Jump to content

What has happened to Dr. Reiner Fuellmich?


CarpeDiem
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/27/2021 at 1:47 PM, CarpeDiem said:

I hear what you are saying Mikheil. If we are relying on higher numbers than the previous then we are no more than pissing into the wind!

 

Protests that get NO MSM coverage but you can learn about on websites and forums 99% of people NEVER visit = pissing into the wind.

There is only one way it can be stopped. Everyone knows it deep down, but no one has the balls. White people worked together for the Soviet revolution. They worked together for the French Revolution, but there is so little testosterone in men today that they want fucking gender blockers and to wear dresses and fucking high heels.

 

Why waste your time peacefully demonstrating? Just sit back and be shat on by your supreme masters, OBEY! Turn the other cheek. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated—or killed. Tremble before the might of our police and military.

 

Don't be like the Daleks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mikheil said:

There is only one way it can be stopped. Everyone knows it deep down, but no one has the balls. White people worked together for the Soviet revolution. They worked together for the French Revolution, but there is so little testosterone in men today that they want fucking gender blockers and to wear dresses and fucking high heels.

 

Why waste your time peacefully demonstrating? Just sit back and be shat on by your supreme masters, OBEY! Turn the other cheek. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated—or killed. Tremble before the might of our police and military.

 

Don't be like the Daleks!

I also hear and read about the power of the word “NO”. Problem is you need vast, vast numbers to say “NO”. Unfortunately, vast, vast numbers have said “YES” to the jab. So for me saying “NO” will have absolutely no affect at all either. 

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been watching Fuellmich’s videos for the past year, and he has had some brilliant guests on exposing some brilliant information. 

 

I remember him him saying he had the first hearing arranged for the 9th November, 9/11 for English dates... I doubt this will happen. 

 

Recently ive been skimming through some of his newer videos, and he makes comments like, ‘our best hope is for humanity to wake up’ (never gonna happen)... ‘in the future I see the unvaccinated will have to make their own community’.... and my thoughts are, what about his big case against Drosten and the PCR test that would end this fraud scamdemic!! Wouldn’t that be our best hope?? Why would the unvaccinated need their own community once the pcr is exposed in court?!?! 

 

At this point he seems to just be making videos to get to get the information out there, beginning to repeat things about it being a spiritual battle and all this... a solid court case exposing Drosten and the pcr test would end this, we wouldn’t need spirituality. 

 

I must say say I have grown impatient with him, as more time goes on with comments highlighted above, I become more and more suspicious. Although it confuses me as to what Dr Wolfgang Wudarg is doing in all of this. From what I gather he single handily stopped the Swine flu scam back in 2009, so I consider him to be a good person. Maybe I’m missing something with their corona committee. 

 

All credit to Milkheil, he called Fuellmich out from day 1. I hope for the sake of humanity we are wrong. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/2/2021 at 1:25 PM, Seeker said:

I’ve been watching Fuellmich’s videos for the past year, and he has had some brilliant guests on exposing some brilliant information. 

 

I remember him him saying he had the first hearing arranged for the 9th November, 9/11 for English dates... I doubt this will happen. 

 

Recently ive been skimming through some of his newer videos, and he makes comments like, ‘our best hope is for humanity to wake up’ (never gonna happen)... ‘in the future I see the unvaccinated will have to make their own community’.... and my thoughts are, what about his big case against Drosten and the PCR test that would end this fraud scamdemic!! Wouldn’t that be our best hope?? Why would the unvaccinated need their own community once the pcr is exposed in court?!?! 

 

At this point he seems to just be making videos to get to get the information out there, beginning to repeat things about it being a spiritual battle and all this... a solid court case exposing Drosten and the pcr test would end this, we wouldn’t need spirituality. 

 

I must say say I have grown impatient with him, as more time goes on with comments highlighted above, I become more and more suspicious. Although it confuses me as to what Dr Wolfgang Wudarg is doing in all of this. From what I gather he single handily stopped the Swine flu scam back in 2009, so I consider him to be a good person. Maybe I’m missing something with their corona committee. 

 

All credit to Milkheil, he called Fuellmich out from day 1. I hope for the sake of humanity we are wrong. 

 

 

I contacted Fuellmich (Feel me in English) last year at the beginning of his "campaign". I provided him with a lot of information, the exact international laws he could use to fight this on international level (many countries have ratified the International Bill of Human Right, and legally bound to it) and even contacts within the International Criminal Court in The Hague, to smooth things out for him. He was obviously not interested in it, totally focused on Drosten. With his contacts and support this could have been already in the process of the ICC. We're now more than a year further and nothing.

 

But it is good press for his offices in Germany and the US. And.....don't forget he IS a lawyer, which should say it all. Give him a million and he will do the job.

Edited by Ween Dwijler
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Ween Dwijler said:

I contacted Fuellmich (Feel me in English) last year at the beginning of his "campaign". I provided him with a lot of information, the exact international laws he could use to fight this on international level (many countries have ratified the International Bill of Human Right, and legally bound to it) and even contacts within the International Criminal Court in The Hague, to smooth things out for him. He was obviously not interested in it, totally focused on Drosten. With his contacts and support this could have been already in the process of the ICC. We're now more than a year further and nothing.

 

But it is good press for his offices in Germany and the US. And.....don't forget he IS a lawyer, which should say it all. Give him a million and he will do the job.

What do you reckon his game isn’t then? A shill for hopium? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Seeker said:

What do you reckon his game isn’t then? A shill for hopium? 

1. He is a lawyer

2. A law office is a business

3. Lawyers don't work for free (bad for business)

4. There is a lot of money to make from Covid victims (he is a smart lawyer!)

 

His game? Making money, lots of money, as a lawyer. Hopium to get Covid clients, thinking they can win something.

 

Note: Lawyers generally score high on the psychopath test scale.

Edited by Ween Dwijler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2021 at 5:05 PM, Ween Dwijler said:

1. He is a lawyer

2. A law office is a business

3. Lawyers don't work for free (bad for business)

4. There is a lot of money to make from Covid victims (he is a smart lawyer!)

 

His game? Making money, lots of money, as a lawyer. Hopium to get Covid clients, thinking they can win something.

 

Note: Lawyers generally score high on the psychopath test scale.

I won't say I told you so - Honest (hee, hee, hee)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/2/2021 at 7:25 AM, Seeker said:

All credit to Milkheil, he called Fuellmich out from day 1. I hope for the sake of humanity we are wrong. 

I wasn't wrong. He's scum like the rest of them. Only ONE thing can stop this and it ain't gonna happen. WE ARE ALL FUCKED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless the above posters are qualified lawyers and understand how the law works ex UK, perhaps it is better to not  make assumptions.  In a multi-layered, changing situation, it is folly to go to court without full information. 

 

In UK, a big legal challenge has been started by a senior lawyer Anna De Buisseret and a team of lawyers.  She showed to camera 700 or so pages of laws that have been broken in this war on humanity (in UK) both she and Reiner state that each named individual complicit in this genocide will be charged. That includes all people who have injected others in the illegal experiment. 

 

 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, writer said:

Unless the above posters are qualified lawyers and understand how the law works ex UK, perhaps it is better to not  make assumptions.  In a multi-layered, changing situation, it is folly to go to court without full information. 

 

In UK, a big legal challenge has been started by a senior lawyer Anna De Buisseret and a team of lawyers.  She showed to camera 700 or so pages of laws that have been broken in this war on humanity (in UK) both she and Reiner state that each named individual complicit in this genocide will be charged. That includes all people who have injected others in the illegal experiment. 

 

 
 
 

With everything that has happened in last 18 months or so, I suppose we all understand why there is so much doubt about some professional people who claim to stand against the system.

I hope I am wrong about Fuellmich. His involvement in the financial ruin of VW has always weighed heavy on my mind, as this was done to FORCE VW into the electric car development/manufacture.

As with everything, time will tell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2021 at 2:43 PM, writer said:

Unless the above posters are qualified lawyers and understand how the law works ex UK, perhaps it is better to not  make assumptions.  In a multi-layered, changing situation, it is folly to go to court without full information. 

 

In UK, a big legal challenge has been started by a senior lawyer Anna De Buisseret and a team of lawyers.  She showed to camera 700 or so pages of laws that have been broken in this war on humanity (in UK) both she and Reiner state that each named individual complicit in this genocide will be charged. That includes all people who have injected others in the illegal experiment. 

 

 
 
 

Dream on

 

FUCK ALL will happen.

 

The Supreme Court in the USA has negated the Creepy Los Cunt's vaccine mandate. The Appeals Court has upheld iy. Has is made any difference NOT A FUCK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2021 at 1:43 PM, writer said:

Unless the above posters are qualified lawyers and understand how the law works ex UK, perhaps it is better to not  make assumptions.  In a multi-layered, changing situation, it is folly to go to court without full information. 

 

In UK, a big legal challenge has been started by a senior lawyer Anna De Buisseret and a team of lawyers.  She showed to camera 700 or so pages of laws that have been broken in this war on humanity (in UK) both she and Reiner state that each named individual complicit in this genocide will be charged. That includes all people who have injected others in the illegal experiment.

 
 

 

I really want Reiner Fuellmich to be genuine, but all I have seen so far are some very informative interviews and documents but nothing more. He even gave a summing up speech by video weeks ago but then didn't say what was going to happen next... Whilst many of the interviews have been impressive, it feels to me like it is all a performance of wheeling in the next specialist calling out the plandemic but then never going anywhere.

 

I have even more to say about Anna de Buisseret who comes with far too many red flags for my comfort. Her Facebook and Twitter pages make for some interesting reading and provide some insight.

 

I went to the Canterbury World Wide Freedom Rally on 24th July with a friend and she spoke there that day. Here is a link to a Bitchute video of her speech. https://www.bitchute.com/video/7Lpxczp1YPfR/

 

She is always introduced as a self-proclaimed "senior lawyer" but what exactly makes her so "senior"? Who is she senior to? And her tendency to name drop is pretty epic too.

 

At the Canterbury rally, she said more than once she had been working on the Covid case with other lawyers since 2019! The Covid story didn't break until early 2020 so how was a team of lawyers working on it beforehand? Perhaps she got her years (or should I say story) mixed up but that doesn't exactly inspire confidence in her.

 

Then there is the fact that she doesn't actually currently hold a practicing certificate as a solictor.

https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/register/person/?sraNumber=21828&fbclid=IwAR0ic0kGrVnRXo3LI-3m5WXOY5C4hYloT93VZgaC3t4q4aW0VUjd5hOH0SU

 

image.png.eab60e11e3f8e20b6a682e76d2099c45.png

De Buisseret announced at the Canterbury rally how she had caught Covid and was ill for 6 weeks in January and February 2020, diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, yet the first person in the UK (who hadn't previously come from China) was only "diagnosed" at the beginning of February 2020. And apparently, by 6th March 2020 when the first death occurred, only 100 people had tested positive. So she is claiming to be in that first 100 people diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 in the UK!

 

Later in the speech, whilst she was talking about Nuremberg, a Jewish girl rushed into the crowd and challenged her. De Buisseret was then, from her vantage point, able to respond to the Jewish girl and seemingly win the argument whilst supported by the host who came and stood next to her and put his arm around her shoulders in solidarity. Unfortunately this event isn't well depicted in the Bitchute video linked above, but I haven't been able to find better capturing of the event. But, from a bystander's viewpoint, it seemed incredibly staged and my friend and I looked at each other with suspicion.

 

Then there is the matter of her being a "retired army officer" with bio-weapons training meaning that she was supposedly in a unique position to understand that a bio-weapon had been released in the early days of the plandemic and was able to call on a former colleague on the ground in Beijing. I, for one, do not buy the bio-weapon / lab leak narrative so this raises my suspicions even more.

 

Also, de Buisseret's Facebook business page has been trolled by a guy called James Ward who is quizzing her on her military history (Territorial Army) and catching her out I think as she hasn't been replying.

 

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=4153563141388244&id=259943550750242

 

image.png.72dcd5d6a13e77a1cae8b289bdd81ea2.png

 

 

In reply to this, James Ward asks her why "Sir" Guy Sayle, a Guards officer, would be "Commander" of a Royal Navy vessel and for evidence he was knighted but she has not responded. I tried looking for this myself and, whilst I could find he was awarded the MBE, I drew a blank on his knighthood. It seems that the Welsh Guards were transported on the Sir Galahad warship during the Falklands war, but I could find nothing to confirm that "Sir" Guy Sayle had been a "Commander" of it.

 

I have watched some of her other interviews too and her grasp of criminal law, and especially the mens rea element of crimes, is rather unimpressive in my view. She repeats that "silence is a war crime" but I am not convinced this is the case and would like a citation of this supposed fact. She throws around the term genocide which I don't think she is using in a correct legal sense - genocide is the attempt to destroy a specific group of people (usually based on their race, ethnicity, nationality or religion) whereas the vaccines are being rolled out indiscriminately to everyone. Along with Kate Shemirani, de Buisseret claims that nurses were hung as a result of Nuremberg and that today's nurses may face the same punishment - but most of those who were punished at Nuremberg, and especially those given the death sentence, were, as far as I can ascertain, high ranking Nazis and Doctors and not your everyday nurse.

 

De Buisseret has made errors in respect of employment law too which is supposedly her speciality - she has said that, if people are sacked for not taking the injection, they can claim "constructive dismissal". That is not correct - she means unfair dismissal. Constructive dismissal is for people who are forced to resign (not those who are sacked) because their employer has behaved in fundamental breach of the employment contract. She also neglects to mention that, to claim unfair dismissal, unless there is discrimination involved or other limited circumstances, you have to have two years service. It is very remiss of her not to mention this requirement for an unfair dismissal claim.

 

Her Facebook page reveals that she has featured on BBC's working lunch. This makes me wonder if she might be an actress as well as an employment lawyer, hence the BBC appearance in 2012 where she is clearly rehearsed.

 

 

Everything she says comes which a huge dose of exaggeration, embellishment and drama whilst she waves around notices of liability. She speaks carelessly with more certitude and less caution than I would expect from a lawyer, let alone one as senior as she proclaims she is. She plucks out soundbytes of legal terms, case law and legislation which may sound impressive to those not well versed in the law but, on closer inspection, her understanding seems lacking. Whilst I don't doubt she has been a lawyer, I am not convinced she made a very good one.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2021 at 10:32 PM, CarpeDiem said:

With everything that has happened in last 18 months or so, I suppose we all understand why there is so much doubt about some professional people who claim to stand against the system.

I hope I am wrong about Fuellmich. His involvement in the financial ruin of VW has always weighed heavy on my mind, as this was done to FORCE VW into the electric car development/manufacture.

As with everything, time will tell. 

You don't need time, you need a working brain. She's a 'Pacifier, a 'Placebo' a Peace at any price shill.

 

She's there, along with Fuellmich to make you feel all warm and cozy inside. "There's no need for violence. No need for an  uprising, No need for Civil War. We have it all under control. Just be patient and "alles sal regkom"

 

Next year, she and Fuellmich will be saying exactly the same thing and they will continue to do so whilst millions are killed, maimed and sterilized.

 

If you believe this bullshit then start looking for that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Maybe you'll meet a Leprechaun with bigger balls than you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2021 at 11:06 PM, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

I really want Reiner Fuellmich to be genuine, but all I have seen so far are some very informative interviews and documents but nothing more. He even gave a summing up speech by video weeks ago but then didn't say what was going to happen next... Whilst many of the interviews have been impressive, it feels to me like it is all a performance of wheeling in the next specialist calling out the plandemic but then never going anywhere.

 

I have even more to say about Anna de Buisseret who comes with far too many red flags for my comfort. Her Facebook and Twitter pages make for some interesting reading and provide some insight.

 

I went to the Canterbury World Wide Freedom Rally on 24th July with a friend and she spoke there that day. Here is a link to a Bitchute video of her speech. https://www.bitchute.com/video/7Lpxczp1YPfR/

 

She is always introduced as a self-proclaimed "senior lawyer" but what exactly makes her so "senior"? Who is she senior to? And her tendency to name drop is pretty epic too.

 

At the Canterbury rally, she said more than once she had been working on the Covid case with other lawyers since 2019! The Covid story didn't break until early 2020 so how was a team of lawyers working on it beforehand? Perhaps she got her years (or should I say story) mixed up but that doesn't exactly inspire confidence in her.

 

Then there is the fact that she doesn't actually currently hold a practicing certificate as a solictor.

https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/register/person/?sraNumber=21828&fbclid=IwAR0ic0kGrVnRXo3LI-3m5WXOY5C4hYloT93VZgaC3t4q4aW0VUjd5hOH0SU

 

image.png.eab60e11e3f8e20b6a682e76d2099c45.png

De Buisseret announced at the Canterbury rally how she had caught Covid and was ill for 6 weeks in January and February 2020, diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, yet the first person in the UK (who hadn't previously come from China) was only "diagnosed" at the beginning of February 2020. And apparently, by 6th March 2020 when the first death occurred, only 100 people had tested positive. So she is claiming to be in that first 100 people diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 in the UK!

 

Later in the speech, whilst she was talking about Nuremberg, a Jewish girl rushed into the crowd and challenged her. De Buisseret was then, from her vantage point, able to respond to the Jewish girl and seemingly win the argument whilst supported by the host who came and stood next to her and put his arm around her shoulders in solidarity. Unfortunately this event isn't well depicted in the Bitchute video linked above, but I haven't been able to find better capturing of the event. But, from a bystander's viewpoint, it seemed incredibly staged and my friend and I looked at each other with suspicion.

 

Then there is the matter of her being a "retired army officer" with bio-weapons training meaning that she was supposedly in a unique position to understand that a bio-weapon had been released in the early days of the plandemic and was able to call on a former colleague on the ground in Beijing. I, for one, do not buy the bio-weapon / lab leak narrative so this raises my suspicions even more.

 

Also, de Buisseret's Facebook business page has been trolled by a guy called James Ward who is quizzing her on her military history (Territorial Army) and catching her out I think as she hasn't been replying.

 

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=4153563141388244&id=259943550750242

 

image.png.72dcd5d6a13e77a1cae8b289bdd81ea2.png

 

 

In reply to this, James Ward asks her why "Sir" Guy Sayle, a Guards officer, would be "Commander" of a Royal Navy vessel and for evidence he was knighted but she has not responded. I tried looking for this myself and, whilst I could find he was awarded the MBE, I drew a blank on his knighthood. It seems that the Welsh Guards were transported on the Sir Galahad warship during the Falklands war, but I could find nothing to confirm that "Sir" Guy Sayle had been a "Commander" of it.

 

I have watched some of her other interviews too and her grasp of criminal law, and especially the mens rea element of crimes, is rather unimpressive in my view. She repeats that "silence is a war crime" but I am not convinced this is the case and would like a citation of this supposed fact. She throws around the term genocide which I don't think she is using in a correct legal sense - genocide is the attempt to destroy a specific group of people (usually based on their race, ethnicity, nationality or religion) whereas the vaccines are being rolled out indiscriminately to everyone. Along with Kate Shemirani, de Buisseret claims that nurses were hung as a result of Nuremberg and that today's nurses may face the same punishment - but most of those who were punished at Nuremberg, and especially those given the death sentence, were, as far as I can ascertain, high ranking Nazis and Doctors and not your everyday nurse.

 

De Buisseret has made errors in respect of employment law too which is supposedly her speciality - she has said that, if people are sacked for not taking the injection, they can claim "constructive dismissal". That is not correct - she means unfair dismissal. Constructive dismissal is for people who are forced to resign (not those who are sacked) because their employer has behaved in fundamental breach of the employment contract. She also neglects to mention that, to claim unfair dismissal, unless there is discrimination involved or other limited circumstances, you have to have two years service. It is very remiss of her not to mention this requirement for an unfair dismissal claim.

 

Her Facebook page reveals that she has featured on BBC's working lunch. This makes me wonder if she might be an actress as well as an employment lawyer, hence the BBC appearance in 2012 where she is clearly rehearsed.

 

 

Everything she says comes which a huge dose of exaggeration, embellishment and drama whilst she waves around notices of liability. She speaks carelessly with more certitude and less caution than I would expect from a lawyer, let alone one as senior as she proclaims she is. She plucks out soundbytes of legal terms, case law and legislation which may sound impressive to those not well versed in the law but, on closer inspection, her understanding seems lacking. Whilst I don't doubt she has been a lawyer, I am not convinced she made a very good one.

 

Just name ONE doctor, nurse or any fucker on planet earth who has received one of these 700 page documents.  THERE AREN'T ANY and there never will be and even IF there were, the Lawyers, Magistrates, Judges are all bought and paid for. Dream on folks. YOU ARE FUCKED. we all are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2021 at 5:02 PM, Mikheil said:

Dream on

 

FUCK ALL will happen.

 

The Supreme Court in the USA has negated the Creepy Los Cunt's vaccine mandate. The Appeals Court has upheld iy. Has is made any difference NOT A FUCK

And anything the court rules against government, government will appeal and the appeals court will find in favour of government (watch the latest US court gimmick with government telling employers they must mandate vaccines for work). It gives impression the courts are 'doing their job' when all they are doing is screwing us all and they know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CarpeDiem said:

And anything the court rules against government, government will appeal and the appeals court will find in favour of government (watch the latest US court gimmick with government telling employers they must mandate vaccines for work). It gives impression the courts are 'doing their job' when all they are doing is screwing us all and they know it.

They aren't even bothering to appeal. Just a big FUCK YOU to the Courts.

 

It's time to beat the ploughshares into swords and FIGHT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...