Jump to content

General Political Thoughts Thread


Recommended Posts

Your reminder that everyone besides the elites will probably suffer once social cohesion is destroyed, not just Europeans.

 

ssvvvv.jpg

 

acm1.jpg

 

https://www.fdesouche.com/2024/01/28/paris-champs-elysees-un-homme-de-49-ans-tue-dans-un-club-de-jeux-apres-un-coup-a-la-carotide-recu-dun-individu-defavorablement-connu/

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/2/2024 at 7:55 AM, EnigmaticWorld said:

"The US, Europe, and Ukraine: this is the same list of enemies compiled by Trump’s long-time partner Vladimir Putin."

 

OPINION: Trump as a ‘Manchurian Candidate’

https://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/27402

 

Biden = blatant anti-white

Trump = Slimy and sneaky anti-white

 

Same breed of arsehole in different packaging.

 

Trump urges Republicans to kill Ukraine aid bill
https://insiderpaper.com/trump-urges-republicans-to-reject-ukraine-aid-bill/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2024 at 9:34 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:

If western governments and NATO are infiltrated by Marxists, KGB, and other spooks that have been underming us, then why should I trust Russia and China, the other arm of the comintern? Why should I trust people that blame Anglos?

 

twiaj.jpg

 

https://twitter.com/onetallorfour/status/1690149026128084992

 

Bingo. Like I say, cultural Marxism is just one arm of communism, designed to undemine the West and direct fools into the arms of gulaghomo.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/5/2021 at 1:10 AM, EnigmaticWorld said:

Feel free to share any of your thoughts or rants, I'll start.

 

I believe in the abolishment of class warfare. You are not rich, you are English, German, Italian etc. You are not poor, or working class, you are the aforementioned. You have more in common with your brothers and sisters than you think.

 

Anyone who wishes to move up their station in life, and has the drive and ambition to do so, should be able to.

 

Communism on the other hand, is perpetual class division. The poor are kept poor. No middle class. Just the rich and the poor. The"worker's revolution" is the cheese on the mouse trap.

 

Totally agree that class is wrong.

 

Once again who do we thank for perpetuating that in the Western World - the church.

 

Here's a bit about the Christian view on Class. Of course, as the article states, the church were originally in favour of Slavery but eventually saw the error in their ways.

 

 

CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES

 

What Christian principles, then, might be thought to be relevant to the problems of class?

 

On the one hand, there seems to be in the New Testament a general taking for granted of the institution of class; the Christian is simply exhorted to live a godly life within the framework of his society. Slaves are encouraged to 'be obedient to those that are your earthly masters' (Eph. 6: 5);  10 ' those who have believing masters must not be disrespectful on the ground that they are brethren' (1 Tim. 6: 2).

 

Christians in general are to be 'submissive to rulers and authorities, to be obedient' (Tit. 3: 1), and should make 'supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings ... for kings and all who are in high positions' (1 Tim. 2: 1-2).

 

Within the household (Col. 3: 18-20) and within the church (1 Tim. 5: 1; perhaps 1 Cor. 12: 28) there is likewise a hierarchy which involves distinctions of status. Nevertheless, it is worthy of observation that this acceptance of the social order by the first century church does not absolve the church of later days from the duty of constantly judging the social order in the light of the word of God. A tautologous example is the institution of slavery, which was regarded in the first century as part of the social structure within which Christian principles should be applied, but recognized later as an institution to which they should be applied.

 

 

So you see, the church promotes we submit to the ruling classes and government. 

 

If you want to get rid of class and King's and aristocracy, we need to get rid of the church, as they have supported, and instilled in the common man that they must support, this disgraceful system for the last 2000 years! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pi3141 said:

Once again who do we thank for perpetuating that in the Western World - the church.

 

Here's a bit about the Christian view on Class. Of course, as the article states, the church were originally in favour of Slavery but eventually saw the error in their ways.

 

If you want to get rid of class and King's and aristocracy, we need to get rid of the church, as they have supported, and instilled in the common man that they must support, this disgraceful system for the last 2000 years!

 

but slavery and kings existed around the world BEFORE the church so you can't blame the church for that. The church just developed at that time in human development when those things were prevalent

 

as to your second comment about getting rid of class, aristocracy and the church, that could read right out of a marxist manual! I think we need to be streetwise about this so that we don't jump out of the frying pan into the fire as the sabbatean marxists WANT us to let go of all the trappings of western society so that they can enslave us in their own slave system of AI run technocracy.

 

This is why we need to understand about the sabbateans and their AI run 'smart grid' technocracy so that we don't get conned. We don't achieve that by constantly deconstructing christianity whilst ignoring the wider context of what is going on

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

but slavery and kings existed around the world BEFORE the church so you can't blame the church for that.

 

But it is right to blame the church for supporting slavery and misogyny and the class system which, as an historical fact, they did support, and they still support the class system, as shown by the Kings coronation. 

 

But you say getting rid of the king and class system is Marxist.

 

Well this thread opened with the argument that we should get rid of the class system, and that Communism, which is based on Marxism, is a perpetual class system, so why don't you explain to EW that his thread is Marxist and that keeping the class system is not like Communism? 

 

Or did you have that conversation with him on this thread.?

 

i started by reading the OP and responded to it, I haven't read the whole thread.

 

 

Edited by pi3141
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, pi3141 said:

But it is right to blame the church for supporting slavery and misogyny and the class system which, as an historical fact, they did support, and they still support the class system, as shown by the Kings coronation. 

 

But you say getting rid of the king and class system is Marxist.

 

Well this thread opened with the argument that we should get rid of the class system, and that Communism, which is based on Marxism, is a perpetual class system, so why don't you explain to EW that his thread is Marxist and that keeping the class system is not like Communism? 

 

Or did you have that conversation with him on this thread.?

 

i started by reading the OP and responded to it, I haven't read the whole thread.

 

So marx started all the talk of 'class' not because he genuinly cared about the common man but because he was part of a secret society network which included the league of the just and was essentially trying to socially engineer society into what the secret society network wants

 

Now you could reasonably ask why a guy agitating for class war would come to britain and find safety here when britain is a parliamentary monarchy. You would think he would be ejected pretty quickly especially after what happened in the french revolution where the illuminati and their jacobins massacred the royal family. But no he came to britain and was safe here.

 

I suggest this was because the rothschild cabal invited him to britain and that he was working for them. That network created communism and set up the central banks which were one of the 10 goals of marx's 'communist manifesto' and they funded the bolshevik revolution in russia which saw their royals massacred.

 

Why have they not yet managed to massacre the british royals you might ask? Well i have a suggestion for that also! The british royals are descended from crypto-jewish knights templar bloodlines who are part of the very same illuminati network that supported marx.

 

This is why king charles is so supportive of the green new deal and all of the wef's global agendas. If he were not part of that secret society network i suggest he would have been massacred by now

 

So they brought about a bolshevik revolution in russia which was a COLLECTIVIST movement and then they also funded nazism in germany which was also a 'national socialist' COLLECTIVIST movement. Then they pitted these two against each other in a marxist dialectic which continues to this day in the form of for example the alt right v's woke

 

The purpose of the dialectic is to bring about a third way synthesis of TECHNOCRACY which is what all the smart tech and 5G and AI and social credit scores and digital currencies are all about. They are making their move now, in our time, right under our noses whilst you are putting all of your focus on the church!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

They are making their move now, in our time, right under our noses whilst you are putting all of your focus on the church!

 

But if the Royal Family are from a crypto-jewish bloodline, and the church has historically supported that bloodline and their claim to rule, then the church is full of Crypto-Jews who are using the institution of the church to further their Jewish plans.

 

Why do you ignore the crypto-jewish-christian churches role in all this?

 

If the Jews have infiltrated Royalty and the Royals need the church support to rule. Then either the Christian church is crypto-jewish or they are entirely deceived by the crypto-Jews royal bloodline claim.

 

So either way, the church is a tool of the crypto-jews.

 

Either way the church has supported division in our society in their support for slavery, misogyny and the class system.

 

Isn't that right?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, pi3141 said:

 

But if the Royal Family are from a crypto-jewish bloodline, and the church has historically supported that bloodline and their claim to rule, then the church is full of Crypto-Jews who are using the institution of the church to further their Jewish plans.

 

full of freemasons and marxists yes

 

you mentioned someone in a spiritualist church saying the father isn't important; that kind of marxist thinking is permeating into any religious establishment into which the network and its minions can penetrate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

full of freemasons and marxists yes

 

 

But Marxism didn’t exist 2000 years ago when the church endorsed misogyny and slavery!

 

Marxism didn’t exist when the church taught adherence to the class system.

 

And the Sabbateans definitely didn't exist through those periods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Macnamara

 

Lets have a bit of history shall we.

 

The Christian Church was founded by the founding Fathers 2000 years ago.

 

The Church Fathers taught 'The Inferior Origin of Women' doctrine, which put a divide between man and woman for centuries.

 

The 'Illuminati' (Crypto-Sabbatean-Jews) main tool is division (and also fear)

 

So considering the Christian Church Fathers introduced and perpetuated misogyny for centuries, and its the crypto-jews that pollute everything, then we are left with the question that either, the Christian Church fathers were Crypto-Sabbatean-Marxist-Jews or the Christian Fathers perpetuated misogynistic teachings and doctrines in the Christian church.  

 

Which do you think it is - were the church fathers Crypto-Sabbatean-Marxist-Jews or were the Church fathers misogynistic?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, pi3141 said:

@Macnamara

 

Which do you think it is - were the church fathers Crypto-Sabbatean-Marxist-Jews or were the Church fathers misogynistic?

 

i think that if you are going back to source then you'd have to investigate the societies that were feeding into the creation of early christianity. You'd have to look at judaism and you'd have to look at hellenism and also the romans

 

Was the context of that time more patriarchal?

 

as for 'division' being one of the tools of the illuminati we can consider if some divisions are real. For example the marxists will tell you there is no difference between men and women and that any perceived difference is just a 'social construct'.

 

If that's true then how can teenage male football teams beat womans international football teams? Clearly men and women are not entirely interchangeable. For example men don't have wombs and therefore cannot birth children. Men don't have mammaries and therefore cannot feed babies.

 

Men on the other hand tend to be bigger and stronger and were therefore better suited to some roles in society for example warriors and ploughmen

 

Is division always something to be feared? Or can we in fact respect and celebrate each others strengths?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...