Jump to content

The Excuse Why The Earth Must Be Depopulated.


Recommended Posts




Some bloody idiot Mathis Wackernagel had forged this graph based on BS (fake data) and now, Club of Rome uses it as an excuse for depopulation of the Earth...


What a scumbag... His Ph.D status must be revoked. 



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because most peasant-ass, low-life, scum sucking human trash bags aint shit.... It's just cleaning out the gutters.


They'd make good fertilizer... 'Man Mulch', the fertiliser with a bit of you in it...


But seriously, the Earth can only support a certain number of humans. I believe the rather abstract dimension of the acre was actually made that one acre of farmed land can feed one human. In China an acre feeds four so it is fluid depending on crops and farming techniques but with modern high fertiliser intensive farming we can pretty much figure how many humans the Earth can feed.


We can also work out our waste footprint, waste being our poop but it also includes Carbon Footprint including our trash. Side note: big business has squarely placed the blame and responsibility for recycling and trash on the consumer. So how many people can the Earth support, what type of people as in western or third world and how long can the Earth be overused before it cannot replenish, before we pass the point of no return.


Well it's such a big question with so many multi faceted and fluid variables that we've no exact answer, however it its believed by many scientist that we are at that point now, which is why 'The Great Reset' is here and as the Georgia Guide Stones say 'Maintain Humanity at 500,000,000 and Leave Room For Nature'




Of Malthusian Proportions


'It is an evident truth that, whatever may be the rate of increase in the means of subsistence, the increase in population must be limited by it, at least after the food has been divided into the smallest shares that will support life. All the children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons. ... To act consistently, therefore, we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavouring to impede, the operation of nature in producing this mortality, and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use.


Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations.


But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases: and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. If by these and similar means the annual mortality were increased ... we might probably every one of us marry at the age of puberty and yet few be absolutely starved'.


- Thomas Malthus 1766-1834





Edited by Seconal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...