Jump to content

Climate change low content

SimonTV

By SimonTV
in Environment & Climate

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Velma

Velma

Posted
Posted (edited)

WILDFIRES in Colorado have forced officials to evacuate approximately 30,000 people after severe blazes have ripped through suburban parts of the state.

 

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1543190/Colorado-wildfires-state-of-emergency-homes-destroyed-pictures

 

Forrest fires have been renamed ‘wild-fires’ because they do more damage to real-estate than trees. These raging inferno’s usually follow severe drought and are accompanied by extreme winds, which spread the sparks and flames far and wide, where they jump highways into suburbia and the fire engulfs everything in its path, already tinder dry.

 

The Rothschild’s PG&E admit to igniting these blazes through faulty power lines, or in Colorado's case, cables downed by the wind, which makes their company entirely responsible for unprecedented environmental and economic destruction. If they know that faulty or unstable equipment causes fires, they should take precautions to mitigate it.

 

However, this is only a cover-story for the deployment of ‘Direct Energy Weapons’ which incinerate thousands of acres, even melting metals, in a matter of hours. The desired result is the evacuation of the area, to which the residents will never return, now homeless in FEMA shelters, refugees in their own land and blaming the weather or nature.

 

Weather Warfare does not stop at fire. All the recent ‘natural disasters’ have been record-breaking events, with twenty-two tornadoes wreaking havoc in five states from Kentucky to Arkansas, leaving a path of devastation about 227 miles long. It wasn’t even tornado season! The aftermath looked like Hiroshima and the loss of life exceeded 100.

 

Flooding worldwide has reached historic proportions with towns and countries pounded by ‘rain bombs’ which deliver a month’s average rainfall in a day. They stall the weather-front over the region where it has been steered, until the river’s overflow their banks and dams burst. It's called geo-engineering, yet the rains never alleviate the droughts.

 

Weather weapons may not result in instant mass deaths, but they can cause more structural damage than missiles. It is a ‘slow-kill’ where the loss of agricultural lands and crops will create the next ‘global crisis’ which will be poverty and hunger. If you were an evil genius who wanted to ‘cull’ the ‘goyim’ like Henry Kissinger, food is the ultimate weapon.

Edited by Velma
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
SimonTV

SimonTV

Posted
  • Author
Posted

https://autos.yahoo.com/uk-inches-closer-eliminating-private-180000325.html?guccounter=2

 

UK inches closer to banning private ownership of cars

 

 

Quote

I’ve been calling out the elitist plan in some government circles to eliminate the private ownership of cars for some time. For many, the possibility that such a thing could be real leads to their minds lashing out at the source of such news, and so I’ve been called a “crazy conspiracy theorist” among other things for trying to shed light on this disturbing topic. Well, time has vindicated my stance and people in the UK are starting to wake up to the very real possibility they would be completely dependent on the government to be driven anywhere.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted

They Tried to Kill the Wood-Burning Stove Over Environmental Concerns, But Entire Campaign Collapses When the Truth Comes Out

Another day, another left-wing narrative goes up in flames.

Last year, the U.K. government cracked down on woodburning stoves after an internal report claimed they caused massive amounts of air pollution via the release of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions, a pollutant that’s damaging to the environment and to health.

In a farcical reversal, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs — the United Kingdom’s equivalent of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — released new evidence last week showing the government study had greatly exaggerated the claims, the U.K.’s Express reported Wednesday.

“The Government figures released last year suggested home wood and coal burning contributed nearly half of all fine particle emissions, but the most recent figures from Defra suggest it is overall less than a quarter of the total,” the Express said.

“Defra announced a ban on wet wood and bagged coal in 2020, claiming burning the materials at home was the ‘single largest source’ of PM2.5 despite only 8 per cent of UK homes burning fuel indoors.”

In other words, it turned out that sloppy data collection was the catalyst for the British government’s war on woodburning stoves.

The government had “mistakenly logged newly-installed stoves as additions rather than replacements, which likely skewed the results,” the Express reported.

Once again, it appears that environmental fearmongering stoked by climate alarmists over woodburning turned out to be yet another false narrative.

The war on woodburning stoves is shocking since these timeless, efficient heaters run on a renewable resource — trees. So why were radical environmentalists up in arms against them?

Andy Hill, the chairman of the Stove Industry Alliance, believes even the current, downgraded figures about the environmental impact of woodburning are inflated.

“The SIA has long maintained that the volume of wood fuel used to calculate the previous figure had been significantly overestimated,” Hill said in a Thursday news release. “The SIA would welcome further research into particulate matter source apportionment for domestic combustion, as we believe the true figure from modern wood burning stoves is significantly lower.”

Meanwhile, left-wing climate activists such as Simon Birkett of Clean Air in London are still demanding a ban on woodburning stoves, notwithstanding their environmental impact.

“It is still an enormous percentage of the most powerful pollution. Whether it is 17 per cent or 38 per cent, it’s still an extremely serious problem,” Hill told The Telegraph.

 
 

For the record, being alive contributes to incremental environmental damage. That’s just reality.

For reference, Earth has undergone five significant ice ages, according to History.com. Four occurred long before humans were around.

In 2019, the nonprofit Competitive Enterprise Institute published a 38-page report spotlighting the numerous failed predictions made by Democratic politicians and other climate alarmists over the past five decades.

“Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s,” the report said. “They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.”

The conclusion of the 50 years of failed apocalyptic predictions was that the false prophets hyperventilating about imminent existential threats were doing so to push partisan political agendas.

Just as they did with the race card, the left has weaponized “climate change” to stoke panic in order to push socialist policies that have little to do with the environment and everything to do with raising your taxes and taking money from one group to give to another.

http://www.stationgossip.com/2022/02/they-tried-to-kill-wood-burning-stove.html

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SimonTV

SimonTV

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 2/22/2022 at 11:02 PM, Macnamara said:

They Tried to Kill the Wood-Burning Stove Over Environmental Concerns, But Entire Campaign Collapses When the Truth Comes Out

Another day, another left-wing narrative goes up in flames.

Last year, the U.K. government cracked down on woodburning stoves after an internal report claimed they caused massive amounts of air pollution via the release of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions, a pollutant that’s damaging to the environment and to health.

In a farcical reversal, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs — the United Kingdom’s equivalent of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — released new evidence last week showing the government study had greatly exaggerated the claims, the U.K.’s Express reported Wednesday.

“The Government figures released last year suggested home wood and coal burning contributed nearly half of all fine particle emissions, but the most recent figures from Defra suggest it is overall less than a quarter of the total,” the Express said.

“Defra announced a ban on wet wood and bagged coal in 2020, claiming burning the materials at home was the ‘single largest source’ of PM2.5 despite only 8 per cent of UK homes burning fuel indoors.”

In other words, it turned out that sloppy data collection was the catalyst for the British government’s war on woodburning stoves.

The government had “mistakenly logged newly-installed stoves as additions rather than replacements, which likely skewed the results,” the Express reported.

Once again, it appears that environmental fearmongering stoked by climate alarmists over woodburning turned out to be yet another false narrative.

The war on woodburning stoves is shocking since these timeless, efficient heaters run on a renewable resource — trees. So why were radical environmentalists up in arms against them?

Andy Hill, the chairman of the Stove Industry Alliance, believes even the current, downgraded figures about the environmental impact of woodburning are inflated.

“The SIA has long maintained that the volume of wood fuel used to calculate the previous figure had been significantly overestimated,” Hill said in a Thursday news release. “The SIA would welcome further research into particulate matter source apportionment for domestic combustion, as we believe the true figure from modern wood burning stoves is significantly lower.”

Meanwhile, left-wing climate activists such as Simon Birkett of Clean Air in London are still demanding a ban on woodburning stoves, notwithstanding their environmental impact.

“It is still an enormous percentage of the most powerful pollution. Whether it is 17 per cent or 38 per cent, it’s still an extremely serious problem,” Hill told The Telegraph.

 
 

For the record, being alive contributes to incremental environmental damage. That’s just reality.

For reference, Earth has undergone five significant ice ages, according to History.com. Four occurred long before humans were around.

In 2019, the nonprofit Competitive Enterprise Institute published a 38-page report spotlighting the numerous failed predictions made by Democratic politicians and other climate alarmists over the past five decades.

“Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s,” the report said. “They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.”

The conclusion of the 50 years of failed apocalyptic predictions was that the false prophets hyperventilating about imminent existential threats were doing so to push partisan political agendas.

Just as they did with the race card, the left has weaponized “climate change” to stoke panic in order to push socialist policies that have little to do with the environment and everything to do with raising your taxes and taking money from one group to give to another.

http://www.stationgossip.com/2022/02/they-tried-to-kill-wood-burning-stove.html

 

I am definitely installing a modern wood fire in to my next house, no way I am paying £2300 per year on gas and electricity. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
SimonTV

SimonTV

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Old article, just came across it. 

 

https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2021/nissan-leaf-electromagnetic-radiation-lawsuit.shtml

 

July 11, 2021 — A Nissan LEAF electromagnetic radiation lawsuit has been filed by a Georgia man who sued the automaker "for permanently damaging his health and for destroying his family and career, not to exceed $10 million."

In addition to the $10 million, the LEAF lawsuit says Nissan should pay an extra $990 million so the plaintiff can start a non-profit organization related to radiation sickness.

The 2015 Nissan LEAF customer who filed the lawsuit alleges the car caused him serious health problems from prolonged driving while sitting on a giant battery that allegedly emits large amounts of low-frequency electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation.

The plaintiff claims the LEAF radiation is "way above" safe levels of 2 mG (milligauss) or less.

According to the radiation lawsuit, the 2015 Nissan LEAF EMF measurements are as follows:

Driver's floor — up to 9.2 mG, Top of the seat — up to 5.3 mG
Passenger floor — up to 13.1 mG, Top of the seat — up to 4.9 mG
Back row floor — up to 31.3 mG, Top of the seat — up to 4.5 mG
Back row/top of the elevated floor panel at the center of the vehicle — up to 12.6 mG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
SimonTV

SimonTV

Posted
  • Author
Posted

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/10/bbc-finds-it-own-climate-editor-spread-misinformation-in-global-warming-documentary/

 

haha

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10799153/BBC-climate-editor-false-claims-global-warming-Panorama-broadcast-inquiry-finds.html

 

BBC climate editor whose sister is an Insulate Britain fanatic made false claims on global warming including worldwide deaths are rising and Madagascar is on the verge of famine, inquiry finds

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...