Jump to content

General Political Thoughts Thread

Recommended Posts



Professor from Soviet Union warns anti-racism agenda in U.S. is ‘rehashing of Marxism’

A professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of Pittsburgh who came to America 30 years ago as a refugee from the Soviet Union is sounding the alarm on the growing anti-racism movement in the U.S., saying it’s basically a rehashing of Marxism and socialism.


Professor Michael Vanyukov, a professor of pharmaceutical sciences, psychiatry and human genetics at the University of Pittsburgh, warns that essentially race has taken the place of class warfare in the narrative.


“Like the Soviet communists, who used class-based hate and rhetoric to control the ‘masses’ and build the society of ideological slaves, the ‘Diversity’ departments use race. In a way, that is worse, because one can change one’s class, but race is forever,” Vanyukov told The College Fix in an email.


Vanyukov recently took a stand against the University of Pittsburgh’s Office for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion’s push for anti-racism on campus and its reliance on Ibram X. Kendi’s work.


“[Kendi’s] demagoguery is no different than what the Soviet propaganda taught about the West and capitalism,” Vanyukov wrote in a letter to the editor in UPitt’s University Times.


He called out the diversity office’s effort “for an open-ended ‘ongoing, corrective action […] to foster fair and desirable societal outcomes,’ rather than for fostering equal opportunities and meritocracy,” as a “rehashing of Marxism and socialism.”


read more:



and more



Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Stop noticing the similarities! Shut it down!




It's almost as if she is a controlled op gatekeeper.



She is a hottie though, pity about the attitude.


Whilst I personally find it deplorable to shut down free speech I found it amusing her and the other shit-steerer Molyneux (no earlylife on wiki for him, but in his own words https://archive.org/details/stefanmolyneuxexposedtojewornottojew_202002) were banned from the theatre in Auckland a few years back and had to leave the country without doing the show. lol Apparently "NZ didn't want their type of influence on our shores". It was pretty shit tbh, but they're both race and shit stirrers extraordinars so it was probably for [I hate saying this, but I mean it as a figure of speech] "the greater good".


Back when I rapped in high school
People told me that Iʼm tight for a white dude
(What you tell em'?)

I'm not white, I'm....


Lauren Simonsen - 3mins



Funny pic of her under Stalin, reminds me of something Mark Collet said in an old clip with Henrik re; influences around Jeremy Corbin/Lab Party "Zionism/Marxism are two sides of the same shekel" 😆

Edited by skitzorat
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Imagine thinking Priti is fash.


And what the fvck does he mean with that refugees welcome hashtag? How are they not welcome? She does nothing to protect our borders. We pretty much have open borders in all but name.


If morons and subversive keep applying the term 'fascist' to the wrong people, you're just giving TPTB even more reasons to push globohomo. Politically illiterate folk are destroying the West with their stupidity.



  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:



Imagine thinking Priti is fash.


And what the fvck does he mean with that refugees welcome hashtag? How are they not welcome? She does nothing to protect our borders. We pretty much have open borders in all but name.


If morons and subversive keep applying the term 'fascist' to the wrong people, you're just giving TPTB even more reasons to push globohomo. Politically illiterate folk are destroying the West with their stupidity.




Sad to say most people, and even some on this forum want to talk about Nazis etc, because the media and

even David Icke correlates the draconian meassures of Covid and Hitler!


Although imo both fascism and communism have some common ideologies, what we are seeing today is

a more totalitarian communistic agenda.


One only has to look at one of the Government's key advisors.


Can you imagine if she was a fascist?  She would have been booted from her role, and probably rightly so.


But she's a Communsit and that's OK


And she's not the only one.


Susan Michie Archives - Guido Fawkes



  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2021 at 11:49 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:


She looks too much like my sister, so I don't even want to think about it. 🤣

To be fair, southern did bring to the attention of South Africa, however I've heard conflicts of interest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Sniffer-in-Chief who can barely tie his shoes, soaring inflation, gas and staple prices, supply chains teetering on collapse, Brazilian levels of minority crime, and the US national sovereignty has completely disintegrated at the Southern border as millions of fighting aged men from the 3rd world walk in, sign up for free stuff and then get bused out into communities across the country.


The VP & border tzar?

Playing Miss America.

Bakery photo ops. Tours. The View. Children's hours talking about fucking Space. Rita is right, she really is a deplorable creature;  even manages to make Killary look authentic…





  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/22/2021 at 10:40 AM, skitzorat said:

The Treaty of Waitangi is New Zealand’s founding document. It takes its name from the place in the Bay of Islands where it was first signed, on 6 February 1840. This day is now a public holiday in New Zealand. The Treaty is an agreement, in Māori and English, that was made between the British Crown and about 540 Māori rangatira (chiefs).

Growing numbers of British migrants arrived in New Zealand in the late 1830s, and there were plans for extensive settlement. Around this time there were large-scale land transactions with Māori, unruly behaviour by some settlers and signs that the French were interested in annexing New Zealand. The British government was initially unwilling to act, but it eventually realised that annexing the country could protect Māori, regulate British subjects and secure commercial interests.


The Treaty is a broad statement of principles on which the British and Māori made a political compact to found a nation state and build a government in New Zealand. The document has three articles. In the English version, Māori cede the sovereignty of New Zealand to Britain; Māori give the Crown an exclusive right to buy lands they wish to sell, and, in return, are guaranteed full rights of ownership of their lands, forests, fisheries and other possessions; and Māori are given the rights and privileges of British subjects.


The Treaty in Māori was deemed to convey the meaning of the English version, but there are important differences. Most significantly, the word ‘sovereignty’ was translated as ‘kawanatanga’ (governance). Some Māori believed they were giving up government over their lands but retaining the right to manage their own affairs. The English version guaranteed ‘undisturbed possession’ of all their ‘properties’, but the Māori version guaranteed ‘tino rangatiratanga’ (full authority) over ‘taonga’ (treasures, which may be intangible). Māori understanding was at odds with the understanding of those negotiating the Treaty for the Crown, and as Māori society valued the spoken word, explanations given at the time were probably as important as the wording of the document.


Early Crown policy

Many Māori prospered economically during the 1840s and 1850s. They supplied vital produce and labour to the fledgling European settlements. Māori agricultural goods found Australian markets, making a significant contribution to New Zealand's revenue. Māori communities obtained loans for flour mills, agricultural implements and ships, and there was investment in Māori health and education.

Despite mutual mistrust at first, by the early 1850s the Treaty relationship seemed generally positive. Amalgamation was a key part of the relationship. Māori would share the rights and privileges of British subjects under a common system as indicated in the terms of the Treaty and early colonial laws.



He Puapua: Blueprint for Breaking up New Zealand


By Roger Childs

New Zealand is being torn apart, separated into an apartheid system of two race-based peoples in an unequal partnership. –John Robinson


A historian with integrity

John Robinson is one of the country’s top historians. The big names who are lionized in the mainstream media, the likes of Ann Salmond, Jock Phillips, Claudia Orange and Vincent O’Malley, have sadly sacrificed their reputations on the altar of political correctness.  Robinson however, is prepared to fearlessly and honestly take on the tough topics of New Zealand history and politics such as the truth about the Treaty of Waitangi, tikanga in the modern era, and now Te Puapua. His research is always thorough and meticulous, his analysis thoughtful and perceptive, and the conclusions he reaches are carefully backed up with evidence. 


Government stealth and secrecy

Readers will be aware that the Te Puapua strategy for progressively increasing the control of Maori in running the country to ultimately achieve joint Maori- Crown governance by 2040, has been around since 2019. But did you hear about the programme, which is now effectively government policy, discussed in the lead up to last year’s election? 

The strategy is based on carrying out the recommendations of the 2007 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP). When the declaration came out, Prime Minister Helen Clark wouldn’t have a bar of it because many of its Articles were in conflict with our laws and system of government. However, her successor, the devious and manipulative (((John Key))), had no such scruples. 

Being dependent on the Maori Party to hold power, he instructed Maori Affairs Minister Pita Sharples to scuttle off secretly to New York to sign the country up to the UNDRIP. There was no consultation with the public and scant analysis in the media of what it would mean for New Zealand.

John Robinson looks in detail at what the Declaration says, which practically directs sovereign states to allow their indigenous people to virtually run their countries. (The full wording of UNDRIP is contained in one of five very useful Appendices.)


He Puapua is well underway

The He Puapua Report proposes revolutionary changes for New Zealand. –Professor Elizabeth Rata

The author traces the background to the current reality that the Ardern Labour government is already implementing the programme. He looks at how growing separatism between Maori – about 13% of the population – and the rest of the New Zealand people, is undermining our democracy. In today’s New Zealand Maori have special rights and in George Orwell’s classic phrase while all citizens are equal, they are more equal than others


Robinson looks at

  • the reality that there is no such thing as race
  • the weak case Maori have for being regarded as indigenous
  • the considerable evidence of pre-Polynesian settlement of New Zealand
  • the evolution of the groundless claims of partnership and Treaty principles which has led to Maori having special rights and powers in local government and other areas
  • the manipulation by the Department of Statistics to increase the percentage of the Maori population!
  • the twisting of the words of the Treaty of Waitangi so that Maori have been given separate rights which were never intended
  • the undemocratic nature of Maori representation in parliament
  • the reality that New Zealand is a racist country with a small minority increasingly becoming more powerful and dominant.

There is also analysis of how He Puapua is currently being implemented in law, education, local government, health, conservation and water resources. Much of this is justified on the basis that as the country’s indigenous people Maori should be given special consideration and that separatist policies are needed to deal with the inequities they face compared with the rest of the population.

As the author puts it: There is no longer any mention of equality; the inequality implicit in the new understanding is hidden behind vague talk of fairness – with no recognition that the special rights (given) to Maori are unfair to others.


Government subterfuge and lack of consultation aids increasing separatism and racism


In recent years there have been many hui and meetings of iwi leaders around the country discussing how joint Crown-Maori governance can be progressively achieved in the next twenty years. One of the worst feature of this process has been the lack of consultation with the wider New Zealand public – 87 % of the population. 

The author also points out that in justifying their right to share power the big players in the Maori lobby constantly falsify the realities of our history. One reality is that almost all Maori today have the blood of colonists running through their veins and most have less than half Polynesian blood. For example Tipene (Steve) O’Regan (Ngai Tahu, Wellington and Ireland) has one sixteenth Maori blood.


There is also the constant bleating that colonialism is the reason for all their current problems, and rejection of the idea that the early white settlers and their descendants brought huge benefits for the native people. Perhaps the greatest of all Maori leaders, Sir Apirana Ngata, has it right in observing: 

Let me acknowledge first that, in the whole of the world, l doubt whether any native race has been so well treated by a European people as the Maori … Sir Apirana Ngata


An important book

He Puapua: Blueprint for Breaking up New Zealand is a work that all New Zealanders should read to understand what is going on under their noses with the connivance of the government. By allowing the Maori caucus in the Labour Party to call the shots, Jacinda Ardern is doing the nation a massive disservice as the democratic rights and liberties of non-Maori continue to be undermined by the implementation of He Puapua.




This is an excerpt from the book He Puapua: Blueprint for breaking up New Zealand, see earlier posts.


He Puapua is a report which was commissioned in 2019 by Te Puni Kokiri (the Ministry of Maori Development) to guide the Government application of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.  This divisive and highly controversial report, which proposes a comprehensive change to New Zealand governance, was kept secret until 2021.


The extent of the intended constitutional transformation is made plain in He Puapua by a descriptive chart, with its origins clearly stated: “Drawing on the report Matike Mai Aotearoa [to an inter-tribal group, the Iwi Chairs’ Forum], the He Puapua Declaration Working Group has adopted a Tiriti model [a ‘Te Tiriti/Rangatiratanga Framework’] based round ‘spheres of authority’.”  Note that this Tiriti is not the original Treaty of Waitangi, but quite the opposite, today’s reinvention.  


Here, New Zealand is broken apart; there is no pretence of inclusivity or unity.  “The [separated] Rangatiratanga sphere reflects Maori governance over people and places”, where Maori have complete control and autonomy.  “The Kawangatanga sphere represents Crown governance” – meaning, of course, the elected government, the place for all New Zealanders, including Maori – as they insist, “Maori must be able to participate in Crown governance”, and there is no thought of withdrawing from voting for the national Parliament, but rather an insistence on preserving Maori seats within this common domain. 


“There is a large ‘joint sphere’ where Maori and the Crown share governance over issues of mutual concern”; that is the two parties in this divided nation, this proposed apartheid system, meet to negotiate, with an effective Maori veto.  

In order that the meaning of this chart can be readily comprehensible to all readers, the labels are given here in English.  


In this representation, the size of the Maori (completely separate) sphere of authority relative to the Crown sphere (the rest of us) is far less than the fraction of Maori in the population.  This is a representation of yesterday’s ‘partnership’, of two partially separated people, with most of the power in the hands of all New Zealanders – which of course, includes Maori. 


New Zealand, is now, in 2021, in a transition to a new, proposed government structure.  This is well under way, with many actions described in chapters here.  The goal is portrayed, for 2040, in the second section of the chart.  This is a depiction of a proposal made in a 2000 ‘Building the Constitution’ conference’ for two parliaments (the Tikanga Maori House for Maori and the Tikanga Pakeha House for others) overseen by a Treaty of Waitangi House for Maori and Pakeha, where there would be a Maori veto (see Chapter 8).  This was not accepted by other delegates, but Maori leaders have chosen not to listen to other New Zealanders, and not to join in dialogue, but to turn away, with no pretence of being inclusive, and develop their own form of apartheid.


Diagram 1 of He Puapua (right side): Maori Sphere (Rangatiratanga)/Joint Sphere/Crown Sphere (Kawanatanga), 2040


The meaning is clear.  A great part of New Zealand is to come under complete Maori control (a “Maori sphere of authority”, with “Maori governance over people and places”).  Apartheid will be complete. 


This is what the Maori elite and their followers believe they will get; they will become angry if others insist otherwise, and in their tikanga (which is now recognised by the government), anger demands satisfaction, recompense for perceived wrongs by utu The elite of the kingitanga is seeking revenge, utu, for their defeat in the nineteenth century.  This will not help struggling Maori, who benefit rather from Crown welfare and employment.


This is not an equal division of the country between the 14% Maori and the rest.  As well as being in complete control of their extensive separate (rangatiratanga) domain, Maori would have considerable power over the part allotted to all others. 

In the common (kawangatanga) sphere: “The Crown resiles some of its power in agreed areas to make space for rangatiratanga, for defined Maori interests.  The public service is bicultural and understands the ways in which it must support rangatiratanga.”  The considerable power of iwi in the common public sphere (kawangatanga) – separate from and additional to that of all other New Zealanders – is being increased now, following the guidelines set out in He Puapua: in law (chapter 9), representation (chapter 10), education (chapter 11), healthcare (chapter 12) and water (chapter 13). 


The proposal gives the iwi leadership around three-quarters of the power together with a veto in the joint sphere.  Everyone else will be disenfranchised.  This is a blueprint for the complete rule of New Zealand by a determined minority.

This is tomorrow’s promised future.  This is what He Puapua is telling us.

I would like to present a third vision for New Zealand, which would demand a complete unravelling of the He Puapua tsunami transformation.


In this vision, all New Zealanders would be living together harmoniously; no New Zealand citizen would be judged, and classified, by the colour of their skin or claims of ancestry, of inherited special rights (which is the very definition of an indigenous people).  We would no longer be divided.


There is no mention of, or intention for, equality in either Matike Mai Aotearoa or He Puapua.  “The Terms of Reference [for Matike Mai Aotearoa] did not ask the Working Group to consider such questions as ‘How might the Treaty fit within the current Westminster constitutional system’ but rather required it to seek advice on a different type of constitutionalism that is based upon He Whakaputanga [the 1835 letter from Northern chiefs to the British Crown, headed by James Busby as a “Declaration of Independence”, proposed an inter-tribal coalition, which failed] and Te Tiriti.


For that reason, this Report uses the term ‘constitutional transformation’ rather than ‘constitutional change’.”  They are insisting on imposing a primitive tribal system, which had self-destructed in the Musket Wars, on a modern developed nation.  The Treaty of Waitangi, bringing the Westminster constitutional system, was an essential part of the great Maori cultural transformation, yet the aim is to return to a way of life which had broken apart in countrywide inter-tribal warfare. 


This ‘complete constitutional transformation’ is intended to be permanent.  The intention of the He Puapua arrangements is that, once they are put into place, they will be final and can never be changed.  We will never overturn this revolutionary transformation and get back a unitary country without a counter-revolution, which would demand a determined united campaign by the majority of New Zealanders – which, sadly, is now not within sight. 


We have lost so much, and the worst has yet to come.  In a few years from now, when the revolution is triumphant and our traditional system of government is destroyed, New Zealanders will wake up and realise that “you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone.”

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Bombadil locked this topic
  • Bombadil unlocked this topic
  • lake pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...