Jump to content

Sarah Everard murder case and calls for '6pm curfew for men'


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, The kraken said:

 

Agree, I did some research myself, not expert by any stretch, but I found family members names and was intrigued by her fathers profession and who I think is her uncle Doug, an expert in renewable energy with experience of managing power plants.

 

Assuming this is him as there seems to be a resemblance to his brother.

Sarahs Uncle: 
https://www.sustainable-pipelines.com/team
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/doug-everard 

 

Sarahs Dad: 

https://sites.google.com/site/ieeeapmttorlando/previous-meetings/prof-jeremy-everard-1
https://www.york.ac.uk/electronic-engineering/staff/jeremy_everard/

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/jeremy-everard-43093b13

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Fundamentals-RF-Circuit-Design-Oscillators/dp/0471497932

 

I remember the case of Gareth Williams the GCHQ cryptographer who was discovered, zipped into a holdall and submerged in a bath, the narrative given by the press at the time that he somehow managed to do this to himself 🤔https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Gareth_Williams

 

Thanks for the links I will take a look. I remember the Gareth Williams case...sticks in my mind. No way did that man do that to himself... 

Edited by Beaujangles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2021 at 3:57 PM, Beachcomber said:

I’ve never known a mis per/ murder case get quite so much publicity

 

It's the perfect times for them to use the deaths of Floyd and Everard to their advantage, and to push their agenda through.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Saved said:

The agenda continues - another policeman, another attack on a woman at night.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9381299/Policeman-25-attacked-mother-two-36-spared-jail-community-service.html

Get with the programme. 
 

this is a women v men agenda. Nothing to do policemen. Even the truth sayers say so.  Never have women and men been more divided. Women standing for freedom and men belittling them. 
 

someone jumped in quick on this and made about men v women. 
 

and the men swallowed it.  It never was about that. It was about abuse of power.  And if men were men. They would have supported it. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Liberty said:

Get with the programme. 
 

this is a women v men agenda. Nothing to do policemen. Even the truth sayers say so.  Never have women and men been more divided. Women standing for freedom and men belittling them. 
 

someone jumped in quick on this and made about men v women. 
 

and the men swallowed it.  It never was about that. It was about abuse of power.  And if men were men. They would have supported it. 

I agree. The reason they are 'using' police officers is that no man can ever be trusted, even if being paid to uphold the law.

 

If even male police cannot control their brute beast instincts, then no man can be trusted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Saved said:

I agree. The reason they are 'using' police officers is that no man can ever be trusted, even if being paid to uphold the law.

 

If even male police cannot control their brute beast instincts, then no man can be trusted.

Sometimes women need the support of men and this was one of them. But they were all too afraid of their 6pm curfew to oblige!  So instead they attacked. 
 

Ive needed the police twice in my life and hopefully never again but if I knew I was calling on someone with a criminal record or someone that had exposed himself and his colleagues not investigated or done anything about it then the police isn’t what I think a woman thinks the police should be. The police should be a guardian not a tyrant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Not Thoth said:

To be honest, were gonna need more lampposts especially around Parliament Square

 

that wont do shit.

 

they do work underground.

 

& thats not a joke.

 

this shit gets darker than most people are willing to look.

 

 

Edited by ThunderFace
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you have all the FBPE EU corporatist/neo Marxist as always hating on pro freedom protestors on twatter...but claiming police behaved different at their 'vigil.' These globalist rats are gutted people are seeing the truth & protesting the tyrants.

The real enemy of freedom & traitors to their countrymen.

 

Again how police treat anti lockdown women, trying to take a walk in the park.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Well you have all the FBPE EU corporatist/neo Marxist as always hating on pro freedom protestors on twatter...but claiming police behaved different at their 'vigil.' These globalist rats are gutted people are seeing the truth & protesting the tyrants.

The real enemy of freedom & traitors to their countrymen.

 

Again how police treat anti lockdown women, trying to take a walk in the park.

 

 

 

'Big men'. 'Hard men'. You fucking pieces of shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farage is right, it was hijacked by Marxist & their media.

 

I posted about Emily Jones on here a while ago, who was almost decapitated by a migrant this time last year.

There was no movement for this girl or hysteria from the media..now in Rampton at the tax payers expense ££££££.

What a fake shithole we live in that allowed this to happen.

 

A woman who slit a seven-year-old's throat has been cleared of murder after the prosecution offered no further evidence and withdrew the charge.

Eltiona Skana, 30, had admitted the manslaughter of Emily Jones on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

Skana, who has paranoid schizophrenia, had been on trial at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court after pleading not guilty to murder.

Mr Justice Wall will sentence Skana for manslaughter on Tuesday.

The jury had been directed to formally return a not guilty verdict.

After hearing evidence from a consultant forensic psychiatrist treating Skana at high-security Rampton Hospital, Michael Brady QC, prosecuting, told the court there was no realistic prospect of a conviction on the murder charge.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-55189658

 

1492.jpg?width=1200&height=900&quality=8

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

She got ten years apparently.

 

That's a lot of time for someone with nothing to lose to take justice into their own hands..... whistles

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9188165/Schizophrenic-Albanian-woman-killed-seven-year-old-girl-sentence-increased.html

A few years in a mental hospital, plenty of liquid cosh, a series of meeting with a panel of experts, released quietly.....

 

......murder again and lessons will be learnt.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was the third day of the third month when thirty-three year old Sarah Everhard was allegedly approached by an off-duty policeman in a car at Clapham Common, presumably at three minutes past three. He must have alighted from his vehicle in order to abduct the victim, but in the third most surveilled city in the world, that moment was not recorded on CCTV. We need more, to catch up with China!

 

Thereafter, little is known about this murder, except that they nailed the suspect within a week. There have been stories about a butchered body found in a builder bag, which was identifiable only by dental records. The general consensus is that the named officer is guilty and probably a serial killer and this was not his first killing. “There must be more bodies,” they insist.

 

Can there ever be such a thing as a fair trial when the press determines the “facts” and decide the verdict of the case, before it even comes to court? The same ‘trial by media’ was conducted in the high-profile April Jones murder, on Mark Bridger who was arrested the following day. No body was found. Then there was the Tia Sharp murder, the body found in the attic, after police had searched her gran’s house with sniffer dogs, four times. Stuart Hazell was convicted, by media.

 

I could go into the notorious Ian Huntley’s conviction for the killing of Holly and Jessica, after he had been dragged through the press and sectioned in Rampton Hospital, but they did such a job on him, few would ever entertain the thought that he was innocent. His alleged victims were also identified by dental records and no cause of death was established. Sarah Everhard’s autopsy has also thus far been inconclusive. There are similarities between these highly publicised cases, in the way they are reported. All I’m saying is, don’t believe everything you read in the papers!

 

 

Edited by Velma
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good point.... there are rumours that the Yorkshire Ripper was innocent but took the rap for Masonic buddies like Jimmy Saville which is why there's this weird picture:

 

I haven't studied the cases, but it wouldn't surprise me. Nothing would anymore.

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Truthspoon said:

It's a good point.... there are rumours that the Yorkshire Ripper was innocent but took the rap for Masonic buddies like Jimmy Saville which is why there's this weird picture:

 

I haven't studied the cases, but it wouldn't surprise me. Nothing would anymore.

 

 

 

In the old Saville thread back in the '10s, started by Anders (RIP), there was a lot of info about his links to Sutcliffe, the Ripper cases and so on. It did look as though Sutcliffe was a patsy for person(s) never charged with the crimes.

 

There was even speculation that the part of the lyric to Panic by The Smiths were some sort of coded reference to Saville's involvement in dubious stuff around the North of England. And, given his slightly morbid interest in such matters (see: Suffer The Children, especially) you would imagine Morrissey had done his homework and knew a few things.

 

Even the e-fit drawn at the time looked more like Saville than Sutcliff or anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Truthspoon said:

It's a good point.... there are rumours that the Yorkshire Ripper was innocent but took the rap for Masonic buddies like Jimmy Saville which is why there's this weird picture:

 

I haven't studied the cases, but it wouldn't surprise me. Nothing would anymore.

 

 

 

 

Sorry I forgot the picture:

 

COPYRIGHT%20UNKNOWN%20%20Peter%20Sutclif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...