CosmoGenesis Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 2 hours ago, DarianF said: I know. I feel such guilt and shame at this horrible, toxic masculine instinct I feel. Horrible, nasty male privileged toxicity. This meme from another thread sums it up 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 "It's not an entirely serious suggestion, because I don't have the power to do that." – Baroness Jenny Jones https://news.sky.com/story/sarah-everard-baroness-who-suggested-6pm-curfew-for-men-says-she-wanted-to-make-a-point-12243462 Yes, exactly. BECAUSE YOU DON'T have the power. But IF YOU DID, YOU WOULD you crazy cunt. That's the obvious implication. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 6 minutes ago, CosmoGenesis said: This meme from another thread sums it up That's a good one. But then again, when you think about it, a real man doesn't give a shit about being praised for his actions. He just does what needs to be done. Grinding it out. Day after day. Year after year. Providing. Protecting. Only the weak modern generation needs constant praise and acknowledgement. It's a bit of a Catch 22 situation I guess. We're kind of screwed either way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Kirkland Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 She wants a curfew for men. I thought that guy who killed Sarah is a cop. He could be of been attacking women while on duty for a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 11 minutes ago, Scott Kirkland said: She wants a curfew for men. I thought that guy who killed Sarah is a cop. He could be of been attacking women while on duty for a while. It all makes sense when you apply Clown World logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamboozooka Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 using feminazis to defund the police instead of blacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubsandwich Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 Bloody men. Can’t trust ‘em! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddsnsods Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 #DickOut #KhantOut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 I keep thinking this nonsense can't get any more stupid, any more illogical. But it keeps on coming at us, like some deranged morphing blob of bullshit rolling out of control. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 This thread has developed into something interesting! During this lockdown I have never felt more vulnerable coming home from work at night with empty streets and catching a empty train. Utter ghostly and otherworldly. There is definitely a feeling of safety with the more people around you. It’s absurd they say men to curfew but we know the absurd can happen! What would happen from that is the same thing as banning guns in America. All the good guys would give in their guns and the bad ones keep them. Making the others defenceless. All the good guys would come off the street and the bad guys on it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 32 minutes ago, Liberty said: It’s absurd they say men to curfew but we know the absurd can happen! What would happen from that is the same thing as banning guns in America. All the good guys would give in their guns and the bad ones keep them. Making the others defenceless. All the good guys would come off the street and the bad guys on it. Thats exactly the 'social engineering' aspect of this! Those men 'most affected' by the propaganda will meekly go along with this; of course the simps, the 'male feminists' and the virtue-signallers will 'bravely' obey these diktats, rush to do all their shopping and make sure they are 'safely' back in their homes 'before curfew'. It would be a very strange world if all the minority of men who don't give a shit about such 'norms', who have no problem with committing crimes and/or manipulating/abusing women, suddenly obeyed these diktats and stayed at home. Criminals generally pay scant regard to the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said: Thats exactly the 'social engineering' aspect of this! Those men 'most affected' by the propaganda will meekly go along with this; of course the simps, the 'male feminists' and the virtue-signallers will 'bravely' obey these diktats, rush to do all their shopping and make sure they are 'safely' back in their homes 'before curfew'. It would be a very strange world if all the minority of men who don't give a shit about such 'norms', who have no problem with committing crimes and/or manipulating/abusing women, suddenly obeyed these diktats and stayed at home. Criminals generally pay scant regard to the law. They wouldn’t be much use anyway if they are going to go home at 6pm. I say the good guys but really they’d be the bad guys for just following orders. But it still stands that those opportunists that meant harm would have a free reign. definitely a feeling of safety with more people around you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 Hugo nailed it but but but but but. I still can’t get out of my mind the body in the lake outside of the royal residence and this “royal” turning up at the murder of a female nearby. It has happened before with Jack the Ripper. might be nothing. I’ll go with this. https://brandnewtube.com/watch/fake-news-psy-op-hugo-talks-lockdown_ATqshFNOpkM4ern.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Chinnery Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 4 hours ago, oddsnsods said: 21 2+1 = 3 Three times 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old-timer Posted March 14, 2021 Author Share Posted March 14, 2021 4 hours ago, DarianF said: Is it just another convenient coincidence that the WHO published this a few days ago, just in time for all this bullshit? https://www.who.int/news/item/09-03-2021-devastatingly-pervasive-1-in-3-women-globally-experience-violence Mmmmmmm There was also an article in yesterday's Daily Mail rehashing the murder of Suzy Lamplugh. It is certainly coming across that they are trying to rile everyone up and cause a divide. Let's not let them win folks XX 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Chinnery Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 20 hours ago, Liberty said: Not far from where wills and Kate live either then. Wasn’t there another body found by their lake a while ago? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Mr Chinnery said: Dunno. Who’s Charlotte? I always take photos when I’m out walking too and if I saw a body part I would call the police and take a photo of it. Sounds suspicious even though I stand by my POV. I do not trust the story. and the hooded people. I would take a photo of them and get the fuck out of there. Edited March 14, 2021 by Liberty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 40 minutes ago, old-timer said: There was also an article in yesterday's Daily Mail rehashing the murder of Suzy Lamplugh. It is certainly coming across that they are trying to rile everyone up and cause a divide. Let's not let them win folks XX There was also a (repeat?) of the doc about the Lamplugh case. I don't recall any vigils for her, or for Rachel Nickell, or even Jill Dando. Nothing. No calls for the entire male population to be locked indoors. No royal or PM condolences. This is engineered, for a specific reason. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Chinnery Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 Why use a actress called Patsy? Patsy https://www.dictionary.com/browse/patsy a person who is easily swindled, deceived, coerced, persuaded, etc.; sucker. a person upon whom the blame for something falls; scapegoat; fall guy. a person who is the object of a joke, ridicule, or the lik Was Couzens a fall guy? Did he just procure this woman, but not kill her? Patsy https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=patsy "scapegoat. red herring. person accused of a something as a cover for a bigger more elaborate crime." Is the whole thing a 'red herring'? Patsy is a red head, or is something bigger being covered up? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 More coded messages. More symbolism. It's in our faces. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Chinnery Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 I don't really buy into all the gematria stuff, as sometimes it's looking for patterns that don't really exist. However the following came up: Everard in Jewish Gematria equals: 875 Everard in English Gematria equals: 438 Everard in Simple Gematria equals: 73 Sacrifice 206 438 73 8781 Nimrod 213 438 73 5663 Nibiru 340 438 73 5137 Crown 1073 438 73 5027 Charles Mountbatten 875 1266 211 349 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 6 minutes ago, Mr Chinnery said: I don't really buy into all the gematria stuff, as sometimes it's looking for patterns that don't really exist. However the following came up: Everard in Jewish Gematria equals: 875 Everard in English Gematria equals: 438 Everard in Simple Gematria equals: 73 Sacrifice 206 438 73 8781 Nimrod 213 438 73 5663 Nibiru 340 438 73 5137 Crown 1073 438 73 5027 Charles Mountbatten 875 1266 211 349 I’m not into it either but your posts are very interesting. You’ve got me interested in numbers for the first time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Alert Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 (edited) 7 hours ago, AnarchicBreeze said: Notice they rolled out a female to give that speech. Keeping people safe from covid by attacking and physically assaulting them seems a sane and reasonable thing to do... for a Nazi thug at least. Police attacks on defenceless women is bad enough (and a rapidly increasing occurrence) but to do it at a vigil for a woman who it seems has been murdered by a member of that same police force is disgraceful. Who is policing the police these days? 4 hours ago, Saved said: This look/expression screams 'I have absolutely no confidence that people are going to believe the crap coming out of my mouth'. I went over the border into Suff London to Clapham Common this afternoon, travelling outside my government designated sector. I am not into the flower, candle lit, teddy bear shrines, but I wanted to show my defiance and to see what was happening there. I am pleased to report that the streets around Clapham Common were heaving with people, so were all the paths leading to the bandstand vigil for Sarah Everard. I was passing hundreds and hundreds of people on narrow paths on the Common and about 1% had masks on. Nobody was worried about social distancing. There were hundreds standing around the bandstand and under 10% had masks on. There were 6 local council stewards in yellow jackets, standing around, doing nothing. The only show of force by the police on the whole of the common was an out of condition officer, with his mask hanging on his bottom lip, and a side kick PCSO. Also people were playing football on the grass etc. and the law was not to be seen. Power to the people. Edited March 14, 2021 by Orange Alert 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Sean Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 There's that steganography again On 3/11/2021 at 7:40 PM, Mr Chinnery said: From a popular news site: "Sarah Everard disappeared in London, United Kingdom, on the evening of 3 March 2021. Everard, a 33-year-old marketing executive who at the time lived in Brixton, South West London, went missing after leaving a friend's house in Clapham." "Anyone with information is asked to call 101 quoting CAD 3309/06MAR." 3/3 33 33 All you need to know. Hoax. There's that steganography again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gone Fishing... Posted March 14, 2021 Share Posted March 14, 2021 9 hours ago, Coldrum said: Good video with great information. To add......if she had been arrested, she'd have still been at the station being processed. Let out much later possibly in the morning. She would not have been able to return to do this bloody interview about her arrest. (edit - watched it again - she was fined and released - my bad - still stinks to high heaven as the video shows) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.