Jump to content

Did it come out of a lab


jack121
 Share

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

A senior Whitehall security source confirmed that British intelligence officials are co-operating with the new American investigation in an attempt to establish the truth about the pandemic.

 

Britain, together with the US, has been highly critical of an investigation by WHO into the origins of the outbreak, claiming China deliberately withheld access to data and samples when a WHO team made a four-week visit to Wuhan in January. 

On Friday night, it emerged many leading scientific journals including Nature Medicine declined to publish evidence showing the virus may have been engineered in a lab.

Last April vaccine specialists contacted several journals over concerns that structural details in the virus which looked man-made were being ignored, as well as pointing out flaws in previously published papers which indicated the virus was natural.

Many people who claim that a lab escape of an engineered virus is a likely scenario for the outbreak of coronavirus, said it was "outrageous" that journals had failed to publish reports from leading scientists.

 

Some scientific journals absolutely refused to publish anything that disagreed with the Chinese view. Nature Medicine at the front of the queue, Nature has been absolutely outrageous in the way they have co-operated with the Chinese narrative.

It included a research review highlighting how Chinese scientists had spent more than a decade conducting "gain of function" experiments to make bat viruses more deadly to humans, so they could get a head start on creating diseases. 

They pointed to inserts in the coronavirus genome that appeared to be evidence of this activity.

 

Madelena Skipper, the editor in chief of Nature, said:

"We are very much in the middle of the pandemic. I would say right now the real question is to deal with the pandemic, the infections, the deaths, and how to persuade more people to take the vaccination, rather than wasting time on the virus' origin. To the best of my knowledge the theory that it is a man-made virus should not be discussed as it is a distraction."

On Friday, Lawrence Young, professor of molecular oncolo at Warwick University, said there were still unanswered questions about a lab leak and "a lot of concern" among scientists that the WHO's investigation was very superficial and not detailed in the slightest.

Prof Young told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme: "They were not given access to any of the primary data within that laboratory. It feels too much of a coincidence, doesn't it, that the original cases were detected in Wuhan, and what you have in the middle of it all a huge center working on creating viruses."

Edited by jack121
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

If Covid does exist, this explanation is more likely, but I doubt if it was an accidental release from the Lab in Wuhan.

Today the Daily Mail reports

 

COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor' and WAS created by Chinese scientists who then tried to cover their tracks with 'retro-engineering' to make it seem like it naturally arose from bats, explosive new study claims

"The paper's authors, British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen, wrote that they have had 'prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China' for a year - but were ignored by academics and major journals"

 

  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9629563/Chinese-scientists-created-COVID-19-lab-tried-cover-tracks-new-study-claims.html

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A pattern I have noticed. 

Last year Trump says it came from a Chinese lab and was shouted down, called the usual names.

Last year Italians said they had found traces in sewer water from 2019 it was said then to be impossible at the time.

 

A year later both those stances have now been claimed by governments .. so I will watch out for other discredited things !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they can show proof by way of an isolated virus, then we can talk about where it originated. We do know that American and Chinese doctors and scientists have been conducting gain of function experiments in China and in the USA for years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/29/2021 at 7:11 AM, jack121 said:

 

Prof Young told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme: "They were not given access to any of the primary data within that laboratory. It feels too much of a coincidence, doesn't it, that the original cases were detected in Wuhan, and what you have in the middle of it all a huge center working on creating viruses."

 

Logic would dictate that this is the most likely origin of it. Been thinking this from day one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also have the epicentre of 5G in Wuhan.

 

Evidence over the last 18 months suggests that there is no virus, and never was a virus. Strains of the common cold used to create hysteria and unnecessary hospital and carehome deaths as part of the Great Reset, with microwave radiation and vaccinations in tandem with relentless fear propganda, divide & conquer tactics, destruction of the economy and enforced social behaviour changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...