Jump to content

Sarah Everard murder case and calls for '6pm curfew for men'


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, DarianF said:

 

If that's true, then explain why the Government needs to pass all these special laws to specifically protect women? Priti Patel insists new laws will protect women: Sarah Everard’s murder intensifies calls for tougher action from UK government: https://amp.ft.com/content/1f3397db-82ce-4978-8f22-2d4b4aef9913

 

🧐🧐

Why do you think that I need to explain the governments or Priti Patels actions? Are you suggesting that they actually give two hoots about the safety of women and aren't simply using Sarah Everards murder as a very convenient bandwagon to jump upon/whip on in their relentless quest for control and removal of liberties (for all of us, not just men)?

 

It's clear that you personally can't seem to accept or even cope with the concept that there are many women who do not need or want men to protect them. You may view it as your right, purpose and role as a man but that doesn't mean all women agree and it certainly isn't your right to force the concept on them (or anyone) as some kind of divine, unassailable fact.

 

You seem unable to comprehend that that a woman can be strong for herself and not need a man to defend her like some medieval maid in distress but at the same time that said woman still loves, respects, values and appreciates the men she has in her life. That you can't comprehend or accept this says more about your lack of emotional maturity/intelligence and ego than is does about women.

 

I find your attitude quite frankly pitiful but having worked in a male dominated environment all my adult life it's one I have seen ad nauseum from many men over the years. I found it irksome, pitiful and really rather sad decades ago and still feel very much the same way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bee said:

Why do you think that I need to explain the governments or Priti Patels actions? Are you suggesting that they actually give two hoots about the safety of women and aren't simply using Sarah Everards murder as a very convenient bandwagon to jump upon/whip on in their relentless quest for control and removal of liberties (for all of us, not just men)?

 

It's clear that you personally can't seem to accept or even cope with the concept that there are many women who do not need or want men to protect them. You may view it as your right, purpose and role as a man but that doesn't mean all women agree and it certainly isn't your right to force the concept on them (or anyone) as some kind of divine, unassailable fact.

 

You seem unable to comprehend that that a woman can be strong for herself and not need a man to defend her like some medieval maid in distress but at the same time that said woman still loves, respects, values and appreciates the men she has in her life. That you can't comprehend or accept this says more about your lack of emotional maturity/intelligence and ego than is does about women.

 

I find your attitude quite frankly pitiful but having worked in a male dominated environment all my adult life it's one I have seen ad nauseum from many men over the years. I found it irksome, pitiful and really rather sad decades ago and still feel very much the same way. 

 

I don't recall saying I want to protect women. That's what white knights, soy boys and manginas want to do. Good luck to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ThunderFace said:

so this boris dude is talking about more street lamps &, you guessed it, cctv cameras to help protect women.

 

couldnt see that coming.

Yep...P R S in effect again. We have a new reason to increase harmful streetlighting (probably with integrated 5G) and those plain-clothed officers loitering around bars, pubs and restaurants in order to "keep women safe". Surveillance surveillance surveillance....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ThunderFace said:

so this boris dude is talking about more street lamps &, you guessed it, cctv cameras to help protect women.

 

couldnt see that coming.

 

...

 

on another note - ive already mentioned how this serves to cause more of a division - but lets for the fuck of say "men" are a problem here...

 

how telling that nobody wants to touch on the topic of the increasingly violent pornograpy that is available at a few clicks for anybody legitimately fuckin up the psyche of alot of impressionable & misguided men.

 

...

 

but nah...more cameras, & there isnt enough artifical lights already blocking out the beauty of the night.

 

what a fuckin joke.

 

& im not even mad at the ones telling it - more so the ones that cant see what a joke it really is.

 

 

Spot on there Thunder, on all counts. The Government doesn't want to address the violent porn issue and their own constant covert agenda of deliberately causing divide between men and women, and failing to control divisive Wokism and all the hate that ensues if you're on the wrong side of the woke opinion makers. Nor does it ever dare investigate the obvious Satanic elements in crimes such as this, when just about anyone looking at it can see all the creepy dates and numerological co-incidences, discrepancies and fakery involved.

 

And what good did CCTV and street lighting do Sarah Everard, in one of the UK's busiest and most surveilled conurbations? It didnt save her life, nor has any evidence come to light because of it. Shows what a sham the whole thing is on so many levels.

Edited by northern star
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Velma said:

 

Starmer says, "An EPIDEMIC of violence against women and girls."

 

When did that happen? I must be immune to this epidemic too....

It's only an epidemic when they want to push draconian laws

 

Fear is the best way to get whatever you want especially when people are so stupid as they are nowadays

 

How a government which has been NOTORIOUS for sex offences and paedophillia for decades gets away with claiming to 'stand up to sex crimes' 

 

Clown planet

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, northern star said:

Spot on there Thunder, on all counts. The Government doesn't want to address the violent porn issue and their own constant covert agenda of deliberately causing divide between men and women, and failing to control divisive Wokism and all the hate that ensues if you're on the wrong side of the woke opinion makers. Nor does it ever dare investigate the obvious Satanic elements in crimes such as this, when just about anyone looking at it can see all the creepy dates and numerological co-incidences, discrepancies and fakery involved.

 

And what good did CCTV and street lighting do Sarah Everard, in one of the UK's busiest and most surveilled conurbations? It didnt save her life, nor has any evidence come to light because of it. Shows what a sham the whole thing is on so many levels.

"ThErE wAsN't EnOuGh CaMeRaS"

surveilled_cities.5f96da643a027.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bee said:

Oh sorry, I forgot. Clearly you are one of those "real men" *sigh*🤦‍♀️

 

I admit, I have had that terrible toxic slur lodged against me in the past. Bloody toxic masculinity. We'll never be rid of it. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bee said:

Yes and sadly there are a lot of 'useless' things in this world.

 

One man's trash is another's treasure.

 

Or should I say one person's? Oh there's that toxic masculinity again. I forget all the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DarianF said:

 

One man's trash is another's treasure.

 

Or should I say one person's? Oh there's that toxic masculinity again. I forget all the rules.

 

She'll clobber you ina minute mate.🤭

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/15/2021 at 6:05 AM, The kraken said:

I've been thinking about this all weekend. When I first heard about her murder I was traumatised by it, but the more I think about it the weirder it seems. For a start why hasn't there been a single interview on camera with any of her family, friends, ex colleagues or anyone who knew her? It's been 10 days since the police launched the missing persons appeal and nothing on camera. This is really unusual, I can't ever remember a high profile murder case where someone hasn't gone on camera to appeal for help, give an update or make a statement on behalf of the family. Every mainstream video or news article about this murder has comments switched off and the written family statements feel soulless and generic, it just seems very staged. 

I've only managed to find one image of her boyfriend and they aren't even in the same photo. https://meaww.com/josh-lowth-boyfriend-missing-woman-sarah-everard-talk-mysterious-rumored-killed-kidnapped-raped-cop

For someone who was so well loved and respected theres an eery silence when it comes to her loved ones publicly acknowledging what's happened to her. 

I wonder if she ever existed in the first place and wouldn't be surprised if the suspect is found dead with another self inflicted head injury in the next day or 2.

 

 

According to genealogy research sites, she does exist as does her brother and a sister. The brother and hers Twitter accounts ceased being used some years ago. They show up on electoral rolls. But having researched quite a lot over the years for something I have been working on, it can be the case that certain families are part of agendas, be it gun control or anything that suddenly takes the media by storm. Her fathers job could be a link...and she travelled extensively in South America according to her Twitter, whilst claiming she was jobless. Definitely an odd case.

 

The cop could well be a case of wrongful conviction.  I have done my own research into a wrongful conviction in Canada - and I can tell you the depth of such cases are incredible and the corruption is rife.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2021 at 10:11 AM, Basket Case said:

But it's not just a man who has committed this atrocity. 

It's a police man - a man of the Law. 

 

This is far from the first time a police officer has committed such crimes. And it won't be the last.. 

 

Why aren’t police officers held to a higher account ? 

Why do they KEEP THEIR PENSION after losing their jobs for sexual and violent CRIMES ? 

Why is there such a very low level of convictions from complaints and allegations against police officers ? 

 

Where is the media campaign to improve the vetting process for police officers ? 

Where is the media campaign to keep us all safe from criminals within the system ? 

 

We all know why.. We all know how the Force covers for and protects their own. But it shouldn't. 

 

We all know why the media doesn't ask the right questions and why we're being distracted. 

 

The media is owned by the Scum at the top that enjoy sexual violence.. 

 

COMMON PURPOSE!

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Crimebodge, the police's cover up of convicted criminal sex offenders and psychopaths recruited to the ranks.

 

The murder of Sarah Everard: The big question the media won't ask

Why is no-one asking this important question about the police in relation to the murder of Sarah Everard?

 

 

 

 

Edited by Orange Alert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Beaujangles said:

 

According to genealogy research sites, she does exist as does her brother and a sister. The brother and hers Twitter accounts ceased being used some years ago. They show up on electoral rolls. But having researched quite a lot over the years for something I have been working on, it can be the case that certain families are part of agendas, be it gun control or anything that suddenly takes the media by storm. Her fathers job could be a link...and she travelled extensively in South America according to her Twitter, whilst claiming she was jobless. Definitely an odd case.

 

The cop could well be a case of wrongful conviction.  I have done my own research into a wrongful conviction in Canada - and I can tell you the depth of such cases are incredible and the corruption is rife.

 

Agree, I did some research myself, not expert by any stretch, but I found family members names and was intrigued by her fathers profession and who I think is her uncle Doug, an expert in renewable energy with experience of managing power plants.

 

Assuming this is him as there seems to be a resemblance to his brother.

Sarahs Uncle: 
https://www.sustainable-pipelines.com/team
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/doug-everard 

 

Sarahs Dad: 

https://sites.google.com/site/ieeeapmttorlando/previous-meetings/prof-jeremy-everard-1
https://www.york.ac.uk/electronic-engineering/staff/jeremy_everard/

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/jeremy-everard-43093b13

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Fundamentals-RF-Circuit-Design-Oscillators/dp/0471497932

 

I remember the case of Gareth Williams the GCHQ cryptographer who was discovered, zipped into a holdall and submerged in a bath, the narrative given by the press at the time that he somehow managed to do this to himself 🤔https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Gareth_Williams

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2021 at 4:52 AM, ThunderFace said:

so this boris dude is talking about more street lamps &, you guessed it, cctv cameras to help protect women.

 

To be honest, were gonna need more lampposts especially around Parliament Square

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...