rebornsteve Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 No idea whether the below video is faked or not. I sent it to my brother and asked his opinion on moon landings. To clarify, my brother lives in California with his Russian wife. I knew his wife’s parents were scientists of some kind. So, her parents worked at Russian space complex in khazakstan for 15 years - where she was born. Wife’s father doesn’t believe they landed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 (edited) 2 hours ago, rebornsteve said: No idea whether the below video is faked or not. It's faked up to 26 seconds. Then it uses footage taken on the Moon. I think this was taken from an advert they did a while back. Oh and I could see the wires. It wasn't this one, but it's quite funny... 2 hours ago, rebornsteve said: I sent it to my brother and asked his opinion on moon landings. To clarify, my brother lives in California with his Russian wife. I knew his wife’s parents were scientists of some kind. So, her parents worked at Russian space complex in khazakstan for 15 years - where she was born. Wife’s father doesn’t believe they landed. Send him over to debate it then. Otherwise it's hearsay and bare assertion. My mate who works with this bloke at Tesco, said his dad knows a teacher who knows one of the engineers who worked on Apollo. He says it happened exactly as claimed and they brought back 842lbs of peer reviewed samples to prove it. Edited March 23 by Mr. Nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 On 3/19/2022 at 10:50 PM, sock muppet said: Radiation, the body can only sustain so much because it destroys the DNA. I definitely answered this post. Equating occasional particles to dna damaging radiation is like equating a glass of salty water to the Atlantic ocean. Do you have anything more than your huff 'n' puff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 They can't go higher than low earth orbit which is 1,200 miles, so how the hell did they go to moon if it's supposed distant is 238,855 miles away? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 6 minutes ago, alexa said: They can't go higher than low earth orbit which is 1,200 miles, Yes they can. Yes they could. 6 minutes ago, alexa said: so how the hell did they go to moon if it's supposed distant is 238,855 miles away? Well, a stunningly stupid claim in the first place - they placed a rocket in Low Earth parking orbit at 17,500mph. The rocket was restarted and accelerated the craft to 25,000mph. This placed it in a very eccentric elliptical orbit. The outer portion of the orbit intersected the Moon's path, like this: That gif illustrates a free-return trajectory, so just as the craft arrives at the Moon it fires an orbital insertion and is captured in orbit by the Moon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 5 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said: Yes they can. Yes they could. Well, a stunningly stupid claim in the first place - they placed a rocket in Low Earth parking orbit at 17,500mph. The rocket was restarted and accelerated the craft to 25,000mph. This placed it in a very eccentric elliptical orbit. The outer portion of the orbit intersected the Moon's path, like this: That gif illustrates a free-return trajectory, so just as the craft arrives at the Moon it fires an orbital insertion and is captured in orbit by the Moon. So why can't they do this again today ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 13 minutes ago, alexa said: So why can't they do this again today ? They can. They need newer versions of this equipment and developed for bigger crew, bigger payloads. Like this: https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 7 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said: They can. They need newer versions of this equipment and developed for bigger crew, bigger payloads. Don't they get enough money ? Doesn't NASA get something like 22 billion a year ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 4 minutes ago, alexa said: Don't they get enough money ? Doesn't NASA get something like 22 billion a year ? They spend their budget on things like The James Webb telescope or the Parker solar probe. It may have escaped your attention, but NASA subcontracts out nearly ALL its budget to other companies that develop and build the hardware. NASA in 2021 | NASA Solar System Exploration What should a space exploration agency spend their money on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 4 hours ago, Mr. Nice said: What should a space exploration agency spend their money on? Feeding the world. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 4 hours ago, alexa said: Feeding the world. They do feed the world. The creation of jobs through any company enables people to work and support their families. The infrastructure to create the machinery and build things, deliver them etc. If you came into this thread to poke up your flag of virtue, gee, well done! Back up your claims about low Earth orbit, which to be honest is hysterical given that you think the bloody world is flat! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 9 hours ago, alexa said: Feeding the world. https://www.nasa.gov/specials/value-of-nasa/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 4 hours ago, Mr. Nice said: They do feed the world. The creation of jobs through any company enables people to work and support their families. The infrastructure to create the machinery and build things, deliver them etc. If you came into this thread to poke up your flag of virtue, gee, well done! Back up your claims about low Earth orbit, which to be honest is hysterical given that you think the bloody world is flat! I guess she missed this one: NASA Research Launches a New Generation of Indoor Farming https://spinoff.nasa.gov/indoor-farming Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endfreemasonscum Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 5 hours ago, Mr. Nice said: They do feed the world. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 1 hour ago, endfreemasonscum said: Oh, you mean NASA should actually not do space exploration and should feed African kids instead? Rock solid proof of a hoax huh? Isn't this the job for the almighty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 1 hour ago, endfreemasonscum said: https://appliedsciences.nasa.gov/what-we-do/food-security-agriculture Praise the lord. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 6 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said: Oh, you mean NASA should actually not do space exploration and should feed African kids instead? Rock solid proof of a hoax huh? Isn't this the job for the almighty? Evil bastards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endfreemasonscum Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Nice Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 6 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said: Sigh. It is quite painful to debate something with somebody who blunders into a subject I studied 15 years ago. Somebody who wears his biased bullshit conspiracy blinkers that prevent him from seeing anything else. After the war. Lots of rocket scientists. Some went to Russia. Some went to the USA. They were labelled Nazis because the vast majority worked for the party. Sadly, as in any war .....not by choice. Now a few were subsequently found to be guilty of stuff. 99% were not. Very few made it into managerial roles. Wernher von Braun was the biggest and he was sent out to pasture soon after Apollo. But conspiracy blinkers sees evil nazis and infesting NASA for all time. Do you have anything of substance on this or can it be taken as read that you will just toddle off without saying anything? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 19 hours ago, Mr. Nice said: Sigh. It is quite painful to debate something with somebody who blunders into a subject I studied 15 years ago. Somebody who wears his biased bullshit conspiracy blinkers that prevent him from seeing anything else. After the war. Lots of rocket scientists. Some went to Russia. Some went to the USA. They were labelled Nazis because the vast majority worked for the party. Sadly, as in any war .....not by choice. Now a few were subsequently found to be guilty of stuff. 99% were not. Very few made it into managerial roles. Wernher von Braun was the biggest and he was sent out to pasture soon after Apollo. But conspiracy blinkers sees evil nazis and infesting NASA for all time. Do you have anything of substance on this or can it be taken as read that you will just toddle off without saying anything? These dopes wouldn't even know how to define the term NAZI if you asked them. It's just a word they use to cover everything and anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endfreemasonscum Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 On 3/18/2022 at 6:33 AM, Mr. Nice said: What the hell is this problem with NASA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endfreemasonscum Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 On 3/19/2022 at 5:04 PM, Mr. Nice said: What old technology was lost that should have been kept and what does that have to do with trust? See the post above. And I'm surprised that you didn't know this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 On 3/18/2022 at 11:33 PM, Mr. Nice said: I'll start with the only thing I am aware of - the cover up of the faults with the Challenger launch vehicle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Commission_Report https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRPT-99hrpt1016/pdf/GPO-CRPT-99hrpt1016.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endfreemasonscum Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 On 3/18/2022 at 6:33 AM, Mr. Nice said: What the hell is this problem with NASA? That they lie about everything. Once you look into it just a little, you realize that the whole thing is just a scam. There really isn't a more obvious one. Just google "nasa fails" videos, or look at nasa's own live feeds. Like when they have to cut the feed as they realize these bad actors' have harness issues and are not in anything resembling zero gravity... The nasa theft is obvious. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 3 minutes ago, endfreemasonscum said: That they lie about everything. Once you look into it just a little, you realize that the whole thing is just a scam. There really isn't a more obvious one. Just google "nasa fails" videos, or look at nasa's own live feeds. Like when they have to cut the feed as they realize these bad actors' have harness issues and are not in anything resembling zero gravity... The nasa theft is obvious. Where's the original unedited video of that low quality GIF you posted, the one with no context or reference? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.