children in foster care

[claire hughes]

Hi I`m in desperate need for help please. My child in care & their going to jab him. I`m not allowed to mention vaccines at all to him. I`ve had 2 meetings with him since this bs started, totaling to 2 hours & little time spent in phone conversations that are often interrupted by SS, as I`m not to discuss virtually all the things I would want to discuss. They stopped contact for 7 wks & within that time brainwashed my boy to the point that he now thinks I`m an incompetent mother not allowing him to have vaccines, which theyve since loaded him with & the LAC nurse visited him & used coercion, its destroyed our relationship.Really finding it difficult to cope.

tel : <REDACTED BY MODERATOR>
Please PM / Private Message for contact

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

4 hours ago, claire hughes said:

Hi I`m in desperate need for help please. My child in care & their going to jab him. I`m not allowed to mention vaccines at all to him. I`ve had 2 meetings with him since this bs started, totaling to 2 hours & little time spent in phone conversations that are often interrupted by SS, as I`m not to discuss virtually all the things I would want to discuss. They stopped contact for 7 wks & within that time brainwashed my boy to the point that he now thinks I`m an incompetent mother not allowing him to have vaccines, which theyve since loaded him with & the LAC nurse visited him & used coercion, its destroyed our relationship.Really finding it difficult to cope.

tel : <REDACTED BY MODERATOR>
Please PM / Private Message for contact

Hello Claire.
Sorry to read about your problems.
lf anyone can help with any advice, that would be great.

Claire, please don't post personal details or contact details on the public forum.
Please be careful when PMing anyone too.

BC
 

[octoplex]

5 hours ago, claire hughes said:

Hi I`m in desperate need for help please. My child in care & their going to jab him.

 

Hi Claire,

I would suggest contacting a sympathetic lawyer who is willing to send SS a letter stating that they are in violation of the Nuremberg code and will be held liable for any harm that comes to your child as a result of their actions.  You can read the Nuremberg code, in full, at the end of this post.

 

Sadly, I do not know if this will stop them, but it would provide you with clear legal evidence, in forthcoming months, that your consent was not given. This could then be used as more solid grounds for a damages claim.

 

I was abused as a child by many institutions, and I can understand the techniques that they are using to coerse your son into compliance with their abuses. Perhaps someone else on this forum can point you towards a lawyer who has previously intervened in a similar situation, and who can help protect your son from being assaulted by abusers armed with an experimental-chemical.

 

Sending courage.

 

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Edited June 29, 2021 by octoplex
fixed spelling

[claire hughes]

Thank you for responding

[claire hughes]

Yes I realize I was being bit careless there, 1. I dont understand how to work with this tech & 2. I`ve been feeling so useless & desperate, I dont like to think what I would be like if this nightmare happens. Thanks for advice

[Simple Actions]

On 6/29/2021 at 1:24 PM, claire hughes said:

Hi I`m in desperate need for help please. My child in care & their going to jab him. I`m not allowed to mention vaccines at all to him. I`ve had 2 meetings with him since this bs started, totaling to 2 hours & little time spent in phone conversations that are often interrupted by SS, as I`m not to discuss virtually all the things I would want to discuss. They stopped contact for 7 wks & within that time brainwashed my boy to the point that he now thinks I`m an incompetent mother not allowing him to have vaccines, which theyve since loaded him with & the LAC nurse visited him & used coercion, its destroyed our relationship.Really finding it difficult to cope.

tel : <REDACTED BY MODERATOR>
Please PM / Private Message for contact

 

Hi Claire, 

Hope things are well...or some good sign of a light at the end of the tunnel in your situation..

Best wishes

[jack121]

Yes you must go and see a solicitor and find out your legal options, or citizens advice bereau, they do have solicitors working for them free of charge usually these solicitors are decent people as they give their time away free of charge to help the community and may be more inclined to assist than some of the money grabbers out there. Sometimes the solicitor may have a friend he can referer you to.

A warning letter from a solicitor threatning legal action and explaining the points of law being infringed works wonders.

If you have a friend in the media or can get your story out there through one of the platforms this is all good, these nazis are terrified of bad publicity. So post away, every platform you can find. Never stop.

 

Edited July 1, 2021 by jack121

[claire hughes]

On 7/1/2021 at 7:52 AM, jack121 said:

Yes you must go and see a solicitor and find out your legal options, or citizens advice bereau, they do have solicitors working for them free of charge usually these solicitors are decent people as they give their time away free of charge to help the community and may be more inclined to assist than some of the money grabbers out there. Sometimes the solicitor may have a friend he can referer you to.

A warning letter from a solicitor threatning legal action and explaining the points of law being infringed works wonders.

If you have a friend in the media or can get your story out there through one of the platforms this is all good, these nazis are terrified of bad publicity. So post away, every platform you can find. Never stop.

 

Thank you I've just seen this but they did last Sunday. Need one I can trust 

[jack121]

14 hours ago, claire hughes said:

Thank you I've just seen this but they did last Sunday. Need one I can trust 

 

Not sure who to trust myself. You could ask them their vaccination status or how they feel about the plan-demic, the empty hospitals during the " height " of the crisis, tv station  lies. All done in a casual off-the-cuff manner as though you are just making polite conversation, let them say how they feel. Get a vibe from them. If after the conversation you feel you have found a kindred spirit then go for it. Most solicitors are free for the first appointment so will not cost you anything to nosy around and dig into their beliefs.

The jab can only be applied by consent and must be free from coercion the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats. If you boy makes a statement that he has been talked into this, or pushed into taking the jab, then this is strong grounds for you to sue and will strengthen you overall case. If your boy can be asked why he wants to take the jab, and who talked him into it, then all good because it is not an independant decision he is being mislead.