Jump to content

A Fake Alien Show Coming To A Town Near You........Soon


alexa

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Pinkiebee said:

When was that filmed ? It must be decades old to make sense of the time line and her aparent age and the 1980s hair style.

 

If the impending alien invasion hasnt happened in the last 30 odd years of be tempted to breath a sigh of relief 

 

Maybe there is  grid lock near Polaris 

 

I couldn't find the date that particular video was made, but Carrol Rosin didn't expose their plan until 2001. I wouldn't prematurely draw a breath of relief because the cult operates in multi-generational time frames ......... not decades. They would also have to wait until the technology had been perfected to the degree that it was believable and people would buy into the hoax. In the description of the video below it states:

 

Quote

  In 2001, Dr. Carol Rosin (the understudy of Dr. Wernher von Braun who was the Father of Rocketry and NASA) came forward and exposed that the Space Based Weapons System is based on LIES. We are now here in 2019-2020 where Donald Trump has officially made the Space Force, the 6th Branch of the Military. Trump is going along with this HOAX! Dr. Carol Rosin said that there would be a succession of 'enemies' for which we'd have to build this space based weapons system. They are as follows 1. First it would be the Russians 2. Then it would be 3rd world crazies / Terrorists 3. Then it would be ASTEROIDS / COMETS / METEORS 4. And the FINAL CARD would be the fake Alien UFO threat Dr. von Braun told Carol that she would be the one to stop the weaponizing of space. Looks like she was unable to do it. Donald Trump proving to be a sell-out once again.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, JCP said:

 

I couldn't find the date that particular video was made, but Carrol Rosin didn't expose their plan until 2001. I wouldn't prematurely draw a breath of relief because the cult operates in multi-generational time frames ......... not decades. They would also have to wait until the technology had been perfected to the degree that it was believable and people would buy into the hoax. In the description of the video below it states:

 

 

 

I dont want to call her a fraud or delusional. 

 

I mean who knows being full of cancer treatment drugs may have made her german mentor delusional. But this is apparently a private conversation that there is no way of verifying .

 

And even if an accurate account from a non delusional mentor.  I'm not sure his undoubted skill at making rockets make him a good judge of American policy an unknown number of decades in the future.

 

A fake alien invasion isnt impossible.  But it does seem highly improbable.  It seems less likely than an actual alien invasion to be honest

 

Nether are at the top of my list of things  I worry about

 

It also seem a bit rich that someone who spent five years perfecting how to drop rockets loaded with explosive on the population of London, should suddenly get concerned about civilian populations

Edited by Pinkiebee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pinkiebee said:

I dont want to call her a fraud or delusional. 

 

I mean who knows being full of cancer treatment drugs may have made her german mentor delusional. But this is apparently a private conversation that there is no way of verifying .

 

And even if an accurate account from a non delusional mentor.  I'm not sure his undoubted skill at making rockets make him a good judge of American policy an unknown number of decades in the future.

 

A fake alien invasion isnt impossible.  But it does seem highly improbable.  It seems less likely than an actual alien invasion to be honest

 

Nether are at the top of my list of things  I worry about

 

Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but that must also mean that you discount the revelations of Serge Monast and Project Blue Beam. His story dovetails Carrol Rosin's but he gives more detail and is from different sources. It may not fit with your worldview. With all of the things people need to be concerned with these days, I wouldn't suggest that anyone place a fake alien invasion at the top of their list of things to worry about; however people should be aware of this possibility in order to identify it, if it actually happens.

 

https://allthatsinteresting.com/project-blue-beam-serge-monast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, JCP said:

 

Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but that must also mean that you discount the revelations of Serge Monast and Project Blue Beam. His story dovetails Carrol Rosin's but he gives more detail and is from different sources. It may not fit with your worldview. With all of the things people need to be concerned with these days, I wouldn't suggest that anyone place a fake alien invasion at the top of their list of things to worry about; however people should be aware of this possibility in order to identify it, if it actually happens.

 

https://allthatsinteresting.com/project-blue-beam-serge-monast

As the chance of a convincing fake and a real alien invasion seem to be of much the same magnitude it's hard to see how being prepared for one helps with the other or how you could tell the differance 

 

Let's face  it you would feel a bit silly if you protested and were taken out with an alien death ray.

 

I'm failing to see why something simpler wouldnt work just as well or quite why you or they wouldnt think they all ready had a compliant.  Gullible population.  So much so that there seems little to be gained from a deception on this scale

 

It looks like the cold war is back on, that worked very well for 50 years. Everyone living with the acceptance they could be eviscerated at 4 minutes notice but for the care of their leaders. Not that the fabled 4 min warning wasnt a fable in its self

Edited by Pinkiebee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pinkiebee said:

As the chance of a convincing fake and a real alien invasion seem to be of much the same magnitude it's hard to see how being prepared for one helps with the other or how you could tell the differance 

We very well might not be able to tell the difference, but without knowing Rosin's and Monast's claims, we wouldn't have the insight to question it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JCP said:

We very well might not be able to tell the difference, but without knowing Rosin's and Monast's claims, we wouldn't have the insight to question it.

I'm fascinated how you would question the differance between a convincing fake and the real thing. Let's say they death ray blast the white house to bits as an opening salvo, just to get out attention. How are you going to critically analyse that event armed with your fore sight ?

 

Clearly the aliens are coming/ already here lot will fall for it hook line and sinker. 

 

The NASA is the devil lot will just say it's a false flag  how will you steer a rational course through it ?

Edited by Pinkiebee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JCP said:

 

Why? What do you know about the white house being blown up? Is the white house being prepared for demolition?

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rSorUVj7OyRw/

Yea!!!  that wouldnt have been my first conclusion of viewing the vid and I'd be slightly more concerned than the narrator of how they are having explosions that dont take the windows out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
1 hour ago, TheConsultant said:



Countered
image.png.89a40f11383d559fb37cb20795f6a7cc.png

Because we shoot them down and ask questions later is not a sign they are a threat, it shows how upper command operates. I can counter further if you wish.
 

 

Well it's not top secret anymore 😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/21/2022 at 3:52 PM, TheConsultant said:

Countered
image.png.89a40f11383d559fb37cb20795f6a7cc.png

Because we shoot them down and ask questions later is not a sign they are a threat, it shows how upper command operates. I can counter further if you wish.

 

If the government were going to stage a fake alien invasion, wouldn't they release or leak propaganda such as videos and documents to convince us? Using evidence that the government provides is not a strong counter. We would probably be closer to the truth if we inverted everything they said. The above document would lead to a particular conclusion and they know how we will perceive it. I think at this point, the best we can say is we don't know and keep an open mind.

 

Some of the reasons I suspect Serge Monast could be right about Project Blue Beam are:

 

1. The programing we've received via books, movies, TV 'programs', etc. The story-line appears to be scripted. Hell, "Ancient Aliens" is in it's teens and still running; with many shows 4 hrs long.

2. The progress of technology is at least 50 yrs ahead of what we know as possible. The use of AI and 5G, the ability to place thoughts and voices in peoples' minds,  the advancement of holograms and lasers, and the possibility of weapons/mounted satellites.

3. The desire of the NWO to create a one world religion.

4. Weather and tectonic control.

5. The Great Reset

6. The government lies about everything; they have proven themselves to be deceptive - why would they resort to truth telling?

7. It would serve their purpose to unite the world against a common enemy

8. They could depopulate who they want and blame it on aliens.

9. Generates Fear

10. The creation of "The Space Force"

11. Werner Von Braun and Carol Rosin's testimony

12. The creation of another enemy to fight

 

That's just off the top of my head, but you can see where I'm going. I'm not saying that my suspicions are correct; only that they can't be discounted. Whether attacked from aliens or government, we would still be under attack. Our ability to determine who is attacking us will dictate how we will respond.

Are aliens real? ....... maybe. Are they working with the government? ...... maybe. Is it all BS? ....maybe. We don't have the power to truly know.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JCP said:

 

If the government were going to stage a fake alien invasion, wouldn't they release or leak propaganda such as videos and documents to convince us? Using evidence that the government provides is not a strong counter. We would probably be closer to the truth if we inverted everything they said. The above document would lead to a particular conclusion and they know how we will perceive it. I think at this point, the best we can say is we don't know and keep an open mind.

 

Some of the reasons I suspect Serge Monast could be right about Project Blue Beam are:

 

1. The programing we've received via books, movies, TV 'programs', etc. The story-line appears to be scripted. Hell, "Ancient Aliens" is in it's teens and still running; with many shows 4 hrs long.

2. The progress of technology is at least 50 yrs ahead of what we know as possible. The use of AI and 5G, the ability to place thoughts and voices in peoples' minds,  the advancement of holograms and lasers, and the possibility of weapons/mounted satellites.

3. The desire of the NWO to create a one world religion.

4. Weather and tectonic control.

5. The Great Reset

6. The government lies about everything; they have proven themselves to be deceptive - why would they resort to truth telling?

7. It would serve their purpose to unite the world against a common enemy

8. They could depopulate who they want and blame it on aliens.

9. Generates Fear

10. The creation of "The Space Force"

11. Werner Von Braun and Carol Rosin's testimony

12. The creation of another enemy to fight

 

That's just off the top of my head, but you can see where I'm going. I'm not saying that my suspicions are correct; only that they can't be discounted. Whether attacked from aliens or government, we would still be under attack. Our ability to determine who is attacking us will dictate how we will respond.

Are aliens real? ....... maybe. Are they working with the government? ...... maybe. Is it all BS? ....maybe. We don't have the power to truly know.

 


I think you need to read documentation before commenting?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheConsultant said:


I think you need to read documentation before commenting?
 

 

Considering where that documentation is sourced from, I question it's credibility. I'm glad your belief-system 'knows' where the truth lies, because mine says "Question Everything". Do you also believe them when they tell you "The jab is safe and effective" ........ or do you pick and choose?

Hell, you might very well be right, but I freely admit that I don't have the ability to "know" at this point. Just pulling up government documents and regurgitating them doesn't satisfy my hunger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JCP said:

because mine says "Question Everything".

I fully agree with that. 

 

23 minutes ago, JCP said:

Do you also believe them when they tell you "The jab is safe and effective" ........ or do you pick and choose?


Why were they classified in the first place? Why did people have to push for it to be released? I believe nothing I read anywhere until I can verify it with other information, or prove it myself personally on some level. I know of some of the mechanics these documents are discussing so I can verify some parts myself, I put these things out there for open minded people to read, absorb or reject it, entirely at their own leisure. Anything I post, question it, doesn't everyone do that on some level with all posts they comsume?
 

23 minutes ago, JCP said:

Just pulling up government documents and regurgitating them doesn't satisfy my hunger.

Not all posts are for everyone - If it doesn't interest you to read them, I get that. I don't read or consume the content of all posts and I absolutely question everything as I go a long, over time you get better at allowing information to settle in, or dissipate as useless. I am never saying this has to be believed, ever. Just like everyone else I am exploring and seeing what fits and what does not. It's one big jigsaw!

Some of the information may prove helpful to peoples wellbeing in some respects and that should never be classified surely? But its not going to interest everyone :D

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

I fully agree with that. 

 


Why were they classified in the first place? Why did people have to push for it to be released? I believe nothing I read anywhere until I can verify it with other information, or prove it myself personally on some level. I know of some of the mechanics these documents are discussing so I can verify some parts myself, I put these things out there for open minded people to read, absorb or reject it, entirely at their own leisure. Anything I post, question it, doesn't everyone do that on some level with all posts they comsume?
 

Not all posts are for everyone - If it doesn't interest you to read them, I get that. I don't read or consume the content of all posts and I absolutely question everything as I go a long, over time you get better at allowing information to settle in, or dissipate as useless. I am never saying this has to be believed, ever. Just like everyone else I am exploring and seeing what fits and what does not. It's one big jigsaw!

Some of the information may prove helpful to peoples wellbeing in some respects and that should never be classified surely? But its not going to interest everyone :D

 

Thanx for your reply 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

1020190010_aadbyrd.jpg.a20032bba198673fe1a9749d2361c6cc.jpg

 

Translation

'Admiral Byrd declared today that it was imperative for the United States to initiate defence measures against the possible invasion of the country by hostile aircraft coming from the polar regions. The Admiral stated, 'I don't want to frighten anyone unduly but it is a bitter reality that in the case of a new war the continental United States will be attacked by aircraft flying in from one or both poles.'

The use of the future tense 'will be attacked' instead of 'may be', or 'could be' or even 'is likely to be' is odd, since he was usually very precise in his use of terminology, and suggests a threat. 'El Mercurio' is a conservative Chilean newspaper with editions in Valparaiso and Santiago.

 

How ever;

 

In 1949, Sec. of Defence and Byrd's boss Admiral Forrestal was declared insane and supposedly committed suicide by jumping out of the barred upstairs window of a psychiatric ward. Even if there is such a thing as coincidence, could this really be one? In 1949, when James Forrestal began to suffer from a mental breakdown, he was sent to convalesce at Bethesda Naval Hospital. However, when he began to discuss Operation Highjump with the hospital staff, talking wildly about UFOs, Atlantis and an underground Nazi city, he was denied visitors, including his wife. Shortly afterwards, he fell out of his hospital window to his death. The official report said that he committed suicide but persistent rumours say that he was murdered by government agents to keep him from talking further about what was really found in the Antarctica wilderness during Operation Highjump.

 

And to be clear - I don’t necessarily disagree with the idea that demonic activity and the extraterrestrial are similar,

Edited by alexa
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...