Jump to content

COVID-19 may be caused by Graphene Oxide introduced by several ways into the body


LuzSublime
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, LuzSublime said:

Researchers show evidence of the presence of graphene oxide nanoparticles in vaccination vials. This can explain why vaccinated people get magnetized.

 

Video here: https://www.orwell.city/2021/06/covid-19-is-caused-by-graphene-oxide.html

 

 


Thanks.
The first l heard of this was in Max Igans latest video update, which l watched this morning.  --> https://www.bitchute.com/video/xfRyWiRHe9jM/ 
Gonna have to do some  reading on this.
BC

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • eSlacK changed the title to URGENT - University of SPAIN shows what's inside vaccines !!! - URGENT
On 6/28/2021 at 1:11 PM, Basket Case said:


Thanks.
The first l heard of this was in Max Igans latest video update, which l watched this morning.  --> https://www.bitchute.com/video/xfRyWiRHe9jM/ 
Gonna have to do some  reading on this.
BC

 

I've been wondering about graphene for a few weeks now.  It is claimed some of the more expensive masks contain graphene

and there are graphene nano particles in the vaccines.

 

Not only is graphene detriment to one's health, but is all of this linked with the 5G claims and the vaccines which I never properly reserched.

 

i.e. Will graphene in the body be a receptor for 5G? I really don't know enough about this topic yet. 

 

Is this relevant?

 

5G: Ready with graphene photonics

 

https://graphene-flagship.eu/innovation/spearheads/c2-sh01-5g/

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

I've been wondering about graphene for a few weeks now.  It is claimed some of the more expensive masks contain graphene

and there are graphene nano particles in the vaccines.

 

Not only is graphene detriment to one's health, but is all of this linked with the 5G claims and the vaccines which I never properly reserched.

 

i.e. Will graphene in the body be a receptor for 5G? I really don't know enough about this topic yet. 

 

Is this relevant?

 

5G: Ready with graphene photonics

 

https://graphene-flagship.eu/innovation/spearheads/c2-sh01-5g/

 

 

 

Have any members researched this already?

 

@Mitochondrial Eve

@ink

@Macnamara

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

 

Have any members researched this already?

 

@Mitochondrial Eve

@ink

@Macnamara

 

 

It's in spanish, you might need to translate it: 

 

"With 5G frequencies of 42.6 GHz, the 1.2 nm nanotubes injected into the vaccines go into resonance and severely alter the brain process"

 

https://acratasnet.wordpress.com/2021/06/14/con-frecuencias-5g-los-nanotubos-inyectados-en-las-vacunas-entran-en-resonancia-y-propagan-potencia-electrica-a-la-velocidad-del-pensamiento-humano/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eSlacK said:

 

It's in spanish, you might need to translate it: 

 

"With 5G frequencies of 42.6 GHz, the 1.2 nm nanotubes injected into the vaccines go into resonance and severely alter the brain process"

 

https://acratasnet.wordpress.com/2021/06/14/con-frecuencias-5g-los-nanotubos-inyectados-en-las-vacunas-entran-en-resonancia-y-propagan-potencia-electrica-a-la-velocidad-del-pensamiento-humano/

 

TRANSLATION; With 5G frequencies of 42.6 GHz, the 1.2 nm nanotubes injected into the vaccines go into resonance and severely alter the brain process

Posted on June 14, 2021 by EDITOR

 

I will start by clarifying that there is no reference on the Internet of a similar study. I think this is something very important, which I summarize like this: With 5G frequencies of 42.6 GHz, the 1.2 nm nanotubes injected into vaccines go into resonance and propagate a high-energy signal at the average speed of human thought ( 1).
 

Something caught my attention when I saw a sales catalog of graphene nanotubes from the Nanografi company . I was surprised by the precise length of the nanotubes of 1.2 nanometers, or 1.2 x 10⁻⁹m. As I already knew the frequencies of 5G microwaves, in the range from 10 to 300 GHz (1 GHz = 10⁹ / s), the curious coincidence of how those precise powers of 10 were canceled out in the well-known mechanical formula of waves: f = v / λ. Call attention to anyone with an engineering degree who is not asleep!

However, although the powers of the data seemed to fit, it was necessary to find out whether or not the velocity of the resulting wave made biological / anatomical sense in a human. And, sure enough, it makes sense. It fits the speed of human thought completely.
 

The following is very simple for anyone with a basic understanding of Physics:

1. There are study results that show that an average neuron sends signals at about 180 km / h. … Certain factors combined would increase the speed up to 432 km / h. There is a lot of variation: some humans think faster than others, and the rate of propagation of thought changes throughout life. This is basic for what follows.

We will take the average speed of thought of 180 km / h. That is, 180,000 m / 3600 s = 50 m / s 
 

2. On the other hand, fullerenes or nanotubes in vaccines exist and are for sale on the market at reasonable prices. For example, the aforementioned Nanografi company sells nanotubes like the one below:

Fullerene-C60, Price: € 88 / gr.
Purity: 99.5%
Fullerene Electrical Resistivity 1034 ohms / m
Fullerene Appearance Shinning Black

For sale, 1.2 nm in length, 0.8 nm in radius. Total precision.

Let us suppose that it was precisely this 1.2 nm nanotube that was injected in vaccines against Covid19. 

 

3. Let's see what happens if we make these nanotubes resonate with microwave radiation outside the human body that contains them:

If the velocity of a wave is v, the frequency is: f = v / λ. Resonant frequencies are equally spaced multiples of a lower frequency called the fundamental frequency. The multiples are called harmonics.

 

Once the transmission speed caused by microwaves in the human brain is known, we are going to see if it is the product of the frequency and the length of the particles. If so, we are well screwed! If the particle is 1.2 nm, like the one in the example for sale, and the frequency is 41.6 GHz, a frequency within the 5G range, then:

1.2 x10⁻⁹. 41.6 x 10⁹ = 50 m / s, which is the speed of thought within the brain. It doesn't have to be exactly that speed. It is to show that the result of applying microwave radiation to nanotubes produces "natural" transmission speeds in the brain, that is, similar to the speed of human thought. 

 

When the nanotubes, attached to the synapses of neurons (which has already been shown to do), come into resonance due to an external microwave radiation of the precise frequency, the amplitudes or powers dissipated by these nanotubes, which transmit the vibration at the speed of thought, they do so with a power that can be extremely dangerous for the brain itself, even if the radiated power of the external wave is not too high. That is resonance: that each cycle increases the amplitude of the previous one without any kind of limit.

 

CONCLUSION: This wave speed in the human brain is achievable for ordinary nanotubes and frequencies radiated by 5G antennas. This is not speculation, but science and technology combined. Materials exist and microwaves of the right frequencies, too. The speed of human thought fits both into a precise formula of Physics absolutely incontestable.
 

It can't be a coincidence. I ask you to comment and study the matter. Correct me if I am wrong.

Health and fitness.

FÉLIX UDIVARRI
 

NOTE: You can use this engineering tool for the calculation:

https://www.herramdamientosingenieria.com/onlinecalc/eng/wave-length/wave-length.html

(1) Obviously, it is an example: Other lengths of nanotubes are possible as long as their product by the microwave frequency is equal to 50.

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2021 at 7:51 PM, Golden Retriever said:

Have any members researched this already?

 

First i heard about it was max igan talking about it

 

I do remember someone on another forum, years ago, touting graphene as the greatest scientific breakthrough of modern times and then looked into it and found something about it being harmful to health

 

I do believe the injections have been adulterated with nanoparticulates but i believe that process started before covid as italian scientists found metal nanoparticulates in vaccines. Its hard not to imagine that it is about making people part of the 'smart grid'

 

To get a feel for this emerging bio-security state there is a very good article by whitney webb on her website which delves into the ins and outs of that world which the elites intend to be the new paradigm:

A “Leap” toward Humanity’s Destruction

The world’s richest medical research foundation, the Wellcome Trust, has teamed up with a pair of former DARPA directors who built Silicon Valley’s skunkworks to usher in an age of nightmarish surveillance, including for babies as young as three months old. Their agenda can only advance if we allow it.

 

Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

First i heard about it was max igan talking about it

 

It might tie into the strange death of a scientist on crete in recent years. She was married to a guy who is in the welcome trust which is at the cutting edge of the emerging bio-security state; he is a scientist too and specialised on microtubules in cells. I wonder if his wife was offed because she was going to say something about the emerging field of how graphene operates on a cellular level:

Potential interference with microtubule assembly by graphene: a tug-of-war

Binquan Luan ORCID logo *a  and  Shengfeng Cheng ORCID logo b  

Abstract

With the ever-increasing demand for graphene-based materials and their promising applications in numerous nanotechnologies, the biological effects of graphene on living systems have become crucial and ought to be well understood. Previously, both the cytotoxicity of graphene towards biological cells and its potential application as a nanomedicine have been revealed experimentally and theoretically. Besides many existing anticancer drugs that target microtubules, here we investigate the possibility of using graphene as a nanomedicine, which could alter the dynamic assembly and disassembly of a microtubule. We found that when a graphene nanosheet is at the hydrophilic interface of two neighboring heterodimers (containing α and β tubulins), it can pull one dimer away from the other through a “tug-of-war” mechanism, driven by the strong dispersive interaction exerted by the surface of the graphene nanosheet. This work demonstrates that based on the existing methods for mitigating graphene's cytotoxicity (already developed in this field), a graphene-based nanomedicine could be designed to target microtubules of cancer cells and induce cell apoptosis.

 

murdered scientist: Suzanne Eaton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzanne_Eaton

 

Her husband who is in the welcome trust which s of course part of the government SAGE team: Anthony A. Hyman

In 2000, his team pioneered the use of RNA interference to define the “parts lists” for different cytoplasmic processes.

During his tenure at the MPI-CBG, Hyman and his lab members have focused on:

  • Cytoplasmic organization and how cells form non-membrane bound compartments
  • Size and scaling of the spindle, centrosomes, and other organelles
  • Spatial control of the microtubule cytoskeleton
  • Positioning of the spindle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_A._Hyman

Edited by Macnamara
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Basket Case said:

 

TRANSLATION; With 5G frequencies of 42.6 GHz, the 1.2 nm nanotubes injected into the vaccines go into resonance and severely alter the brain process

Posted on June 14, 2021 by EDITOR

 

I will start by clarifying that there is no reference on the Internet of a similar study. I think this is something very important, which I summarize like this: With 5G frequencies of 42.6 GHz, the 1.2 nm nanotubes injected into vaccines go into resonance and propagate a high-energy signal at the average speed of human thought ( 1).
 

Something caught my attention when I saw a sales catalog of graphene nanotubes from the Nanografi company . I was surprised by the precise length of the nanotubes of 1.2 nanometers, or 1.2 x 10⁻⁹m. As I already knew the frequencies of 5G microwaves, in the range from 10 to 300 GHz (1 GHz = 10⁹ / s), the curious coincidence of how those precise powers of 10 were canceled out in the well-known mechanical formula of waves: f = v / λ. Call attention to anyone with an engineering degree who is not asleep!

However, although the powers of the data seemed to fit, it was necessary to find out whether or not the velocity of the resulting wave made biological / anatomical sense in a human. And, sure enough, it makes sense. It fits the speed of human thought completely.
 

The following is very simple for anyone with a basic understanding of Physics:

1. There are study results that show that an average neuron sends signals at about 180 km / h. … Certain factors combined would increase the speed up to 432 km / h. There is a lot of variation: some humans think faster than others, and the rate of propagation of thought changes throughout life. This is basic for what follows.

We will take the average speed of thought of 180 km / h. That is, 180,000 m / 3600 s = 50 m / s 
 

2. On the other hand, fullerenes or nanotubes in vaccines exist and are for sale on the market at reasonable prices. For example, the aforementioned Nanografi company sells nanotubes like the one below:

Fullerene-C60, Price: € 88 / gr.
Purity: 99.5%
Fullerene Electrical Resistivity 1034 ohms / m
Fullerene Appearance Shinning Black

For sale, 1.2 nm in length, 0.8 nm in radius. Total precision.

Let us suppose that it was precisely this 1.2 nm nanotube that was injected in vaccines against Covid19. 

 

3. Let's see what happens if we make these nanotubes resonate with microwave radiation outside the human body that contains them:

If the velocity of a wave is v, the frequency is: f = v / λ. Resonant frequencies are equally spaced multiples of a lower frequency called the fundamental frequency. The multiples are called harmonics.

 

Once the transmission speed caused by microwaves in the human brain is known, we are going to see if it is the product of the frequency and the length of the particles. If so, we are well screwed! If the particle is 1.2 nm, like the one in the example for sale, and the frequency is 41.6 GHz, a frequency within the 5G range, then:

1.2 x10⁻⁹. 41.6 x 10⁹ = 50 m / s, which is the speed of thought within the brain. It doesn't have to be exactly that speed. It is to show that the result of applying microwave radiation to nanotubes produces "natural" transmission speeds in the brain, that is, similar to the speed of human thought. 

 

When the nanotubes, attached to the synapses of neurons (which has already been shown to do), come into resonance due to an external microwave radiation of the precise frequency, the amplitudes or powers dissipated by these nanotubes, which transmit the vibration at the speed of thought, they do so with a power that can be extremely dangerous for the brain itself, even if the radiated power of the external wave is not too high. That is resonance: that each cycle increases the amplitude of the previous one without any kind of limit.

 

CONCLUSION: This wave speed in the human brain is achievable for ordinary nanotubes and frequencies radiated by 5G antennas. This is not speculation, but science and technology combined. Materials exist and microwaves of the right frequencies, too. The speed of human thought fits both into a precise formula of Physics absolutely incontestable.
 

It can't be a coincidence. I ask you to comment and study the matter. Correct me if I am wrong.

Health and fitness.

FÉLIX UDIVARRI
 

NOTE: You can use this engineering tool for the calculation:

https://www.herramdamientosingenieria.com/onlinecalc/eng/wave-length/wave-length.html

(1) Obviously, it is an example: Other lengths of nanotubes are possible as long as their product by the microwave frequency is equal to 50.

 

 

 

Thanks BC. I'll try to analyse it all when I have more time.

 

Thanks to the member @LuzSublime for starting this thread, because I do believe Graphene in the vaccines may be

connected with the Smart Grid.

 

I urge members to do their own research and report it.

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is new on my radar so I haven't properly looked into this topic yet but, during my general browsing today, I have come across a European Commission document about graphene dated Feb 2015 and which examines graphene's health effects including as a nanomaterial. Whilst not necessarily linked to magnetisation in this document, graphene is noted for its ability to disrupt cellular processes and organ function, provoke an immune response and cause inflammation and cancer.

 

https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/graphenes_health_effects_summarised_in_new_guide_48si8_en.pdf

 

image.png.1efc1d6f49852a7d2af4bf6dbb5741ae.png

image.png.657a664bcf11c7bf225aa53c49f02d56.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/5503-coronavirus-mega-thread/page/2502/

 

On 7/8/2021 at 3:17 PM, Number6 said:

Graphene Oxide

(in ^big red text^, 3 quarters of way down Corona page) 

 

As got from link in Corona MegaThread^... Here is text highlighting increasing applications graphine oxide is expected to be used for in future and said on that tech supply website. 

 

"Because graphene іѕ оnlу оnе аtоm thісk, уоu саn сrеаtе оthеr mаtеrіаlѕ bу іnjесtіng graphene layers wіth оthеr соmроundѕ (for еxаmрlе, a grарhеnе layer, a lауеr оf аnоthеr соmроund, fоllоwеd bу аnоthеr graphene lауеr, аnd ѕо on) еffесtіvеlу using graphene аѕ аtоmіс ѕсаffоldіng frоm whісh оthеr mаtеrіаlѕ аrе dеѕіgnеd. Thеѕе nеwlу сrеаtеd соmроundѕ mау аlѕо bе ѕuреrlаtіvе materials, juѕt lіkе the original one but wіth роtеntіаllу еvеn mоrе applications."

 

 

ALSO,  graphine oxide discussed on Rumble specificly... 

https://rumble.com/vjllb5-what-is-graphene-oxide-main-ingredient-in-pfizer-astrazeneca-vials-explaine.html

 

 

Excuse me for saying this Eve, but yeah looks serious alright... Kills mitochondria energy powerhouse in cells and enters into all cells in the body's circulation immediately, and makes you an electro-conductive control 'asset' (of Elon Musk and the Cabal) . 

Edited by TetraG
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Regarding "aptopsis"...

This as recognized by Jane Ruby on the Stew Peters show is a routine bodily function of casting out old cells like they were garbage, or SPENT, which by nature have a natural die off naturally - - -  but *all change* as things in this process are sped up with the invader of a poison like graphine oxide inside you... And causing various excessive triggers from body's own natrual-bio mechanisms turned HYPER RESPONSIVE (I guess is the overall picture we're getting) as captured in this video capture... Hopefully you can see here...

 

Screenshot_20210709-225329.png

Edited by TetraG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps somebody with greater knowledge in this field can comment on this recent paper, but apparently graphene oxide does have magnetic properties - namely, "weak ferromagnetism and pure paramagnetism".

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379721005295

 

But, from what I can make out, graphene oxide's paramagnetism would not explain the phenomenon of magnets sticking to people who have had the injections including the Pfizer / BioNTech vials scrutinised by the Spanish scientists. This is because paramagnetism involves only a weak attraction between materials whereas, in comparison, ferromagnetism (where graphene oxide is considered weak) has a much stronger attraction. For example, aluminium is considered paramagnetic rather than ferromagnetic and does not stick to magnets under normal circumstances.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramagnetism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst in light of the above post I doubt that graphene oxide can explain the apparent magnetism of injected people, I have also come across this very interesting piece concerning graphene oxide's impact on the brain.

 

https://www.materialstoday.com/carbon/news/graphene-oxide-on-the-brain/

 

If indeed the Spanish researchers' findings are correct about the overwhelming presence of graphene oxide in the Pfizer / BioNTech vials, perhaps the reason as to why this is could be explained via the link above which concludes that this nanomaterial targets the amygdala and can effectively shut down the fight or flight response.

 

Quote

The researchers used a model of PTSD where rats are exposed to the scent of a predator, a cat, and respond with a typical fright response.

 

“Exposure to a predator can modify neuronal connections - a phenomenon known as plasticity - and increases synaptic activity in a specific area of the amygdala,” explains first author of the study, Audrey Franceschi Biagioni. “If exposed to a predator odor, the rat has a defensive response, holing up, [which] is so well-imprinted in the memory that the animal remembers the odor of the predator and acts out the same protective behavior.”

 

Remarkably, the researchers found that rats sensitized to the scent of a cat ‘forgot’ their fear response after injection with GO directly into the amygdala part of the brain. The researchers think that GO temporarily interferes with synaptic plasticity, impairing the formation of long-term adverse memories in response to a threat and reducing anxiety-related behaviors. Administration of GO could provide a means of preventing unwanted synaptic plasticity, blocking the reinforcement of unpleasant memories, which could be particularly useful in the treatment of PTSD.

 

According to the Japanese technical document as referenced by Byram Bridle in his interview with Alex Pierson, following the Pfizer / BioNTech injections, lipid nano-particles have been found in most organs rather than just at the injection site. Bridle also claims that the spike protein produced by the injections can break through the blood brain barrier as per the following study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00771-8.

 

Perhaps this is wild speculation, but I wonder therefore if graphene oxide may be a form of sedation in its recipients making them more placid and submissive, especially in the event of repeat injections. If a rat can be made to forget its fear response to a cat, surely a human being can also be made to no longer appreciate any impending danger too such as complete totalitarian dictatorship and removal of all freedom and autonomy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • VictoriaZ changed the title to F.A.O David & Gareth Icke : Man (Fred Corbin) Says he has Leaked Internal Doc Proving the Vaccines Contain Graphene Oxide

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...