Jump to content

World Health Organization pushes International Pandemic Treaty

Poul Nelb

Recommended Posts



"On March 30th 2021, the WHO released a letter, signed by its director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus plus 23 other world leaders, calling for the world to unite behind a new international pandemic treaty."


"In their announcement on March 30th 2021 entitled COVID-19 shows why united action is needed for more robust international health architecture"

"The WHO claims that everyone must have “universal and equitable access”"


"We are, therefore, committed to ensuring universal and equitable access to safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for this and future pandemics. Immunisation is a global public good


"It would be rooted in the constitution of the World Health Organisation, drawing in other relevant organisations key to this endeavour, in support of the principle of health for all. ""


"‘The main goal of this treaty would be to foster an all-of-government and all-of-society approach, strengthening national, regional and global capacities and resilience to future pandemics. "


"‘It would also include recognition of a ‘One Health’ approach that connects the health of humans, animals and our planet. "






Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I am reposting this from the Coronavirus Megathread. I had originally considered posting it in this thread but thought it would, as an important topic, be more visible in the Megathread. However, given all the bickering and forum sliding which is currently burying any info in that thread, I am now reposting this here.


The concerns surrounding the WHO's global pandemic treaty are starting to gain pace with the first public hearings on the proposals now closed.


Kit Knightly has written this piece for OffGuardian outlining how the proposed treaty is a recipe for technocratic globalism with the suggestion that nation states will need to be "held accountable" if they fail to fall lockstep in with any "agreed requirements".




The WHO currently does not possess the power to enforce compliance. But it seems, following on from the UN's report from May 2021, that the treaty sets to change that alongside offering incentives for nation states for early reporting of "health emergencies" by way of financing and technical support. Punishments could also be meted out for non-compliance such as "public reprimands, economic sanctions or denial of benefits" within the shadow of the suspicious circumstances surrounding the deaths of defiant leaders including President John Magufuli of Tanzania and President Pierre Nkurunziza of Burundi.


Such measures will only serve to encourage pandemics, especially given the grossly loose redefinition of the word and, worse still, from which a "precautionary principle" will be derived. Nation states may be required to take action against a potential pandemic with restrictive measures like to include yet more testing, use of vaccine passports and the threat of lockdowns and stay at home measures.


And all this could be issued at the whim of an unelected bureaucratic elite of so-called experts who will reassure us to "trust the science"™.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rockefeller Foundation created the WHO & funds U.S. Public Health

The Rockefeller Foundation is the organization responsible for creating a “blueprint” or prototype for the WHO (World Health Organization) it was called the: International Health Division. Anyone who has studied world history in earnest and is worth their salt knows that the Rockefeller family is the controlling arm of the Rothschild family in the USA. David Rockefeller’s book “Memoirs” admits secretly conspiring for a New World Order.

The Rockefeller Foundation in conjunction with the Global Business Network created this simulation in 2010. The “Lock Step” scenario describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society that results in “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership.”

Here is a quote from Page 19 (This was published by The Rockefeller Foundation in May, 2010) [Download Full PDF]

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most obvious “IN YOUR FACE” aspect of this is that the CORONAVIRUS just like Ebola has been patented by the United States Patent Office. Who owns the patent to the Coronavirus you say??? Well none other than “The Pirbright Institute“. Oh and by the way, guess who are major stakeholders / funding “The Pirbright Institute” either directly or through subsidiaries? That would be Bill and Melinda Gates as well as the British Royal Family and the Rothschilds of course.




  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...