, one obviously our real sun, in the middle....and there is a non light transmitting object as far as I can tell to the left. Writing it all off as an illusion via sketchy info is a little hasty... Don't be so sure that is the case.

 

I only said 'sorry' because some people here really don't like being told things they don't want to hear. What I said was my opinion, I don't know whether I am right or wrong, thats just what I think.

 

If you want to believe that you can see some other planet or sun right next to our sun then fine, carry on.

[Nick Myer]

1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I only said 'sorry' because some people here really don't like being told things they don't want to hear. What I said was my opinion, I don't know whether I am right or wrong, thats just what I think.

 

If you want to believe that you can see some other planet or sun right next to our sun then fine, carry on.

I'm not that fragile so no need for any sorry for me.  No probs. No, It's not a matter of what I want to believe.. This isn't about egos or fixed world view, this is about establishing

and confronting the truth.. My only aims are getting to and exposing the truth.. It's that simple, thus I don't rush to dismiss things I look deeply into what might be..

This is interesting, just spotted from 2016... from the Daily Express.. it might offer some clues.. and be relevant to my footage too..

'Astronomer ‘exposes NASA cover up’, claiming second sun, and Nibiru REAL during broadcast'

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/676909/Astronomer-exposes-NASA-cover-up-claiming-second-sun-and-Nibiru-REAL-during-broadcast

[Origin]

Cosmology is based on assumptions and the belief that some of it will be true. In all ages people have perceived something and tried to describe it and give it meaning. What it can be. To this day, not one human being has been able to touch any of it in real terms. No matter what humans try, they cannot see the true image and the context will remain unknown. And there is no truth that humans are ready for. And no one stands where the next one stands in development. Everyone has their own version of truth. And that is the one he can cope with.  

[Nick Myer]

'2 Suns or what?'

https://www.bitchute.com/video/0eiRm41QKFkY/

[Pre-Raphaelite]

Planet X - no such thing. Unless one prefers to believe that millions of cosmologists and millions of amateur astronomers the whole world over are keeping secret a planetary body / extra star in the the solar system because...reasons.

[Nick Myer]

On 9/18/2021 at 9:54 AM, Pre-Raphaelite said:

Planet X - no such thing. Unless one prefers to believe that millions of cosmologists and millions of amateur astronomers the whole world over are keeping secret a planetary body / extra star in the the solar system because...reasons.

Interesting theory/opinion...This of course may well not be planet X..but may well include a second sun or sun simulator...in the footage..

So how many of the 'millions of cosmologists and millions of amateur astronomers' point there telescopes directly at the sun during the daytime and zoom in

and then publish their findings? Can you show me any? Presumably they do this daily during daylight hours 7 days a week?.. So they don't miss anything? Obviously tricky though, in a world of ever increasing overcast GeoEngineered skies... but some opportunities do present themselves. Personally I'll keep asking questions until I am 100% certain of what is true.

What is your explanation re what is seen in the footage I posted...and can you support that with evidence? Until it's all confirmed it's speculation however the footage is interesting and exceeds what anyone would perceive as normal.. But that doesn't mean it isn't showing something being hidden deliberately from the public..

[Pre-Raphaelite]

To me it isn't a question of providing evidence for something that is not there. Astronomers, both professional and amateur, search the skies regularly and it may be said that at any one time numerous optical and radio telescopes are covering much of the visible universe - well, as far as practicable. Were there some foreign planetary body lurking in the solar system its presence would in any case be given away by perturbations on existing planets, not to mention being detected by visual or radio means.

 

I don't know (or care) where the idea of Nibiru/Planet X arose but to me there is nothing credible about it. A bit like Barbara Marciniak's Pleidean Times.

[Grumpy Owl]

On 9/20/2021 at 6:52 PM, Nick Myer said:

Interesting theory/opinion...This of course may well not be planet X..but may well include a second sun or sun simulator...in the footage..

So how many of the 'millions of cosmologists and millions of amateur astronomers' point there telescopes directly at the sun during the daytime and zoom in

and then publish their findings? Can you show me any? Presumably they do this daily during daylight hours 7 days a week?.. So they don't miss anything? Obviously tricky though, in a world of ever increasing overcast GeoEngineered skies... but some opportunities do present themselves. Personally I'll keep asking questions until I am 100% certain of what is true.

What is your explanation re what is seen in the footage I posted...and can you support that with evidence? Until it's all confirmed it's speculation however the footage is interesting and exceeds what anyone would perceive as normal.. But that doesn't mean it isn't showing something being hidden deliberately from the public..

 

Perhaps you could try filming the same footage 'outside', ie not through a double glazed window.

 

Just a suggestion...

[Nick Myer]

21 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

Perhaps you could try filming the same footage 'outside', ie not through a double glazed window.

 

Just a suggestion...

The whole point of filming through a window aka glass (that's what a camera lens films though too) was to filter the glare

via UV film affixed to the window. Filming outside would over power the image with glare.. thus unlikely to spot/film the

same objects at any time without a filter  I may be able to construct something for outside though,  but it would still be filming through the camera glass and a UV filter layer of plastic or glass.  How would you explain unique cloud (chemtrail) cover in front of a filmed apparent object? Filming directly at the sun is not an easy task

clearly, not that I am an expert at this.. However, we live in a world that is controlled by people who lie, cheat, harm, deceive and hide things from the public by

default. Add that to the many strange sightings around the world to inc apparent 2 suns and other objects, makes it a credible possibility that certain objects above us

are routinely hidden from us. And anyone who hasn't noticed the near daily induced overcast skies via GeoEngineering/aka sprayed aerosols should pay more

attention and look up more..   But clearly those spray days have many facets to their uses not excluding Weather Warfare, BioWarfare and hiding things..

[Grumpy Owl]

2 hours ago, Nick Myer said:

However, we live in a world that is controlled by people who lie, cheat, harm, deceive and hide things from the public by

default.

 

That much I will agree with. However we do need to be careful that we don't start looking for "things that aren't there", or seeing things that we want to see.

 

Which could just be the result of some optical illusion. And I emphasise the word 'could' here.

[Nick Myer]

Luckily I don't have any preconceived agenda to find doom and destruction to inc planetary threats..

Not on my wish list... I'd actually prefer to enjoy life daily and nightly.. Thus I only seek the truth and aim to help stopping the global nightmare..

Re the footage  yes it remains unproven as to what it is, to inc whether it's an' optical illusion'.  No one has so far explained how cloud cover

can be in front of the left side object and also be an optical illusion.. Worth remembering it's also an extreme zoom in.  I'm in absolutely

no doubts the sun light has altered in the past 10 years.. to a very extreme white light(not during sunsets), thus may include artificial light being used at certain times.. So I still very much suspect

a solar simulator is up there for certain reasons as 1 potential sun like object. And it's known this has been achieved technologically.

Maybe the entirety of life is an optical illusion..as David Icke suggests..

Only time as we know it will tell.. but hopefully the mystery of this footage will be solved soon..

Edited September 23, 2021 by Nick Myer

[Grumpy Owl]

12 minutes ago, Nick Myer said:

I'm in absolutely no doubts the sun light has altered in the past 10 years.. to a very extreme white light(not during sunsets)

 

Others have commented on this previously, and I would tend to agree. On some days, like today or yesterday, when the sky is relatively clear and free from cloud, the sun does look particularly more 'fierce' at times.

 

It could well be due to a combination of the weakening magnetic field and/or atmospheric changes, the sun does still look 'very yellow' at sunrise and sunset to me.

[Nick Myer]

Indeed that whiter daytime blinding sun could be down to some damage caused to Earths natural shields to include the ozone layer/ionosphere/magnetosphere..

all that kind of stuff.. and perhaps caused intentionally or not via GeoEngineering and or the use of HAARP technology etc..

Or it's a star on the brink of Supernova next to the sun or as I think it is a sun simulator or reflector.. What I have observed over a few years

is that lens flares often offer clues of the objects being filmed..and a few times I have picked up cone shaped lens flares and 5 sided shield shaped

lens flares.. of technological origin it seems..That makes me think sun gun(as the Nazis were developing) and or sun simulator.

As mentioned though, lens flares move when the camera moves

so it's always obvious as to what they are against apparent static objects..  Thus in the footage I think the real sun is the more orange coloured object..

In this snapshot the white light beaming apparent sun is out of shot.. showing what I think is the real sun and a mystery object behind cloud cover..

[Nick Myer]

Hmmm.. I wonder why that amused 'Patriot'...

Worth baring in mind that those who have captured Planet Earth and aim to

control and depopulate Humanity, do not exclude 'offworld' within their maniacal agenda..

That's my sense of it all anyway..

[Origin]

It is remarkable that only those who believe in religions, and Flat Earther, detect Planet X. Imagine that a planet magically appears near the Earth and no one can see it. 

Whatever. The world of humans is still supernatural.

 

 

 

 

 

[Nick Myer]

On 9/27/2021 at 4:02 PM, Origin said:

It is remarkable that only those who believe in religions, and Flat Earther, detect Planet X. Imagine that a planet magically appears near the Earth and no one can see it. 

Whatever. The world of humans is still supernatural.

 

On 9/27/2021 at 4:02 PM, Origin said:

It is 'remarkable' that on a serous question thread you posted 2 stupid videos, one quite clearly green screen special FX = Irrelevant to

what I was asking and showing re my footage.  And take note re your ridiculous claim: I'm not religious or a flat Earther but I did shoot some interesting footage that shows up

some unusual objects when zoomed in, worthy of discussion or analysis/deciphering of the said footage.  That does not of course mean that I am stating that what is seen in the footage is 'Planet X', a second sun, a sun simulator etc etc. I am simply posing questions on what the objects could be.. bar one, that is obviously our sun..

 

 

[Origin]

You can find hundreds of Planet X videos on yt. Many things appear in videos but it does not mean that something is there.

[Nick Myer]

4 hours ago, Origin said:

You can find hundreds of Planet X videos on yt. Many things appear in videos but it does not mean that something is there.

Thanks for that vacuous response to add to the two irrelevant videos you posted, 1 clearly green screen fake..

You did not address the actual footage link I posted. Thus, you've offered no detailed analysis and have deciphered nothing..

 

[Origin]

Reality is defined by perceived patterns that result in many different contextual variations. And it is irrelevant how much of the demonstrated anomalies I have decoded. I perceive spatial extent in which we are located somewhat differently than humans have been conditioned to perceive it. Planet X is a human expectation that will not turn out to be true.

[Nick Myer]

1 hour ago, Origin said:

Reality is defined by perceived patterns that result in many different contextual variations. And it is irrelevant how much of the demonstrated anomalies I have decoded. I perceive spatial extent in which we are located somewhat differently than humans have been conditioned to perceive it. Planet X is a human expectation that will not turn out to be true.

How about less of the flowery language and more of an analysis of the footage, in this reality?

You see,, in this reality, stuff still happens.. People still lie, cheat, try to hide stuff ..oh and try

to harm people too.. Think 5G and vaccines for that one as a starter. People also try to distract, divert and "debunk" in this reality

as a Red Herring tactic, just as a side note.  Evidence is required for actual debunking, worth noting.

So basically in this reality, hidden objects to include of the technological kind

can be deliberately hidden by those who have seized control over this world. Thus, many things can exist in this reality but still

remain hidden to the larger population.

That is not stating that the mystery object on the left in the footage is Planet X though.

And in my footage, 2 mystery objects other than the sun can be seen, if you remember.?.

Do you have a God complex by any chance? Try to remind yourself you are not an all knowing being..

Edited September 30, 2021 by Nick Myer

[Origin]

It was your choice to believe human constructs. And in your reality, that's the way it is. How can I have a God complex when I know it is not a God. I have no belief.

[Nick Myer]

3 hours ago, Origin said:

It was your choice to believe human constructs. And in your reality, that's the way it is. How can I have a God complex when I know it is not a God. I have no belief.

I have a strong belief that you are incapable of analyzing or deciphering video footage and or photographs/snapshots of footage.

I'll bid you goodbye now.. Your robotic superiority/God complex style is not really solving this mystery oddly enough. or furthering this debate.

I'll wait for some relevant feedback from others on this subject, not more samey new age robotic fluff void of actual substance..(at least in one respect)..

It was always about this reality and things spotted within it..

Bye, no need to reply.