Proof The Covid Vaccine Is A Political, Economic Invention

[Shining-one]

This was my main argument to support my never taking part in this vaccine program. It's a subtle point you need to look at very logically to grasp.

If this vaccine program was designed to save lives, why should issues around the country of origen, or economic block matter? China, Russia, India. Much as I would refuse the Sputnik vaccine same as all the rest, it appears thus far to have yielded less side effects than AstraZeneca. The latter has left several people I know unwell for weeks, and many more clotting victims that may have been hushed. 

Yet, the EU is demanding "select" vaccines for use essentially as a "passport". I quote:

 

"The European Medicines Agency (EMA), which is the agency of the European Union responsible for the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products, has approved only four Coronavirus vaccines so far, which are:

Comirnaty (BioNTech, Pfizer)

COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna

Vaxzevria (previously COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca)

COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen (Johnson & Johnson)"

 

Two points: Many Russians I talked to rejected Sputnik because they tell me they consider any rushed vaccine too risky. I respond basically I would not want any rushed vaccine wherever it was produced. The bottom line is they were all rushed, at great risk to ourselves, because, pharmaceutical companies wanted to make billions from sales. Putin was the first to try and capitalise so Sputnik was rushed out. Other countries then felt the squeeze so rushed forward a vaccine of their own - to hell with any side effects that may over time create serious health issues for millions of people. 

Consider the following E.U. quote:

 

“They say, Sputnik V is good, but Putin doesn’t care to use it as a cure for the Russian people – he offers it to the world as another hybrid weapon to divide and rule. This is neither new, nor good for mankind,” 

 

????????????

 

I am no fan of Putin. Yet, does anyone seriously believe Sputnik was created as an international, divisive weapon and not intended as a genuine vaccine? 

Let's put it this way: 

If anyone is foolish enough to allow governments to dictate what medication they take, what does it matter what the ethnic origen of a vaccine is? What does it matter which company makes millions of dollars in sales of a toxic substance? Are these people supposedly claiming to save lives or not? What us their motivation, restriction of travel to and from borders, or revenue from rushed pharmaceutical products?

Conclusion: 

I imagine I will look back in 5 years as relieved not to have been taken in by this vaccine-passport farce. 

 

 

 

[Shining-one]

To add, I think the time to get serious about vaccine passports is now. Myself, as I get older, don't feel overly bothered over not being able to travel. However, in my early 30s, I travelled a lot. Spain, France, Estonia, Latvia and Russia. It is amazing to think in the future, politicians feel emboldened to tell us we can't leave our borders unless we risk vaccines that offer no legal compensation, should children wind up with something akin to thalidomide:

 "Many children in the 1960's, like the kindergartner pictured above, were born with phocomelia as a side effect of the drug thalidomide, resulting in the shortening or absence of limbs."

And having been in countries where travel abroad was restricted decades ago, I can say that to sit back passively will result in the train passing by. That is, the last step from democracy to dictatorship is now in the balance unless people get off their proverbial backsides and stand up. 

[Lorna]

I agree with you.

Today I wrote a comment on youtube saying that the AstraZeneca vaccine was not safe and that I was not taking it. I told people to enter VAERS and to check for themselves all the people that have died due to these vaccines from december until now. And I finished saying that the only vaccine that I would take was the Sputnik V.

Well, 15 minutes later, I received an e-mail from google saying that my youtube channel has ben terminated and that I am not able to open a new account ever again (WTF!?).

The reason?. Because we say so. There is something really fishy going on with that vaccine, ladies and gents.

[Pina Colada]

8 hours ago, Shining-one said:

This was my main argument to support my never taking part in this vaccine program. It's a subtle point you need to look at very logically to grasp.

If this vaccine program was designed to save lives, why should issues around the country of origen, or economic block matter? China, Russia, India. Much as I would refuse the Sputnik vaccine same as all the rest, it appears thus far to have yielded less side effects than AstraZeneca. The latter has left several people I know unwell for weeks, and many more clotting victims that may have been hushed. 

Yet, the EU is demanding "select" vaccines for use essentially as a "passport". I quote:

 

"The European Medicines Agency (EMA), which is the agency of the European Union responsible for the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products, has approved only four Coronavirus vaccines so far, which are:

Comirnaty (BioNTech, Pfizer)

COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna

Vaxzevria (previously COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca)

COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen (Johnson & Johnson)"

 

Two points: Many Russians I talked to rejected Sputnik because they tell me they consider any rushed vaccine too risky. I respond basically I would not want any rushed vaccine wherever it was produced. The bottom line is they were all rushed, at great risk to ourselves, because, pharmaceutical companies wanted to make billions from sales. Putin was the first to try and capitalise so Sputnik was rushed out. Other countries then felt the squeeze so rushed forward a vaccine of their own - to hell with any side effects that may over time create serious health issues for millions of people. 

Consider the following E.U. quote:

 

“They say, Sputnik V is good, but Putin doesn’t care to use it as a cure for the Russian people – he offers it to the world as another hybrid weapon to divide and rule. This is neither new, nor good for mankind,” 

 

????????????

 

I am no fan of Putin. Yet, does anyone seriously believe Sputnik was created as an international, divisive weapon and not intended as a genuine vaccine? 

Let's put it this way: 

If anyone is foolish enough to allow governments to dictate what medication they take, what does it matter what the ethnic origen of a vaccine is? What does it matter which company makes millions of dollars in sales of a toxic substance? Are these people supposedly claiming to save lives or not? What us their motivation, restriction of travel to and from borders, or revenue from rushed pharmaceutical products?

Conclusion: 

I imagine I will look back in 5 years as relieved not to have been taken in by this vaccine-passport farce. 

 

 

 

I think that the different vaccines from different countries is just a ploy to persuade people that this product is safe, however that one is not.

It's all an illusion because the whole thing is orchestrated from a central point, the Russia versus China versus American etc is just an illusion. 

Also the "vaccine " was doubtless manufactured or at least parts if it were and researched long ago,  this whole narrative about how it's all been miraculously created by scientists in response to a sudden crisis is all just more lies.

Sure, the shareholders at big pharma will get richer, but it's not just about money.

The vaccine so called literally makes the person into an organic part of the Smart grid. 

That's what I think, anyway. 

[DarianF]

How's this for a bullshit cover story?

 

Needle phobia could be the cause of 10% of COVID vaccine hesitancy in the UK – new research

https://theconversation.com/needle-phobia-could-be-the-cause-of-10-of-covid-vaccine-hesitancy-in-the-uk-new-research-162678

 

You couldn't make it up

[Shining-one]

Lorna, this is what I suggest. Contact the admin of YouTube or Google and inform them of your intention to publicise the fact they are censoring freedom of speech, expression and the right to disagree where vital issues of health are concerned. By "publicise" I mean making friends, family, social groups aware of the censorship issue. Given these platforms already censored David Icke, I tend to stick to my old line of zero tolerance by consumers. Anti vaxers very much differ and some aren't generally anti vax in cases where said vaccine has been subjected to prolonged testing. We have a right to our particular view and the option to blacklist social media sites that block free expression. Not sure what percentage anti vaxers are globally but I figure there are enough of us to give out negative feedback. Personally I tend to exploit division. There are video channels on Yandex.com and I've seen David Ickes videos there. Funny thing is the Navalniy videos and forums are all censored but anti vax discussion is allowed, even if Sputnik gets criticized. Google likewise is suffering control in China and Russia as they no longer have a monopoly. A dose of their own disdain for free opinion. People should not use these media channels and seek alternatives.

[Shining-one]

I still tend not to view this as a conspiracy. To me it's more like the European Witch hysteria, where certain parties exploit the fear of the masses for gain. For example, refusing tourists who had Sputnik rules out Indians, Chinese and Turks, amongst others. We know Sputnik is better than Astra Zeneca to date but governments have the objective to sell medications. So they refuse Sputnik to protect their market - and could care less about blood clots. Likewise they can stop transit from non EU countries. Clearly, Russia and China may blacklist opposing vaccines too. So people like me who studied Russian seemingly wasted their time.The crucial thing is all of this totally discredits the vaccine as a risky, economic farce. It's rushed, dangerous, unproven and unscientific as a marketed product. Knowing what I know, I'd not touch it with a ten foot barge pole.

[The Old Knight]

On 6/18/2021 at 10:16 PM, Shining-one said:

“They say, Sputnik V is good, but Putin doesn’t care to use it as a cure for the Russian people – he offers it to the world as another hybrid weapon to divide and rule. This is neither new, nor good for mankind,” 

 

????????????

 

I am no fan of Putin. Yet, does anyone seriously believe Sputnik was created as an international, divisive weapon and not intended as a genuine vaccine? 

Let's put it this way: 

If anyone is foolish enough to allow governments to dictate what medication they take, what does it matter what the ethnic origen of a vaccine is? What does it matter which company makes millions of dollars in sales of a toxic substance? Are these people supposedly claiming to save lives or not? What us their motivation, restriction of travel to and from borders, or revenue from rushed pharmaceutical products?

Conclusion: 

I imagine I will look back in 5 years as relieved not to have been taken in by this vaccine-passport farce. 

 

 

 

 

Made me think of this from a few years back, people were collecting genetic samples from Russians including the Pentagon. If you had genetic data collected from all around the world you could make specific bio weapons to target certain ethnicity's, if you wanted them all targeted you'd have a complete genetic map. 

 

 

Skip to: 2:25

 

 

 

Edited June 19, 2021 by The Old Knight

[Pina Colada]

15 hours ago, DarianF said:

How's this for a bullshit cover story?

 

Needle phobia could be the cause of 10% of COVID vaccine hesitancy in the UK – new research

https://theconversation.com/needle-phobia-could-be-the-cause-of-10-of-covid-vaccine-hesitancy-in-the-uk-new-research-162678

 

You couldn't make it up

Omg.

 

They are desperate to coerce every man woman and child to take the death jab.

 

From the article:

But the COVID-19 vaccination programme means that almost everyone has had to – or will soon have to – face the needle.