Jump to content

David Icke a Freemason according to Twitter thread


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

I remember the Savile megathread on the old forum but sadly we cannot refer back to it now. I only discovered the DIF in 2016 so long after Savile's death. So for me personally, given that the thread was hundreds of pages long, I would have only started reading it towards the end - due its size, I didn't go through the entire thing. I also had far less time in those days, and far more catching up to do, to keep up with all the threads on the old forum.

 

You say that old forum members knew about Savile before the news broke - was that more specifically before Savile died in Oct 2011, or did the thread start after his death but before the news broke throughout 2012? And did it provide any evidence that DI had spoken out about Savile during the time that he was alive?

 

It started after his death. Webarchive shows 20-09-2012, 02:54 PM for the first post and start of the thread 'Jimmy Savile OUTED as a PAEDO OCT 3rd'.

http://web.archive.org/web/20150804220908/forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=222773

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

has anyone else noticed an uptick in attacks recently? This forum is certainly coming under some fire at the moment....we must be on someones radar!

Here's a thread from 2009, discussing Savile (notice the freemason shill defending Savile):   http://web.archive.org/web/20150920193220/http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=55339

Sadly, DI didn't "out" Jimmy Savile in 'The Biggest Secret' and I think you will find that when your copy arrives. He certainly did, however, expose Lord Mountbatten.   Regarding the video y

Posted Images

25 minutes ago, metak88 said:

 

It started after his death. Webarchive shows 20-09-2012, 02:54 PM for the first post and start of the thread 'Jimmy Savile OUTED as a PAEDO OCT 3rd'.

http://web.archive.org/web/20150804220908/forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=222773

 

Thanks metak - out of likes for now...

 

Following the links from the first page of the old forum's Savile megathread, I have found this which was posted to DI's headline page on the 2nd November 2011 - two days after Savile's death.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20141206223310/http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/55533-death-of-a-showman-jimmy-saville-1926-2011/

 

image.png.15fb0428d2edc575278a21628cf92266.png

image.png.471b1ea04abbd61217ee25345df94303.png

image.png.2ca5e6831c627f0f65edc9c9d1a48e8e.png

 

 

So DI certainly didn't hang around outing Savile after he had died and well before the story broke in the mainstream. Perhaps this helps suggest that DI may also have spoken out about Savile before his death, but this is still unproven at present unless anybody else can come up with anything?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Oakwise said:

Don't any of you remember the Savile mega-thread (on this forum) that ran for ages before the news broke? 

 

It was pretty much common knowledge round these parts. 

 

I think it was just after the news broke into the MSM . It was started by a forum member called Anders that sadly passed away from cancer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

Thanks metak - out of likes for now...

 

Following the links from the first page of the old forum's Savile megathread, I have found this which was posted to DI's headline page on the 2nd November 2011 - two days after Savile's death.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20141206223310/http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/55533-death-of-a-showman-jimmy-saville-1926-2011/

 

 

 

Great to see that thread again, just wish we could access the whole of it. So much information in there.  Made me feel  quite sad seeing some of the posters that are no longer with us. I do recall seeing that   Haut de la Garenne  piece about Savile on DI's headlines page before he died.

Edited by greatdayforfreedom
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

Thanks metak - out of likes for now...

 

Following the links from the first page of the old forum's Savile megathread, I have found this which was posted to DI's headline page on the 2nd November 2011 - two days after Savile's death.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20141206223310/http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/55533-death-of-a-showman-jimmy-saville-1926-2011/

 

image.png.15fb0428d2edc575278a21628cf92266.png

image.png.471b1ea04abbd61217ee25345df94303.png

image.png.2ca5e6831c627f0f65edc9c9d1a48e8e.png

 

 

So DI certainly didn't hang around outing Savile after he had died and well before the story broke in the mainstream. Perhaps this helps suggest that DI may also have spoken out about Savile before his death, but this is still unproven at present unless anybody else can come up with anything?

 

I think I remember that piece. The megathread may have been after the news broke, but it was still common knowledge. I'm pretty certain it was discussed on the forum prior. A lot of people did know about it.

 

The article you reference at least proves it was covered on the website before it was an accepted fact in the mainstream. 

 

But when that's all said, this is pretty pointless. The main thing is that there are very sinister power elites out there getting away with very serious crimes. I dunno, dealing with that seems more important. 

Edited by Oakwise
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, greatdayforfreedom said:

 

Great to see that thread again, just wish we could access the whole of it. So much information in there.  Made me feel  quite sad seeing some of the posters that are no longer with us. I do recall seeing that   Haut de la Garenne  piece about Savile on DI's headlines page before he died.

 

Trip down memory lane, innit?

 

Just been reading this thread from 2014:

 

http://web.archive.org/web/20150915215442/http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=277716

 

Talking about the very same subject.

 

To quote redman from that thread:

 

Quote

 

One thing is for sure, back in the day when he [Icke] was blatantly pointing fingers at ex prime ministers and that sleazy entertainment industry he was about 15 years ahead of the mainstream media and most people for that matter.

 

So in that sense, I think that link you posted sucks balls.

 

Icke put his dick on the chopping board plenty of times, I bet the bellend who posted that thread about him hasn't done fucking zip.

 

 

Also found this forgotten gem:

 

http://web.archive.org/web/20150920063514/http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=247688

Edited by Oakwise
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the info. So still no evidence that David outed Saville before his death? So what, he knew about it whilst at the BBC or not? If he did, did he report it to anyone? If not then how can he wrote about others who knew and said/did nothing?

 

It may not matter to some but it matters to me as if David has made false claims about outing a monster like Saville I can only begin to wonder how other things may not be correct either. Truth and integrity are all to me, that's why it matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know, I don't expect him to be perfect,, I don't see him as the "messiah", or trying to be that. I think he's being as genuine as he can from the place he's at in his awakening.

I can say though he has assisted me in my own.

 

2 sayings come to mind:

"...don't throw the baby out with the bathwater..." and  "...let he/she who is without sin(error/insanity) throw the first stone...". 

 

https://jamesmilson.com/about-the-blog/judge-softly-or-walk-a-mile-in-his-moccasins-by-mary-t-lathrap/

 

Of course the same thing could be said about this Savile character. Like it or not.

Edited by novymir
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I dont expect him or anyone to be 'perfect'. I do expect him to be truthful when he is the one who says 'the truth will set you free'. He has had a lot of mileage out of saying he outed Savile before he died. If its a lie, its a monsterous one.

Edited by Bee
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Bee said:

No.

 

'no' as in you actually were the apprentice and are now back to try and cause damage to david's public image or 'no' as in you weren't the apprentice but are still here to try and cause harm to david's public image?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose the entire matter could easily be put to rest were Mr. Icke a recognized member of his own forum (as most other authors of websites tend to be). A simple post from him would be all that it would take.

 

If he did say anything about this it may have been in one of his slide presentations/speaking events, during the early-to-mid Aughties, whilst showing the faces of prominent figures/discussing the depravity of certain elites & some of their seedy associates.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hegel Schmegel said:

I suppose the entire matter could easily be put to rest were Mr. Icke a recognized member of his own forum (as most other authors of websites tend to be). A simple post from him would be all that it would take.

 

If he did say anything about this it may have been in one of his slide presentations/speaking events, during the early-to-mid Aughties, whilst showing the faces of prominent figures/discussing the depravity of certain elites & some of their seedy associates.

 

i don't think it would be a good idea for david to open that door. If he opens that door then where does it end?

 

should he be at the beck and call of everyone on the internet who wants to speaks to him? How would he know if the person he is speaking to him is a bona fide truther or someone intent on mischief?

 

Not really workable is it?

 

I find it interesting though that some of these attacks in david are materialising at this time when david's youtube channel has been wiped therefore removing much of his material from the internet

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at that book cover it states that the man in the middle is FREE. It also shows his `parts`as censored. That man is currently free is in question. What David is clearly doing here is making a statement. ``I am Me..I am free`Then his cover shows how that man is far from free...he is surrounded by the ties that bind because he is following the satanistic bullshit. That the genitals are censored shows that this is referencing the agendas. I seriously wonder how people cannot see things in plain sight and come here bellyaching about the most ludicrous nonsense.

 

As for Jimmy Saville.  I am quite sure that people that work for the BBC do not know everyone else who works for them, let alone what they do in their spare time!!!

 

David says in his book he was TOLD about Saville in the 90`s. So that shows he was not in the know prior. How he got word out could involve many things. Letters to people, organizations. A word in the ear of. It seems to me there are quite a few on here that are not here for the right reasons. They post nicey post and then bullshit posts. They verbally attack others and then retreat and come back saintly. If any of you think you are going unnoticed, you are mistaken.  

 

As for ``Bee`` if you think David should have done more to out Saville, give us an idea of what you would have expected...followed by how you think the outcome would have been. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/16/2021 at 8:20 PM, Diesel said:

I remember the old forum outed allot of people including Saville 

 

I remember the original Savile thread was where I learned before he died & Grand Secretary was there trying to defend Savile.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Beaujangles said:

 

 

As for ``Bee`` if you think David should have done more to out Saville, give us an idea of what you would have expected...followed by how you think the outcome would have been. Thanks.

 

Don't twist what I have said - its lazy and unhelpful. This has nothing to do with what I think David should have done so stop trying to derail the thread.

 

Other testimonies have been very clear from a significant amount of ex BBC employees that it was well known about Savile as far back as the 1970's and that it was actually a running joke how Savile liked young girls etc.

 

David worked at the BBC in the 1980's on national, keystone programmes that were massive in their day (I remember). So many people at the BBC knew about Savile that I find it next to impossible to believe that David was not aware of any of the rumours during his almost 10 years working for the BBC.

 

David has stated many many times that he 'outed' Savile before Savile died. I can find no evidence for this whatsoever. All I've asked is how did David 'out' Savile before his death? He didn't write about Savile in any of this books prior to Savile dying as far as I can see. When he says he 'outed' him what does he mean? Who did he 'out' Savile to? Did he go to the police for example?

 

As already stated, all I care about is the truth and David has had a great deal of mileage out of his claim that he outed Savile before Savile died. I just want to know the truth; did he know about Savile in the 1980's whilst working on major national BBC programmes or not? If he did, why didn't he speak up at the time, after all he has criticised enough other people for not doing so. If he didn't know about Savile in the near decade he spent at the BBC then when did he 'out' Savile; how did he out Savile and was it before or after Savile's death?

 

These are very basic straightforward questions surely? A man who writes a books called 'The Truth Shall Set You Free' should not fear any scrutiny surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/16/2021 at 9:04 PM, Macnamara said:

 

'no' as in you actually were the apprentice and are now back to try and cause damage to david's public image or 'no' as in you weren't the apprentice but are still here to try and cause harm to david's public image?

Look, I have no idea who the apprentice is/was and really couldn't care less either. You're just another one trying to derail the thread. I find it very interesting that you find simple, basic questions about David somehow threatening. Are you saying no one is allowed to question anything David says? Is he somehow beyond scrutiny then? I have followed his work for many many years but he is no messiah and is not above question. None of us are or should be. Me asking simple questions that lead you to accuse me of being here to "damage" David public image actually says a lot more about you than it does me. A truthful person has nothing to hide. It might not bother you that David may have lied about outing Savile before he died but it bothers me as once a liar always a liar.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

maybe there's a need to look deeper at book publishers and film companies

 

I think censoring genitals on the cover of his book (I Am Me, I Am Free) comes from the book publishers etc.? Here are two examples of uncensored book covers.

 

https://d3525k1ryd2155.cloudfront.net/h/616/862/1011862616.0.x.jpg

https://d2h1pu99sxkfvn.cloudfront.net/b0/746700/513874558_Fe49B35zKE/P0.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...