Moon landings

[andy1033]

NASA = Never a straight answer

 

I personally believe they did goto moon, but i believe what they hid, was that they used better techs than they told people. ie they were hiding the real technology they used. Even though that was before i was alive, we can see how things work today, and its very likely nasa is a front, for just show, and what really goes on in secret is never told to us.

[Mr. Nice]

1 minute ago, andy1033 said:

NASA = Never a straight answer

 

Andy, that is someone else's quote parroted. Give me some instances where they haven't given a straight answer, because as an agency they pretty much provide every aspect of every mission. 

 

1 minute ago, andy1033 said:

I personally believe they did goto moon, but i believe what they hid, was that they used better techs than they told people. ie they were hiding the real technology they used. Even though that was before i was alive, we can see how things work today, and its very likely nasa is a front, for just show, and what really goes on in secret is never told to us.

 

Ok. So within that paragraph I noticed your opinions which you are free to have of course. But I didn't notice any examples as to why you think this.

[sock muppet]

40 minutes ago, ink said:

Well as they cannot keep any historical information without overwriting it .... and seem to lose 'old' technology .... I think that I would sack them all if they worked for me!

 

I wouldn't trust incompetence :)

 

An excellent point you make there, an historical event of biblical proportions and the original photographs and video tape just, well, vanished, and three...two...one...you're back in the room.

[Mr. Nice]

On 3/19/2022 at 11:24 PM, sock muppet said:

 

An excellent point you make there, an historical event of biblical proportions and the original photographs and video tape just, well, vanished, and three...two...one...you're back in the room.

 

Waited all weekend to reply to this total crap. Here's the thing. Not one peace of that above is accurate, so it keeps making me wonder how much of this whole NASA are the antichrist is just down to ignorance and rubbish research.

 

NONE of the original photographs are missing, lost, deleted or in any jeopardy at all. They are all kept safely stored in chilled storage facilities. Every one of them was copied numerous times and every one of them is online and freely available.

 

None of the video tape used on the mission vanished. The telemetry and slow scan TV BACKUP tapes were overwritten from Apollo 11. All the telemetry was copied onto other media and all the TV was recorded as it was transmitted. These tapes were in short supply and nobody had the presence of mind to keep them, because it wasn't deemed important to keep backups when the data was already stored on other media. 

[sock muppet]

Ok, in the other thread you said all you need to eliminate hostile radiation was a sealed bucket and a space hat, but when i asked you about space idiots in low Earth orbit who's own experience of flashes of light in the eye, you said radiation, and yet in low Earth orbit you have the Earth's magnetic field as a shield as well as a space bucket and space hat and yet radiation still get's through and that's just detected in the eye let alone the whole body, so my conclusion to this is i will never go on a space mission with you because i think it would be dangerous, jus sayin, jus sayin, no need to get huffy.

[Mr. Nice]

1 minute ago, sock muppet said:

Ok, in the other thread you said all you need to eliminate hostile radiation was a sealed bucket and a space hat

 

You are lying! That was in reference to an idiotic claim about UV radiation and nowhere did I coin the phrase about any buckets or hats. The astronauts wore a series of dosimeters and were exposed to small levels of radiation. This was indicative of the shielding rating of the vessel they were in.

 

1 minute ago, sock muppet said:

but when i asked you about space idiots in low Earth orbit who's own experience of flashes of light in the eye, you said radiation

 

Another lie. I said they saw a charged particle. 

 

1 minute ago, sock muppet said:

and yet in low Earth orbit you have the Earth's magnetic field as a shield 

 

And as we can see from the Aurora, the magnetosphere will not stop every single charged particle or stop them from being deflected.

 

1 minute ago, sock muppet said:

as well as a space bucket and space hat and yet radiation still get's through 

 

Again this ignorance about buckets and hats. If they are in the craft they don't wear a helmet and if they are wearing a helmet they aren't in the craft. Instances where charged particles entered through either are not unusual. No system will stop every particle. Exposure to lethal or dangerous levels of radiation involve particles with very high flux and trillions and trillions of them for a significant period. Particles already entered through the hull will have largely been attenuated.

 

1 minute ago, sock muppet said:

 that's just detected in the eye let alone the whole body

 

Haha, gotta laugh it this. They see 1 flash of light in their eyeball from a single charged particle and suddenly they are dosed in radiation levels akin to Chernobyl!

 

1 minute ago, sock muppet said:

so my conclusion to this is i will never go on a space mission with you because i think it would be dangerous, jus sayin, jus sayin, no need to get huffy.

 

Dangerous in that one of us would have no understanding at all of a single thing occurring. That would be you btw.

 

Are we done with the silly claim about pictures and video?

[Given To Fly]

NASA's logo literally has a forked tongue. Add that T (for tongue) along with NASA and you've an anagram of SATAN. And don't get me started on its Nazi connections.

Edited March 22, 2022 by Given To Fly

[Mr. Nice]

33 minutes ago, Given To Fly said:

NASA's logo literally has a forked tongue. 

 

Nope.

The NASA logo is a wonderful example of a timeless, traditional logo. While the sphere evidently signifies a planet, the stars in the meatball represent the space. The red chevron, on the other hand, forms the alternate shape of the constellation Andromeda. It is supposed to be a wing that exemplifies aeronautics.

 

33 minutes ago, Given To Fly said:

Add that T (for tongue) along with NASA and you've an anagram of SATAN.

 

It's not a tongue  and it makes TNASA or Santa That's also gobbleydegook.

 

33 minutes ago, Given To Fly said:

And don't get me started on its Nazi connections.

 

Go on, start. We already covered that in the Moon Hoax nonsense thread, so you might like to read that before posting crap about operation paperclip.

 

So your distrust lies in nonsense about a snake tongue and employing experienced rocket engineers from Germany (most of whom were forced to work for the Nazis). Try again.

[sock muppet]

This looks about right, but hey ho, both are DECEIVERS.

 

 

[sock muppet]

55 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said:

Again this ignorance about buckets and hats. If they are in the craft

 

Again, your idea of a CRAFT is exactly what it says, the CRAFT of make believe, where as my description is more truthful of a space bucket, which is what it is that you would entrust your life in, therefore, sorry bud it's a no go for any space mission i would join you on in a space bucket.

[sock muppet]

1 hour ago, Mr. Nice said:

And as we can see from the Aurora, the magnetosphere will not stop every single charged particle or stop them from being deflected.

 

Again, you dismiss your own argument for here is a visual representation of the enormous amount of radiation and high energy particles spiraling down the lines of magnetic force, exciting the low pressure gas as they go emitting light, and yet you dismiss it as harmless, there are dead Astronauts on the moon!

[sock muppet]

1 hour ago, Given To Fly said:

NASA's logo literally has a forked tongue. Add that T (for tongue) along with NASA and you've an anagram of SATAN

 

And don't forget that timeless statement before every launch where they flaunt it in the worlds face by saying, THAT'S T MINUS!!!

[Mr. Nice]

7 hours ago, sock muppet said:

 

Again, your idea of a CRAFT is exactly what it says, the CRAFT of make believe, where as my description is more truthful of a space bucket, which is what it is that you would entrust your life in, therefore, sorry bud it's a no go for any space mission i would join you on in a space bucket.

 

Okay, well thank you for sharing your opinion. I too feel strangely comforted in the knowledge that I would not need to share any space mission with you.

 

7 hours ago, sock muppet said:

 

Again, you dismiss your own argument for here is a visual representation of the enormous amount of radiation and high energy particles spiraling down the lines of magnetic force, exciting the low pressure gas as they go emitting light, and yet you dismiss it as harmless.

 

I dismiss nothing. You massively conflate it with no understanding. You are like every single conspiracy theorist. You think that YOU know things based on reports from the very people who you claim are lying! You clearly know zilch about this subject. 

 

7 hours ago, sock muppet said:

There are dead Astronauts on the moon!

 

Righto. Got any proof? So they got humans to the surface then

[Mr. Nice]

7 hours ago, sock muppet said:

 

And don't forget that timeless statement before every launch where they flaunt it in the worlds face by saying, THAT'S T MINUS!!!

 

Time. T is for time. Duh. They flaunt it in the world's face do they? This fruitcake "satan" guff

[Mr. Nice]

8 hours ago, sock muppet said:

This looks about right, but hey ho, both are DECEIVERS.

 

The only deception I am seeing is from you doctoring a logo and providing to justification for it.

[sock muppet]

7 hours ago, Mr. Nice said:

You are like every single conspiracy theorist

 

I am a bleeding obvioust (new word i made up between obvious and theorist), and when something is too good to be true, well, it usually is.

 

8 hours ago, Mr. Nice said:

Righto. Got any proof? So they got humans to the surface then

 

Well shockingly NO is the answer to that in terms of PROOF and neither do you, the whole thing IS a media event and that is the TRUTH, but i can see the force is strong in you, i know a little off topic but just curious, what number booster shot are you on now, you know for the non existent virus, well actually it is on topic because MSM never lies does it! Your Government would never lie to you either.

[Mr. Nice]

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

I am a bleeding obvioust (new word i made up between obvious and theorist), and when something is too good to be true, well, it usually is.

 

Nope. You see part of the problem is that you have no clue about the subject so you aren't qualified to offer an opinion on what is obvious.

I just wrote a reasonably detailed reply to you and of course you have nothing in response.

 

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

Well shockingly NO is the answer to that in terms of PROOF and neither do you,

 

That is correct, I have no proof that there are dead astronauts on the Moon. Faceplant time.

 

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

the whole thing IS a media event and that is the TRUTH,

 

Nope. You have no evidence for any of your claims (well none that I can't tear to pieces) and once again you aren't qualified to pronounce, with your clear ignorance of any of this, that you know "the truth".

 

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

but i can see the force is strong in you, 

 

And I can see that you have no evidence or knowledge of any of the subject matter.

 

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

i know a little off topic but just curious, what number booster shot are you on now,

 

Off topic shit, none of your business.

 

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

you know for the non existent virus

 

Sars2 is not non-existent.

 

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

well actually it is on topic because MSM never lies does it! Your Government would never lie to you either.

 

The appeal to incredulity, a pathetic attempt at poisoning the well and off topic bare assertion. NASA is not a government - it is predominantly a large bunch of scientists and engineers.

 

Here we are on page 2 and nobody has offered any tangible reason to mistrust NASA - just noise.

[sock muppet]

1 hour ago, Mr. Nice said:

Sars2 is not non-existent

 

You are correct, my apologies, it's just at my age i forget that a computer simulation qualifies as reality these days!

Or is it Virtual Insanity!

Edited March 22, 2022 by sock muppet
do i have to?

[Mr. Nice]

37 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

 

You are correct, my apologies, it's just at my age i forget that a computer simulation qualifies as reality these days!

Or is it Virtual Insanity!

 

Off topic noise. 

[Given To Fly]

20 hours ago, sock muppet said:

 

And don't forget that timeless statement before every launch where they flaunt it in the worlds face by saying, THAT'S T MINUS!!!

 

I just did a quick search and 't minus' did originate from NASA I'm raring to conclude that it means as you suggested. Never thought of it before. Makes so much sense.

[Given To Fly]

21 hours ago, Mr. Nice said:

 

Nope.

The NASA logo is a wonderful example of a timeless, traditional logo. While the sphere evidently signifies a planet, the stars in the meatball represent the space. The red chevron, on the other hand, forms the alternate shape of the constellation Andromeda. It is supposed to be a wing that exemplifies aeronautics.

 

 

It's not a tongue  and it makes TNASA or Santa That's also gobbleydegook.

 

 

Go on, start. We already covered that in the Moon Hoax nonsense thread, so you might like to read that before posting crap about operation paperclip.

 

So your distrust lies in nonsense about a snake tongue and employing experienced rocket engineers from Germany (most of whom were forced to work for the Nazis). Try again.

 

And you prob believe that the eye, the pyramid and the slogans and hidden symbolism on the back of dollar notes is as non-conspiratorial as well

[sock muppet]

10 minutes ago, Given To Fly said:

 

I just did a quick search and 't minus' did originate from NASA I'm raring to conclude that it means as you suggested. Never thought of it before. Makes so much sense.

 

Always in hidden in plain sight, until you start questioning

[Mr. Nice]

15 minutes ago, Given To Fly said:

 

And you prob believe that the eye, the pyramid and the slogans and hidden symbolism on the back of dollar notes is as non-conspiratorial as well

 

I love the way you take your claim and conflate it with other conspiracy claims. Good effort. The wing is a wing not a forked tongue. The name is NASA not with a silly made up T, or a silly made up anagram. I believe that every single symbol ever has some conspiracy nerd , somewhere, someplace making some "connection". Any symbol on a dollar bill would have the same crowd making the same claims.

[Mr. Nice]

25 minutes ago, Given To Fly said:

 

I just did a quick search and 't minus' did originate from NASA I'm raring to conclude that it means as you suggested. Never thought of it before. Makes so much sense.

 

You're raring are you

[Mr. Nice]

15 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

Always in hidden in plain sight, until you start questioning

 

Oh, that's from....don't tell me.....it will come to me.....conspiracy for beginners. Yep. that's it.

 

All hidden, but where every one can see, but ONLY the really smart conspiracy theorists can work it out. I'll have to look harder - you guys are just amazing.