Transgender Trend

[Malbec]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12579459/GRAHAM-LINEHAN-world-remember-Daniel-Radcliffe-Emma-Watson-Rupert-Grint-arrogant-ungrateful-cowards-turning-J-K-Rowling-trans-row.html

 

His Wikipedia page describes him as an "anti trangender activist" whereas he maintains that he is for women's rights. He was recently cancelled from an event at Edinburgh fringe Festival this summer. 

 

I did find the womens rights argument quite confusing at first (it sort of presented as not a huge thing that people need to be worrying about?) but he articulates the point quite well within this article. 

 

[Observations]

I heard this question on GB News to Louise Distras

 

"Why has this taken hold in the music industry?"

 

Louise's reply ended with;

 

"I think we should let it die and let all the cowards go down with the ship, build a new industry ..."

 

I looked her up, and found a bit of a hornets nest

 

"Your position will have further detrimental effects on your musical career if you continue to deny transgender women are women and transgender are men"

 

Wikipedia;

In an interview with Vocal Media, Distras criticised Ireland's new hate speech laws, saying "We should all be able to speak without being policed and told what we can and can't say about our own lives."

 

Alongside five other women, Distras featured in a Daily Mail article about the experiences of ordinary women being ostracised from their jobs for questioning gender ideology.

 

In an interview with writer Julie Bindel for UnHerd about misogyny in the music industry, Distras said that "the music industry used to be about freedom of expression and freedom of speech", and there was "an urgent need to build a new one with a proper counterculture, where women have actually got a proper say".

[Mitochondrial Eve]

Although this article in the Telegraph has attracted some criticism, namely that it is overblowing its claims, it does appear that there are signs of rolling back on the transgender agenda. In this instance, changes to the NHS constitution are being proposed which will define sex as "biological sex" and could mean restricting single sex wards by way of this definition.

 

I see signs of backtracking taking into consideration that there have now been several court cases which have confirmed the fundamental human right to hold philosophical beliefs about the immutability of biological sex as in the Maya Forstater, James Esses and Rachel Meade cases. In each of these cases, they were found to have been discriminated against for not buying into transgender ideology.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/30/nhs-sex-biological-landmark-shift-against-gender-ideology/

Sex is biological fact, NHS declares in landmark shift against gender ideology

Campaigners welcome change to constitution, which will ban trans women from female-only wards, as ‘return to common sense’

Quote

The NHS is to declare that sex is a matter of biology in a landmark shift against gender ideology.

 

Changes to the health service’s written constitution proposed by ministers will for the first time ban trans women from women-only wards, and give women the right to request a female doctor for intimate care.

 

The NHS constitution, a document that aims to set out the principles and values of the health service and legal rights for patients and staff, was last updated in 2015. It has to be updated at least every 10 years by the Secretary of State. 

 

Campaigners for women’s rights welcomed the significant shift, which comes after years of wrangling and follows accusations that the health service had been captured by “gender ideology”.

 

In 2021, NHS guidance said trans patients could be placed in single-sex wards based on the gender with which they identified. The new constitution will state: “We are defining sex as biological sex.”

 

The clarification means that the right to a single-sex ward means patients would “not have to share sleeping accommodation with patients of the opposite biological sex”.

 

Until now, no commitment was made to biological sex, meaning some female patients complained that they were forced to share sleeping space with trans women – those who are born male but identify as female.

 

Women’s rights campaigners said the move was a “return to common sense and an overdue recognition that women’s wellbeing and safety matter.”

However, NHS leaders raised concerns that the health service was being “dragged into a pre-election culture wars debate”.

 

The changes to the constitution are a further indication of a change in attitudes after the Cass review into the NHS’s gender identity services found evidence that allowing children to change gender was built on weak foundations.

 

Dr Hilary Cass, a paediatrician, said allowing “social transitioning” for young people – when they are treated as the opposite gender – could “change their trajectory” and lead to them pursuing a potentially damaging medical pathway in later life.

 

The updates to the constitution will also include the introduction of a duty to help patients get back to work and embed “Martha’s Rule” into the framework of the health service.

 

This follows pledges by Victoria Atkins, the Health Secretary, to give families the right to access a rapid review from an outside team if a patient is deteriorating. It is named after 13-year-old Martha Mills, who died in 2021 after medics missed signs of sepsis and failed to heed warnings from her parents that their daughter’s condition was getting worse.

 

Women will also be given the right to request that intimate care is provided, where reasonably possible, by someone of the same biological sex.

 

It follows warnings that some female patients have been pressured into accepting such care from trans-identifying staff who were born male.

 

The proposed changes will also see discrimination requirements updated, with the word gender replaced with sex.

 

Gender reassignment remains a protected characteristic, meaning that a transgender patient could be given their own room in a hospital to protect their right to a single-sex service.

 

The document also places a duty on health providers to use “clear terms” to communicate and take account of biological differences. It follows pledges from ministers to stop NHS trusts using terms like “chestfeeding” and “people who give birth”.

 

In February, Ms Atkins highlighted her concerns, telling The Telegraph: “We need to be making this robust case to refuse to wipe women out of the conversation.”

 

On Tuesday, she said: “We want to make it abundantly clear that if a patient wants same-sex care they should have access to it wherever reasonably possible.

“We have always been clear that sex matters and our services should respect that.

 

“By putting this in the NHS constitution we’re highlighting the importance of balancing the rights and needs of all patients to make a healthcare system that is faster, simpler and fairer for all.”

 

Maya Forstater, chief executive of gender critical group Sex Matters, said: “It is excellent news that the NHS constitution is being revised to put ‘sex’ in its rightful place – at the heart of principle 1, which sets out that the NHS must treat everyone with equality and respect for their human rights.

 

“The confusion between ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ in official policies like the NHS constitution is what has enabled women’s rights to be trampled over in the name of transgender identities.

 

“Sex, of course, is a matter of biology, not identity, and it is welcome that the NHS is now spelling this out in relation to single-sex accommodation and intimate care.”

 

Ms Forstater said too many female patients seeking that intimate care be given by a woman had been pressured into accepting a trans-identifying male instead.

“Healthcare providers have become confused and frightened by the idea that a gender recognition certificate, or even just a personal identity claim, overrides other people’s rights when it comes to same-sex care from healthcare professionals.”

 

She said the shift was “simply a return to common sense and an overdue recognition that women’s wellbeing and safety matter.”

 

Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents healthcare leaders, said its members would review the proposals in detail. However, he added: “What is absolutely clear at this stage is that a focus on high-quality care for all is maintained and that the NHS is not dragged into a pre-election culture wars debate. This is not where energies should be focused.”

 

Mr Taylor said staff worked hard to show fairness and compassion towards all patients. “In particular, groups of people, including trans and non-binary patients, continue to receive some of the worst health outcomes of any group in our society and NHS leaders and staff will want to do all they can to support these patients, as well as their trans and non-binary staff to reduce inequalities. “Whatever changes are eventually introduced following the consultation need to be clear and workable for NHS staff, who should not expect to have to interpret ambiguous guidance at a local level.”

 

The eight-week consultation will be the first stage of a review of the constitution.

 

The Government will consider responses from everyone, including the public, clinicians and medical professionals, patients, carers and organisations representing patients and staff and health stakeholders, before publishing the consultation response and the new NHS constitution.

 

Louise Ansari, chief executive of Healthwatch England said: “The NHS constitution plays a crucial role in shaping the culture of our NHS and helping the public to know their rights.

 

“Since the NHS constitution launched, it has helped to shift the balance of power from services towards patients and their families. But, with only a third of people knowing their rights, there is still a long way to go.

 

“Given the challenges our NHS faces, a conversation to reaffirm and raise awareness of the most important rights to the public has never been more timely.

“We urge everyone to take part in the consultation and have their say. This is your opportunity to send a clear message about the rights you hold most dear.”

[DaleP]

I think the transgender trend is promoted because they don't want men because women are chaotic by nature and they want more chaos in the world. Also, if they fuck up people's mind and they don't know which gender they belong to, they will be mentally fucked up and by dealing with it, you waste your time and energy when in fact you should be doing something more productive.

 

On 5/4/2024 at 3:15 AM, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

In warfare a long accepted strategy is to injure the enemy so his companions need to rescue him thus removing assets from the enemy active rolls.

 

An assault can be crippled if enough booby traps or snipers are strategically positioned for this purpose.

 

As warfare evolves in the sophistication of it's weaponry we find a similar strategy at work with the jab as the weapon.

 

The person injured and incapacitated by the jab must be cared for meaning resources are diverted from the pool of otherwise productive people resulting in societal structural decay.

 

Weakening us, the perceived enemy.

[Mitochondrial Eve]

As the NHS is showing signs of rolling back on the transgender trend as per my post above, the same may also apply to schools according to this BBC article.

 

Again this is only draft guidance, but it does nevertheless show increasing caution when it comes to pushing gender identity and it looks likely that schools will be directed not to teach this concept nor expose children to disturbing content. Other restrictions concerning sex education in schools are also being suggested and rules will be strengthened in order for parents to have easier access to teaching materials to see what is being taught.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/education-69017920

Schools told not to teach about gender identity

Quote

Announcing the guidance, Mr Sunak said: "Parents rightly trust that when they send their children to school, they are kept safe and will not be exposed to disturbing content that is inappropriate for their age.

 

"That's why I was horrified to hear reports of this happening in our classrooms last year".

 

Ms Keegan said the new guidance had been motivated by a request from teachers "to provide more clarity" on age-appropriate sex education, but she had also seen reports of "campaign groups' or lobby groups' materials" being used in classrooms.

 

She said she had received evidence of lesson slides including "things like choosing lots of different genders and identities and saying which ones of these are gender identities - the spectrum. The sort of, 'it can be a spectrum, it's fluid, you can have different genders on different days' or 'there's 72 of them'. That kind of thing".

 

The education secretary admitted to BBC Radio 4's Today programme that she did not know how widespread the issue was as "it's not something that we've gone and done a particular survey of", but said she did not think it was common.

 

[cia]

Although I think india has far too much intolerance for LGBT on average for this to work very well, I think they're starting the transgender agenda here too. I'm wondering how and when they're going to achieve this in our developing countries.

Quote

 

Unfortunately, India is going the American way. The Department of Gender Studies at NCERT recently, published a training manual for teachers that encapsulated elements of Gender Identity Politics. The document blamed ‘caste patriarchy’ for the stigma against transgenders and railed against ‘binary’ in schools, such as different seating arrangements for boys and girls and different lines for them during assemblies. It claimed that the binary basis of toilets for boys and girls was a problem, although it later suggested a third unisex toilet be added. The document also suggested raising awareness about puberty blockers. Puberty blockers are medicines that block the natural development of puberty among children. Certain western countries have permitted children to receive puberty blockers without their parents’ consent.

At the Tagore International School, a photograph was shown to children by an LGBT Rights group that showed a man breastfeeding a child after developing enlarged breasts. 

 

 

lol

 

Edited May 19, 2024 by cia

[cia]

https://www.opindia.com/2021/03/canadian-man-jailed-for-calling-his-biologically-female-child-as-daughter/

 

This shits real?

[peter]

It seems to me that Australians are the most obliging  ( stupid ) nation on earth ,in most countries trans fats have been banned because they are extremely detrimental to ones health just like I suspect being a fat trans would be, both physical and mental, it just makes me wonder why they're both still tolerated  ( one needs to be banned the other needs help) 

PS before a member of the rainbow alphabet community gets up on their high horse and talks about feelings, the writings in Mark Manson book will have come into effect so you are wasting your time

[DaleP]

On 5/28/2024 at 12:45 AM, peter said:

It seems to me that Australians are the most obliging  ( stupid ) nation on earth ,in most countries trans fats have been banned because they are extremely detrimental to ones health just like I suspect being a fat trans would be, both physical and mental, it just makes me wonder why they're both still tolerated  ( one needs to be banned the other needs help) 

PS before a member of the rainbow alphabet community gets up on their high horse and talks about feelings, the writings in Mark Manson book will have come into effect so you are wasting your time

 

I don't know about stupid but it appears to me that the authority is much more heavy handed, more authoritarian compared to UK. In UK, it appears to be, in terms of the police, but it is touch and go because they can't appear to look too forceful as it make obvious, go against the British tradition.

 

'a member of the rainbow alphabet community'.....

Edited May 30, 2024 by DaleP

[SuperstarNeilC]

 

[webtrekker]

Monty Python had this shit sorted years ago ...

 

 

 

 

 

[BornFreeNowAgain]

On 5/31/2024 at 12:24 AM, DaleP said:

 

I don't know about stupid but it appears to me that the authority is much more heavy handed, more authoritarian compared to UK. In UK, it appears to be, in terms of the police, but it is touch and go because they can't appear to look too forceful as it make obvious, go against the British tradition.

 

'a member of the rainbow alphabet community'.....

Yep, COVID showed many Australians (as well as shocked them) at just how 'brutal' the authority in this Country could be. Australia is a 'modern-day' experiment, much like the USA was previously. All the brainwashing of being in 'the Lucky Country', being 'The Best Country in the World' and 'She'll be right mate', have put Australians in a illusion of Utopia. Steve Hughes (the comedian) called it right at the beginning of the scamdemic when he doubted Australia would put up much fight because it doesn't have the history of fighting for anything like large parts of Europe have. The other side of Australia is that it is made up of mostly immigrants; who tend to just be grateful for a seemingly better Country to live in with opportunities. 

 

It will be interesting if Australians wake up over the next couple of years. One of the things that have helped all the above has been the 'pay-offs' that Australians have enjoyed up until now; relatively safe Country, great weather, opportunities, the Australian version of the 'American dream' of home ownership, and an innocence that few Countries enjoy (if you forget the fact the Country was stolen from Native Australians, which many are/have been willing to do). But the 'pay-offs' are coming to an end, will Australians now revolt and wake up, only time will tell. Cracks are appearing in the illusion, let us hope they turn into massive craters. 

[BornFreeNowAgain]

On 5/8/2024 at 12:37 AM, DaleP said:

I think the transgender trend is promoted because they don't want men because women are chaotic by nature and they want more chaos in the world. Also, if they fuck up people's mind and they don't know which gender they belong to, they will be mentally fucked up and by dealing with it, you waste your time and energy when in fact you should be doing something more productive.

 

Yep, certainly they want to weaken males, probably ready for the next stage with the World military and army to dampen any pushbacks. There is a reason that immigrants of fighting age are turning up in a number of 'developed' Countries at this time. 

 

I think another possible reason is to divert the many 'lost Souls' who feel they 'don't belong or don't fit in' or those that just feel different. If the theory that Starseeds, Blue Rays, Indigo's and other such beings is true, and that they have incarnated to assist other Souls, it would make sense that many people are feeling very lost right now. I have felt that way for most of my life, which I am sure some others here can relate to. In my day, there wasn't really anything 'they' could divert me towards, other than perhaps Mental Health which thankfully never happened in my case. But these days, one of the main weapons 'they' use when someone feels 'lost' or 'different' is to divert them towards believing they have been born with the wrong gender. What better way than to ensure these Souls don't just figure out that they came here for a reason, and to find out what their purpose is. Left to figure out what is different about them , they would figure out they are a Soul trapped in a simulated prison, as we all would and why the main intent of the 'rulers' is to inhibit our Spiritual Growth. Perhaps more are being born here these days though which would make sense given the critical juncture we find ourselves right now. 

[DaleP]

7 hours ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

Yep, COVID showed many Australians (as well as shocked them) at just how 'brutal' the authority in this Country could be. Australia is a 'modern-day' experiment, much like the USA was previously. All the brainwashing of being in 'the Lucky Country', being 'The Best Country in the World' and 'She'll be right mate', have put Australians in a illusion of Utopia. Steve Hughes (the comedian) called it right at the beginning of the scamdemic when he doubted Australia would put up much fight because it doesn't have the history of fighting for anything like large parts of Europe have. The other side of Australia is that it is made up of mostly immigrants; who tend to just be grateful for a seemingly better Country to live in with opportunities. 

 

It will be interesting if Australians wake up over the next couple of years. One of the things that have helped all the above has been the 'pay-offs' that Australians have enjoyed up until now; relatively safe Country, great weather, opportunities, the Australian version of the 'American dream' of home ownership, and an innocence that few Countries enjoy (if you forget the fact the Country was stolen from Native Australians, which many are/have been willing to do). But the 'pay-offs' are coming to an end, will Australians now revolt and wake up, only time will tell. Cracks are appearing in the illusion, let us hope they turn into massive craters. 

 

Interesting take on it and I agree.

It's not recorded in the genes. But then again.....what's happening in Scotland? I thought there was a film called Brave Heart.

 

[peter]

20 hours ago, webtrekker said:

Monty Python had this shit sorted years ago ...

 

 

 

 

 

One of my all time favorite shows,I must have seen it at least 20 times and I still laugh my head off

[peter]

On 6/8/2024 at 9:55 AM, webtrekker said:

Monty Python had this shit sorted years ago ...

 

Are they the peoples front of Judea or the Judean peoples front ,I can never remember but one of them are splitters

 

 

 

 

Edited June 9, 2024 by peter

[peter]

On 6/8/2024 at 5:17 PM, BornFreeNowAgain said:

 But the 'pay-offs' are coming to an end, will Australians now revolt and wake up, only time will tell. Cracks are appearing in the illusion, let us hope they turn into massive craters. 

I don't think so ,in my estimation most are apathetic bastards and wont stand up for what they believe. Having said that a lot didn't have a choice(it's not mentioned in the media but there are class actions being brought against the government and the drug companies). Until the people band together nothing will change ,you cant do it by yourself you need the numbers. I've mentioned this before but when it was mandatory to sign in and wear a mask everywhere I walked into the police station without a mask and didn't sign in, you can imagine the kerfuffle that caused ,anyway I handed them a piece of paper with a number on it  and told them to give it a call,it was the anti- discrimination dept of the Queensland government ,straight away they quietened down and I did what I had to do and left . The point I'm making  is it made no difference,did anything change? no and there lies the problem.With any new unpopular thing  the government brings in they will hammer dissenters very hard at the outset to make an example to the rest of the sheep and it works extremely effectively, as a matter of fact that modus operandi has been used effectively since the dawn of civilization the only difference being we have moved away from public beheadings and hangings to destroying someone financially but the outcome is still the same with regards to societal behavior .

As I said before you need the numbers ( Ps and some balls)

[wagdog19]

Pretend you are a Giant Panda by giving yourself 2 black eyes, eating bamboo shoots and refusing to have sex with your partner.

[cemeterycrow]

UK Supreme Court rules trans women are not legally women under Equality Act 

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/supreme-court-woman-definition-ruling-legal-uk-latest-news-b2734201.html

 

Quote

 

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that the Equality Act’s definition of a woman is based on biological sex.

Five judges unanimously decided that transgender women with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) should not be treated as a woman under the 2010 Equality Act.

 

 

So this country had to go all the way to the Supreme Court to be allowed to say without fear of prosecution or persecution that men.......are not women.

How did this country and the west in general get to this state of madness and idiocy that this had to happen.

 

Personally speaking I don't really care if a man wants to dress, live or identify as a woman but they are not women and I don't understand why this was ever a point of contention.

[wagdog19]

52 minutes ago, cemeterycrow said:

UK Supreme Court rules trans women are not legally women under Equality Act 

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/supreme-court-woman-definition-ruling-legal-uk-latest-news-b2734201.html

 

 

So this country had to go all the way to the Supreme Court to be allowed to say without fear of prosecution or persecution that men.......are not women.

How did this country and the west in general get to this state of madness and idiocy that this had to happen.

 

Personally speaking I don't really care if a man wants to dress, live or identify as a woman but they are not women and I don't understand why this was ever a point of contention.

P.R.S. imo. The ptb have achieved whatever objective they had, now onto phase 2 of their agenda. It will be sinister and twisted for sure. Sick f#%ks. 

[Anti Facts Sir]

I doubt this is the end of it.

 

But yeah, the whole concept of choosing genders and over-riding biology to mutilate yourself, and then push this concept onto vulnerable children, is beyond me.

[cemeterycrow]

3 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

I doubt this is the end of it.

 

But yeah, the whole concept of choosing genders and over-riding biology to mutilate yourself, and then push this concept onto vulnerable children, is beyond me.

The damage is already done I guess, no doubt they will be out shouting 'trans rights now' in every city centre all over the country all year long.

 

 

lol

Edited April 16 by cemeterycrow

[Anti Facts Sir]

Lots of weirdos on the BBC headlines tonight. That'll help the cause in the public's mind.

[cemeterycrow]

Quote

Children of all ages who believe they are transgender will be eligible for gender treatment on the NHS, including therapy and counselling. Previously, a minimum age limit of seven years old was to be introduced, yet this was scrapped following a consultation. An inside source at the health service close to the consultation process, revealed to The Telegraph that NHS England had “caved to the pressure” of transgender activists.

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2055391/trans-toddlers-be-given-nhs

 

 

Edited May 16 by cemeterycrow

[Grumpy Owl]

Ahead of Pride month in June, the annual Pride event takes over Birmingham city centre this weekend.

 

Yet, some people are still not satisfied!

 

Pride to go 'back to roots' after new home search

Quote

Eva Echo, Birmingham Pride's director of innovation, said: "The trans+ community is still ignored by politicians at local and national level.

"For too long we've been talked over, used for political gain and forced to watch as our rights are stripped away, and our existence twisted beyond recognition."

from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2jj8zn9zzo

 

Whose rights are being stripped away? They have the same rights as every other man or woman in this country, basic human rights that is.

 

When we should all be striving for equality, these groups somehow WANT to be treated differently, hence all the noise they continue to make.

 

It's difficult to ignore them really, when it's being shoved in everyone's faces every day!