SimonTV Posted January 15 Author Share Posted January 15 They had to close beaches when toxic wind mill fiber glass ended up being sprawled across several square miles. https://files.catbox.moe/eu5giq.mp4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sit down, Waldo Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 BT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one BT has abandoned its scheme to turn green street cabinets into electric vehicle (EV) charging points having completed only one of the 60,000 conversions it initially said it was aiming for... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 24 Author Share Posted January 24 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 All western European countries have been inflicted with the net zero environmental fraud which has destroyed their energy production and reduce their economic ability. Which now can be known as the "co2 is bad" fraud. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 Insane new greenhouse gases target/net zero bill going through the corrupt houses. https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3776 https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/59-01/0014/240014.pdf The Greenhouse Gas inventory covers the seven direct greenhouse gases under the Paris Agreement. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Methane (CH4) Nitrous oxide (N2O) Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) The Al Gore fraud has finally reached the UK government. They had already allocated £100 billion to net zero before making any new laws about it. So it is only "sensible" that the government and all its politicians need to create new laws, otherwise what is the point of them right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 (edited) Signed by 94 countries at the UN summit on biodiversity in September 2020, the pledge committed world leaders to take 10 urgent actions by 2030 to reduce biodiversity loss. Actions included sustainable food production, ending the illegal wildlife trade and implementing nature-based solutions for climate change. A copy of the "pledge" text below https://mega.nz/file/VMFTwC7b#UmPdzgQmWs4VX9rvfwDzy9k60KjW4jvpWi2BpBLGUSo It states that basically "we accept" that there is a plantary emergency. Amongst other insanity. "We are in a state of planetary emergency: the interdependent crises of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation and climate change - driven in large part by unsustainable production and consumption - require urgent and immediate global action. Science clearly shows that biodiversity loss, land and ocean degradation, pollution, resource depletion and climate change are accelerating at an unprecedented rate. This acceleration is causing irreversible harm to our life support systems and aggravating poverty and inequalities as well as hunger and malnutrition. Unless halted and reversed with immediate effect, it will cause significant damage to global economic, social and political resilience and stability and will render achieving the Sustainable Development Goals impossible." I think they have been watching too much Zeitgeist and Jacque Fresco Edited January 26 by SimonTV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 Wow this like a bill within an agreements within a pledge within a framework. This is the POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/409e/19ae/369752b245f05e88f760aeb3/wg2020-05-l-02-en.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 Basically this new bill will give a panel of experts new powers to shut down entire industries, which they claim are not sustainable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 wow this bill is insane. They going to pick a random people from the population and they MUST consider the experts advice as "representation of the scientific community". Who chooses the experts? They do, they pick the "experts" that agree with their insane global emergency non sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 26 Author Share Posted January 26 (edited) Sorry for so many posts here, just adding as I read more. OK so within this POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK it states that $700 billion is needed for this frame work, the pledge states the framework is what is needed and the bill claims the pledge must be actioned within a strategy and section 7 of the bill outlines the financial obligations of the bill. Which is effectively committing some portion of GDP towards this agenda. Man I need to get in on this next fraud, I missed the boat on the last gravy train. I might create some bogus net zero corporation with a website and all this BS about diversity and then get in on this fraud, oh boy $$$$. Edited January 26 by SimonTV 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 (edited) Genetic technology bill has passed the houses. Not had a chance to read it yet but looks like it will legalise the use of GM food in the UK or at least create regulations around its use. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/6/contents/enacted https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3167 Edited January 28 by SimonTV 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 29 Author Share Posted January 29 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 It's amazing how just three or four years ago, many people had no problems paying their energy bills. It's also possible that many people now complaining about energy bills are the same ones that vigorously waved their flags for Ukraine, or agreed to accept Ukrainian 'refugees' into their homes. I would expect, given the choice, many people would rather have lower energy bills, even if it meant doing business/trade with Russia again. Still it seems there is money to be spent on retro-fitting older homes, but don't expect any help unless you're in receipt of benefits. Mum struggling to heat 1930s home gets help Quote A mother of two who moved into a 1930s home said the family faced a "massive" hike in heating bills until she received help. Holly Farmer said heating was one item they could not "scrape by" on, with youngsters aged four and eight to look after. Until funds from the West Midlands mayor helped pay for insulation, extractor fans and solar panels, she said they used to have the heating on all week. She said it was the "little things" they noticed had improved, like running a bath that was hot enough without having to put the heating on. Ms Farmer's three-bedroom home, which she moved into three years ago, is one of 200 social homes in Sandwell built between the wars that are being improved in Wednesbury's Friar Park. She said: "Before, we would lose so much heat. We were starting to have a problem with little bits of mould." Heating bills pretty much doubled after Covid, she said, adding: "It was hard, working part-time. There are things you can't scrape on when you've got children." She said it was possible to cut costs in other ways, such as shopping, but not with gas and electricity. "You can't with two children," she said. "They have to be warm." Ms Farmer, 30, said they now "don't put [the heating] on half as much" and she was grateful for the support. from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gw93w04q7o I still find it curious that despite concern being raised about global temperatures being on the increase, there's millions of pounds of money being found to help insulate homes and make them 'warmer'. Quote Mayor Richard Parker is putting £167m into upgrading up to 10,000 of the oldest and coldest social and privately-owned homes in the region to make them warmer and cheaper to run. He described it as "the most ambitious programme" the region had seen to improve living standards and tackle fuel poverty. An estimated 254,000 West Midlands households are in fuel poverty - one of the highest rates in the country, his office said. Alternatively Mr Parker could seek to call for an end to the conflict in Ukraine so we can start buying cheap gas again from Russia. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 BBC Politics West 10 till 10.30 Sunday UK aims to be net zero by 2050 … Huge solar farm in Wiltshire … Plans for one of the biggest solar farms in Europe were launched in the Cotswolds this week. Rosie Clark Stop Lyme Down campaigner “ A millions panels as high as a double decker bus ( 2000 acres ) It will decimate the local villages which rely on tourism “ BBC Reporter; “ Most of us want cheaper fuel bills and we need to fight climate change “ Leslie Bennett Solar Supporter “ We need clean energy “ … … “ It’s not first grade farmland, I think it’s chalk “ … … “ You’ve got to think about the world for the future “ … Conservative Faye Purbrick; “ Support our farmers … if you speak to farmers they’ll tell you sheep don’t graze the same under the panels … “ … “ There’s more and more attacks on farmers, the trees, the wild-life … they’re making our food, what are we going to do import all of our food? “ … 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted February 2 Author Share Posted February 2 Reported in Germany North Rhine-Westphalia weird particles in the fog as seen in the US recently. https://files.catbox.moe/dd8wjk.mp4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsika Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 On 1/28/2025 at 11:55 PM, SimonTV said: Genetic technology bill has passed the houses. Not had a chance to read it yet but looks like it will legalise the use of GM food in the UK or at least create regulations around its use. GM food is already in the UK (and Europe) via the back door entry of feedstock e.g. corn, soya. I'm supposing they now want front door entry to further poison as many as possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 6 hours ago, Observations said: BBC Reporter; “ Most of us want cheaper fuel bills and we need to fight climate change “ Does anyone really believe that energy bills will ever dramatically come down in price again? We could of course agree to start buying cheaper gas from Russia again. Or perhaps the money being spent (wasted?) on solar and wind farms could be better utilised in extracting more gas from under the North Sea. Still don't get why we don't use our own natural resources, rather than having to import it. Quote “ There’s more and more attacks on farmers, the trees, the wild-life … they’re making our food, what are we going to do import all of our food? “ That's the basic aim really. In a strange twist of inversion, our farmers are being incentivised financially to NOT grow and produce. But this is nothing new really, it was the same with "EU subsidies". "You can't eat solar panels or wind turbines" - just as much as solar panels and wind turbines will never be able to meet the UK's energy supply requirements. Just think about the hundreds of thousands of acres of agricultural land here in the UK, where we could be growing 'staples', or rearing livestock such as cattle, sheep and poultry. Then ask yourself why we choose to import so much grain, vegetables, fruits and meats from elsewhere, which have to be transported by diesel-powered trucks (so much for being better for the environment). 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 On 3/31/2024 at 11:52 PM, EnigmaticWorld said: On 9/13/2023 at 12:01 AM, EnigmaticWorld said: Russia Collusion: Kremlin Funds Anti-American Activism at UN https://thenewamerican.com/video/alex-newman-russia-collusion-kremlin-funds-anti-american-activism-at-united-nations/ Quote MADRID — In an apparent effort to hamper American energy and boost Russian fossil fuels, the Kremlin has been pouring money into “green” groups and “climate change” activists. At the United Nations “COP25” summit in Spain this week, The New American magazine’s foreign correspondent Alex Newman went looking for answers. One of the powerful forces at the UNFCCC climate conference was the Climate Action Network (CAN), a powerful alliance of “Green” organizations. This group spent most of the conference demonizing the United States, President Trump, and American energy. It turns out there is more than meets the eye, though. CAN’s largest donor has been, the Sea Change Foundation. According to investigations by the U.S. Congress, however, the Sea Change Foundation has been getting money from the Kremlin via a shadowy shell corporation in Bermuda called “Klein Ltd.” Lawmakers said the Putin regime’s goal was to boost Russia’s government-controlled energy sector, which produces about 50% of its exports, at the expense of the West. We tried to find out what was going on, but as you’ll see, nobody wanted to talk. On 3/13/2023 at 2:03 PM, EnigmaticWorld said: Enviro-Communism https://fitzinfo.net/enviro-communism/ On 12/4/2022 at 12:16 AM, EnigmaticWorld said: Why the Russians Conceived the Global Warming Scam https://web.archive.org/web/20170922064510/https://aim.org/aim-column/why-the-russians-conceived-the-global-warming-scam/ 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campion Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 (edited) 19 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said: Imagine my surprise about this. On the plus side, at least Europe's reserves are still there underground and we can restart the extraction if and when we break the spell. Britain still has hundreds of years of coal for example, just waiting if we want to get it. After some decades of the climate change scam, it will become even more valuable as other countries like Russia and Saudi start to exhaust theirs. In theory anyway - it's not as if the likes of us get a choice in it. Edited February 5 by Campion 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Huh? Record January warmth puzzles climate scientists Quote Last month was the world's warmest January on record raising further questions about the pace of climate change, scientists say. January 2025 had been expected to be slightly cooler than January 2024 because of a shift away from a natural weather pattern in the Pacific known as El Niño. But instead, last month broke the January 2024 record by nearly 0.1C, according to the European Copernicus climate service. The world's warming is due to emissions of planet-heating gases from human activities - mainly the burning of fossil fuels - but scientists say they cannot fully explain why last month was particularly hot. It continues a series of surprisingly large temperature records since mid-2023, with temperatures around 0.2C above what had been expected. "The basic reason we're having records being broken, and we've had this decades-long warming trend, is because we're increasing the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere," Gavin Schmidt, director of Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, told BBC News. from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyjk92w9k1o And there was me thinking that the "science was settled" and all these climate 'experts' knew that everything is down to people driving BMWs and flying off on holidays to the Canaries. Quote January 2025 ended up 1.75C warmer than January temperatures of the late 19th Century, before humans started significantly warming the climate. Quote A number of theories have been put forward for why the last couple of years have been warmer than anticipated. One idea involves a prolonged response of the oceans to the 2023-24 El Niño. While it was not especially strong, it followed an unusually lengthy La Niña phase from 2020-23. The El Niño event might therefore have "lifted the lid" on warming, allowing ocean heat that had been accumulating to escape into the atmosphere. But it's unclear how this would still be directly affecting global temperatures nearly a year after El Niño ended. Quote The fact that sea temperatures in other regions of the world remain particularly warm could suggest "that the behaviour of the ocean is changing", according to Samantha Burgess, deputy director of Copernicus. "We're really looking to see how the ocean temperatures evolve because they have a direct influence on air temperatures." So basically, "they don't know". The BBC confidently states that this is all because of 'humans warming the climate', while others think it is something to do with ocean temperatures. The behaviour of the oceans is linked to the sun and solar activity - I understand that the sun has been particularly active of late. Anyway, as someone who lives in the UK and has spent most of January shivering, I might politely disagree with the claim of it being the 'hottest month ever'. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoScota Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 38 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said: Huh? Record January warmth puzzles climate scientists from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyjk92w9k1o And there was me thinking that the "science was settled" and all these climate 'experts' knew that everything is down to people driving BMWs and flying off on holidays to the Canaries. So basically, "they don't know". The BBC confidently states that this is all because of 'humans warming the climate', while others think it is something to do with ocean temperatures. The behaviour of the oceans is linked to the sun and solar activity - I understand that the sun has been particularly active of late. Anyway, as someone who lives in the UK and has spent most of January shivering, I might politely disagree with the claim of it being the 'hottest month ever'. AccuWeather always seems to have temps that say it's warmer than what it actually feels and looks like, which I believe is part of the brainwashing into accepting this guff. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsika Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 13 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said: The world's warming is due to emissions of planet-heating gases from human activities - mainly the burning of fossil fuels psychopathic Geo-engineering agenda - but scientists say they cannot fully explain why last month was particularly hot. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Grapes Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1velocity7 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 its going from 6deg today to 13deg tomorrow lovely morning today and shitloads of chemtrails around the sun by lunch overcast with spots of rain fri 45mph gales sun 50mph gales no weather warnings though and cant find a storm name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Grapes Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 (edited) "Historic palaces of Venice provide a clue for sea level rise since 1350" September 21, 2017 https://www.climatechangepost.com/news/historic-palaces-of-venice-provide-a-clue-for-sea-level-rise-since-1350/ Edited February 28 by Grumpy Grapes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.