Jump to content

Afghanistan - Back to Square One


 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, jack121 said:

 

Please don't believe everything you read in the papers.

They never tell you the full story.

They just tell you what they want you to know.

Afganistan is not as they would have you believe.

They afghans just destroyed a warehouse full of vaccine vials, burnt thousands of face masks, no vaccine mandates, no lockdowns, told the nwo to get lost.

Judge people by their actions, not the words spewing from the mouth of the main stream media.

All is not as it seems. Afganistan is a threat to the nwo, that is why they are being shitted on by.

 

What am I believing in the papers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Strummer101 said:

I beg to differ a little here. Of course you must judge right from wrong and say so, not to do so is moral cowardice.

 

Hey, you say evil, I agree, on both counts. 

 

It is my business though to say that Sharia is a discriminatory backward doctrine, that deserves no place in any century, let alone this one. It is that simple. It is my duty to point out if a particular creed (man-made at that) holds half the human race to be worth less that the other half, that is abhorrent and wrong, and should be opposed. 

 

I think I can stop there.

 

By the way, I do not view Islam - show me any religion that does not view women as somehow second class?  

 

 

Thank you for expanding your point - I understand where you are coming from and principally agree with what you are saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see what they have done here, put an ‘imbecile’ at the helm in the White House, so that people like Tony Blair can blame the disasterous foreign policy of the Neocons on “lunacy” and “incompetence” or the “dementia” of Biden, rather than a calculated strategy to revive Islamic “terrorism” and throw the Middle East into further chaos, to facilitate the Zionist Belt & Road project.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trouble with your average awful person who worships the MSM is they think anyone with dark brown skin, black hair and a good frizzy beard is an Islamic terrorist. they have no idea that these people could be from any country, culture or religion. ISIS, Taliban, Al-Qaeda all scary bogey men who chop your limbs off. I don't believe anything in the mainstream any more. All too well timed and orchestrated for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2021 at 12:39 AM, Macnamara said:

 

well that is directly after the second vatican council isn't it which some believe was a jewish/masonic plot. It is also after the death of pope john paul XXIII who some believe was assassinated

 

Sedevacantism is the position held by some traditional Catholics[1][2] that the present occupier of the Holy See is not a valid pope due to the mainstream church's alleged espousal of modernism and that, for lack of a valid pope, the See is vacant.

Most sedevacantists believe that the Holy See has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958. Others believe that there is no certainty of the vacancy until the moment before Pope Paul VI promulgated Lumen Gentium, which sedevacantists regard as heretical. Very few others regard the Holy See to be vacant since the death of Pope John XXIII in 1963, the death of Pope Paul VI in 1978, or even the death of Pope Pius X in 1914.

Sedevacantism owes its origins to the rejection of the theological and disciplinary changes implemented following the Second Vatican Council (1962–65).[7] Sedevacantists reject this Council, on the basis of their interpretation of its documents on ecumenism and religious liberty, among others, which they see as contradicting the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church and as denying the unique mission of Catholicism as the one true religion, outside of which there is no salvation.[8] They also say that new disciplinary norms, such as the Mass of Paul VI, promulgated on 3 April 1969, undermine or conflict with the historical Catholic faith and are deemed blasphemous, while post-Vatican II teachings, particularly those related to ecumenism, are labelled heresies.[9] They conclude, on the basis of their rejection of the revised Mass rite and of postconciliar Church teaching as false, that the popes involved are also false.[1] Among even traditionalist Catholics,[2][10] this is a quite divisive question.[1][2]

Traditionalist Catholics other than sedevacantists recognize as legitimate the line of popes leading to and including Pope Francis.[11] Sedevacantists, however, claim that the infallible Magisterium of the Catholic Church could not have decreed the changes made in the name of the Second Vatican Council, and conclude that those who issued these changes could not have been acting with the authority of the Catholic Church.[12] Accordingly, they hold that Pope John XXIII and his successors left the true Catholic Church and thus lost legitimate authority in the Church. A formal heretic, they say, cannot be the Catholic pope.[13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedevacantism

I do not wish to put words in mouths. 

 

Do you believe that the Catholic church should still hold in their doctrine, that ALL Jews are responsible for the death of Christ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unbelievable. He'll borrow the money from a Rothschild Central bank or affiliation and the taxpayer

will pay it back AT INTEREST.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9923571/PM-promises-unlock-hundreds-millions-new-Afghan-regime-agree-list-demands.html

 

Boris Johnson's cash offer to Taliban: Prime Minister promises to unlock hundreds of millions if new Afghan regime will agree to list of demands from the G7

5120.jpg?width=1200&height=900&quality=8

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Is this person for real? That is the SNP,  a separatist, nationalist party.

 

I bet the Kimpton Edinburgh is taking room service orders already.......'this is luxury living'.....what a mug.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

Unbelievable. He'll borrow the money from a Rothschild Central bank or affiliation and the taxpayer

will pay it back AT INTEREST.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9923571/PM-promises-unlock-hundreds-millions-new-Afghan-regime-agree-list-demands.html

 

Boris Johnson's cash offer to Taliban: Prime Minister promises to unlock hundreds of millions if new Afghan regime will agree to list of demands from the G7

5120.jpg?width=1200&height=900&quality=8

 

Yeah that's the mural that got Corbyn into trouble.....it's about as funny as a burning orphanage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

I agree!  It's not funny, it's factual.

Yep, on the Mail website that's factual then.

 

The fucking Mail.........give me a break!

 

Make yourself scarce, before I set Bazooka Joe on you, he/she/they love the 'MSM'.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

Is this person for real? That is the SNP,  a separatist, nationalist party.

 

SNP wants separation from the rest of the UK, but not the European Union!

 

They're all globalists, Tories, Labour, SNP .... which is why they are all supporting the globalists’ Lockdown/‘New Normal’ agenda.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Strummer101 said:

Can you give some examples please? 

 

Dude, you think the SNP aren't psuedo nationalists. I would rather watch paint dry than reason with that kind of idiocy. Did I already not make it clear before that I don't want to talk to you? Not trying to be a dick, but it will just end up in an argument and the forum doesn't deserve that.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

No, it's a mural.

 

A mural depicting facts.

 

"On 3 August 1835, somewhere in the City of London, two of Europe’s most famous bankers came to an agreement with the chancellor of the exchequer. Two years earlier, the British government had passed the Slavery Abolition Act, which outlawed slavery in most parts of the empire. Now it was taking out one of the largest loans in history, to finance the slave compensation package required by the 1833 act. Nathan Mayer Rothschild and his brother-in-law Moses Montefiore agreed to loan the British government £15m, with the government adding an additional £5m later. The total sum represented 40% of the government’s yearly income in those days, equivalent to some £300bn today.

 

One might expect this so-called “slave compensation” to have gone to the freed slaves to redress the injustices they suffered. Instead, the money went exclusively to the owners of slaves, who were being compensated for the loss of what had, until then, been considered their property. Not a single shilling of reparation, nor a single word of apology, has ever been granted by the British state to the people it enslaved, or their descendants.

 

Today, 1835 feels so long ago; so far away. But if you are a British taxpayer, what happened in that quiet room affects you directly.

 

Your taxes were used to pay off the loan, and the payments only ended in 2015. Generations of Britons have been implicated in a legacy of financial support for one of the world’s most egregious crimes against humanity.

The fact that you, and your parents, and their parents in turn, may have been paying for a huge slave-owner compensation package from the 1830s only came to public attention last month. The revelation came on 9 February, in the form of a tweet by HM Treasury:

 

“Here’s today’s surprising #FridayFact. Millions of you have helped end the slave trade through your taxes. Did you know? In 1833, Britain used £20 million, 40% of its national budget, to buy freedom for all slaves in the Empire. The amount of money borrowed for the Slavery Abolition Act was so large that it wasn’t paid off until 2015. Which means that living British citizens helped pay to end the slave trade.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/29/slavery-abolition-compensation-when-will-britain-face-up-to-its-crimes-against-humanity

 

5120.jpg?width=1200&height=900&quality=8

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

about as funny as a burning orphanage

 

 

That could have been your tagline under your name but the forum dropped that feature unfortunately.

 

Know any good songs about burning orphanages ?

 

😉 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2021 at 8:55 PM, screamingeagle said:

it's called propaganda,people like "humor" so to them it's just another way of spreading the "news" about afgan war 

 

and for those people that are suprised by this situation ,maybe this helps

 

"The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous. Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance"

 

true but c'mon the dude with a bazooka taking pictures 😄

 

1332375703_talibangymafghanistanselfiebaxooka.png.18e194534d92f7e2b771cf5108ac7429.png

 

we're getting bombarded with all sorts of shit and negative and fear-porn.

 

i wonder what's next ?

Ordo ab Chao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...