Jump to content

Is Russia part of the New World Order?


Recommended Posts

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has been criticized by Israel for suggesting that a disproportionate number of officials involved in corruption scandals in his country are ethnic Jews.

 

“Here are 36 people on a list involved in corruption,” Lukashenko told the Council of Ministers in Minsk. “Sorry, I don’t consider myself anti-Semitic, but more than half of them are Jewish. Do they have a special, privileged role, that they steal and do not think about their future? Do they have privileges?” He added, “All people’s living in Belarus should be equal: Jews, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Russians, and Poles.”

 

Israeli officials have previously accused Lukashenko of anti-Semitic comments, including a 2007 incident in which he told reporters that Jewish people allowed the places they lived to fall into neglect. Referring to the Belarusian city of Bobruisk, he claimed Jewish residents had turned it into a “pigsty.” He added, “This was founded as a Jewish city, and you know how Jews treat the places they live in.”

 

Lukashenko was scolded again by the Israeli government after he said in July 2021 that the whole world had been made to “kneel” to the Jewish people because of the Holocaust.

https://www.rt.com/news/599392-israel-accuses-belarus-president-antisemitism/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, bryan said:

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has been criticized by Israel for suggesting that a disproportionate number of officials involved in corruption scandals in his country are ethnic Jews.

 

“Here are 36 people on a list involved in corruption,” Lukashenko told the Council of Ministers in Minsk. “Sorry, I don’t consider myself anti-Semitic, but more than half of them are Jewish. Do they have a special, privileged role, that they steal and do not think about their future? Do they have privileges?” He added, “All people’s living in Belarus should be equal: Jews, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Russians, and Poles.”

 

Israeli officials have previously accused Lukashenko of anti-Semitic comments, including a 2007 incident in which he told reporters that Jewish people allowed the places they lived to fall into neglect. Referring to the Belarusian city of Bobruisk, he claimed Jewish residents had turned it into a “pigsty.” He added, “This was founded as a Jewish city, and you know how Jews treat the places they live in.”

 

Lukashenko was scolded again by the Israeli government after he said in July 2021 that the whole world had been made to “kneel” to the Jewish people because of the Holocaust.

https://www.rt.com/news/599392-israel-accuses-belarus-president-antisemitism/

 

 

Snap!

 

On 7/6/2021 at 10:48 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Holy shit.

 

Maybe, before you judge me, you should consider the fact that I'm just in a different part of my pipeline.

Regarding that, it could be dollar store anti-zio sentiment, or it could be legit, I dunno. He's contradicted Putin before, like with the Moscow attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/foreign-media-issue-wild-claim-u-s-israel/

 

A new, and wild, claim has been reported coming out of publications run by the Egyptian government:

 

That Israel and the United States, the two most common targets of Islamist terrorist organizations, set up those Islamist terror organizations.

 

A report from the Middle East Media Research Institute said that the government-published articles claim, “the U.S. and Israel are the ones who established the Islamist terrorist organizations al-Qaida, ISIS and others like them, and that these countries are responsible for instigating terrorism throughout the world.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bryan said:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/foreign-media-issue-wild-claim-u-s-israel/

 

A new, and wild, claim has been reported coming out of publications run by the Egyptian government:

 

That Israel and the United States, the two most common targets of Islamist terrorist organizations, set up those Islamist terror organizations.

 

A report from the Middle East Media Research Institute said that the government-published articles claim, “the U.S. and Israel are the ones who established the Islamist terrorist organizations al-Qaida, ISIS and others like them, and that these countries are responsible for instigating terrorism throughout the world.”

 

Gateway Pundit is Eurasianist-Duginist aligned. There's truth in it, but it's only one side of the story.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/26/2024 at 10:22 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:

Gateway Pundit is Eurasianist-Duginist aligned. There's truth in it, but it's only one side of the story.

 

Indeed, and it's hardly a new idea that militia groups are funded by other countries so I wonder what the Egyptians are up to. Perhaps they've got their own problems with the Muslim Brotherhood which they want to distract attention from. Anyway, I can remember these claims going back to the Russian involvement in Afghanistan when the CIA were funding the Mujahideen in Operation Cyclone in the 1980s, but that kind of thing is probably much older as the Great Game goes back a lot further.  And then if those militias turn round and attack their supporters' countries it can serve a purpose with the classic problem/reaction/solution formula. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Campion said:

 

Indeed, and it's hardly a new idea that militia groups are funded by other countries so I wonder what the Egyptians are up to. Perhaps they've got their own problems with the Muslim Brotherhood which they want to distract attention from. Anyway, I can remember these claims going back to the Russian involvement in Afghanistan when the CIA were funding the Mujahideen in Operation Cyclone in the 1980s, but that kind of thing is probably much older as the Great Game goes back a lot further.  And then if those militias turn round and attack their supporters' countries it can serve a purpose with the classic problem/reaction/solution formula. 

 

It's a documented fact that the CIA and MI6 funded the Mujahideen for over a decade.

 

So what's the other side of the story then? Do you have evidence that the Russians created ISIS, for example?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, bryan said:

 

It's a documented fact that the CIA and MI6 funded the Mujahideen for over a decade.

 

So what's the other side of the story then? Do you have evidence that the Russians created ISIS, for example?

 

Are you geopolitically slow? They support the whole thirdworldist bloc. I'm off to work shortly, but I'll dig up some info. Of course, I doubt you'll care as you're not white.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, bryan said:

It's a documented fact that the CIA and MI6 funded the Mujahideen for over a decade.

 

So what's the other side of the story then? Do you have evidence that the Russians created ISIS, for example?

 

How about Russia backing Hezbollah: 

 

"The Hezbollah-Russia relationship is of several parameters including an economic partnership, weapon trades and military assistance.[1]

Over the last few years, as part of their strategy to expand their influence in the Middle East, Russia has broadened its involvement in Lebanon, strengthening ties in cultural, economic and military subjects in Beirut. Although Russia's activities in Lebanon are not all related to Hezbollah, its alliance with Hezbollah is substantial and provides Russia with access and power in Lebanon, while benefitting the Lebanese Shia Islamist militant group and political party, Hezbollah. Russia does not recognize Hezbollah to be a terrorist organization.[2]

...

"A milestone in Hezbollah-Russia relations was in 2015, when Russian and Hezbollah forces fought together in alliance with the Assad regime in Syria."

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah-Russia_relations  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

How about Russia backing Hezbollah: 

 

"The Hezbollah-Russia relationship is of several parameters including an economic partnership, weapon trades and military assistance.[1]

Over the last few years, as part of their strategy to expand their influence in the Middle East, Russia has broadened its involvement in Lebanon, strengthening ties in cultural, economic and military subjects in Beirut. Although Russia's activities in Lebanon are not all related to Hezbollah, its alliance with Hezbollah is substantial and provides Russia with access and power in Lebanon, while benefitting the Lebanese Shia Islamist militant group and political party, Hezbollah. Russia does not recognize Hezbollah to be a terrorist organization.[2]

...

"A milestone in Hezbollah-Russia relations was in 2015, when Russian and Hezbollah forces fought together in alliance with the Assad regime in Syria."

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah-Russia_relations  

 

You seem to be assuming that regime change in Syria would have been a good thing. That would put you on the same team as Bullingdon Club member, David Cameron, but nothing new there. When you compare the timelines from two wikipedia articles, you can see that Russia's arming of Hezbollah was a reaction to NATO's aggression against Assad.

  

In March 2011, popular discontent with the rule of Bashar al-Assad triggered large-scale protests and pro-democracy rallies across Syria, as part of the wider Arab Spring protests in the region.

 

A Hezbollah officer, said in an interview that Russia has been amplifying its backing for his armed movement since 2012.

 

Receiving arms from NATO and GCC states, rebel forces initially made significant advances against the government forces, who were receiving arms from Iran and Russia. Rebels captured the regional capitals of Raqqa in 2013 and Idlib in 2015.

 

A milestone in Hezbollah-Russia relations was in 2015, when Russian and Hezbollah forces fought together in alliance with the Assad regime in Syria.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah-Russia_relations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_civil_war

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, bryan said:

 

You seem to be assuming that regime change in Syria would have been a good thing. That would put you on the same team as Bullingdon Club member, David Cameron, but nothing new there. When you compare the timelines from two wikipedia articles, you can see that Russia's arming of Hezbollah was a reaction to NATO's aggression against Assad.

  

In March 2011, popular discontent with the rule of Bashar al-Assad triggered large-scale protests and pro-democracy rallies across Syria, as part of the wider Arab Spring protests in the region.

 

A Hezbollah officer, said in an interview that Russia has been amplifying its backing for his armed movement since 2012.

 

Receiving arms from NATO and GCC states, rebel forces initially made significant advances against the government forces, who were receiving arms from Iran and Russia. Rebels captured the regional capitals of Raqqa in 2013 and Idlib in 2015.

 

A milestone in Hezbollah-Russia relations was in 2015, when Russian and Hezbollah forces fought together in alliance with the Assad regime in Syria.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah-Russia_relations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_civil_war

 

Fqe5-Kd-HWYAYE0-Wg.jpg

 

sj.jpg

 

rb1.jpg

 

pcgt.jpg

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj2u-c0HDj4

 

Report: Assad regime using Israeli drones against Syrian rebels

https://www.jpost.com/arab-israeli-conflict/report-assad-regime-using-israeli-drones-against-syrian-rebels-446415

 

"Mrs. Assad... British-born Syrian wife, the former J. P. Morgan banker"

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/10/magazine/the-enigma-of-damascus.html

 

Assad close to being knighted under Blair

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/assad-close-to-being-knighted-under-blair-kxg5rxtwq5n

 

The Assad family ties to Israeli business tycoon
http://web.archive.org/web/20180731094813/https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/features/2015/8/17/exclusive-assads-sanctions-busting-ties-to-israeli-business-tycoon

 

ghdgh.jpg

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bryan said:

You seem to be assuming that regime change in Syria would have been a good thing. That would put you on the same team as Bullingdon Club member, David Cameron, but nothing new there. When you compare the timelines from two wikipedia articles, you can see that Russia's arming of Hezbollah was a reaction to NATO's aggression against Assad.

 

I'm not judging the Syrian regime, your question was about whether Moscow creates or supports proxy groups to further their agenda in the same way as Washington does. Maybe the Arab spring and its aftermath was good or bad, there's a lot of different sides in the area including Muslims, Jews and Christians but it's not our fight. All its done for us is create lots more refugees coming here to the UK to escape the fighting which of course is what Russia wants. We could do a lot worse than staying neutral in the whole middle east situation and focus on the wellbeing and growth of our own native people. 

Edited by Campion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

"Troops loyal to president Bashar al-Assad succeeded in reclaiming the site from hard-line Sunny Muslim combattants from Al-Nusra, a group with ties to terror organisation Al-Qaeda. Maaloula contains a large statue of the Virgin Mary and both orthodox and catholic monasteries, and remains one of the few places where western Aramaic, the language of Jesus, is still spoken."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Campion said:

 

All its done for us is create lots more refugees coming here to the UK to escape the fighting which of course is what Russia wants. We could do a lot worse than staying neutral in the whole middle east situation and focus on the wellbeing and growth of our own native people. 

 

Putin created the migrant crisis by invading Iraq, bombing Libya back to the stone age, and trying to overthrow the government in Syria.

 

Unless the old memory's playing tricks again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i cant believe ppl are resorting to russian proxy armies bad, western proxy armies good

none of it is good cos they all slaughtered innocent men, women and children in the name of saving them from the dictators

everything from the first gulf war in 1994 was started based on lies and we could probable go back further.

Edited by 1velocity7
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, 1velocity7 said:

i cant believe ppl are resorting to russian proxy armies bad, western proxy armies good

none of it is good cos they all slaughtered innocent men, women and children in the name of saving them from the dictators

everything from the first gulf war in 1994 was started based on lies and we could probable go back further.

 

It's not good enough to say they're all as bad as each other. The Russians don't use proxy armies to overthrow governments they don't like. When they worked with Hezbolah it was to prevent anglo-saxon countries from overthrowing the Syrian government after they refused to let them build a pipeline through the country.

 

Another reason for western countries to target Assad is because he gets on with the Christians.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1velocity7 said:

i cant believe ppl are resorting to russian proxy armies bad, western proxy armies good

none of it is good cos they all slaughtered innocent men, women and children in the name of saving them from the dictators

everything from the first gulf war in 1994 was started based on lies and we could probable go back further.


That's not the point. The problem is people avoiding the elephant in the room. Because of the whole Palestine thing, you have people on both the Right and Left saying the West is ZOG, or at least aligned with them. While that might be true, for now, it ignores the fact that it's no different in the East, and that "muh ZOG" doesn't want a strong West. Whatever conspiracy theorists want to call it, NWO, the messianic age, or whatever, they want the West to fall first.

The "Anglo-Saxon" shit is bullshit too, see:

 

https://x.com/AngloEnigm17422/status/1723341040101310692

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...