Guest Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 17 minutes ago, Icke-Kia said: May be we should ask Dave about it, he does claim to be made directly by God unlike most others. What exactly would you mean by that remark? Personally I have no 'man made' god ....... that which made me I have no name for and would not try to comprehend that which they are nor give that which they are a 'name'. I have what I call a 'teacher' who is not of this realm ....... who guides me in this 'hel' but they are not that which created me. Although ....... they do hope that I will become 'born' out from this 'place' and thus actualise as an individual, independent awareness! But back on topic .... We will know if an alien invasion 'show' is real or fake just via .... If it is promoted on television and the internet then it is fake. First rule of domination .... Disrupt all your opponents communications. So all the tele and mobiles will NOT work if it is real (for want of a better word .... maybe reel .... as a film reel) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 3 minutes ago, ink said: What exactly would you mean by that remark? Personally I have no 'man made' god ....... that which made me I have no name for and would not try to comprehend that which they are nor give that which they are a 'name'. I have what I call a 'teacher' who is not of this realm ....... who guides me in this 'hel' but they are not that which created me. Although ....... they do hope that I will become 'born' out from this 'place' and thus actualise as an individual, independent being! But back on topic .... We will know if an alien invasion 'show' is real or fake just via .... If it is promoted on television and the internet then it is fake. First rule of domination .... Disrupt all you opponents communications. So all the tele and mobiles will NOT work if it is real (for want of a better word .... maybe reel .... as a film reel) Dave claims to be made directly by God whereas most others are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 3 minutes ago, Icke-Kia said: Dave claims to be made directly by God whereas most others are not. To clarify .... which Dave? And you are made from your mum and dad then and you have nothing else within you? <<<< Is that correct? I thought this may be off topic but a 'fake alien' show may well include some type of man made 'small god' .... to make the mass fearful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 David Icke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 Just now, Icke-Kia said: David Icke. So you contend that most do not claim to be made by a god! 30 minutes ago, Icke-Kia said: he does claim to be made directly by God unlike most others. So the most others being the 2 billion Christians, 1.7 billion Muslims .... plus all the other 'most others' who have a faith? Having a quick / dirty look .... atheists define much less than 1 billion thus your comment "most others" is woefully incorrect! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 (edited) David Icke claims to be made directly by God where most others are not. What i think or others are has nothing to do with his claim. Its not my claim it's his. Edited May 23, 2021 by Icke-Kia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 14 minutes ago, Icke-Kia said: David Icke claims to be made directly by God where most others are not. What i think or others are has nothing to do with his claim. Am I getting this correctly .... You are claiming that David has stated that "most others" are NOT made by a 'god'? Or do you mean that "most others" do not consider that they are made by a 'god'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 The first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 9 minutes ago, Icke-Kia said: The first. Please may I have the video or text of this claim .... I am not saying you are incorrect, it may just be that I have never witness such a statement! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 Well that cut off a bit sudden so excuse me but I just watched the 2nd part and will now watch the third before making judgement (but he has not as yet stated as you state) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 (edited) Yes he did in the first part, 5 mins in. So if hes not saying he was created by God and most others are not, then explain his this does not make me special, better claim. If hes not claiming to be different why say that? Edited May 23, 2021 by Icke-Kia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 So part three and I will address the words David said in the first part which are not as you have stated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 That claim was mild by Dave's standards... Quote Icke, David In March 1991, a former U.K. soccer star, spokesperson for the Green party, and broadcaster named David Icke called a press conference in London to announce a number of upcoming world-shaking events revealed to him personally, he said, by Socrates, “the Godhead,” Jesus Christ, and various other spirits. They had chosen him, he said, to be the “channel for the Christ spirit.” The press paid close attention and published lengthy interviews with Mr. Icke. Mr. Icke declared that “disruptive thought vibrations” originating with the Sicilian Mafia and the Tiananmen Square massacre in China had combined to set in motion a cataclysm that would first be evidenced when Mount Rainier in the United States would explode. No date was given. This would be followed, he said, by the complete disappearance of New Zealand, the collapse of the Channel Tunnel, the fall of Naples Cathedral, and an unspecified failure of the Texas oil fields. These events would be brought about by the “archangel Ak-Taurus,” who, he said, had previously managed to thwart an attempt by the citizens of Atlantis to avoid the submersion of that civilization. The Atlanteans, said Mr. Icke, had been urged to tune in to the “power point” at Stonehenge, but they did not heed the warning and were thus destroyed. He also revealed that both King Arthur and Merlin, along with the archangels, have now turned off the power at Stonehenge so that Ak-Taurus cannot use it against mankind. What a relief! By Christmas 1991, Mr. Icke predicted, Cuba, Greece, the Isle of Arran, the cliffs of Kent, and Teeside would be hit by a great earthquake (8.0 on the Richter scale) that would submerge them. Mr. Icke has since stated that at the time he made these predictions he knew they were crazy. I have no disagreement with that evaluation. https://web.randi.org/i---encyclopedia-of-claims.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 (sorry I do have 'life' shit I have to do so excuse my tardy response) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 52 minutes ago, ink said: I will address the words David said in the first part which are not as you have stated. I wonder what you said back in 1991? I said many things but I have learnt more and grown since then! Anyway …. He was taking about frequencies within people and said this: "So we have this situation with frequencies and people and beings on different times of their evolution …." (then is asked about reincarnation and answers that by stating that it is a learning process via evolution and experience) "So beings on this frequency at this time are, er, have all been created by various beings, not the being necessary we know as God, the Godhead as it is said to us, because the Godhead has created certain beings directly but once you reach a certain frequency, due to evolution, you have the ability also to create beings, and it’s this process of creating beings, the Godhead creating beings, those beings then evolving to the point where they can, creating more, them going up and so on, that has created this pyramid effect of creation from the initial 3 beings that started out creation right down to the vast number we have now." (interrupted but wishes to finish what he is saying) "Some beings therefore are created directly by this being called the Godhead or God as this being has/is called in the bible and they are known as the sons and daughters of God, in simple fashion. Jesus was one of them and there are many others and I just happen to be, fortunately, one of them also which is why this title comes about. It does not make me one percent, half a percent, a millimetre of a percent, better than anyone else, it just makes me a being that has been created in that way." So this is NOT as you state as far as I read the meaning (even though it is quite something that someone feels that words said 30 years ago should hold sway now) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gone Fishing... Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 David says that we are all just different points of attention of the same one consciousness Which would mean that your body you inhabit in this reality is merely an experience you are having in this reality and that is why David tells people not to obsess about race and things because you are in this world but not of it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TetraG Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 3 hours ago, ink said: So this is NOT as you state as far as I read the meaning Allow me to chip in, a fragment of your time... So since the dawn of inception & the dawn of this thread it has since been attempted hereby before our very time tempered eyes and ears a certain clarification between you Ink and you Icke-Kia, and The subjectee Honorable Sir David Icke... So, by reference of howeth Mr DI discusses in past words about the creator talk and the Godhead (comprising 3 beings??? well who or what be they at the start of time? - just asking)... and then less mysteriously I presume other more familiar down to earth runabouts... Owing their exustence to a relatively ordinary darwinian evolutionary palpable narrative of god-like creatures co-habiting and co-rabbiting to co-create a sort of "mix paste" of themselves over the long haul as are deemed evident by the many many many species that came into being, as David makes good on noting and I could be content at that, but regress in time to the forebearer of all things it seems we/they/it are reportedly all basicly owing or part owing to the source (unless inbred like some blissful open source but with some Rotten Apple/MS thrown in, yuck!!).... originally ordained into life as creatures/ Beings of The Earth Plain (each and all comparable to a frequency that no matter which that frequency is, makes them all basicly perceptible based on all matter comprising energy of a certain frequency in terms of points of attention but within a consciousness mainframe so it might be construed, and as just outlined those 'daring do' animals of our planet all have in common (where devoid of conjecturing) if to be believed a sort dual existence via superfluous subatomic mollecular 'selves' yet apparently solid formation by whole measure as our eyes perceive on the outside, and alright maybe thats getting a bit quantum-esque, or paradoxic but IT IS WHAT IT IS OKAY,, LOL,, we can work with it, err anyhow just combining my unimitable limited knowledge.. Errr, to the extent not unsurpassed) But then apprehending all knowable knowledge at the time and since time itself got its name, by Gods divergent good will, and errr superfluous wisdom of general relativity and one-ness, and/or endless string theories each as long as a piece of string did rather well to concoct, give or take a few human mistakes culminating in the mayhem we see today (like put upon us by transhuman AI pscyhopaths) and yet all one apart they did once at some stage divergify from that one synergistic Godhead but meanwhile Jesus was busy teaching humans not to misbehave... Which is fair enough. Admirable even!! Well folks, there is my mid-faring thesis so as to ascertain all in all a prospectus theoreticus in reversus so to speak yielded or yielding unto from the words of David Icke as quoted by Ink with some connotational comparison derived between them and from what Icke-Kia had interpreted or thought they had heard/read, which it turn, turns out not far off or far from what I just read (or thought I heard/read) via the feedback of history being replayed or rehashed for purposes of regurgitation and memory restratification (I guess). (must be said I'm not using the videos atm. Ain't got time to indulge, already on this forum too much, and even a short thesis can cost me the washing up akin to a meta cataclysmic crashpile) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaujangles Posted May 24, 2021 Share Posted May 24, 2021 (edited) When writing books it is always better to not overload the content with superfluous vocabulary... Basically, David was stating at that time, that he believed himself to be one of many people who was created slightly differently. ( I believe in his spirituality) Whereas all beings are of the same consciousness - some are wired differently, maybe on a different wavelength or frequency, so to speak. We see this in mediums and clairvoyants as well as people who have heightened senses. I did not hear him say he was special in that he was specifically made by God and that everyone else was not. David has mentioned his own father and his mother on occasion, so obviously he knows he was ``born of woman and sired by man`` I think taking words in a literal sense is often where people lose the translation. David was very early on in his awakening to it all from what I can gather. He experienced things that he has since repeated many times. He is now 69 not in his thirties. I would imagine he would explain things much more clearly now, with his years of experience and understanding. But the bottom line is...he didnt say what the original poster said that he said. As for the looneys in the audience who were acting like self -righteous baboons... I wonder where they are now - now that much of what David has said has occurred. Edited May 24, 2021 by Beaujangles 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TetraG Posted May 24, 2021 Share Posted May 24, 2021 (edited) 19 hours ago, Beaujangles said: When writing books it is always better to not overload the content with superfluous vocabulary... ... I'll take it as a supplementary criticism and not outright condemnation. Especially being as I can't afford to be writing essays everyday. And just hope I did not make things worse, although we must always be reminded ideas about God (=by any reckoning, whether religious or broadly spiritual anything) in the mind of young shoulders and subsequently older shoulders can vary quite dramatically. Anyway my slightly humorous tone having maybe added something (superfluous playfully verbose verbatim or not) I alongside that include myself in among some others here who maybe had *incomplete notions* of *younger* David Icke but had never cleared up itches or issues (literally anything thereof thought upon hearing overly literal words, in respect of David that Beaujangles cautions and then verses reality of what was said or meant by younger David) ... But I guess now we all know those that didn't already find out. Edited May 24, 2021 by TetraG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 25, 2021 Share Posted May 25, 2021 He certainly said he was made directly by god where most are not. Anyone fancy a crack at this? On 5/23/2021 at 8:35 PM, Icke-Kia said: That claim was mild by Dave's standards... https://web.randi.org/i---encyclopedia-of-claims.html We all talk bullshit from time to time and as ink pointed out as you age you learn. At the age of 39 one should have learnt a few lessons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screamingeagle Posted May 25, 2021 Share Posted May 25, 2021 53 minutes ago, Icke-Kia said: At the age of 39 one should have learnt a few lessons. like you and your username Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icke-Kia Posted May 25, 2021 Share Posted May 25, 2021 2 hours ago, screamingeagle said: like you and your username Which you dont know the significance of and never will. Do you operate basket case and ink with strings or are they just easily amused? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screamingeagle Posted May 25, 2021 Share Posted May 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Icke-Kia said: Which you dont know the significance of and never will. you mean military shortform...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 25, 2021 Share Posted May 25, 2021 36 minutes ago, Icke-Kia said: Do you operate basket case and ink with strings or are they just easily amused? Mainly strings .... but we, sometimes, are let loose from the 'collar' .... Time is short. I have never comprehend such as you .... you join someones forum to 'have a pop' at them but consider that is ok to do .... you will bring up any little part of anything they said from 30 years ago .... just to slag them off .... and within your mind you consider that .... ok! Amazes me .... I find it a sad thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts