Jump to content

Climate change low content


 Share

Recommended Posts

On 9/13/2021 at 7:48 PM, Nobby Noboddy said:

Wow.

 

That's a 'slam-dunk' I think the phrase is.

 

There really couldn't be any other explanation.

 

There are explanations offered in the comments of that video, which do make sense and seem plausible.

 

But then the 'chemtrail believers' just dismiss them, because its not what they want to hear.

 

For starters, whenever I do see 'trails' coming from planes above me, they are clearly coming from the engines mounted on the wings. Not from out of the tail section like that.

 

Don't get me wrong, I do think that there is something being sprayed from above us, but that video is not in my opinion any 'conclusive evidence' of this, especially when there is no proper context to that video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lord Deben aka John Gummer, says not having street lights in rural areas would help the country meet emissions targets. Use a torch instead, insists Gummer, as he urges rural authorities to push back against urbanisation of their areas. He said authorities must think about everything they do through the prism of climate change.

 

https://guernseypress.com/news/uk-news/2021/09/15/use-torches-instead-of-street-lights-in-rural-areas-urges-climate-adviser/

 

Gummer was party chairman under Thatcher, agriculture secretary under her and John Major, and then environment secretary for four years from 1993. He is possibly most famous, or infamous, for trying to feed his daughter Cordelia a beefburger to convince the public it was safe from mad cow disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Fluke said:

 

Look at these c**** I'd run them over. Then again it's not worth getting in trouble for these wasters. Some of us gotta learn a living

 

It would be a different kettle of fish if it was us antivaxxers. I doubt the police would have obliged us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

It would be a different kettle of fish if it was us antivaxxers. I doubt the police would have obliged us.

Exactly they'd just beat us. All part of the plan. This lot are paid off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

So are the protesters, they are all in it together, stands out a mile.

Yeah I meant the protesters. They were down the road from my house the other day if I'd known I'd gone and shouted abuse at them. 

 

 

Edited by Fluke
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.png

 

Quote

Look really close at this picture. The yellow thing in the middle above the white is a bulldozer. It is burying windmill blades used for green energy. Why you ask?? Because these blades need to be disposed of and there is presently no way to recycle them. That’s how green energy works…

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2021 at 4:25 PM, Velma said:

Lord Deben aka John Gummer, says not having street lights in rural areas would help the country meet emissions targets. Use a torch instead, insists Gummer, as he urges rural authorities to push back against urbanisation of their areas. He said authorities must think about everything they do through the prism of climate change.

 

https://guernseypress.com/news/uk-news/2021/09/15/use-torches-instead-of-street-lights-in-rural-areas-urges-climate-adviser/

 

Gummer was party chairman under Thatcher, agriculture secretary under her and John Major, and then environment secretary for four years from 1993. He is possibly most famous, or infamous, for trying to feed his daughter Cordelia a beefburger to convince the public it was safe from mad cow disease.

 

I can sort of agree with this sentiment.

 

A couple of years ago now, I was on holiday staying in a caravan park just outside of a village on the west coast of Wales.

 

The park was located just off a minor road, which was illuminated by LED streetlights. I discovered that after about 1am, the streetlights would turn off. It didn't bother or concern me, as I don't drive and even if I could drive I'd have no intention of driving at that time of night, and nor did I fancy going for a walk around the area at that time either.

 

The apparent reasoning was that the road was very little used during the night, so there was no point illuminating it. Which sort of makes sense really. Why expend energy lighting up a road for no-one to use?

 

But then again, LED lighting supposedly uses far less energy anyway, so how much of a cost saving would there be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over 100 world leaders are expected to attend the conference, but only a few names are widely known so far.

 

Here are all the world leaders confirmed to be attending COP26 at the end of October.

 

Pope Francis

 

Greta Thunberg

 

Sir David Attenborough

 

President Joe Biden, United States

 

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland

 

Her Majesty the Queen, United Kingdom

 

Prime Minister Boris Johnson, United Kingdom

 

 

 

The usual suspects, none of whom have any expertise or qualifications in the field of geology, meteorology, climatology, oceanography or environmental science, but they will fly in on private jets to "save the planet."

 

Earth Science includes:

 

  • Fundamentals of geology, oceanography, meteorology, and astronomy.
  • Earth’s minerals and rocks.
  • Earth’s interior.
  • Plate tectonics, earthquakes, volcanoes, and the movements of continents.
  • Geology and the fossil record.
  • Oceans and the atmosphere.
  • The solar system and the universe.

 

 

The timing of this conference is auspicious for occultists. On Halloween, the last Sunday of the month and the day the clocks go back, they intend to solve the world’s problems, (largely created by the machinations of this elite group) with a magic wand, made from holy wood. There will be significant spell-casting over the thirteen day period of this Satanic ritual, as they switch the narrative from Brexit and Covid to Climate Change (weather warfare) and the urgency to create a ‘unified world’ to 'Build Back Better.'

 

 

 

https://www.scotsman.com/news/environment/which-leaders-will-attend-cop26-full-list-of-country-heads-visiting-glasgow-for-climate-change-summit-3392176

 

Edited by Velma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I can sort of agree with this sentiment.

 

A couple of years ago now, I was on holiday staying in a caravan park just outside of a village on the west coast of Wales.

 

The park was located just off a minor road, which was illuminated by LED streetlights. I discovered that after about 1am, the streetlights would turn off. It didn't bother or concern me, as I don't drive and even if I could drive I'd have no intention of driving at that time of night, and nor did I fancy going for a walk around the area at that time either.

 

The apparent reasoning was that the road was very little used during the night, so there was no point illuminating it. Which sort of makes sense really. Why expend energy lighting up a road for no-one to use?

 

But then again, LED lighting supposedly uses far less energy anyway, so how much of a cost saving would there be?

 

Personally, I wouldn't complain, because I live incognito in a rural area beside the woods and the 'dark skies' would be phenomenal, but it would cause problems for the eldery and vulnerable, besides, that's why we pay Council Tax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why climate change is bogus.

 

“The world is warming because of fossil fuel emissions caused by humans.”

 

(A spurious assertion not proven by science, but agreed by the Club of Rome.)

 

Extreme weather events linked to climate change - including heatwaves, floods and forest fires - are intensifying and governments agree urgent collective action is needed.

 

(Geoengineering is disrupting the climate and weather is being manipulated for warfare against the world population, causing death, famine, disease, displacement and refugees.)

 

World leaders, united by the Paris Accord, are instructed to reduce ‘global warming’ by cutting emissions until they reach net zero in 2050.

 

(This ruse will require a 4th Industrial Revolution, where ‘smart cities’ will provide the answer. Rich countries are to finance poor countries, to achieve this goal.)

 

The COP26 will want specific pledges on ending coal, petrol cars and protecting nature. Meat and dairy consumption will also have to be cut. Vegans will be happy.

 

(There will be protestors saying that this does not go far enough and demanding immediate action, to save iDavid Attenborough's iguanas, or whatever.)

 

The scientists say the rollout of the agreement must be stepped up to have any chance of curbing dangerous climate change. Of course they do.

 

Be careful what you wish for…

 

People are already being driven from their lands by fire and flood, into Fema camps; hurricanes are demolishing whole towns and not from ‘global warming’ but weather modification, to ‘rewild’ the earth, in accordance with Agenda 2030.

 

The world will be the exclusive domain of the ‘elite’ to indulge their pleasures, like the ‘dangerous game’ (think Ramsay Bolton) while the serfs (Reek) live and work in their technopods, under AI control, waiting for their turn in the ‘hunger games.’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Regarding floods-- the world has always had floods! If one reads history books and diaries of people from history accounts of floods are common occurrences. The middle ages had a lot of rain fall which led to sodden crop fields and famines. 

 

A few days of heavy rain in London and it's all due to people having gas central heating. 🙄

 

Of course I'm sorry for those whose homes and shops got flooded out.

 

Look what happened in the 1920s:

 

Quote

 

The great 1928 flood of London

In 1928 the Thames flooded much of central London, with fatal consequences. It was the last time the heart of the UK's capital has been under water. How did the city cope and what has changed?

It was after midnight when the river burst its banks. Most Londoners slept as the floodwaters gushed into some of the nation's grandest buildings and subsumed many of city's narrowest slum streets under 4ft of water.

The Houses of Parliament, the Tate Gallery and the Tower of London were all swamped. So too, tragically, were many of the crowded basement dwellings into which the city's poorest families were crammed. Some 14 souls drowned and thousands were left homeless.

 

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26153241

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What an out and out scam this climate change agenda is. Making Corporations and their political sponsors billions

of shekels worldwide.

 

The Corporations are the ones who should be paying for all the havoc of pollution for decades and

the decimation of the rain frorests which Governments turned a blind eye to.

 

They are going to make British homeowners pay 100 pounds each for their "green agenda"

 

And yet !!!!

 

 

 

I don't like Andrew Neil one iota ... haven't read the article, but maybe some truth?

Still keen on green now that your bill's arrived? Carbon zero is a glorious goal. But as our leaders use it to burnish their halos, the true cost is finally hitting home. ANDREW NEIL warns of storms to come

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10074327/Still-keen-green-bills-arrived-ANDREW-NEIL-warns-storms-come.html

 

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All those people, especially not very well off folk agreeing with the bogus climate change

agenda are going to be reeling from this news. I had no idea because I now live abroad.

I used to live in Walthamstow and drive to work in Surrey for a while, the public transport

connections were not feasible.

 

So from later this month 350,000 people will have to pay 12.50 pounds each day to use

their car if it is 15 years old plus. That's a staggering 250.00 pounds a month (for five days,

more if you use the car 7 days)

 

This is going to affect the least well off as per usual. I tried my best to warn people I know

about the climate change agenda and Covid of course to no avail. They must have inner turmoil from knowing they are accepting the lies of Government and media. If not then they are just plain stupid.

 

Absolutely outrageous

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10094969/Sadiq-Khan-delay-expansion-ULEZ-year-Tories-warn.html

 

The Mayor is being urged to wait before extending the green scheme because it is 'absurd' to think people had been able to prepare amid Covid-19. ULEZ covers central London from Westminster to the City of London but will expand up to, but not including, the North and South Circular Road, on October 25. It operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and sees vehicles needing to meet strict emissions standards or drivers must pay a £12.50 daily charge.

 

Ulez Car Check, Map, Charges And Start Date: What You Need To Know |  HuffPost UK

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...